Guest guest Posted December 12, 2000 Report Share Posted December 12, 2000 I have heard that there is some convincing evidence that AA (12-step) involvement not only is ineffective but that it actually creates dependence patterns that cause those who return to drinking to be waaay worse then they ever were before the steps. Does anybody out there have any stats on how much more severe the drinking of a former stepper is than that of anybody who tried to quite through non-XA methods? I guess it's kind of like being told you have a brain tumor. The Dr. says that if they operate there's only a 1 in 20 chance that the operation will work. (those are AA's " success " stats, I believe) The Dr. continues to explain " if you don't do anything at all, you will probably experience some deterioration in your mental and physical capacities over time and ultimately the tumor will take some years off of your life. You will, however have a few more good years. If you take the operation, with the 1 in 20 chance, and it doesn't work, your condition will rapidly decline and you may be dead within a year. " Who in their right mind would risk the operation? I think this is a fairly good analogy of the danger of AA. Not just " try it for a while, if it doesn't work, quit. " There's some actual psychic damage being inflicted here. I want to find out the actual magnitude of accelerated decline that the stepper who returns to drinking faces, vs the person who tries to quit on their own. Thanks, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.