Guest guest Posted June 19, 2004 Report Share Posted June 19, 2004 Tina - The same thing happened to me. I had Zachary on a gluten free diet for about 4 weeks when I realized he probably had celiac disease. I got the soonest appointment I could with a gastroenterologist and they did draw blood which showed elevated IgA and IgG antibodies to gluten. However, it was too late to do a biopsy which is the only way to get the celiac diagnosis at this time. I was told I would have to add gluten back to Zach's diet for 2 months in order to do the biopsy and get a diagnosis. As desperately as I wanted an answer at the time, there is no way I would consider this. The good news is that now that they know that celiac disease is not rare, there is lots of research going on and one of the things that they are looking for is other ways to diagnosis celiac disease rather than an invasive biopsy. I am hoping they will find a way to diagnose people who have been off gluten for a significant amount of time. Good luck. Zachary 4.9 SCD 9 months Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 19, 2004 Report Share Posted June 19, 2004 " I guess I am wondering if they will be able to tell if Abraham actually has celiac or not. " Be prepared that the doctor may ask to give him gluten for a day. Not sure about this, just something that stuck in my mind. Marjan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 19, 2004 Report Share Posted June 19, 2004 > I am really thinking that my son has celiac from all the symptoms and > things I have been reading, plus the fact that he is extremely gluten > sensitive and has inflammation in his intestines according to a > test. To be honest, it doesn't really matter. If he is gluten sensative or celiac, the end result is the same, he needs to be on a GF diet for his WHOLE life. There are blood tests that can be done and in fact are considered better than biopsy. Biopsy has a greater chance of false negative. Many doctors consider the gluten challenge to be a valid diagnositc tool. This involves being on the GF diet for a couple weeks, then having a gluten-filled day. Watch for symptoms. This is enough to diagnose gluten intolerance. Celiac disease is just gluten intolerance that has been left untreated for an extended length of time so that severe damage has been done. I was diagnosed with the gluten challenge back before the blood tests were done. Neither my doctor or I felt the need for any further invasive testing. My son was diagnosed with blood tests at 14 months. Andre and Liam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 19, 2004 Report Share Posted June 19, 2004 I just now finished Elaines book - am I confused, or can this diet actually cure celiac? She states that there is much debate as to whether or not gluten allergy is a cause or a symptoms of celiac. So, based on patients who followed the diet strictly for a year, most had complete reversal of symptoms and were able to slowly go back to a normal diet, since the gut was healed and the bacteria returned to a healthy state. Am I missing something? Isn't this the point of doing the diet for celiacs? Robbie Re: Celiac Question > I am really thinking that my son has celiac from all the symptoms and > things I have been reading, plus the fact that he is extremely gluten > sensitive and has inflammation in his intestines according to a > test. To be honest, it doesn't really matter. If he is gluten sensative or celiac, the end result is the same, he needs to be on a GF diet for his WHOLE life. There are blood tests that can be done and in fact are considered better than biopsy. Biopsy has a greater chance of false negative. Many doctors consider the gluten challenge to be a valid diagnositc tool. This involves being on the GF diet for a couple weeks, then having a gluten-filled day. Watch for symptoms. This is enough to diagnose gluten intolerance. Celiac disease is just gluten intolerance that has been left untreated for an extended length of time so that severe damage has been done. I was diagnosed with the gluten challenge back before the blood tests were done. Neither my doctor or I felt the need for any further invasive testing. My son was diagnosed with blood tests at 14 months. Andre and Liam For information on the Specific Carbohydrate Diet, please read the book _Breaking the Vicious Cycle_ by Elaine Gottschall and read the following websites: http://www.breakingtheviciouscycle.info and http://www.pecanbread.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 20, 2004 Report Share Posted June 20, 2004 I for one don't care about taking back foods or being cured, just controlling my celiac and being functional. Before SCD everything I ate gave me pain. After three years I have taken the very occasional piece of conventional cheesecake without consequence but it seems too sweet. I had a needed and large weight loss prior to starting SCD and I maintain a normal weight effortlessly with SCD. it rends to be self regulating. i still do have flares but they subside.To me this is like diabetes in a way. i can live with it and cope with it but could not before SCD. Carol F. This is great info. I have been in touch with a gal a couple of times that has a little baby dianosed with celiac. It was heartbreaking to talk with her - he's improved a lot GF but still has problems. I wanted to communiate the SCD diet to her, but I definitely don't want to give her erronious info. Thank you all for the input! Robbie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2004 Report Share Posted July 15, 2004 Hi Helen, Elaine believes that the tests for celiac are not reliable. Here is her article about celiac: http://www.scdiet.org/7archives/scdceli1.html How about trying SCD for a month instead of testing? Mimi >My question is how > will the doctor test for DH, Celiac, even asymptomatic? