Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: When to start

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Hi ,

You may want to look in the files section (the box on the left)

under Andy Index to find out more specifics about chelating and the

supplements. It's got some great information. If I remember

correctly, it seems to mention that you should be on the supplements

for at least a couple of weeks before starting chelation. You also

want to start the supplements one at a time so that you know what

your child is reacting to, meaning if you introduced a new

supplement three days ago and your child's behavior is really off,

then you can suspect the supplement and take it away to see if the

off behavior goes away. If I remember correctly, Vitamin C, Vitamin

E, magnesium and zinc are very important to take before chelating.

That's about all I can remember right now, but the files will tell

you so much more. Happy reading and take care, Becky in Chesapeake,

VA

P.S. I like your answer to another member in another group you

happen to be in, but you may want to know that that particular

member is on the autism spectrum, so going back and forth in replies

would not help much.

> I got my shipment from Kirkman's of ALA (and other supplements).

I

> was planning to start chelating my son today. I really want to

get a

> couple rounds in before school starts. Earlier today my son got

sick

> (vomiting). I think it is a 24 hour flu since my other son had it

> yesterday but fine today. How long should I wait before I start

> chelation? Could I start next week?

> Maybe it is better this way so I can start him on supplements

first

> then chelating a week later. That way if there is any reaction I

can

> pinpoint it better.

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for your suggestions. My son has already been on zinc,

magnesium, calcium, Vitamin C and TMG for over a year. I recently

got Milk Thistle since I have read it is helpful to protect the liver

but have not yet tried it. I also just got the EFA powder from

Kirkman's which I have yet to try. I have tried flax seed oil before

and could not get him to take it. I have never tried cod liver oil

since he is allergic to fish. I will probably try the EFA first then

the milk thistle before starting chelation.

> > I got my shipment from Kirkman's of ALA (and other supplements).

> I

> > was planning to start chelating my son today. I really want to

> get a

> > couple rounds in before school starts. Earlier today my son got

> sick

> > (vomiting). I think it is a 24 hour flu since my other son had

it

> > yesterday but fine today. How long should I wait before I start

> > chelation? Could I start next week?

> > Maybe it is better this way so I can start him on supplements

> first

> > then chelating a week later. That way if there is any reaction I

> can

> > pinpoint it better.

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi and welcome to the group!

My advice? Do NOT do hep treatment while on chemo. In fact, you may not be

able to do hep treatment at all. A lot depends on what kind of cancer and

treatment you had.

I say this because ribavirin is a carcinogen (cancer causing agent). I have

heard some doctors say they will not treat with riba too soon to a patient

having undergone certain cancer treatment or having cancer.

Chemo doesn't make you feel good. Hep treatment won't make you feel good

either. No reason to make you feel worse.

Also, if you insist on doing hep treatment, I'd wait at least a year after the

chemo to do the hep treatment so that the chemo has a chance to flush out of

your system. I just talked to one lady who did her chemo several years ago and

was put in the hospital the other day because her body had just accumulated so

much chemo and it wore down her immune system so much, that she just collapsed.

Hep C is usually a slow moving disease. What determines whether you need

treatment, for the most part, is your liver biopsy.

<<I have a feeling that the viral load will be

exponentially worse in two months and hence harder to clear. >>

Viral loads fluctuate. And the viral load really is no indicator of your

illness. Flushing the chemo out of your body will go a long long way in

allowing your body to return to normal, and will probably (I say probably

because I'm no doctor) return your liver enzymes to a reasonable level. (Liver

enzymes also fluctuate, often due to the medications we take like chemo, or even

aspirin.)

I finished high dose interferon treatment (the standard treatment) for malignant

melanoma in Dec 2002. I most likely will NEVER do ribavirin again, EVER.

Melanoma is just too risky. That's why I say a lot depends on your cancer and

your meds. While I was on the high dose interferon, my liver enzymes rose.

They returned to normal when I finished. I'm still flushing the crap from my

body and trying to get my energy back.

I did a year of standard hep c treatment before I did the high dose interferon,

neither of which eliminated the virus (I'm genotype 1b).

Fortunately, my liver biopsy is good, mild inflamation, so I'll probably never

have to worry about a liver transplant in this lifetime. I still have to take

care of myself, get biopsys, labs etc.

So my advice would be a big not only NO but HELL NO. Chemo and the hep

treatment are serious drugs and they can seriously mess you up. Flush the chemo

from your system some before remedicating it again.

