Guest guest Posted June 28, 2003 Report Share Posted June 28, 2003 Forgive my snottiness but... I have this sense that given time Mercola could find a mercury connection for every disease under the sun. And his ability to draw conclusions on the basis of one or two studies is always so interesting - quite a talent. Surprising in this case that he doesn't take the time to hawk one of his life-affirming supplements to followup his conclusions. Maybe I should finish by saying something nice....his brash decisiveness mixed w/ candor for an md is refreshing. jeff O^P Message Follows---- From: Adlard <cadlard@...> rheumatic Subject: rheumatic Multiple sclerosis from Dr. Joe Mercola Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 22:35:02 +0930 Multiple Sclerosis and Epstein-Barr Virus German researchers have demonstrated that there may be an association between the Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) reactivation and disease activity in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients over time. 108 MS patients and 163 controls were assessed for the prevalence of antibodies against herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), HSV-2, EBV, and cytomegalovirus (CMV). In contrast to the control populations, antibodies against EBV were present in 100% of MS patients. There was no significant differences between the groups for the other viruses. 19 of the MS patients were then followed monthly for 1 year, measuring active viral replication and it was noted that viral reactivation was seen in 72.7% of patients with exacerbations of their MS symptoms. The authors suggest that EBV might play an indirect role in MS as an activator of the underlying disease process. This could therefore, have some clinical significance in the treatment of this difficult condion. Neurology July 25, 2000; 55:178-84 DR. MERCOLA'S COMMENT: MS is a very challenging problem to treat. There are no simple solutions. Usually mercury is a complicating factor. The mercury tends to impair the immune system and allow infections like Epstein Barr worsen the problem. Following a good diet is of course also key. Elimination of milk and dairy is critical. Studies have shown that cow's milk consumption is correlated with MS prevalence (Neuroepidemiology 1992;11:304-12, Neuroepidemiology 1993;12:15-27). Collection of data from the autonomic nervous system is one of the most sophisticated approaches that I am aware of to learn what the underlying reasons for the cause of MS. Here are some other avenues that might be useful as well: 1. Vitamin D Deficiency - MS much more common in individuals with lower vitamin D levels and in countries where people get less sunlight exposure. A previous article in the newsletter showed a positive effect of sunlight exposure on MS. Maybe correcting a vitamin D deficiency can halt progression? 2. Calcium AEP - Although I don't know of any good studies on it, the late Dr. Nieper in Germany used it extensively in his clinic and Dr. Atkins in New York City claims that 85% of his patients get positive results from it. Although there is an oral form available, most physicians use an IV administration. I have not tried it yet but might enter a clinical investigation with it in the near future. 3. Electromagnetic Stimulation of the Pineal Gland - There is a Dr. Reuven Sandyk in the NYC area who uses AC pulsed electromagnetic fields to stimulate the pineal gland and he seems to get some very good results, although the treatment is very expensive and must be done long-term. Due to the prohibitively expensive equipment, Dr. Sandyk's clinic is probably the only place to receive this treatment. 4. Alpha Lipoic Acid - A study from the Netherlands showed that Lipoic acid is a non-specific scavenger of Reactive Oxygen Species and decreased the phagocytosis of myelin by macrophages. Free radicals appear to play a regulatory role in the destruction of myelin (Journal of Neuroimmunology 1998 Dec 1;92:67-75) 5. Progesterone - Progesterone has actually been shown in animal studies to promote the formation of new myelin sheaths (Human Reproduction 2000 Jun;15 Suppl 1:1-13, J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1999 Apr-Jun;69:97-107, Mult Scler 1997 Apr;3:105-12). I am not aware of any clinicians using progesterone the treat MS patients, but if any of my readers have any additional information on this, please e-mail me. Related Articles: HERPES VIRUS MAY TRIGGER MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS Sunlight Exposure Beneficial In Multiple Sclerosis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2003 Report Share Posted June 28, 2003 l agree that all information should be posted, and let the person make their own decision. lt is good