Guest guest Posted October 20, 2000 Report Share Posted October 20, 2000 Yup. Only a die-hard liberal atheist could possibly fail to see that if you don't want teenagers shooting one another you shouldn't give them condoms! ;-) -- wally Fwd: [T-S] Speaking of Church and State > Hello All > > This was fwded to the traumatic-stress list as an example of braindead > religiosity. It gets tedious but its worth reading till the end for the very > ironic laugh at the end ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 20, 2000 Report Share Posted October 20, 2000 The school shootings didn't seem to start until the Christians started their " Rally Round the Flag " gatherings and starting Bible clubs in schools. > Yup. Only a die-hard liberal atheist could possibly fail to see that if you > don't want teenagers shooting one another you shouldn't give them condoms! > ;-) > > -- wally > > Fwd: [T-S] Speaking of Church and State > > > > Hello All > > > > This was fwded to the traumatic-stress list as an example of braindead > > religiosity. It gets tedious but its worth reading till the end for the > very > > ironic laugh at the end ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 20, 2000 Report Share Posted October 20, 2000 At 06:19 PM 10/20/00 +0000, you wrote: >The school shootings didn't seem to start until the Christians >started their " Rally Round the Flag " gatherings and starting Bible >clubs in schools. School violence started a long time ago, and contrary to popular belief it has been *declining* in recent years. It has been declining since at least 1993 -- well before the heavy media coverage started -- and probably since before that, although I can't find my older figures at the moment. Here are some online stats for 1993-1997: http://www.ed.gov/PressReleases/10-1999/violence.html The heavy media coverage of school shootings is basically a media fad. They do that, ya know. Increased media coverage of something doesn't mean that the incidence of it has actually increased. Here's a trivia question. Guess what nation has the greatest rate of student killings per capita? It's not the USA. Scroll down for the answer. It's Japan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 21, 2000 Report Share Posted October 21, 2000 Hello The decline of violence in the US in recent years I am sure is primarily the result of the upturn in the economy. now, was their ever a time in the US when someone could shoot schoolkids dead and it *didnt* get a lot of heavy media coverage??? That would be pretty odd to me. Having said that, I am aware that many such shootings may be of single victims that wont get as much coverage. It takes multiple shootings to get media coverage, and recent tragedies have obscured the fact that the general level of violence has gone down. Did the Japan figure include suicides? Yes or no I think the high figure in Japan is a rlection of the same forces as in the US - a culture crisis in a society that has advanced rapidly in a short period of time. P. > > >The school shootings didn't seem to start until the Christians > >started their " Rally Round the Flag " gatherings and starting Bible > >clubs in schools. > > School violence started a long time ago, and contrary to popular > belief it has been *declining* in recent years. It has been > declining since at least 1993 -- well before the heavy media > coverage started -- and probably since before that, although > I can't find my older figures at the moment. > > Here are some online stats for 1993-1997: > > http://www.ed.gov/PressReleases/10-1999/violence.html > > The heavy media coverage of school shootings is basically > a media fad. They do that, ya know. Increased media > coverage of something doesn't mean that the incidence of it > has actually increased. > > Here's a trivia question. Guess what nation has the greatest rate > of student killings per capita? It's not the USA. Scroll down for > the answer. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's Japan. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 21, 2000 Report Share Posted October 21, 2000 At 08:24 PM 10/21/00 +0000, you wrote: >Hello > >The decline of violence in the US in recent years I am sure is >primarily the result of the upturn in the economy. now, was their ever >a time in the US when someone could shoot schoolkids dead and it >*didnt* get a lot of heavy media coverage??? That would be pretty odd >to me. Yes, actually, for some definitions of " heavy. " Back around 1992, for instance, someone could shoot other teenagers dead without its being headline national news for a week. >Having said that, I am aware that many such shootings may be >of single victims that wont get as much coverage. It takes multiple >shootings to get media coverage, and recent tragedies have obscured >the fact that the general level of violence has gone down. > >Did the Japan figure include suicides? No, just murders. The Japanese suicide problem is a whole different set of numbers. >Yes or no I think the high >figure in Japan is a rlection of the same forces as in the US - a >culture crisis in a society that has advanced rapidly in a short >period of time. Could be, could be . . . there are probably a lot of factors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 21, 2000 Report Share Posted October 21, 2000 > > Yes, actually, for some definitions of " heavy. " Back around 1992, > for instance, someone could shoot other teenagers dead without > its being headline national news for a week. But so many all at one go? and with bombs and booby traps all over the place? Please tell me that that stuff didnt go on all the time without anyone commenting? How do the murders happen in Japan? Are they mostly shootings or stabbings? What are their gun laws like? I must admit this fact is an eye opener. P. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 21, 2000 Report Share Posted October 21, 2000 At 10:12 PM 10/21/00 +0000, you wrote: > > > > > Yes, actually, for some definitions of " heavy. " Back around 1992, > > for instance, someone could shoot other teenagers dead without > > its being headline national news for a week. > >But so many all at one go? and with bombs and booby traps all over >the >place? Please tell me that that stuff didnt go on all the time >without anyone commenting? No, the Columbine incident was unique. It was the worst such massacre in the USA's history. >How do the murders happen in Japan? Are they mostly shootings or >stabbings? What are their gun laws like? I must admit this fact is an >eye opener. The student weapon of choice is the machete. Japan has a sword subculture, in much the way that the USA has a firearm subculture. They have very strict gun control and blade control. As usual, though, that doesn't seem to stop anyone who really wants one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.