Get a liver biopsy and see if you even need treatment.

Nice to meet you!

Alley

Grand Prairie, Tx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to the group!

My advice? Do NOT do hep treatment while on chemo. In fact, you may not be

able to do hep treatment at all. A lot depends on what kind of cancer and

treatment you had.

I say this because ribavirin is a carcinogen (cancer causing agent). I have

heard some doctors say they will not treat with riba too soon to a patient

having undergone certain cancer treatment or having cancer.

Chemo doesn't make you feel good. Hep treatment won't make you feel good

either. No reason to make you feel worse.

Also, if you insist on doing hep treatment, I'd wait at least a year after the

chemo to do the hep treatment so that the chemo has a chance to flush out of

your system. I just talked to one lady who did her chemo several years ago and

was put in the hospital the other day because her body had just accumulated so

much chemo and it wore down her immune system so much, that she just collapsed.

Hep C is usually a slow moving disease. What determines whether you need

treatment, for the most part, is your liver biopsy.

<<I have a feeling that the viral load will be

exponentially worse in two months and hence harder to clear. >>

Viral loads fluctuate. And the viral load really is no indicator of your

illness. Flushing the chemo out of your body will go a long long way in

allowing your body to return to normal, and will probably (I say probably

because I'm no doctor) return your liver enzymes to a reasonable level. (Liver

enzymes also fluctuate, often due to the medications we take like chemo, or even

aspirin.)

I finished high dose interferon treatment (the standard treatment) for malignant

melanoma in Dec 2002. I most likely will NEVER do ribavirin again, EVER.

Melanoma is just too risky. That's why I say a lot depends on your cancer and

your meds. While I was on the high dose interferon, my liver enzymes rose.

They returned to normal when I finished. I'm still flushing the crap from my

body and trying to get my energy back.

I did a year of standard hep c treatment before I did the high dose interferon,

neither of which eliminated the virus (I'm genotype 1b).

Fortunately, my liver biopsy is good, mild inflamation, so I'll probably never

have to worry about a liver transplant in this lifetime. I still have to take

care of myself, get biopsys, labs etc.

So my advice would be a big not only NO but HELL NO. Chemo and the hep

treatment are serious drugs and they can seriously mess you up. Flush the chemo

from your system some before remedicating it again.

Get a liver biopsy and see if you even need treatment.

Nice to meet you!

Alley

Grand Prairie, Tx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IH.Welcome to the group.This is a question for the Doc.,we have a Doc. on the

group.If I were you (my personal opinion!!)I would wait untill the chemo is

finished,three months more would.nt make much differents.. You should ask for a

biopsy,ALT and AST levels are no indication of the state of your liver.If you

mean by standard treatment interferon and ribavarine,not the pegylated

interferon,pegasys,I would not do treatment.Only do treatment with the new

Pegylated interferon from Roche .1b.s are difficult to treat with the old

standard treatment.Goodluck and you need it!.Willem.

When to start

Hi I am new to this group. I was wondering whether I should start

the standard treatment for hep C now or wait until I finish

chemotherapy for another cancer. My viral load was 14,000 when they

caught it, two months later it was 44,000 and four months later it

was 200,000. That last test was done three months ago. I finish

chemo in March. I am a genotype 1b. The level of scarring is

anywhere between a 1 - 3, with two of my doctors agreeing to accept

it at 2. My ALT and AST levels have ranged from 2 to 10 times

normal since April while on the chemo, more so on the lower end of

the scale. I have been told that I should wait until after the

chemo to begin treatment. One of the doctors told me that I had

acute and should start treatment now. The other doctors agreed that

I should wait to treat one terminal illness at a time. My question

is: I am nearing the end of the chemotherapy -- come mid march I

will be finished. I have a feeling that the viral load will be

exponentially worse in two months and hence harder to clear. I have

to get rid of this in order to be more agressive with my cancer,

which, has not grown back, but it will--it is just a matter of

time. What opinions are there for treating now vs in three months?

Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IH.Welcome to the group.This is a question for the Doc.,we have a Doc. on the

group.If I were you (my personal opinion!!)I would wait untill the chemo is

finished,three months more would.nt make much differents.. You should ask for a

biopsy,ALT and AST levels are no indication of the state of your liver.If you

mean by standard treatment interferon and ribavarine,not the pegylated

interferon,pegasys,I would not do treatment.Only do treatment with the new

Pegylated interferon from Roche .1b.s are difficult to treat with the old

standard treatment.Goodluck and you need it!.Willem.

