Guest guest Posted December 31, 2004 Report Share Posted December 31, 2004 Cy: The frustrating thing was, Rob immediately bonded with him before the medication issue ever arose. So he was a likeable guy. You would think that being in a setting dealing with minors he would have his head on straight. Dr. D, Rob's neprhologist, is the department head, so I'm sure he will nip this behavior in the bud, so to speak. I emailed Dr. D. last night and told him the whole story. Yes, he had rushed in from doing another patient's biopsy. He sent in the fellow first, and he asked what we were expecting from the visit that day, because the results were not in from Dr. Kashtan. I said, well, they should be in his chart, because Dr. D. had faxed them to me several weeks prior!! I think he was shocked that I kept my own records. As for your own experience, I think that some in the medical field like to write off what parents know and have studied, because it makes them uncomfortable that they are not as knowledgeable as they should be. What did the attending have to say about that situation?? I tell patients all the time that they should not tolerate unacceptable behavior from their doctors. The patient is the employer. It is definately a give and take situation, and I do know an excellent professional I work with who is sorely overworked. But he is always focused on the patient who is in front of him, and gives them his complete attention. It reminds me of a story about fish. A little boy encountered a school of fish that had gotten stranded on the beach. He was frantically trying to throw them back into the water. Someone came along (and I always get the story not quite right here) and said, you'll never save all those fish, its impossible. You won't make a difference. And the little boy replied, holding up a single fish, that " I can make a difference with this one! " . They should be entirely focused on the patient in front of them! When my uncle was dying, his GP wouldn't give him pain medication because he had pneumonia on top of all his medical issues. He was thrashing about the bed and in agony. I was his medical POA. My cousin (who is also a nurse) and I had to almost tackle his doctor out in the hallway and demand he be kept more comfortable. Our uncle did not want extreme measures taken, and he had expressed this to the both of us just a few days prior. We finally convinced the doctor by saying " you should treat our uncle like you would your own mother or father...and want him to be comfortable. " . he finally wrote an order for morphine and my uncle had a peaceful death, which is what he wanted. But my uncle suffered for those 2 days before the order was written. Rob hasn't really mentioned the doctor's appt. I am going to talk with him some more this weekend and see where he stands. I think he was pretty upset and shocked with the rheumy appointment and visit with the physical therapist. They really read him the riot act about doing his exercises. I'll see what his take is on things this weekend, and that is an excellent idea to have Dr. D. have a talk with him. I think he would be happy to do that. Thanks for listening and your excellent advice. As far as having a peaceful weekend, I will! Just being able to vent here to people who truly understand does me immense good. AND, I am OFF tomorrow, sunday and monday!! Have to go into work in a bit though, but it shouldn't be a difficult day. Happy New Year! , mom to Rob, 15 On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 23:28:57 -0800 " Cy Webb " writes: Oh ! What an utter slimebag! How I HATE the " hadn't read the patient's chart " problem. This is simply just poor medicine. I ran into this frequently with my husband's docs before he died and a good friend of mine runs into with her son's docs. Assuming that you're not showing up in the ER with an emergency situation, the very least they could do is scan the recent letters and labs. I would definately write that email to Dr. D - who will hopefully read the guy the riot act. It is very hard being the parent of an adolescent - when the adults around you act like such buffoons. We ran into something similar once ( but nowheres in the same league as the bozo you encountered) when the docs at Packard sprung a resident on us. I began to ask a question about C3NF - and the guy kept giving me answers that were appropriate for C3 (apparently h e never finished reading the chapter in his immunology textbook about complement). I refused to back down - and he refused to appreciate the distinction. After he trotted off to ask his boss (leaving me feeling very much like I was at the car dealers waiting to speak to the manager!), the attending came in. Fortunately, it's never happened to us again. I often think of Pierre's line a long time ago to the effect that you're paying for the guy's experience - not necessarily his time (I think Pierre said that once in response to patients complaining about very short appointments). At the very least, you should get the experience! Would it be appropriate for you to ask Dr. D to have a one-on-one conversation with Rob and steer him straight about the relative importance of meds? Do you think he'd be willing to give Rob a call at home? That might help. I think you're standing your ground in front of Rob will also make an important impression. has seen me politely (and OK, sometimes not so politely) question the docs and try to get an explanation (i.e. not blinding letting them put him on clonidine recently). I always try to do it with the sense that adults aren't always right (no surprise there) and asking educated questions instead of blindly following the doc allows you to take better care of yourself. Our guys are at that threshold of taking care of themselves - which is a scary thing to contemplate. As impossible as it sounds, I hope you guys have a peaceful weekend. Cy Re: Rob update > > I'm sorry I haven't been responding or posting very much. I do try to > read the posts, but have had trouble keeping up. I finally was able to > get a new computer, so that problem is solved. Unfortunately, the other > admissions nurse in my department was suspended, and then had a scheduled > vacation, so I have been working and on call for the last 10 out of 11 > days. It has been very hectic. > I did get Tuesday off to take Rob to his rheumatology and nephrology > appts. > Rob's regular nephrologist was out of town. I just love this doctor, Dr. > Devarajan. He is wonderful. Unfortunately, we had to go on and schedule > with another nephrologist in the group, because we have to travel 120 > miles to the appts for rheumy and neph, and I do not like to take Rob out > of school, so I wanted him to be seen during Christmas break. > This nephrologist, who had never seen Rob before, made me so mad I > thought I was going to blow