advice and l only hope that this group will follow it no matter what the treatment is. The more information the better we can make decisions. Lee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2003 Report Share Posted June 28, 2003 , I think you overstepped your bounds a bit here. If I had MS, I would be glad to read ANYTHING that may help me. I read it all and make my own decision. We need not be judgemental. This post hurt no one. It is purely informational. Having been in a tough situation more than once, I was surpired to see you post in this fashion.JMO Marge > Forgive my snottiness but... > I have this sense that given time Mercola could find a mercury connection > for every disease under the sun. And his ability to draw conclusions on the > basis of one or two studies is always so interesting - quite a talent. > Surprising in this case that he doesn't take the time to hawk one of his > life-affirming supplements to followup his conclusions. Maybe I should > finish by saying something nice....his brash decisiveness mixed w/ candor > for an md is refreshing. > jeff > > O^P Message Follows---- > From: Adlard <cadlard@c...> > rheumatic > Subject: rheumatic Multiple sclerosis from Dr. Joe Mercola > Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 22:35:02 +0930 > > Multiple Sclerosis and Epstein-Barr Virus > > German researchers have demonstrated that there may be an association > between the Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) reactivation and disease activity > in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients over time. > > 108 MS patients and 163 controls were assessed for the prevalence of > antibodies against herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), HSV-2, EBV, and > cytomegalovirus (CMV). > > In contrast to the control populations, antibodies against EBV were > present in 100% of MS patients. > > There was no significant differences between the groups for the other > viruses. > 19 of the MS patients were then followed monthly for 1 year, measuring > active viral replication and it was noted that viral reactivation was > seen in 72.7% of patients with exacerbations of their MS symptoms. > > The authors suggest that EBV might play an indirect role in MS as an > activator of the underlying disease process. This could therefore, have > some clinical significance in the treatment of this difficult condion. > > Neurology July 25, 2000; 55:178-84 > > DR. MERCOLA'S COMMENT: MS is a very challenging problem to treat. There > are no simple solutions. Usually mercury is a complicating factor. The > mercury tends to impair the immune system and allow infections like > Epstein Barr worsen the problem. > > Following a good diet is of course also key. Elimination of milk and > dairy is critical. Studies have shown that cow's milk consumption is > correlated with MS prevalence (Neuroepidemiology 1992;11:304-12, > Neuroepidemiology 1993;12:15-27). > > Collection of data from the autonomic nervous system is one of the most > sophisticated approaches that I am aware of to learn what the > underlying reasons for the cause of MS. Here are some other avenues > that might be useful as well: > > 1. Vitamin D Deficiency - MS much more common in individuals with lower > vitamin D levels and in countries where people get less sunlight > exposure. A previous article in the newsletter showed a positive effect > of sunlight exposure on MS. Maybe correcting a vitamin D deficiency can > halt progression? > > 2. Calcium AEP - Although I don't know of any good studies on it, the > late Dr. Nieper in Germany used it extensively in his clinic and Dr. > Atkins in New York City claims that 85% of his patients get > positive results from it. Although there is an oral form available, > most physicians use an IV administration. I have not tried it yet but > might enter a clinical investigation with it in the near future. > > 3. Electromagnetic Stimulation of the Pineal Gland - There is a Dr. > Reuven Sandyk in the NYC area who uses AC pulsed electromagnetic fields > to stimulate the pineal gland and he seems to get some very good > results, although the treatment is very expensive and must be done > long-term. Due to the prohibitively expensive equipment, Dr. Sandyk's > clinic is probably the only place to receive this treatment. > > 4. Alpha Lipoic Acid - A study from the Netherlands showed that Lipoic > acid is a non-specific scavenger of Reactive Oxygen Species and > decreased the phagocytosis of myelin by macrophages. Free radicals > appear to play a regulatory role in the destruction of myelin (Journal > of Neuroimmunology 1998 Dec 1;92:67-75) > > 5. Progesterone - Progesterone has actually been shown in animal > studies to promote the formation