When to start

Hi I am new to this group. I was wondering whether I should start

the standard treatment for hep C now or wait until I finish

chemotherapy for another cancer. My viral load was 14,000 when they

caught it, two months later it was 44,000 and four months later it

was 200,000. That last test was done three months ago. I finish

chemo in March. I am a genotype 1b. The level of scarring is

anywhere between a 1 - 3, with two of my doctors agreeing to accept

it at 2. My ALT and AST levels have ranged from 2 to 10 times

normal since April while on the chemo, more so on the lower end of

the scale. I have been told that I should wait until after the

chemo to begin treatment. One of the doctors told me that I had

acute and should start treatment now. The other doctors agreed that

I should wait to treat one terminal illness at a time. My question

is: I am nearing the end of the chemotherapy -- come mid march I

will be finished. I have a feeling that the viral load will be

exponentially worse in two months and hence harder to clear. I have

to get rid of this in order to be more agressive with my cancer,

which, has not grown back, but it will--it is just a matter of

time. What opinions are there for treating now vs in three months?

Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi.Misred the mail,you did have a biopsy.Willem.

When to start

Hi I am new to this group. I was wondering whether I should start

the standard treatment for hep C now or wait until I finish

chemotherapy for another cancer. My viral load was 14,000 when they

caught it, two months later it was 44,000 and four months later it

was 200,000. That last test was done three months ago. I finish

chemo in March. I am a genotype 1b. The level of scarring is

anywhere between a 1 - 3, with two of my doctors agreeing to accept

it at 2. My ALT and AST levels have ranged from 2 to 10 times

normal since April while on the chemo, more so on the lower end of

the scale. I have been told that I should wait until after the

chemo to begin treatment. One of the doctors told me that I had

acute and should start treatment now. The other doctors agreed that

I should wait to treat one terminal illness at a time. My question

is: I am nearing the end of the chemotherapy -- come mid march I

will be finished. I have a feeling that the viral load will be

exponentially worse in two months and hence harder to clear. I have

to get rid of this in order to be more agressive with my cancer,

which, has not grown back, but it will--it is just a matter of

time. What opinions are there for treating now vs in three months?

Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 1/22/2004 2:21:44 PM Eastern Standard Time,

brdietrich@... writes:

> Hi I am new to this group. I was wondering whether I should start

> the standard treatment for hep C now or wait until I finish

> chemotherapy for another cancer. My viral load was 14,000 when they

> caught it, two months later it was 44,000 and four months later it

> was 200,000. That last test was done three months ago. I finish

> chemo in March. I am a genotype 1b. The level of scarring is

> anywhere between a 1 - 3, with two of my doctors agreeing to accept

> it at 2. My ALT and AST levels have ranged from 2 to 10 times

> normal since April while on the chemo, more so on the lower end of

> the scale. I have been told that I should wait until after the

> chemo to begin treatment. One of the doctors told me that I had

> acute and should start treatment now. The other doctors agreed that

> I should wait to treat one terminal illness at a time. My question

> is: I am nearing the end of the chemotherapy -- come mid march I

> will be finished. I have a feeling that the viral load will be

> exponentially worse in two months and hence harder to clear. I have

> to get rid of this in order to be more agressive with my cancer,

> which, has not grown back, but it will--it is just a matter of

> time. What opinions are there for treating now vs in three months?

>

> Thank you

>

Given what you're going through, I wouldn't double up on treatment. Also,

the current cancer treatment is probably effecting your liver enzymes. It may

be that some of that will get better, after the current treatment is finished.

We'll be praying for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a lady friend who just finished breast cancer treatment. She knew she had

cirrhosis before the cancer. She was not allowed to do the hep c treatment and

was given the option to do Tamafloxin for the breast cancer because it's so

liver damaging. She chose not to do it.

What cancer did you have, may I ask?

Alley

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the responses. I have a primary brain tumor. They rarely

ever spread outside of the nervous system. The problem is, this is

considered a terminal cancer. I have what is called an anaplastic

astrocytoma grade III. If I follow the statistics, I may have three

to five years. My goal is to get into a clinical trial but cannot

because they found the hep C. So I am trying to get rid of the hep c

as soon as I finish the chemo on the brain. I think I really need

some good medical advice/recommendations--I followed Dr. Herrera from

the hepatitis neighborhood web site to this forum. Can you help me

to get in touch with any doctors on this list? Maybe even Dr.

