Guest guest Posted December 13, 2000 Report Share Posted December 13, 2000 This might be old news to you guys, but it got a rise out of one of the AA stalwarts when I posted it on Delphi. Honestly, I don't know why -- they could just say that Furlong was violating AA principles, which is clearly the case. I guess they want to preserve the illusion that there's some kind of magical mechanism that prevents one AA member from violating another's anonymity. http://www.salon.com/people/col/reit/2000/12/08/npfri/index.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.