Guest guest Posted November 16, 2004 Report Share Posted November 16, 2004 Hi , A very warm welcome to you! I am glad you found your way to us. Your question is one that comes up fairly often. The general consensus is that unless biopsy results would bring about a change in the course of treatment, most Nephrologists will not biopsy until the protein is higher. The standard course of treatment is Ace inhibitors, such as Enalapril and as long as your labs look good, and your blood pressure is stable, I think most Nephs would take the approach yours is to hold off on biopsy. There is some inherent risk in the biopsy, and if it can be avoided, many Nephrologists would prefer to not put the patient through a biopsy. A course of Prednisone treatment is normally reserved for controlling high protein spill. There are serious side effects to Prednisone. Not many Nephs would treat with Prednisone for a protein spill of 1000 mg/24 hours. I am not a doctor, just a fellow patient so please do not take what I am writing as medical advise. I just know I would prefer personally to avoid the Prednisone if my protein was that low. Now if your creatinine is increasing, and protein spill is increasing, that may be another story. It is very hard to say not knowing your history or trends. My comments are more how most Nephs will treat IgAN in general. I am sorry you had a reason to find your way here , but I hope you find lots of information and encouragement here. Welcome again! In a message dated 11/16/2004 4:49:19 PM Pacific Standard Time, lindanee@... writes: > > Hello everyone. I just found this group on my searing for answers > quest. This is great! Look forward to getting to know everyone. > > Here is my question. I have been seeing a nephrologist for 3 > years. I have gross hemarturia at least once a month and blood in > my urine all the time. My protein levels in my urine have been as > high as 2000 but now that I am taking Enalapril, my protein level > has reduced to about 1000. My doctor feels that until my protein > level is at 3000 he does not want to do a biopsy because he said > there is no treatment. But, I have been feeling very sick the last > 2 months and decided to get a second opinion. The new nephrologist > said he also believes I do have Iga and wants me to have a biopsy to > confirm. He said he then thinks I should start a 6 month steroid > treatment. Has anyone else been along this path? Did you opt for > the biopsy? Steroid treatment? Or should I listen to my other > nephrologist and wait until my protein levels go up to 3000? HELP?!?! > > Thanks for listening. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 16, 2004 Report Share Posted November 16, 2004 I had the biopsy pretty early and was told that there was no treatment and that steroids wouldn't help. Now that was about 5 years ago so perhaps things have changed (?) Good luck - I know how difficult it is to gather information and then have to decide what you should do. New to group - Biopsy Question Hello everyone. I just found this group on my searing for answers quest. This is great! Look forward to getting to know everyone. Here is my question. I have been seeing a nephrologist for 3 years. I have gross hemarturia at least once a month and blood in my urine all the time. My protein levels in my urine have been as high as 2000 but now that I am taking Enalapril, my protein level has reduced to about 1000. My doctor feels that until my protein level is at 3000 he does not want to do a biopsy because he said there is no treatment. But, I have been feeling very sick the last 2 months and decided to get a second opinion. The new nephrologist said he also believes I do have Iga and wants me to have a biopsy to confirm. He said he then thinks I should start a 6 month steroid treatment. Has anyone else been along this path? Did you opt for the biopsy? Steroid treatment? Or should I listen to my other nephrologist and wait until my protein levels go up to 3000? HELP?!?! Thanks for listening. To edit your settings for the group, go to our Yahoo Group home page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/iga-nephropathy/ To unsubcribe via email, iga-nephropathy-unsubscribe Visit our companion website at www.igan.ca. The site is entirely supported by donations. If you would like to help, go to: http://www.igan.ca/id62.htm Thank you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 16, 2004 Report Share Posted November 16, 2004 Hi , Welcome to the group I'm glad you found us. I am sorry to hear of your diagnosis though. touched on the norm for most nephs. Protein spill of over 3000 and worsening labs tends to be the point where a biopsy is done. As said there is risk involved with the biopsy. Also steroid treatment is no cake walk and all the pros and cons should be looked at. I've been on prednisone for over a year due to protein spill of over 3000...it's done the job in bringing it down but it hasn't been an easy year either. Depending on your creatinine level, your other labs and how your b/p is holding a biopsy may do nothing to change your course of treatment the only thing it would give you is a definite diagnosis of IgAN. There is a new school of thought out there (I can't find the article I was reading now about it) regarding early treatment with steroids