Guest guest Posted August 13, 2001 Report Share Posted August 13, 2001 http://www.craniospinal.net/netpages/physicians/parkvsmsa.html Distinguishing PD From Multiple System Atrophy Preliminary Predictive Model Requires Validation Recognizing a pattern of clinical features may help physicians distinguish Parkinson's disease (PD) from multiple system atrophy (MSA), according to research published in the March issue of the Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. The investigators offer a preliminary predictive model to aid in the distinction of these similar-looking conditions. " It is often difficult to distinguish clinically between MSA and [PD], particularly early in the disease, " write the authors, led by G.K. Wenning from the neurology department of University Hospital in Innsbruck, Austria. The authors point out that no systematic studies have been conducted to determine reasons for such poor diagnostic accuracy, and that overlapping clinical features probably contribute. " [A]s prognosis and treatment response is different for patients with MSA compared with PD, a correct diagnosis is important. ... Our results suggest that improving diagnostic accuracy of MSA requires pattern recognition rather than defining unique pathognomonic symptoms or signs. " Thus, the authors set out to develop a predictive model to help differentiate MSA from PD. They examined data on 100 pathologically confirmed cases of PD and 38 cases of MSA, in brains collected by the Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank (PDSBB) in London between 1987 and 1993. Statistical measures were used to determine diagnostic utility of a diversity of variables that included socio-demographic factors, clinical features, drug side effects, and other features, like presence of depression. Researchers were able to determine that the following clinical features tend to suggest a diagnosis of MSA over PD: poor initial response to levodopa and absence of psychiatric side effects from antiparkinsonian drugs, recurrent falls, autonomic failure, dysarthria and dysphagia, and preserved cognitive function on bedside testing. Features that failed to distinguish the two diseases included symmetric onset, akinesia, tremor, levodopa-induced motor complications, and depression. " Most good clinicians can distinguish the two disorders, ... but this quantifies what people have intuitively sensed, " Abraham Lieberman, MD, tells in an interview seeking independent assessment of the study. " Practically, it doesn't make a difference because there's no treatment for . ... Basically, what you do is put people on sinemet [a levodopa/carbidopa combination], and if they respond, they probably have Parkinson's disease. If they don't respond, they probably have something like . ... I think in the future it will be important, because the etiologies of these diseases are probably different. ... Five years from now, when we have treatments for and a means of trying to prevent the disease and slow it down, it'll be very important that we distinguish one from the other. " Lieberman is a professor of neurology at the University of Miami and medical director of the National Parkinson's Foundation. The next step, write the authors, is to validate the model they have developed with different data sets. Furthermore, advances in neurodiagnostic methods may help ease the difficulty in distinguishing these two disorders. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 15, 2001 Report Share Posted August 15, 2001 Diseases may be classified according to the syptoms associated with them, or they may be classified according to the 'etiology' that is the underlying disease process. My impression is that MSA, or at least some cases of MSA may be classified as atypical Parkinson's or as Parkinson's plus based on how the patient is affected. However the cellular damage that is observed post-mortem is different between Parknsons and MSA. Lewy bodies are found in the brain tissues of Parkinson's patients, not so in MSA patients. In that respect Parkinson's is similar to Alzheimers or diffuse Lewy body disease though it is very very different from those in terms of the symptoms. There has been some encouraging work in immunotherapy, the development of a vaccine that produces antibodies in the immune system that destroys the Lewy bodies. A vaccine of this sort has been show to prevent an Alzheimer's-like disease in a strain of mice bred to develop the disease and also to halt the progress of the disease when the vaccine is admininistered later. Unlike stem cell therapy this cure does nothing to repair the damage already done, it does stop further damage from occurring. That work might help both Alzheimers and Parkinsons patients but would most likely not help MSA patients. Stem cell therapy has the potential for helping all. The post mortem clinical indicator used to identify MSA is the presence of cytoplasmic inclusions in the glial cells. However, inclusions of that sort are also observed in some otherwise healthy brains so it is not clear how they fit into the picture. That there are two distictly different clinical indicators for Parkinsons and MSA tells me that they are probably two very different underlying diseases. But real researchers who really do know their burros from their burrows, may view that difference (the cellular differences) as superficial. Or in other words what they believe is not so important as why they believe it. > i have read where researchers believe that MSA is atypical parkinson's. any > comments on that. casunlimited@a... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2001 Report Share Posted September 4, 2001 Please clarify the definition of the word SPORADIC. Thought it meant not hereditary but in a post from Bill just now the term sporadic or hereditary was used. