Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 In a message dated 9/20/2004 11:40:05 AM Eastern Standard Time, usns@... writes: > --I have an article here that > states that with fast growing cancer, a patient will have > I had read something about that too...about inducing hypothyroidism in lung cancer..to slow the cancer. I found the info a bit confusing though...because another source I have read mentioned that the doctor had never seen lung cancer (or heart attack) in someone taking Armour. Cindi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 In a message dated 9/20/2004 11:40:05 AM Eastern Standard Time, usns@... writes: > --I have an article here that > states that with fast growing cancer, a patient will have > I had read something about that too...about inducing hypothyroidism in lung cancer..to slow the cancer. I found the info a bit confusing though...because another source I have read mentioned that the doctor had never seen lung cancer (or heart attack) in someone taking Armour. Cindi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 In a message dated 9/20/2004 11:40:05 AM Eastern Standard Time, usns@... writes: > --I have an article here that > states that with fast growing cancer, a patient will have > I had read something about that too...about inducing hypothyroidism in lung cancer..to slow the cancer. I found the info a bit confusing though...because another source I have read mentioned that the doctor had never seen lung cancer (or heart attack) in someone taking Armour. Cindi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 In a message dated 9/20/2004 12:16:46 PM Eastern Standard Time, usns@... writes: > I would suspect that if someone was a heavy smoker, even if on > Armour, the Armour is not going to stop the propensity towards lung > cancer.... > That's what I thought...but being a former smoker - but now on Armour, it was sorta nice to read that. Cindi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 In a message dated 9/20/2004 12:16:46 PM Eastern Standard Time, usns@... writes: > I would suspect that if someone was a heavy smoker, even if on > Armour, the Armour is not going to stop the propensity towards lung > cancer.... > That's what I thought...but being a former smoker - but now on Armour, it was sorta nice to read that. Cindi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 In a message dated 9/20/2004 12:16:46 PM Eastern Standard Time, usns@... writes: > I would suspect that if someone was a heavy smoker, even if on > Armour, the Armour is not going to stop the propensity towards lung > cancer.... > That's what I thought...but being a former smoker - but now on Armour, it was sorta nice to read that. Cindi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 In a message dated 9/20/2004 12:51:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, jamyrogers@... writes: > Actually, the unsuspected illness by Broda talks about increased > eart > attacks caused by Dr's giving too high doses of Armour if memory serves me. > The Drs saw that his results were good with higher does he was giving than > they had, so then they just gave way too much to patients and they were > having heart attacks. yes. that is true. that was a major problem with high doses of Armour. but wherever it was I read....in one of the 15 books I have...the doctor talks about not ever having a patient who was on Armour have a heart attack. I think this was mentioned in relation to the fact that it is often low thyroid that causes heart disease. Cindi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 In a message dated 9/20/2004 12:51:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, jamyrogers@... writes: > Actually, the unsuspected illness by Broda talks about increased > eart > attacks caused by Dr's giving too high doses of Armour if memory serves me. > The Drs saw that his results were good with higher does he was giving than > they had, so then they just gave way too much to patients and they were > having heart attacks. And now as i think about this...this doctor (I'll have to try to remember what book - maybe Solved-The Riddle of Illness?) talked about how heart attacks (like some of the other diseases we have talked about) didn't starts becoming the major problem they are until after folks were not properly getting diagnosed with low thyroid. I can certainly see the reasoning behind that. I know a couple of folks now with heart problems who I think are hypo. Cindi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 In a message dated 9/20/2004 12:51:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, jamyrogers@... writes: > Actually, the unsuspected illness by Broda talks about increased > eart > attacks caused by Dr's giving too high doses of Armour if memory serves me. > The Drs saw that his results were good with higher does he was giving than > they had, so then they just gave way too much to patients and they were > having heart attacks. And now as i think about this...this doctor (I'll have to try to remember what book - maybe Solved-The Riddle of Illness?) talked about how heart attacks (like some of the other diseases we have talked about) didn't starts becoming the major problem they are until after folks were not properly getting diagnosed with low thyroid. I can certainly see the reasoning behind that. I know a couple of folks now with heart problems who I think are hypo. Cindi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 > (Found the bottom paragraph within an article about Armour on the > website healthyrecipes.com) > > There is one condition in which someone should NOT start on Armour > or T3 meds like Cytomel--those with severe acute cardio-pulmonary > conditions, such as congestive heart failure, when the metabolic > slowing effect of a low FT3 level can actually be life-saving. _____________________ This issue has been debated. Because low thyroid or