Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: exam help

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Hi Val!

I usually hear " No scleral icterus " or " Sclerae clear. "

Hope this helps! :-)

exam help

Head: Normocephalic, atraumatic. He has no s/l *icteris* _____ clear *maybe

sclera clear*?. No conjunctival lesions, and no apparent funduscopic

pathology. Extraocular muscle movements were without any abnormalities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

#1- icterus

#2- possibly sclerae clear (I hear this a lot).

Monika

exam help

> Head: Normocephalic, atraumatic. He has no s/l *icteris* _____ clear

*maybe sclera clear*?. No conjunctival lesions, and no apparent funduscopic

pathology. Extraocular muscle movements were without any abnormalities.

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got the reply to this question ages ago. I seem to be getting all the

answers before the questions and some doubles of things. Anyone else having

this?

-- exam help

Head: Normocephalic, atraumatic. He has no s/l *icteris* _____ clear *maybe

sclera clear*?. No conjunctival lesions, and no apparent funduscopic

pathology. Extraocular muscle movements were without any abnormalities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

, I had that problem all last week, but mine seems to be cleared up and

working right this week. Guess the gremlines finally left my ISP and headed

over to yours. I can really sympathize. Hope you don't get too frustrated.

This is another good reason to always make sure that we send answers both to the

group and directly to the person asking the questions, since we can never tell

who might be having problems, Margaret

>>> " njburk@... " 10/28/02 12:48PM >>>

I got the reply to this question ages ago. I seem to be getting all the

answers before the questions and some doubles of things. Anyone else having

this?

-- exam help

Head: Normocephalic, atraumatic. He has no s/l *icteris* _____ clear *maybe

sclera clear*?. No conjunctival lesions, and no apparent funduscopic

pathology. Extraocular muscle movements were without any abnormalities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

one of the reasons some replies come later maybe is people dont read

the email as soon as it is sent...I know for example today I was out all day

and Im just now reading the email...Nel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Me, too! I have had this problem in the past, but never to the degree that it's

been in the last week or so. I've also had trouble with replies showing up

hours later. Gremlins again, but they drive my wild.

I got the reply to this question ages ago. I seem to be getting all the

answers before the questions and some doubles of things. Anyone else having

this?

Dawn C.

M-TEC Student

IC, Ortho - 1 year

AIM: fasthands47

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Im getting the replies before the questions sometimes....but I

mean sometimes Im answering questions 12 hours after the email gets

here...just cause I dont get to the email right away....I probaby should just

read them and not respond....Nel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have cable internet and the answers are coming before the replies. I read

my mail within 5 minutes of getting it.

-- Re: exam help

one of the reasons some replies come later maybe is people dont read

the email as soon as it is sent...I know for example today I was out all day

and Im just now reading the email...Nel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This often/if not always happens to me. I usually don't check my email

except for twice a day unless my work is less. With Juno I would get an

alert. With the old Eudora I also got an alert that their was mail

awaiting. But not anymore. I will have to have my computer guru help me

out and check if there is a setting I missed.

Aliceanne

At 09:48 AM 10/28/2002 -0800, njburk@... wrote:

>I got the reply to this question ages ago. I seem to be getting all the

>answers before the questions and some doubles of things. Anyone else having

>this?

>

>-- exam help

>

>Head: Normocephalic, atraumatic. He has no s/l *icteris* _____ clear *maybe

>sclera clear*?. No conjunctival lesions, and no apparent funduscopic

>pathology. Extraocular muscle movements were without any abnormalities.

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...