Herrera?

I am not a simple case--obviously. But I do have an abudance of

faith and strength (for right now) and a willingness to try new

things.

I started the chemo for the BT in 5/02 and will finsish this March.

I think we need a definitive answer on whether the hepc interfeuron +

rib would actually hasten the return of my tumor--which is stable so

far--praise God.

As far as scarring scales and the like. Here is what my biopsy says:

FINAL DIAGNOSIS

" CHRONIC HEPATITIS C WITH MILD ACTIVITY (GRADE 2) AND PERIPORTAL

FIBROSIS (STAGE 2) "

MICROSCOPIC DESCRIPTION

LIVER (NEEDLE BIOPSY)

The sections show small pieces of benign liver tissue. Portal triads

are expanded by a chronic inflammatory cell infiltrate that focally

extends beyond the limiting plate. No significant acute inflammation

is present. No granulomata are present. No bile stasis is seen.

Within the lobules, a mild steatosis is noted. Mild lobular chronic

inflamation is also present. A few individually necrotic hapatocytes

are identified. No significatn cholestasis is seen.

Special stains for fibrous tissue (reticulin and trichrome) show

fibrous portal expansion and periportal fibrosis. A few foci are

also suspicious for bridging fibrosis, but the small size of the

tissue fragments precluds good assessment. Stainable iron is

somewhat increased, and appears localized within Kupfer cells and

hepatocytes. All control stains are appropriate.

> I have a lady friend who just finished breast cancer treatment. She

knew she had cirrhosis before the cancer. She was not allowed to do

the hep c treatment and was given the option to do Tamafloxin for the

breast cancer because it's so liver damaging. She chose not to do it.

>

> What cancer did you have, may I ask?

>

> Alley

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply. Yes, could I get a doctor's opinion on this?

I would really appreciate it.

Here is a reply I sent to another group member for easy reference:

Thanks for the responses. I have a primary brain tumor. They rarely

ever spread outside of the nervous system. The problem is, this is

considered a terminal cancer. I have what is called an anaplastic

astrocytoma grade III. If I follow the statistics, I may have three

to five years. My goal is to get into a clinical trial but cannot

because they found the hep C. So I am trying to get rid of the hep c

as soon as I finish the chemo on the brain. I think I really need

some good medical advice/recommendations--I followed Dr. Herrera from

the hepatitis neighborhood web site to this forum. Can you help me

to get in touch with any doctors on this list? Maybe even Dr.

Herrera?

I am not a simple case--obviously. But I do have an abudance of

faith and strength (for right now) and a willingness to try new

things.

I started the chemo for the BT in 5/02 and will finsish this March.

I think we need a definitive answer on whether the hepc interfeuron +

rib would actually hasten the return of my tumor--which is stable so

far--praise God.

As far as scarring scales and the like. Here is what my biopsy says:

FINAL DIAGNOSIS

" CHRONIC HEPATITIS C WITH MILD ACTIVITY (GRADE 2) AND PERIPORTAL

FIBROSIS (STAGE 2) "

MICROSCOPIC DESCRIPTION

LIVER (NEEDLE BIOPSY)

The sections show small pieces of benign liver tissue. Portal triads

are expanded by a chronic inflammatory cell infiltrate that focally

extends beyond the limiting plate. No significant acute inflammation

is present. No granulomata are present. No bile stasis is seen.

Within the lobules, a mild steatosis is noted. Mild lobular chronic

inflamation is also present. A few individually necrotic hapatocytes

are identified. No significatn cholestasis is seen.

Special stains for fibrous tissue (reticulin and trichrome) show

fibrous portal expansion and periportal fibrosis. A few foci are

also suspicious for bridging fibrosis, but the small size of the

tissue fragments precluds good assessment. Stainable iron is

somewhat increased, and appears localized within Kupfer cells and

hepatocytes. All control stains are appropriate.

> IH.Welcome to the group.This is a question for the Doc.,we have a

Doc. on the group.If I were you (my personal opinion!!)I would wait

untill the chemo is finished,three months more would.nt make much

differents.. You should ask for a biopsy,ALT and AST levels are no

indication of the state of your liver.If you mean by standard

treatment interferon and ribavarine,not the pegylated

interferon,pegasys,I would not do treatment.Only do treatment with

the new Pegylated interferon from Roche .1b.s are difficult to treat

with the old standard treatment.Goodluck and you need it!.Willem.