showing good results. If I can find it again I'll post the link. Amy G. New to group - Biopsy Question Hello everyone. I just found this group on my searing for answers quest. This is great! Look forward to getting to know everyone. Here is my question. I have been seeing a nephrologist for 3 years. I have gross hemarturia at least once a month and blood in my urine all the time. My protein levels in my urine have been as high as 2000 but now that I am taking Enalapril, my protein level has reduced to about 1000. My doctor feels that until my protein level is at 3000 he does not want to do a biopsy because he said there is no treatment. But, I have been feeling very sick the last 2 months and decided to get a second opinion. The new nephrologist said he also believes I do have Iga and wants me to have a biopsy to confirm. He said he then thinks I should start a 6 month steroid treatment. Has anyone else been along this path? Did you opt for the biopsy? Steroid treatment? Or should I listen to my other nephrologist and wait until my protein levels go up to 3000? HELP?!?! Thanks for listening. To edit your settings for the group, go to our Yahoo Group home page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/iga-nephropathy/ To unsubcribe via email, iga-nephropathy-unsubscribe Visit our companion website at www.igan.ca. The site is entirely supported by donations. If you would like to help, go to: http://www.igan.ca/id62.htm Thank you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 17, 2004 Report Share Posted November 17, 2004 Hello and welcome, I can't speak to the quesion of prednisone, but can share my biopsy experience. Unlike the other folks who posted, I was biopsied with less then 1000 protien spill, I was around 800 and my creatinine was 1.2, my creatinine clearence was 60-70. My neph wanted to biopsy saying it was the only way to confirm the diagnosis, I didn't want to at all. I got two second opinions and both of those nephs concured- do the biopsy. So I did, that was eight or nine years ago. Today the approach may be different. I am currently waiting for my last labs, but expect my protien to be about 800 and my creatinine to be about 2.2, and creatinine clearence to be in the 30's. I take fish oil, an ACE inhibitor, sodium bicarb (to help with my potassium levels), calcium, iron, get procrit shots, and eat a low protien low patassium diet. Did the new neph go into why he advocates prednisone for you now? Talk with your doctors, go in armed with questions and open up a dialogue. While it may not feel like it, this is a working relationship. I am happy you found this group, I wish I had many years ago. Take care... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 17, 2004 Report Share Posted November 17, 2004 Welcome to the group . Well, you saw two different nephrologists and you got two opinions. That's not unusual with diseases that have no real treatments. I wasn't biopsied until my proteinuria was about 800mg/day, and that was more than a decade after blood first appeared in my urine. Even then, my nephrologist at the time was of two minds about it. So, basically, they are both right. The biopsy probably won't make any difference in treatment, ultimately, but it WILL give you a positive diagnosis. Both are valid viewpoints, really. The neph who isn't for the biopsy at this time, probably will be eventually. Proteinuria of 1000mg/day may or may not be enough to use steroids. This is relatively mild proteinuria, so, a case can be made that the enalapril by itself is working. The thing with steroids is that they can have wicked side effects in the longer term, so a proteinuria of only 1000mg/day might not be worth it. Opinions about that vary in the world of nephrology. About waiting for proteinuria to go to 3000mg.... Proteinuria is not like kidney function, which may slowly but gradually decline over time. Proteinuria isn't related to actual kidney function. It's a separate thing. It may flare up occasionally, or it may not. It's not something that necessarily increases over time. I reached end-stage renal disease after 25 years of IgAN, and I never had proteinuria much greater than 1000mg/day. Pierre New to group - Biopsy Question > > > > Hello everyone. I just found this group on my searing for answers > quest. This is great! Look forward to getting to know everyone. > > Here is my question. I have been seeing a nephrologist for 3 > years. I have gross hemarturia at least once a month and blood in > my urine all the time. My protein levels in my urine have been as > high as 2000 but now that I am taking Enalapril, my protein level > has reduced to about 1000. My doctor feels that until my protein > level is at 3000 he does not want to do a biopsy because he said > there is no treatment. But, I have been feeling very sick the last > 2 months and decided to get a second opinion. The new nephrologist > said he also believes I do have Iga and wants me to have a biopsy to > confirm. He said he then thinks I should start a 6 month steroid > treatment. Has anyone else been along this path? Did you opt for > the biopsy? Steroid treatment? Or should I listen to my other > nephrologist and wait until my protein levels go up to 3000? HELP?!?! > > Thanks for listening. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.