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2004 Report Share Posted July 15, 2004 Mimi, Thanks for the article. The problem is that my youngest only shows signs of rash on the back of his leg - no other discomfort that I know of. My daughter is feeling fine so I don't know if there is internal damage going on or not. Pretty much we have a healthy diet, probably more dairy for them than necessary, but much less than before and surely less than the average population. I hate to make so many foods completely off bounds to them if they can in fact digest it and I can't see how one month SCD will really show me anything different, since I don't see much now. Does that make sence? I scanned the article and I will read it more thouroughly tonight. Thanks Helen, mom to three > Hi Helen, > > Elaine believes that the tests for celiac are not reliable. Here is > her article about celiac: > http://www.scdiet.org/7archives/scdceli1.html > > How about trying SCD for a month instead of testing? > > Mimi > > >My question is how > > will the doctor test for DH, Celiac, even asymptomatic? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 16, 2004 Report Share Posted July 16, 2004 Helen, I am not really sure what tests would be helpful. Maybe other list members might know. The Great Smokies Comprehensive Stool Analysis Test does measure malabsorption. I wonder what is the best test for carbohydrate malabsorption? It would be great if this list would have the answer to this question. Maybe patients of Dr Buie could give us the answer since Dr Buie tests for that. Mimi > Mimi, > Thanks for the article. The problem is that my youngest only shows > signs of rash on the back of his leg - no other discomfort that I > know of. My daughter is feeling fine so I don't know if there is > internal damage going on or not. Pretty much we have a healthy diet, > probably more dairy for them than necessary, but much less than > before and surely less than the average population. I hate to make > so many foods completely off bounds to them if they can in fact > digest it and I can't see how one month SCD will really show me > anything different, since I don't see much now. Does that make > sence? I scanned the article and I will read it more thouroughly > tonight. > Thanks > Helen, mom to three > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 16, 2004 Report Share Posted July 16, 2004 Excema is a sure sign of allergy. If, indeed, he is gluten sensitive, scd would get rid of that rash really quickly. I've been dealing with those patchy excema rashes for a long time and they don't last long after the offending food is gone. You might see other profound things after going on the diet that you might not even see as a problem - I have a strange thing with my younger son - he is not autistic but he is not verbal at all. 2wks into the diet and he's all of a sudden interested in language, he's trying to learn words and is using sign language to communicate. This may be a huge coincidence, but I still wonder. So I don't know - it is hard, but just to see my kids loving fruits and veggies and wanting to snack on them (my older son asked for green beans for breakfast - go figure) is just thrilling in and of itself. Standard medical tests for celiac include a blood test to look for antibodies and a biopsy. My youger son has obvious signs of gluten intolerance so I've opted to just put him on the diet and not have him subject to the procedure. Later on I may try and get the confirmed dx, but he's only 15 mos old and since my older son is on scd, it's just easy for me to put him on, too. Robbie scd 4wks Re: celiac question Mimi, Thanks for the article. The problem is that my youngest only shows signs of rash on the back of his leg - no other discomfort that I know of. My daughter is feeling fine so I don't know if there is internal damage going on or not. Pretty much we have a healthy diet, probably more dairy for them than necessary, but much less than before and surely less than the average population. I hate to make so many foods completely off bounds to them if they can in fact digest it and I can't see how one month SCD will really show me anything different, since I don't see much now. Does that make sence? I scanned the article and I will read it more thouroughly tonight. Thanks Helen, mom to three > Hi Helen, > > Elaine believes that the tests for celiac are not reliable. Here is > her article about celiac: > http://www.scdiet.org/7archives/scdceli1.html > > How about trying SCD for a month instead of testing? > > Mimi > > >My question is how > > will the doctor test for DH, Celiac, even asymptomatic? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.