> When to start

>

>

> Hi I am new to this group. I was wondering whether I should

start

> the standard treatment for hep C now or wait until I finish

> chemotherapy for another cancer. My viral load was 14,000 when

they

> caught it, two months later it was 44,000 and four months later

it

> was 200,000. That last test was done three months ago. I finish

> chemo in March. I am a genotype 1b. The level of scarring is

> anywhere between a 1 - 3, with two of my doctors agreeing to

accept

> it at 2. My ALT and AST levels have ranged from 2 to 10 times

> normal since April while on the chemo, more so on the lower end

of

> the scale. I have been told that I should wait until after the

> chemo to begin treatment. One of the doctors told me that I had

> acute and should start treatment now. The other doctors agreed

that

> I should wait to treat one terminal illness at a time. My

question

> is: I am nearing the end of the chemotherapy -- come mid march I

> will be finished. I have a feeling that the viral load will be

> exponentially worse in two months and hence harder to clear. I

have

> to get rid of this in order to be more agressive with my cancer,

> which, has not grown back, but it will--it is just a matter of

> time. What opinions are there for treating now vs in three

months?

>

> Thank you

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<< I have what is called an anaplastic

astrocytoma grade III. If I follow the statistics, I may have three

to five years. My goal is to get into a clinical trial but cannot

because they found the hep C. So I am trying to get rid of the hep c >>

I don't qualify for trials either. I don't think you'll qualify for the cancer

trials even if you do get rid of the hep, cuz of the hep treatment. You need to

double check on that.

I don't qualify for cancer trials because of the hep and because of the

treatment, I don't qualify for the hep c trials because of the cancer etc. Catch

22.

<< What kind of cancers does it promote by the way? >>

I don't know any more than what the given literature says. You might want to

delve further into that. There hasn't been much time honored study on riba and

cancer unfortunately. It hasn't been used long enough on hep c people to

accumulate data. It may be that it triggers cancer (we all have cancer cells in

our body, they just aren't " on " ) or it may be a coincidence or both.

If you gotta get rid of the hep to do more trials, just know that genotype 1's

have a 50% (or less depends on who you listen to) chance of getting rid of it

with peg/riba. With a terminal cancer, I don't think I'd worry about the riba.

You've got some tuff choices out there. Good luck. Let us know what you

decide.

Alley

Grand Prairie, Tx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know one thing. You probably do not have what your claiming you

have. If you did, you would probably be a little more positive and

qualify your remarks with facts. Your comment " I don't think you'll

qualify for the cancer trials even if you do get rid of the

hep...catch 22 " sounds like an attempt to discourage. If you are

for real, then I feel sorry for you--you have given up. If you are

not for real, then you have no business telling me or anyone else in

this forum what you THINK is possible and what is not. I would

guess you are probably with an insurance company or someone who has

a strong interest in seeing people like me give up and die.

> << I have what is called an anaplastic

> astrocytoma grade III. If I follow the statistics, I may have

three

> to five years. My goal is to get into a clinical trial but cannot

> because they found the hep C. So I am trying to get rid of the

hep c >>

>

> I don't qualify for trials either. I don't think you'll qualify

for the cancer trials even if you do get rid of the hep, cuz of the

hep treatment. You need to double check on that.

>

> I don't qualify for cancer trials because of the hep and because

of the treatment, I don't qualify for the hep c trials because of

the cancer etc. Catch 22.

>

> << What kind of cancers does it promote by the way? >>

>

> I don't know any more than what the given literature says. You

might want to delve further into that. There hasn't been much time

honored study on riba and cancer unfortunately. It hasn't been used

long enough on hep c people to accumulate data. It may be that it

triggers cancer (we all have cancer cells in our body, they just

aren't " on " ) or it may be a coincidence or both.

>

> If you gotta get rid of the hep to do more trials, just know that

genotype 1's have a 50% (or less depends on who you listen to)

chance of getting rid of it with peg/riba. With a terminal cancer,

I don't think I'd worry about the riba.

>

> You've got some tuff choices out there. Good luck. Let us know

what you decide.

>

> Alley

> Grand Prairie, Tx

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Denial mixed with hope mixed with a strong personality covered with

my attempts at faith makes for some interesting emotions. We are

all human. Sorry for any offense caused. I am just trying to find

a home. Not a good start. I'll try to accept the realities of what

I have. It's not easy when your as young as I am. I just have to

back off and trust in God--it is out of my hands.

