Guest guest Posted March 4, 2003 Report Share Posted March 4, 2003 Have just received back the results of a 24-hr Urine Iodine Test that was done because of iodine contrast used in a CT scan a few months ago. Could someone help clarify these numbers for me? I'm not sure which number I'm supposed to be looking at. Iodine Contrast was 58, Iodine was 109. I'm scheduled to go off thyroid meds tomorrow to prepare for my first post-RAI scan. Anita in TX Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2003 Report Share Posted March 5, 2003 Hi Aniti..... Looks like you're going to have to wait some more;-) Nick ********************************************************************************\ ********************************* (Dr. Ain) Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:50:16 -0500 Subject: Evaluation of iodide status after contrast dye In-reply-to: >I feel like I am in somewhat the same boat. had TT 11/7/00 and RAI 200 >mci 12/19/00. WBS on 12/29/00 showed uptake in neck area only. But now >I feel a lump on the right side and the left side of my neck is >swollen. It feels sort of like having a golf ball (no something a bit >smaller than a golf ball) caught in my throat all the time sort of >pushing in on my windpipe or something. I am scheduled for a contrast >CT on 2/20/01 so I guess we'll see then. My doc says maybe more surgery >and/or more RAI depending on what we see. he says we only have to wait >6 weeks between CT with contrast and RAI but I know Dr. Ain on this list >says that the CT with contrast can make the RAI less effecetive for up >to a year or so. Should I ask my doctor again about this? I like and >trust him so far... Dear ThyCa Members: Stable (non-radioactive) iodine contamination from iodinated contrast dye is certainly an important potential contribution to I-131 scan & /or treatment failure. If one has been exposed during the course of a CAT scan or other radiographic procedure, it is possible that it may take nearly a year to clear the stable iodine; however, the length of time may vary from a couple months to more than 10 months. To determine when this iodine has cleared requires the following: 1). Start a low iodine diet (carefully followed) for one week. Maintain the usual thyroid hormone medication (Note: this is not a preparation for scan or therapy). 2). On the last day of the diet, collect an accurate and full 24-hour urine sample. 3). Have the urine sent for a total urine iodide analysis. The only commercial lab that I have found to be reliable is at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN). 4). A total urine iodide of 80 (or less) micrograms in 24 hours demonstrates that the stable iodine interference has sufficiently passed. 5) If the urine iodide is much higher, it may be useful to wait 1-2 months and repeat sequence 1) through 4) to evaluate the body's stable iodine content. This sequence is repeated until the urine value is sufficiently low. A urine iodide value sufficiently low demonstrates that the full scan/therapy preparation may be initiated without interference from the previous contrast dye administration. This is the general method that I advise physicians to follow in answering when their patient may be optimally cleared of such stable iodine contamination. On the other hand, sometimes clinical situations arise in which it is not possible to wait until every parameter is optimal. **************PLEASE BE ADVISED********************* THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS COMMUNICATION IS INTENDED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT INTENDED, NOR SHOULD IT BE CONSTRUED, AS SPECIFIC MEDICAL ADVICE OR DIRECTIONS. ANY PERSON VIEWING THIS INFORMATION IS ADVISED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN PHYSICIAN(S) ABOUT ANY MATTER REGARDING THEIR MEDICAL CARE. ************************************************ B. Ain, M.D. Associate Professor of Internal Medicine Director, Thyroid Nodule & Oncology Clinical Service Director, Thyroid Cancer Research Laboratory Division of Endocrinology and Molecular Medicine Department of Internal Medicine, Room MN524 University of Kentucky Medical Center 800 Rose Street, Lexington, Kentucky 40536-0298 ********************************************************************************\ ********************************* At 09:18 PM 3/4/2003 +0000, you wrote: >Have just received back the results of a 24-hr Urine Iodine Test that >was done because of iodine contrast used in a CT scan a few months >ago. Could someone help clarify these numbers for me? I'm not sure >which number I'm supposed to be looking at. > >Iodine Contrast was 58, Iodine was 109. > >I'm scheduled to go off thyroid meds tomorrow to prepare for my first >post-RAI scan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2003 Report Share Posted March 5, 2003 Thanks, Nick. I appreciate this. I should get my hard copy of the test results today and should know how this was measured. Will post later. This is pure, utter frustration All I can say at this point is: NOOOOOOOOOO!!! Why