Guest guest Posted January 27, 2003 Report Share Posted January 27, 2003 Oh yeah, here's another - they took the patient into the OR, and the doc said the patient was -- s/l protently -- identified as so-and-so. It's not quite appropriately, but can't quite get it. thanks again! Carol in NC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 27, 2003 Report Share Posted January 27, 2003 Carol, How about properly identified. Margaret >>> " Carol " 01/27/03 10:53PM >>> Oh yeah, here's another - they took the patient into the OR, and the doc said the patient was -- s/l protently -- identified as so-and-so. It's not quite appropriately, but can't quite get it. thanks again! Carol in NC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 27, 2003 Report Share Posted January 27, 2003 Carol, How about properly identified. Margaret >>> " Carol " 01/27/03 10:53PM >>> Oh yeah, here's another - they took the patient into the OR, and the doc said the patient was -- s/l protently -- identified as so-and-so. It's not quite appropriately, but can't quite get it. thanks again! Carol in NC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 27, 2003 Report Share Posted January 27, 2003 Carol, How about properly identified. Margaret >>> " Carol " 01/27/03 10:53PM >>> Oh yeah, here's another - they took the patient into the OR, and the doc said the patient was -- s/l protently -- identified as so-and-so. It's not quite appropriately, but can't quite get it. thanks again! Carol in NC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.