of new myelin sheaths (Human > Reproduction 2000 Jun;15 Suppl 1:1-13, J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1999 > Apr-Jun;69:97-107, Mult Scler 1997 Apr;3:105-12). I am not aware of any > clinicians using progesterone the treat MS patients, but if any of my > readers have any additional information on this, please e-mail me. > > Related Articles: > > HERPES VIRUS MAY TRIGGER MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS > > Sunlight Exposure Beneficial In Multiple Sclerosis > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2003 Report Share Posted June 28, 2003 Marge, You're right, I'm certain I wasn't being very appropriate, but let me clarify. I would not in a million years suggest that information such as this should not be presented. Never even implied that. My criticism was directed purely at the individual's approach not at the information itself or its availability. I feel that when an md CHOOSES to make commercial money off of and overtly market items that are directly connected to therapies he aggresively advocates and promotes, his self-interest and all his judgements and affirmations absolutely should be scrutinized or at the very least questioned. That simply comes w/ the territory. And in reality that sort of practice can hurt someone ($). Perhaps I'm stating the obvious, and we're all educated and discerning enough to weed through the overgrowth. My personal experience suggests otherwise. My other criticism was simply whenever I see conclusions offered on very limited cited data, and that conclusion is not qualified in any manner at all, I find that irresponsible coming from an MD or any other technically inclined professional individual whose conclusions carries a certain weight (i.e. someone with a web site). Someone else, w/o the training etc., doing similar could be excused. Nothing wrong w/ putting out information. It should though be put into some degree of relative context, and if he doesn't do it, then maybe soneone else should. It's really more professional than personal, though I obviously failed to deliver in that respect. I appreciate that POV. jeff ----Original Message Follows---- From: " elfmarge " <Elfmarge@...> rheumatic Subject: rheumatic Re: Multiple sclerosis from Dr. Joe Mercola Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 13:55:02 -0000 , I think you overstepped your bounds a bit here. If I had MS, I would be glad to read ANYTHING that may help me. I read it all and make my own decision. We need not be judgemental. This post hurt no one. It is purely informational. Having been in a tough situation more than once, I was surpired to see you post in this fashion.JMO Marge > Forgive my snottiness but... > I have this sense that given time Mercola could find a mercury connection > for every disease under the sun. And his ability to draw conclusions on the > basis of one or two studies is always so interesting - quite a talent. > Surprising in this case that he doesn't take the time to hawk one of his > life-affirming supplements to followup his conclusions. Maybe I should > finish by saying something nice....his brash decisiveness mixed w/ candor > for an md is refreshing. > jeff > > O^P Message Follows---- > From: Adlard <cadlard@c...> > rheumatic > Subject: rheumatic Multiple sclerosis from Dr. Joe Mercola > Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 22:35:02 +0930 > > Multiple Sclerosis and Epstein-Barr Virus > > German researchers have demonstrated that there may be an association > between the Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) reactivation and disease activity > in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients over time. > > 108 MS patients and 163 controls were assessed for the prevalence of > antibodies against herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), HSV-2, EBV, and > cytomegalovirus (CMV). > > In contrast to the control populations, antibodies against EBV were > present in 100% of MS patients. > > There was no significant differences between the groups for the other > viruses. > 19 of the MS patients were then followed monthly for 1 year, measuring > active viral replication and it was noted that viral reactivation was > seen in 72.7% of patients with exacerbations of their MS symptoms. > > The authors suggest that EBV might play an indirect role in MS as an > activator of the underlying disease process. This could therefore, have > some clinical significance in the treatment of this difficult condion. > > Neurology July 25, 2000; 55:178-84 > > DR. MERCOLA'S COMMENT: MS is a very challenging problem to treat. There > are no simple solutions. Usually mercury is a complicating factor. The > mercury tends to impair the immune system and