Guest guest Posted December 30, 2004 Report Share Posted December 30, 2004 You are probably right about it taking a long, long time to determine the best treatment for IgaN. Mine is a case in point: 43 years ago I had acute glumerulitis with no subsequent treatment with steroids; only antibiotics short term. In March 2004 I was diagnosed via biopsy with IgaN and immediately prescribed prednisone. The side effects were so bad that I think I would need to be held down to take it again. I have been off pred since Oct 5 and my labs have remained stable and I feel that life is worthwhile again. Was it worth it?............Thanks for all your wonderful information. Gloria > There is certainly more prednisone use now than just a few years ago, I > find. > > The most common thing about IgAN is that the most appropriate treatment is > not known. > > There have been some positive reports about various things, including > corticosteroids, but there is little in the way of convincing evidence about > anything, except that ACE inhibitors and ARBs seem to be slow progression, > as well as reducing proteinuria somewhat. This is what makes it so hard to > answer questions like this one. At least with ACEI and ARB's, many people > have to take something for blood pressure anyway. > > I think we're at a point now that, if both the patient and the nephrologist > don't mind the side effects, many people can end up being prescribed > prednisone, and be perpetually either on it or weaning off from it. When I > think about quality of life, it's hard to say that those on prednisone are > better off overall, except in cases of nephrotic syndrome. On the other > hand, the worst quality of life of all is if someone reaches esrd, so, > there's a tendency to give every possible " treatment " a try to see what it > will do. > > One thing I'm concerned about with drugs like prednisone is the tendency > some nephrologists have of looking only at the kidneys, and not the rest of > the body. They might make the renal numbers look better for a while, but > they might not care as much about long term side effects in the patient > (which can be quite severe and debilitating). All studies are relatively > short, and they look at very specific end-points. The ultimate test is > whether prednisone would reduce the rate at which IgAN patients reach esrd. > Approximately 1 to 2% of IgAN patients reach esrd each year, and those that > do have usually done so only after 10, 20 years or more. So, at that rate, > it's going to take a heck of a long study to see what really reduces esrd. > > Pierre > > Re: Prednisone treatment? > > > > > > > > > > The primary use for prednisone is for reducing heavy proteinuria to more > > > manageable levels. In recent years, some (not all) nephrologists have > > > started using it in cases where proteinuria is more moderate. In some > > cases, > > > it might be used in mild IgAN in hopes of putting it into some kind of > > > remission. But the catch is, even if it helps while taking it, IgAN is > > > usually not severe enough of a disease to keep a person on prednisone > > > indefinitely. The long term adverse effects of this drug are just too > > > great - maybe worse than the disease being treated. So, you take > > prednisone > > > for a while, then you have to be weaned off, and then you're back where > > you > > > started. > > > > > > The " standard " treatment for IgAN is still primarily the same as you > had, > > > ie. appropriate BP meds. Fish oil use is still not universally accepted, > > > simply because the evidence is disputable - both actual trial evidence > and > > > observable evidence from actual clinical practice. > > > > > > The problem with IgAN is that, while it can and does cause proteinuria, > > IgAN > > > can progress to esrd even if proteinuria is always relatively mild (as > it > > is > > > for most people who have IgAN). I should know - that's what happened to > > me. > > > In other words, it appears that while heavier proteinuria is a risk > factor > > > on its own for progression to esrd, it does not appear to be the primary > > > mechanism of injury to the kidneys when you have IgAN. In that scenario, > > > it's very disputable as to whether the benefits of prednisone clearly > > > outweigh the risks - unless proteinuria is heavy enough to be treated on > > its > > > own. > > > > > > Oral steroids can be " miracle drugs " . But they are so only for a > > relatively > > > short time. > > > > > > Pierre > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.