basically a low metabolic rate controlled mostly by T3 causes many cardio-pulminary conditions. So, having low T3 may actually hasten the worsening of their condition and may be why they got in the fix in the first place. I think that very slow and careful T3 addtion would not be harmful and I would want this for myself personally. This is just my opinion. Tish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 In a message dated 9/20/2004 1:39:48 PM Eastern Standard Time, jamyrogers@... writes: > no, what I am saying is that Broda found that many hypo people had heart > issues but the ones that he trested with Armour didn't ok..not sure i understand. do you mean that folks who he had been treating with Armour did not develop heart problems? but why was he treating them then? i'm confused. could be brain fog. it happens occassionally. cindi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 This is important information for the many folks here who want to self-treat an older family member, as I sure have my dear mother-in- law. But once a heart condition has developed, introducing Armour or Cytomel can be quite a serious issue...and hopefully done with the monitoring of a good doc. Another good piece of information--I have an article here that states that with fast growing cancer, a patient will have hypothyroid induced to slow the progress of the cancer! Janie > > (Found the bottom paragraph within an article about Armour on the > > website healthyrecipes.com) > > > > There is one condition in which someone should NOT start on Armour > > or T3 meds like Cytomel--those with severe acute cardio- pulmonary > > conditions, such as congestive heart failure, when the metabolic > > slowing effect of a low FT3 level can actually be life-saving. > _____________________ > > This issue has been debated. Because low thyroid or basically a low > metabolic rate controlled mostly by T3 causes many cardio- pulminary > conditions. So, having low T3 may actually hasten the worsening of > their condition and may be why they got in the fix in the first > place. I think that very slow and careful T3 addtion would not be > harmful and I would want this for myself personally. This is just my > opinion. > > Tish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 This is important information for the many folks here who want to self-treat an older family member, as I sure have my dear mother-in- law. But once a heart condition has developed, introducing Armour or Cytomel can be quite a serious issue...and hopefully done with the monitoring of a good doc. Another good piece of information--I have an article here that states that with fast growing cancer, a patient will have hypothyroid induced to slow the progress of the cancer! Janie > > (Found the bottom paragraph within an article about Armour on the > > website healthyrecipes.com) > > > > There is one condition in which someone should NOT start on Armour > > or T3 meds like Cytomel--those with severe acute cardio- pulmonary > > conditions, such as congestive heart failure, when the metabolic > > slowing effect of a low FT3 level can actually be life-saving. > _____________________ > > This issue has been debated. Because low thyroid or basically a low > metabolic rate controlled mostly by T3 causes many cardio- pulminary > conditions. So, having low T3 may actually hasten the worsening of > their condition and may be why they got in the fix in the first > place. I think that very slow and careful T3 addtion would not be > harmful and I would want this for myself personally. This is just my > opinion. > > Tish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 I would suspect that if someone was a heavy smoker, even if on Armour, the Armour is not going to stop the propensity towards lung cancer.... But the article points to ANY fast growing cancer. I need to find it. Jane > I had read something about that too...about inducing hypothyroidism in lung > cancer..to slow the cancer. I found the info a bit confusing though...because > another source I have read mentioned that the doctor had never seen lung > cancer (or heart attack) in someone taking Armour. > Cindi > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 I would suspect that if someone was a heavy smoker, even if on Armour, the Armour is not going to stop the propensity towards lung cancer.... But the article points to ANY fast growing cancer. I need to find it. Jane > I had read something about that too...about inducing hypothyroidism in lung > cancer..to slow the cancer. I found the info a bit confusing though...because > another source I have read mentioned that the doctor had never seen lung > cancer (or heart attack) in someone taking Armour. > Cindi > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 I would suspect that if someone was a heavy smoker, even if on Armour, the Armour is not going to stop the propensity towards lung cancer.... But the article points to ANY fast growing cancer. I need to find it. Jane > I had read something about that too...about inducing hypothyroidism in lung > cancer..to slow the cancer. I found the info a bit confusing though...because > another source I have read mentioned that the doctor had never seen lung > cancer (or heart attack) in someone taking Armour. > Cindi > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 Actually, the unsuspected illness by Broda talks about increased eart attacks caused by Dr's giving too high doses of Armour if memory serves me. The Drs saw that his results were good with higher does he was giving than they had, so then they just gave way too much to patients and they were having heart attacks. Right? >From: nc2406@... >Reply-To: NaturalThyroidHormones >To: NaturalThyroidHormones >Subject: Re: Re: When someone should NOT get on >Armour... >Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:02:37 EDT > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 