allow infections like > Epstein Barr worsen the problem. > > Following a good diet is of course also key. Elimination of milk and > dairy is critical. Studies have shown that cow's milk consumption is > correlated with MS prevalence (Neuroepidemiology 1992;11:304-12, > Neuroepidemiology 1993;12:15-27). > > Collection of data from the autonomic nervous system is one of the most > sophisticated approaches that I am aware of to learn what the > underlying reasons for the cause of MS. Here are some other avenues > that might be useful as well: > > 1. Vitamin D Deficiency - MS much more common in individuals with lower > vitamin D levels and in countries where people get less sunlight > exposure. A previous article in the newsletter showed a positive effect > of sunlight exposure on MS. Maybe correcting a vitamin D deficiency can > halt progression? > > 2. Calcium AEP - Although I don't know of any good studies on it, the > late Dr. Nieper in Germany used it extensively in his clinic and Dr. > Atkins in New York City claims that 85% of his patients get > positive results from it. Although there is an oral form available, > most physicians use an IV administration. I have not tried it yet but > might enter a clinical investigation with it in the near future. > > 3. Electromagnetic Stimulation of the Pineal Gland - There is a Dr. > Reuven Sandyk in the NYC area who uses AC pulsed electromagnetic fields > to stimulate the pineal gland and he seems to get some very good > results, although the treatment is very expensive and must be done > long-term. Due to the prohibitively expensive equipment, Dr. Sandyk's > clinic is probably the only place to receive this treatment. > > 4. Alpha Lipoic Acid - A study from the Netherlands showed that Lipoic > acid is a non-specific scavenger of Reactive Oxygen Species and > decreased the phagocytosis of myelin by macrophages. Free radicals > appear to play a regulatory role in the destruction of myelin (Journal > of Neuroimmunology 1998 Dec 1;92:67-75) > > 5. Progesterone - Progesterone has actually been shown in animal > studies to promote the formation of new myelin sheaths (Human > Reproduction 2000 Jun;15 Suppl 1:1-13, J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1999 > Apr-Jun;69:97-107, Mult Scler 1997 Apr;3:105-12). I am not aware of any > clinicians using progesterone the treat MS patients, but if any of my > readers have any additional information on this, please e-mail me. > > Related Articles: > > HERPES VIRUS MAY TRIGGER MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS > > Sunlight Exposure Beneficial In Multiple Sclerosis > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2003 Report Share Posted June 28, 2003 I'm neither a fan nor detractor of Mercola, but the effect of Hg on humans is very, very hard to overstate. Where it is present, the system suffers multiple cascading failures of every system with which it has contact, and it is considered impossible to chelate by allopaths. Some alternative practitioners point to cilantro as a potential chelator of Hg, and other possibilities as well, but all-in-all nothing seems to have caught on well enough to find widespread following. Geoff soli Deo gloria www.HealingYou.org - Your nonprofit source for remedies and aids in fighting these diseases, information on weaning from drugs, and nutritional kits for repairing adrenal damage; 100% volunteer staffed. (Courtesy: Captain Cook's www.800-800-cruise.com) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2003 Report Share Posted June 29, 2003 Geoff, I thought the main point of chelation therapy was to remove heavy metals, especially mercury, from the body, so I am confused by your statements that it is considered impossible to chelate! Can you elaborate? What, then, is the purpose of chelation? Thanks, Geoff wrote: > I'm neither a fan nor detractor of Mercola, but the effect of Hg on humans > is very, very hard to overstate. Where it is present, the system suffers > multiple cascading failures of every system with which it has contact, and > it is considered impossible to chelate by allopaths. Some alternative > practitioners point to cilantro as a potential chelator of Hg, and other > possibilities as well, but all-in-all nothing seems to have caught on well > enough to find widespread following. > > Geoff > soli Deo gloria > > www.HealingYou.org - Your nonprofit source for remedies and aids in > fighting > these diseases, information on weaning from drugs, and nutritional > kits for > repairing adrenal damage; 100% volunteer staffed. > > (Courtesy: Captain Cook's www.800-800-cruise.com) > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2003 Report Share Posted June 29, 2003 , You wrote: " I thought the main point of