> > << I have what is called an anaplastic

> > astrocytoma grade III. If I follow the statistics, I may have

> three

> > to five years. My goal is to get into a clinical trial but

cannot

> > because they found the hep C. So I am trying to get rid of the

> hep c >>

> >

> > I don't qualify for trials either. I don't think you'll qualify

> for the cancer trials even if you do get rid of the hep, cuz of

the

> hep treatment. You need to double check on that.

> >

> > I don't qualify for cancer trials because of the hep and because

> of the treatment, I don't qualify for the hep c trials because of

> the cancer etc. Catch 22.

> >

> > << What kind of cancers does it promote by the way? >>

> >

> > I don't know any more than what the given literature says. You

> might want to delve further into that. There hasn't been much time

> honored study on riba and cancer unfortunately. It hasn't been

used

> long enough on hep c people to accumulate data. It may be that it

> triggers cancer (we all have cancer cells in our body, they just

> aren't " on " ) or it may be a coincidence or both.

> >

> > If you gotta get rid of the hep to do more trials, just know

that

> genotype 1's have a 50% (or less depends on who you listen to)

> chance of getting rid of it with peg/riba. With a terminal

cancer,

> I don't think I'd worry about the riba.

> >

> > You've got some tuff choices out there. Good luck. Let us know

> what you decide.

> >

> > Alley

> > Grand Prairie, Tx

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 1/24/2004 1:31:17 PM Eastern Standard Time,

brdietrich@... writes:

> I consider myself a Christian and saved. My faith

> waivers, but in the end it is all one really has.

>

Whenever my faith waivers, I read Job. God Bless

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 1/23/2004 9:50:59 PM Eastern Standard Time,

brdietrich@... writes:

> Denial mixed with hope mixed with a strong personality covered with

> my attempts at faith makes for some interesting emotions. We are

> all human. Sorry for any offense caused. I am just trying to find

> a home. Not a good start. I'll try to accept the realities of what

> I have. It's not easy when your as young as I am. I just have to

> back off and trust in God--it is out of my hands.

>

We understand. We all have bad days. Take that trust you have in God and

hold on to it firmly. I aquired this disease in 1987 and I'm still here. It's

frustrating...mainly because you have to learn to slow down before you

" qualify " age-wise. Not to mention the fact that you consisitently feel like

you've

beaten with a 2 X 4.That tends to make us all a bit " touchy " at times...one of

the truly nastier side effects of HCV is that it tends to exaccerbate both

existing and hereditary problems. So we're all fighting at least two and

sometimes multiple problems. Frequently, the treatment or relief from one

medical

condition makes the other one worse, or lethal. Hence the Catch 22. I'm having

a debate with myself, even as I write, as to whether or not I want to try

another treatment. ALT's and AFT's are high, but in the normal range,

consistently, for the first time in a couple of years. Viral load is 537. I'm

having a

liver biopsy next week. That will be the decision making time. Anyway,

we'll all have a better day tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alley,

what a rough time you are having with your body. I am so sorry to hear, you

have been such an inspiration to the group. hope that everything works out

for you

Suzy

From: " Alley " <alleypat@...>

Reply-Hepatitis C

<Hepatitis C >

Subject: Re: Re: When to start

Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:44:11 -0600

<< I have what is called an anaplastic

astrocytoma grade III. If I follow the statistics, I may have three

to five years. My goal is to get into a clinical trial but cannot

because they found the hep C. So I am trying to get rid of the hep c >>

I don't qualify for trials either. I don't think you'll qualify for the

cancer trials even if you do get rid of the hep, cuz of the hep treatment.

You need to double check on that.

I don't qualify for cancer trials because of the hep and because of the

treatment, I don't qualify for the hep c trials because of the cancer etc.

Catch 22.

<< What kind of cancers does it promote by the way? >>

I don't know any more than what the given literature says. You might want

to delve further into that. There hasn't been much time honored study on

riba and cancer unfortunately. It hasn't been used long enough on hep c

people to accumulate data. It may be that it triggers cancer (we all have

cancer cells in our body, they just aren't " on " ) or it may be a coincidence

or both.

If you gotta get rid of the hep to do more trials, just know that genotype

1's have a 50% (or less depends on who you listen to) chance of getting rid

of it with peg/riba. With a terminal cancer, I don't think I'd worry about

the riba.

You've got some tuff choices out there. Good luck. Let us know what you

decide.

Alley

Grand Prairie, Tx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...