Actually, the unsuspected illness by Broda talks about increased eart attacks caused by Dr's giving too high doses of Armour if memory serves me. The Drs saw that his results were good with higher does he was giving than they had, so then they just gave way too much to patients and they were having heart attacks. Right? >From: nc2406@... >Reply-To: NaturalThyroidHormones >To: NaturalThyroidHormones >Subject: Re: Re: When someone should NOT get on >Armour... >Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:02:37 EDT > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 Actually, the unsuspected illness by Broda talks about increased eart attacks caused by Dr's giving too high doses of Armour if memory serves me. The Drs saw that his results were good with higher does he was giving than they had, so then they just gave way too much to patients and they were having heart attacks. Right? >From: nc2406@... >Reply-To: NaturalThyroidHormones >To: NaturalThyroidHormones >Subject: Re: Re: When someone should NOT get on >Armour... >Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:02:37 EDT > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 no, what I am saying is that Broda found that many hypo people had heart issues but the ones that he trested with Armour didn't. Then DR's started just over dosing on Armour with an attitude like it is all good, so people were getting too much t3 and had heart attacks >From: nc2406@... >Reply-To: NaturalThyroidHormones >To: NaturalThyroidHormones >Subject: Re: Re: When someone should NOT get on >Armour... >Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:56:28 EDT > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 no, what I am saying is that Broda found that many hypo people had heart issues but the ones that he trested with Armour didn't. Then DR's started just over dosing on Armour with an attitude like it is all good, so people were getting too much t3 and had heart attacks >From: nc2406@... >Reply-To: NaturalThyroidHormones >To: NaturalThyroidHormones >Subject: Re: Re: When someone should NOT get on >Armour... >Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:56:28 EDT > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 That's what I got from the book too Jamy. I think that some DR's might have taken the stance: if a little is good, more is better? I was married to somebody like that once. He about drove me crazy! lol. :-) If I'm not mistaken, autopsy reports had something to do with how Broda found problems with hypoT being untreated because of the amts of mucin (sp) in the body. I wish I had the book here with me at the office, but I think he definately was onto something for people who had hypoT and how to treat them. SandyE~Houston Original Message: ----------------- From: JAMY jamyrogers@... Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:37:02 -0700 To: NaturalThyroidHormones Subject: Re: Re: When someone should NOT get on Armour... <html><body> <tt> <BR> no, what I am saying is that Broda found that many hypo people had heart <BR> issues but the ones that he trested with Armour didn't. Then DR's started <BR> just over dosing on Armour with an attitude like it is all good, so people <BR> were getting too much t3 and had heart attacks<BR> <BR> >From: nc2406@...<BR> >Reply-To: NaturalThyroidHormones <BR> >To: NaturalThyroidHormones <BR> >Subject: Re: Re: When someone should NOT get on <BR> >Armour...<BR> >Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:56:28 EDT<BR> ><BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 > This is important information for the many folks here who want to > self-treat an older family member, as I sure have my dear mother- in- > law. But once a heart condition has developed, introducing Armour or > Cytomel can be quite a serious issue...and hopefully done with the > monitoring of a good doc. __________________ You are really right. I wasn't thinking about this situation where someone would give it to their mother or mother-in-law. I think that you should go very carefully with treating relatives. You sure don't want their death or serious illness on your concience. The best thing here is to find a good doctor. I shouldn't have posted my post on this. I was thinking of an ideal situation and not reality. Tish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 > This is important information for the many folks here who want to > self-treat an older family member, as I sure have my dear mother- in- > law. But once a heart condition has developed, introducing Armour or > Cytomel can be quite a serious issue...and hopefully done with the > monitoring of a good doc. __________________ You are really right. I wasn't thinking about this situation where someone would give it to their mother or mother-in-law. I think that you should go very carefully with treating relatives. You sure don't want their death or serious illness on your concience. The best thing here is to find a good doctor. I shouldn't have posted my post on this. I was thinking of an ideal situation and not reality. Tish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 > This is important information for the many folks here who want to > self-treat an older family member, as I sure have my dear mother- in- > law. But once a heart condition has developed, introducing Armour or > Cytomel can be quite a serious issue...and hopefully done with the > monitoring of a good doc. __________________ You are really right. I wasn't thinking about this situation where someone would give it to their mother or mother-in-law. I think that you should go very carefully with treating relatives. You sure don't want their death or serious illness on your concience. The best thing here is to find a good doctor. I shouldn't have posted my post on this. I was thinking of an ideal situation and not reality. Tish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.