chelation therapy was to remove heavy metals, especially mercury, from the body, so I am confused by your statements that it is considered impossible to chelate! Can you elaborate? What, then, is the purpose of chelation? " IV chelation is recognized by the AMA for the removal of lead. It is often used by alternative practitioners with EDTA to prevent and repair blocked veins and arteries. It is commonly used in Europe with EDTA as a first-line treatment for circulatory issues. Other substances are also used in IV chelation. Hg acts and is stored differently than lead and other metals. I personally spoke to the leading researcher on Hg last year while I was searching for a means of chelating it in regard to the possibility of its being involved in autism. I believe he was at the University of Missouri but I am not certain about that, his specialty was Hg specifically, and large-scale environmental disturbances secondarily. According to him, it is considered the most dangerous and deadly of the heavy metals and it flatly cannot be removed from complex biologics (humans,) his comments parroting conventional allopathic reasoning. I don't recall the fellow's name; without the information I needed it was irrelevant. I have since found that Homeopaths and other alternative practitioners do not consider Hg so stable that it cannot be removed. The real issue with Hg is not its lethality, but at what level damage goes beyond the body's natural ability to overcome and repair the effects. This is the debate to which, I believe, Jeff intoned when he commented on Mercola's comments, and the question is certainly valid. The far end of it is trying to establish levels for adults, infants, etc. Many people mistakenly see infants and children as " little " adults, an emotional/political viewpoint imbuing them with " rights " absent " responsibility. " While that perspective may be appropriate political fodder, it is factually wrong when it comes to physiology and this raises serious issues with Hg levels as the levels of tolerance in infants may well be nil, while some level in the PPB or PPT range for adults may be appropriate. Geoff soli Deo gloria www.HealingYou.org - Your nonprofit source for remedies and aids in fighting these diseases, information on weaning from drugs, and nutritional kits for repairing adrenal damage; 100% volunteer staffed. (Courtesy: Captain Cook's www.800-800-cruise.com) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2003 Report Share Posted June 29, 2003 " The real issue with Hg is not its lethality, but at what level damage goes beyond the body's natural ability to overcome and repair the effects. " Geoff you captured it much better than me - this is exactly what I was trying to get across. Information is great, but its true usefullness is proportional to its context. That threshold you alluded to remains a mystery at this time, and this fact should be considered, especially by a trained physician who may specialize in unqualified and weakly supported pronouncements. I could maybe overlook such flagrant lapses, as the world is full of misleading and/or incomplete assertions - I'm sure I've made a few, its just that mine don't help to generate income. Regarding that threshold, a similar quandary exists for radiation - at what level is radiation relatively " safe? " Likewise, nobody can say. Yet the body continually repairs genetic damage done by UV radiation. Maybe the body " learned " how to do this from the constant bombardment over time. Maybe heavy metal assault (not the music) is relatively much more of a recent occurrence, and the body cannot yet adapt. Given this maybe Hg toxicity is truly underappreciated. Again, who knows? This is my point - the jury is still out. So the context does become very important. It's worth considering when assessing what to do (and what to buy) in order to protect ourselves in the midst of this perpetual barage of toxins. jeff ----Original Message Follows---- From: " Geoff " <geoff@...> " " <pinto@...> CC: <rheumatic > Subject: rheumatic Re: Multiple sclerosis from Dr. Joe Mercola Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 10:05:13 -0700 , You wrote: " I thought the main point of chelation therapy was to remove heavy metals, especially mercury, from the body, so I am confused by your statements that it is considered impossible to chelate! Can you elaborate? What, then, is the purpose of chelation? " IV chelation is recognized by the AMA for the removal of lead. It is often used by alternative practitioners with EDTA to prevent and repair blocked veins and arteries. It is commonly used in Europe with EDTA as a first-line treatment for circulatory issues. Other substances are also used in IV chelation. Hg acts and