a gasket! > We did have great news, the Cozaar is continuing to control the protein > and blood in his urine. We were so happy to hear about that! > The neph, on the other hand....started talking to Rob about how > proteinuria damages the kidneys. Then, he says, at some point, Rob could > go off the Cozaar just to see if the hematuria and proteinuria would > still occur. This led him into talking about how he knows that lots of > patients don't take their meds, and its ok if they do that, and he could > take a drug holiday during the summer, and just see what happens!! Rob, > of course, absolutely LOVED this idea. I was livid! I looked the neph > squarely in the eye, and said, I CANNOT BELIEVE that you just told an > ADOLESCENT that its ok not to take meds! He hemmed and hawed around, and > then asked me if I was interested in having a definitive diagnosis. I > told him that Dr. D. was fairly sure of the Alport's diagnosis, and that > Dr. Kashtan of U Minn agreed, and he poo pooed that too. Of course, he > had not even gone completely through Robs chart and I had to fill him in > on many things. But, it was like he was out to undermine everything that > had taken place! Granted, it would be wonderful if Rob didn't have > Alports, but the biopsy clearly showed irregularities, and there is no > other explanation for what he has, other than diabetic nephropathy, and > we know he is not diabetic. So this guy was absolutely irritating and > maddening! I have been waiting to calm down (but I find that I just keep > getting madder!), I plan to email Dr. D and tell him just how disgusted I > was about what he told Rob. It is hard enough to get a teenager to take > his meds, and Rob also has an exercise regimen he must do to keep things > limber (because of the ankylosing spondylitis). He faces his spine fusing > in about 10 years. It is imperative that he diligently exercise in order > to prevent it fusing in a 'bad' position. Meds are the one thing Rob has > been compliant with, but the exercises, no. But at least he is compliant > with meds, that is until Dr. 'HELPFUL' told him no need! > The rheumy did read Rob the riot act about the exercises, so at least > SOMEONE cares if he is compliant!! > Ok, thanks for listening! > , mom to Rob, 15 > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2004 Report Share Posted December 31, 2004 Good show getting that email out. It gives Dr. D a chance to remedy the situation. My hat is off to you for having the department chief as your doc! With our guys, so much of it is modeling behaviors that will carry them into adulthood. I never expected that parenthood would include include teaching my kid to be a good medical consumer, but that is where the heart of the matter is. It's probably a little easier for you and I because we've been active in the field (before I did law, my background was in the biological sciences). While I defer to their clinical experience in a minute, I do expect explanations that make sense. In law, one of the more damning criticisms you can make is to accuse someone of being too conclusory - which is what docs often are. In our case, the attending and I continued the conversation as if the incident with the resident never happened. I got an answer that was responsive to my question. We kind of ignored the resident who proceeded to get littler and littler and almost disappeared. A happy and healthy new year to you and Rob. Cy Re: Rob update > > > > > > I'm sorry I haven't been responding or posting very much. I do try to > > read the posts, but have had trouble keeping up. I finally was able to > > get a new computer, so that problem is solved. Unfortunately, the other > > admissions nurse in my department was suspended, and then had a > scheduled > > vacation, so I have been working and on call for the last 10 out of 11 > > days. It has been very hectic. > > I did get Tuesday off to take Rob to his rheumatology and nephrology > > appts. > > Rob's regular nephrologist was out of town. I just love this doctor, > Dr. > > Devarajan. He is wonderful. Unfortunately, we had to go on and schedule > > with another nephrologist in the group, because we have to travel 120 > > miles to the appts for rheumy and neph, and I do not like to take Rob > out > > of school, so I wanted him to be seen during Christmas break. > > This nephrologist, who had never seen Rob before, made me so mad I > > thought I was going to blow a gasket! > > We did have great news, the Cozaar is continuing to control the protein > > and blood in his urine. We were so happy to hear about that! > > The neph, on the other hand....started talking to Rob about how > > proteinuria damages the kidneys. Then, he says, at some point, Rob > could > > go off the Cozaar just to see if the hematuria and proteinuria would > > still occur. This led him into talking about how he knows that lots of > > patients don't take their meds, and its ok if they do that, and he > could > > take a drug holiday during the summer, and just see what happens!! Rob, > > of course, absolutely LOVED this idea. I was livid! I looked the neph > > squarely in the eye, and said, I CANNOT BELIEVE that you just told an > > ADOLESCENT that its ok not to take meds! He hemmed and hawed around, > and > > then asked me if I was interested in having a definitive diagnosis. I > > told him that Dr. D. was fairly sure of the Alport's diagnosis, and > that > > Dr. Kashtan of U Minn agreed, and he poo pooed that too. Of course, he > > had not even gone completely through Robs chart and I had to fill him > in > > on many things. But, it was like he was out to undermine everything > that > > had taken place! Granted, it would be wonderful if Rob didn't have > > Alports, but the biopsy clearly showed irregularities, and there is no > > other explanation for what he has, other than diabetic nephropathy, and > > we know he is not diabetic. So this guy was absolutely irritating and > > maddening! I have been waiting to calm down (but I find that I just > keep > > getting madder!), I plan to email Dr. D and tell him just how disgusted > I > > was about what he told Rob. It is hard enough to get a teenager to take > > his meds, and Rob also has an exercise regimen he must do to keep > things > > limber (because of the ankylosing spondylitis). He faces his spine > fusing > > in about 10 years. It is imperative that he diligently exercise in > order > > to prevent it fusing in a 'bad' position. Meds are the one thing Rob > has > > been compliant with, but the exercises, no. But at least he is > compliant > > with meds, that is until Dr. 'HELPFUL' told him no need! > > The rheumy did read Rob the riot act about the exercises, so at least > > SOMEONE cares if he is compliant!! > > Ok, thanks for listening! > > , mom to Rob, 15 > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.