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2001 Report Share Posted September 4, 2001 mooneyg@... wrote: Are any of these diseases genetically transferred? There are some ataxias (movement disorders) which are genetically transferred. Some of the OPCA forms are and even some PD is attributed to gene problems. However, MSA is not by definition. Only the sporatic type of OPCA is considered hereditary at this point. To our knowledge there have never been two people in the same family with MSA. Take care, Bill and Charlotte Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2001 Report Share Posted September 4, 2001 Errr I guess this is where I ask a question..... My father has been diagnosed with MSA. My garndfather died over 30 years ago with symptoms alsmost exactly the same as my Dad. Are there questions I should be asking my doctor? I have just come back from a weeks holiday with my Mum and Dad and my daughter. Boy was it great but hard work! It was like taking three toddlers mind you not just the one. Becky (UK) : Werre Sent: 04 September 2001 15:16 To: shydrager Subject: Re: Distinguishing PD From Multiple System Atrophy mooneyg@... wrote: Are any of these diseases genetically transferred? There are some ataxias (movement disorders) which are genetically transferred. Some of the OPCA forms are and even some PD is attributed to gene problems. However, MSA is not by definition. Only the sporatic type of OPCA is considered hereditary at this point. To our knowledge there have never been two people in the same family with MSA. Take care, Bill and Charlotte If you do not wish to belong to shydrager, you may unsubscribe by sending a blank email to shydrager-unsubscribe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2001 Report Share Posted September 4, 2001 Sporadic means NON-hereditary. Bill meant to say that there are both non-hereditary(sporadic) and hereditary forms of OPCA. The non-hereditary(sporadic) form of OPCA is considered to be Multiple System Atrophy. The hereditary forms of OPCA are known as Spinocerebellar Ataxia (SCA). Genetic tests are available for SCA-1, SCA-2, SCA-3, SCA-6 and SCA-8. Research is progressing on SCA and more genes are being found every year so more testing will be become available. Regards, Pam Bvpond44@... wrote: > > Please clarify the definition of the word SPORADIC. > > Thought it meant not hereditary but in a post from Bill just now the > term > sporadic or hereditary was used. > > If you do not wish to belong to shydrager, you may > unsubscribe by sending a blank email to > > shydrager-unsubscribe > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2001 Report Share Posted September 4, 2001 Hi Becky, I would make sure your father's doctors are aware of the family history. If they were unaware of this when they diagnosed him it might cause them to rethink the diagnosis. Regards, Pam Becky wrote: > > Errr I guess this is where I ask a question..... > > My father has been diagnosed with MSA. My garndfather died over 30 > years ago with symptoms alsmost exactly the same as my Dad. Are there > questions I should be asking my doctor? > > I have just come back from a weeks holiday with my Mum and Dad and my > daughter. Boy was it great but hard work! It was like taking three > toddlers mind you not just the one. > > Becky (UK) > > > > : Werre > Sent: 04 September 2001 15:16 > To: shydrager > Subject: Re: Distinguishing PD From Multiple System Atrophy > > > > mooneyg@... wrote: > > Are any of these diseases genetically transferred? > > There are some ataxias (movement disorders) which are genetically > transferred. Some of the OPCA forms are and even some PD is attributed > to gene problems. However, MSA is not by definition. Only the sporatic > type of OPCA is considered hereditary at this point. To our knowledge > there have never been two people in the same family with MSA. > > Take care, Bill and Charlotte > If you do not wish to belong to shydrager, you may > unsubscribe by sending a blank email to > > shydrager-unsubscribe > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2001 Report Share Posted September 4, 2001 Becky, The genes for many hereditary ataxias are known and a DNA check for those genes is a simple blood test (which takes longer to analyze). With my insurance most of it would be covered. Ask your doctor about it. Take care, Bill and Charlotte ============================= Becky wrote: > Errr I guess this is where I ask a question..... > > My father has been diagnosed with MSA. My garndfather died over 30 > years ago with symptoms alsmost exactly the same as my Dad. Are there > questions I should be asking my doctor? > > I have just come back from a weeks holiday with my Mum and Dad and my > daughter. Boy was it great but hard work! It was like taking three > toddlers mind you not just the one. > > Becky (UK) > > > > : Werre > Sent: 04 September 2001 15:16 > To: shydrager > Subject: Re: Distinguishing PD From Multiple System Atrophy > > > > mooneyg@... wrote: > > Are any of these diseases genetically transferred? > > There are some ataxias (movement disorders) which are genetically > transferred. Some of the OPCA forms are and even some PD is attributed > to gene problems. However, MSA is not by definition. Only the sporatic > type of OPCA is considered hereditary at this point. To our knowledge > there have never been two people in the same family with MSA. > > Take care, Bill and Charlotte > If you do not wish to belong to shydrager, you may > unsubscribe by sending a blank email to > > shydrager-unsubscribe > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.