is stored differently than lead and other metals. I personally spoke to the leading researcher on Hg last year while I was searching for a means of chelating it in regard to the possibility of its being involved in autism. I believe he was at the University of Missouri but I am not certain about that, his specialty was Hg specifically, and large-scale environmental disturbances secondarily. According to him, it is considered the most dangerous and deadly of the heavy metals and it flatly cannot be removed from complex biologics (humans,) his comments parroting conventional allopathic reasoning. I don't recall the fellow's name; without the information I needed it was irrelevant. I have since found that Homeopaths and other alternative practitioners do not consider Hg so stable that it cannot be removed. The real issue with Hg is not its lethality, but at what level damage goes beyond the body's natural ability to overcome and repair the effects. This is the debate to which, I believe, Jeff intoned when he commented on Mercola's comments, and the question is certainly valid. The far end of it is trying to establish levels for adults, infants, etc. Many people mistakenly see infants and children as " little " adults, an emotional/political viewpoint imbuing them with " rights " absent " responsibility. " While that perspective may be appropriate political fodder, it is factually wrong when it comes to physiology and this raises serious issues with Hg levels as the levels of tolerance in infants may well be nil, while some level in the PPB or PPT range for adults may be appropriate. Geoff soli Deo gloria www.HealingYou.org - Your nonprofit source for remedies and aids in fighting these diseases, information on weaning from drugs, and nutritional kits for repairing adrenal damage; 100% volunteer staffed. (Courtesy: Captain Cook's www.800-800-cruise.com) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 30, 2003 Report Share Posted June 30, 2003 Goeff and Jeff, I understand exactly what you mean.However, i know too many meds are " pushed " on pts too, many with harmful dside effects that are not usualy fully disclosed. I find that appealling too. Pick your balttle I guess but I did all the traditioal route and got really ill. I have been using alternative medicine for quite awhile and these folks have more understanding. I think it is important to note we all need to take full respnsobility for the treatments we choose. I did not do this till 1996 and now i am happy to have it all presented. I read it all and then do my own research ..then make a decision. I no longer strut alongside of what the medical community CHOOSES to make known to us. There is a lot out there..maybe a little offbeat but if I am getting better with fewer side efetcs..I feel this is important too. I have an internist who knows I research and know I do these alternative things and has said I am better for it. To me, it helps the AP work more optimally! Marge > " I thought the main point of chelation therapy was to remove heavy metals, > especially mercury, from the body, so I am confused by your statements that > it is considered impossible to chelate! Can you elaborate? What, then, is > the purpose of chelation? " > > IV chelation is recognized by the AMA for the removal of lead. It is often > used by alternative practitioners with EDTA to prevent and repair blocked > veins and arteries. It is commonly used in Europe with EDTA as a first-line > treatment for circulatory issues. Other substances are also used in IV > chelation. > > Hg acts and is stored differently than lead and other metals. I personally > spoke to the leading researcher on Hg last year while I was searching for a > means of chelating it in regard to the possibility of its being involved in > autism. I believe he was at the University of Missouri but I am not certain > about that, his specialty was Hg specifically, and large-scale environmental > disturbances secondarily. According to him, it is considered the most > dangerous and deadly of the heavy metals and it flatly cannot be removed > from complex biologics (humans,) his comments parroting conventional > allopathic reasoning. I don't recall the fellow's name; without the > information I needed it was irrelevant. I have since found that Homeopaths > and other alternative practitioners do not consider Hg so stable that it > cannot be removed. > > The real issue with Hg is not its lethality, but at what level damage goes > beyond the body's natural ability to overcome and repair the effects. This > is the debate to which, I believe, Jeff intoned when he commented on > Mercola's comments, and the question is certainly valid. The far end of it > is trying to establish levels for