me??????? I need a pitty party NOWWW!!!! Where was my brain when I needed it????? Hmmm - that DID make me feel a LITTLE better Anita in TX > >Have just received back the results of a 24-hr Urine Iodine Test that > >was done because of iodine contrast used in a CT scan a few months > >ago. Could someone help clarify these numbers for me? I'm not sure > >which number I'm supposed to be looking at. > > > >Iodine Contrast was 58, Iodine was 109. > > > >I'm scheduled to go off thyroid meds tomorrow to prepare for my first > >post-RAI scan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2003 Report Share Posted March 5, 2003 Dear Anita: It sounds as if your iodine levels are somewhere between the levels obtained on a regular diet (i.e., about 400) and those obtained on a very well observed LID (i.e., 50). Also, by the time you receive the RAI for your scan a few weeks from now, your values should be even lower than the 58 plus 109. I am curious about the iodine contrast number. Do they actually assay for the iodine contrast in your urine as well as for free iodine? You could call the lab to find out what that means. When you get the answer, let us know. I am assuming you went on the LID in preparation for the iodine assay. Good Luck, Marilyn Loeb, Rochester, NY 24-hr Urine Iodine Test Results/Clarification Have just received back the results of a 24-hr Urine Iodine Test that was done because of iodine contrast used in a CT scan a few months ago. Could someone help clarify these numbers for me? I'm not sure which number I'm supposed to be looking at. Iodine Contrast was 58, Iodine was 109. I'm scheduled to go off thyroid meds tomorrow to prepare for my first post-RAI scan. Anita in TX This e-mail support group is one of many free services of ThyCa: Thyroid Cancer Survivors' Association, Inc. <web site: www.thyca.org>. If you do not wish to belong to this group, you may UNSUBSCRIBE by sending a blank e-mail to: thyca-unsubscribe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2003 Report Share Posted March 5, 2003 Thanks, Marilyn. Ohhhh,Yes, I did go on the LID - twice - in anticipation of this test. I am very well versed on the LID, at the moment - and look forward to doing it again for the upcoming scan I am confused as to whether the two numbers were to be added together. I should receive the hard copy of the test today and should be able to post more when this is received. The only thing that was given to me, verbally, were the two sets of numbers. Later, Anita in TX > Dear Anita: > > It sounds as if your iodine levels are somewhere between the levels > obtained on a regular diet (i.e., about 400) and those obtained on a > very well observed LID (i.e., 50). Also, by the time you receive the > RAI for your scan a few weeks from now, your values should be even lower > than the 58 plus 109. I am curious about the iodine contrast number. Do > they actually assay for the iodine contrast in your urine as well as for > free iodine? You could call the lab to find out what that means. When > you get the answer, let us know. I am assuming you went on the LID in > preparation for the iodine assay. > > Good Luck, > Marilyn Loeb, Rochester, NY > > 24-hr Urine Iodine Test Results/Clarification > > Have just received back the results of a 24-hr Urine Iodine Test that > was done because of iodine contrast used in a CT scan a few months > ago. Could someone help clarify these numbers for me? I'm not sure > which number I'm supposed to be looking at. > > Iodine Contrast was 58, Iodine was 109. > > I'm scheduled to go off thyroid meds tomorrow to prepare for my first > post-RAI scan. > > Anita in TX Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2003 Report Share Posted March 5, 2003 When I did the 24-hour urine iodine test, seems to me they wanted the " free iodine " to be below 65. -Alyssa Idaho Falls " anitahin2002 " wrote: > > Have just received back the results of a 24-hr Urine Iodine Test that > was done because of iodine contrast used in a CT scan a few months > ago. Could someone help clarify these numbers for me? I'm not sure > which number I'm supposed to be looking at. > > Iodine Contrast was 58, Iodine was 109. > > I'm scheduled to go off thyroid meds tomorrow to prepare for my first > post-RAI scan. > > Anita in TX > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2003 Report Share Posted March 5, 2003 Here is a repost from Dr. Ain addressing those numbers. Gail --Dear ThyCa Members: Stable (non-radioactive) iodine contamination from iodinated contrast dye is certainly an important potential contribution to I-131 scan & /or treatment failure. If one has been exposed during the course of a CAT scan or other radiographic procedure, it is possible that it may take nearly a year to clear the stable iodine; however, the length of time may vary from a couple months to more than 10 months. To determine when this iodine has cleared requires the following: 1). Start a low iodine diet (carefully followed) for one week. Maintain the usual thyroid hormone medication (Note: this is not a preparation for scan or therapy). 