adults, infants, etc. Many people > mistakenly see infants and children as " little " adults, an > emotional/political viewpoint imbuing them with " rights " absent > " responsibility. " While that perspective may be appropriate political > fodder, it is factually wrong when it comes to physiology and this raises > serious issues with Hg levels as the levels of tolerance in infants may well > be nil, while some level in the PPB or PPT range for adults may be > appropriate. > > Geoff > soli Deo gloria > > www.HealingYou.org - Your nonprofit source for remedies and aids in fighting > these diseases, information on weaning from drugs, and nutritional kits for > repairing adrenal damage; 100% volunteer staffed. > > (Courtesy: Captain Cook's www.800-800-cruise.com) > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 30, 2003 Report Share Posted June 30, 2003 Marge, " Geoff and Jeff " - sounds like one of those morning radio shows. I agree with your comments. I'd only add that those who supply the info need to be held to high standards, since eventually you only get what you consistently demand. And call me cynical, but those who conspicuously profit from the information they supply are not quite on the same plane as those who don't. jeff ----Original Message Follows---- From: " elfmarge " <Elfmarge@...> rheumatic Subject: rheumatic Re: Multiple sclerosis from Dr. Joe Mercola Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 16:31:03 -0000 Goeff and Jeff, I understand exactly what you mean.However, i know too many meds are " pushed " on pts too, many with harmful dside effects that are not usualy fully disclosed. I find that appealling too. Pick your balttle I guess but I did all the traditioal route and got really ill. I have been using alternative medicine for quite awhile and these folks have more understanding. I think it is important to note we all need to take full respnsobility for the treatments we choose. I did not do this till 1996 and now i am happy to have it all presented. I read it all and then do my own research ..then make a decision. I no longer strut alongside of what the medical community CHOOSES to make known to us. There is a lot out there..maybe a little offbeat but if I am getting better with fewer side efetcs..I feel this is important too. I have an internist who knows I research and know I do these alternative things and has said I am better for it. To me, it helps the AP work more optimally! Marge > " I thought the main point of chelation therapy was to remove heavy metals, > especially mercury, from the body, so I am confused by your statements that > it is considered impossible to chelate! Can you elaborate? What, then, is > the purpose of chelation? " > > IV chelation is recognized by the AMA for the removal of lead. It is often > used by alternative practitioners with EDTA to prevent and repair blocked > veins and arteries. It is commonly used in Europe with EDTA as a first-line > treatment for circulatory issues. Other substances are also used in IV > chelation. > > Hg acts and is stored differently than lead and other metals. I personally > spoke to the leading researcher on Hg last year while I was searching for a > means of chelating it in regard to the possibility of its being involved in > autism. I believe he was at the University of Missouri but I am not certain > about that, his specialty was Hg specifically, and large-scale environmental > disturbances secondarily. According to him, it is considered the most > dangerous and deadly of the heavy metals and it flatly cannot be removed > from complex biologics (humans,) his comments parroting conventional > allopathic reasoning. I don't recall the fellow's name; without the > information I needed it was irrelevant. I have since found that Homeopaths > and other alternative practitioners do not consider Hg so stable that it > cannot be removed. > > The real issue with Hg is not its lethality, but at what level damage goes > beyond the body's natural ability to overcome and repair the effects. This > is the debate to which, I believe, Jeff intoned when he commented on > Mercola's comments, and the question is certainly valid. The far end of it > is trying to establish levels for adults, infants, etc. Many people > mistakenly see infants and children as " little " adults, an > emotional/political viewpoint imbuing them with " rights " absent > " responsibility. " While that perspective may be appropriate political > fodder, it is factually wrong when it comes to physiology and this raises > serious issues with Hg levels as the levels of tolerance in infants may well > be nil, while some level in the PPB or PPT range for adults may be > appropriate. > > Geoff > soli Deo gloria > > www.HealingYou.org - Your nonprofit source for remedies and aids in fighting > these diseases, information on weaning from drugs, and nutritional kits for > repairing adrenal damage; 100% volunteer staffed. > > (Courtesy: Captain Cook's www.800-800-cruise.com) > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 1, 2003 Report Share Posted July 1, 2003 CORRECTION: Hg I just found a note I wrote in June '01 after speaking to the researcher I mentioned in this thread. I think it important to note his perspective of " peer reviewed literature. " " Peer reviewed literature " can be quite misleading depending on the " peers " doing the " reviewing " and to which " peer " group one either subscribes or ascribes authority. For example, Homeopaths invented the PCDBS (placebo-controlled double-blind study) and used that method to populate their Materia Medica. But since the late 1800's when they were losing their business and influence to Homeopaths, Allopaths, with their formation of the AMA, have ceaselessly attacked Homeopathy as nonsense. It is ironic that they have so effectively sold PCDBS as the " only " valid method of knowing what a drug does or does not do, while still decrying Homeopathy as chicanery meant to trick people into placebo healing states. If the " peers " doing the reviewing are not real " peers " the perspective is going to be skewed and may be altogether nonsense. That said, he was at the University of Kentucky, not Missouri; here is a reprint of the essential portions of that post: --- From 06/02/01 --- (Gail wrote:) > BUT! I just deleted a message from Austin's mother talking > about the mercury levels after Hepatitis B injections and a > penny dropped! I am a teacher and worked in an area where > there was a high risk of Hepatitis (kids occasionally bite > teachers!). So the Health dept gave free shots to teachers > in some areas. I got my RA not immediately but within 2 years. > > WHo knows? Not me. There is speculation that some outward reactions, like RA, can be quite delayed. There appears to be evidence supporting the theory, but not enough to say absolutely yes / no. I wish I knew more. I just finished corresponding with a research scientist at the University of Kentucky about chelating Hg (mercury) which is a big concern for me. They do an extensive amount of work on Hg. Here is what he said: " I hate to say it, but at this time there is no none (sic) supplement or even drug for the removal of mercury from the human body. Occasionally, you may read that there may be some type of chelator for Hg in the body, but to the best of my peer reviewed literature searches, I have never seen a known and accredited " cure " . The only known biological mercury binding protein is found in bacteria (mer P). We preform (sic) a significant amount of research on the element, but nearly all is involved in the environmental area. Aside from detection from saliva, blood, and urine, we don't work much with biological systems. The hope of the research is to utilize synthetic compounds to immobilize mercury before it impacts humans. You may run across web sites and advertisements which claim to remove Hg from the body, but I would not put any faith into it even under desperate conditions. The major problem is the possibility of attacking other vital metals in the body such as iron. Designing chelators to attack only a specific metal is nearly impossible. For systems where only one metal is a problem makes the work easy, but unfortunately the human body is no that straight forward. I wish I could tell you that there does exist a biological protein for humans like the merP, but unfortunately there is not, but I guess this is why mercury is considered the most toxic metal know to mankind. I am not sure the extent of your daughters Hg poisoning (if this is indeed the fact), but I would highly avoid materials that would increase the biological accumulation. Probably the greatest area to avoid are mercury amalgams which are used in teeth to fill where cavities once were. Always request and demand a polymer resin be used instead. This is a huge area of debate, but I promise you that the fillings do leach and can lead to a serious problem years down the road. " And they use mercury in most of the vaccines... this is just too ugly. --- END --- Note of particular consequence his final comment: " ...the fillings do leach and can lead to a serious problem years down the road. " Geoff soli Deo gloria www.HealingYou.org - Your nonprofit source for remedies and aids in fighting these diseases, information on weaning from drugs, and nutritional kits for repairing adrenal damage; 100% volunteer staffed. (Courtesy: Captain Cook's www.800-800-cruise.com) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.