2). On the last day of the diet, collect an accurate and full 24-hour urine sample. 3). Have the urine sent for a total urine iodide analysis. The only commercial lab that I have found to be reliable is at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN). 4). A total urine iodide of 80 (or less) micrograms in 24 hours demonstrates that the stable iodine interference has sufficiently passed. 5) If the urine iodide is much higher, it may be useful to wait 1-2 months and repeat sequence 1) through 4) to evaluate the body's stable iodine content. This sequence is repeated until the urine value is sufficiently low. A urine iodide value sufficiently low demonstrates that the full scan/therapy preparation may be initiated without interference from the previous contrast dye administration. This is the general method that I advise physicians to follow in answering when their patient may be optimally cleared of such stable iodine contamination. On the other hand, sometimes clinical situations arise in which it is not possible to wait until every parameter is optimal.--Dr. Ain 1-01 -- In Thyca , Alyssa Dodd <dodd@t...> wrote: > When I did the 24-hour urine iodine test, seems to me they wanted the > " free iodine " to be below 65. > > -Alyssa Idaho Falls > > " anitahin2002 " wrote: > > > > Have just received back the results of a 24-hr Urine Iodine Test that > > was done because of iodine contrast used in a CT scan a few months > > ago. Could someone help clarify these numbers for me? I'm not sure > > which number I'm supposed to be looking at. > > > > Iodine Contrast was 58, Iodine was 109. > > > > I'm scheduled to go off thyroid meds tomorrow to prepare for my first > > post-RAI scan. > > > > Anita in TX > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2003 Report Share Posted March 6, 2003 Anita > Iodine Contrast was 58, Iodine was 109. My guess is that this should read Iodine Contrast: 58, Total iodine: 109. I am guessing that they did a standard iodine-in-urine test (109) and then went further to find how much was contrast. OTOH, these values are in the right ballpark, a bit high, but far better than 500 or 5000, which they would have been some weeks ago. Ian Ian Adam Radiation Safety Officer The Institute of Cancer Research Cotswold Road Sutton Surrey SM2 5NG Tel: 020 8722 4250 Mobile: 07791 702 230 Fax: 020 8722 4300 EMail: iana@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2003 Report Share Posted March 6, 2003 Gail, I just replied to Ian's response before I read your posting. I know I've read the following at least a hundred times over the past few weeks and it just didn't sink in. I think Ian's thought that the combined total is 109 is going to be correct. I won't know until I see the paperwork. Until this minute, I think I've been in complete denial at the thought I'm going to have to put off the FBS for a while. Oh, brother. Thanks, Gail. Anita in TX > > > > > > Have just received back the results of a 24-hr Urine Iodine Test that > > > was done because of iodine contrast used in a CT scan a few months > > > ago. Could someone help clarify these numbers for me? I'm not sure > > > which number I'm supposed to be looking at. > > > > > > Iodine Contrast was 58, Iodine was 109. > > > > > > I'm scheduled to go off thyroid meds tomorrow to prepare for my first > > > post-RAI scan. > > > > > > Anita in TX > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2003 Report Share Posted March 6, 2003 Dear Anita: We do have to wait to see what the 109 and 58 refer to. But I just don't think that 109 is a bad number, although I would like to have others weigh in on this, preferably Drs. Ain or Rolla or . Marilyn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2003 Report Share Posted March 6, 2003 Re: 24-hr Urine Iodine Test Results/Clarification Gail, I just replied to Ian's response before I read your posting. I know I've read the following at least a hundred times over the past few weeks and it just didn't sink in. I think Ian's thought that the combined total is 109 is going to be correct. I won't know until I see the paperwork. Until this minute, I think I've been in complete denial at the thought I'm going to have to put off the FBS for a while. Oh, brother. Thanks, Gail. Anita in TX > > > > > > Have just received back the results of a 24-hr Urine Iodine Test that > > > was done because of iodine contrast used in a CT scan a few months > > > ago. Could someone help clarify these numbers for me? I'm not sure > > > which number I'm supposed to be looking at. > > > > > > Iodine Contrast was 58, Iodine was 109. > > > > > > I'm scheduled to go off thyroid meds tomorrow to prepare for my first > > > post-RAI scan. > > > > > > Anita in TX > > This e-mail support group is one of many free services of ThyCa: Thyroid Cancer Survivors' Association, Inc. <web site: www.thyca.org>. If you do not wish to belong to this group, you may UNSUBSCRIBE by sending a blank e-mail to: thyca-unsubscribe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.