Magnetics

[Guest guest]

>He also followed the 7-14-21 day immune cycle thing, where you don't have your

work done on the same day of the week. >This is another Huggins thing, and I

don't know if it is true or not, but seemed simple enough to do, so that's what

we did. So >if I went in on a Tuesday the first time, then my next visit would

be on any day of the week but Tuesday, etc.------------>Jackie

Thanks for your response Jackie.

Like you say the measuring of the fillings and 7-14-21 day rules are so simple

to follow they might as well be done when possible.

I have long wondered about how the magnetic effect of metals in the mouth

affects the concentration of mercury/metals in the head/brain area.

I'm not well-versed in magnetics, but am following the assumption that metals

tend towards each other based on an attractive force if their charges are

opposite. Just like beads of mercury are pulled towards each other (if close) by

some force and metal shavings are attracted by a magnet, I wonder what effect

magnetic fields in the body have on the accumulation of metals?

When mercury or other metals form deposits surely they will create an

electromagnetic charge at that point in the body that can attract more metals

towards it. I mean why not?

The more metals that are attracted ton this site, the higher the overall

magnetic field becomes, and more metals are attracted there. I'm sure this may

be conjecture, but I'm wondering if magnetics has been studied in any depth with

regard to chelation. I'm sure most people will dismiss it and I know it is not

part of this protocol, but I'd be grateful to know of any information related to

this question if it exists.

I have known of many people that got worse after the safely removing of metals

from the mouth (without any form of chelation however) and I wondering if the

metals that are released are attracted to already formed bioaccumulation sites

once the electromagnetic pull from the mouth subsides with removal of amalgams,

for example the pituitary. If the magnetic pull is stronger inside the brain

surely it could pull metals from the blood into it based solely on charge.

I'm not sure if I have verbalised it properly, but from a laymen's perspective

the interaction between magnetism and metals seems important to at least to

consider.

On another note, I have also wondered how metals in the mouth interact with

electromagnetic radiation that permeates our current existence.

Dean

[Guest guest]

I don't have an answer for you Dean, but your question raised another question

for me, so I am interested in the answer also. I've been much worse this fall

since my appendix ruptured, had an upper GI for a cyst near my stomach, two

courses of antibiotics--Levaquin, and 3 or 4 CATscans of my abdomen. I was

blaming the Levaquin for giving me symptoms of redistribution, but lately I've

been wondering about everything else, like the anesthesia and the CATscans.

Aren't CATscans magnetic? Something certainly caused a huge setback for me this

fall, and it would be nice to know what it was, although I think I never

will.---------Jackie

In frequent-dose-chelation , DeanNetwork wrote:

>He also followed the 7-14-21 day immune cycle thing, where you don't have

your work done on the same day of the week. >This is another Huggins thing, and

I don't know if it is true or not, but seemed simple enough to do, so that's

what we did. So >if I went in on a Tuesday the first time, then my next visit

would be on any day of the week but Tuesday, etc.------------>Jackie

Thanks for your response Jackie.

Like you say the measuring of the fillings and 7-14-21 day rules are so simple

to follow they might as well be done when possible.

I have long wondered about how the magnetic effect of metals in the mouth

affects the concentration of mercury/metals in the head/brain area.

I'm not well-versed in magnetics, but am following the assumption that metals

tend towards each other based on an attractive force if their charges are

opposite. Just like beads of mercury are pulled towards each other (if close) by

some force and metal shavings are attracted by a magnet, I wonder what effect

magnetic fields in the body have on the accumulation of metals?

When mercury or other metals form deposits surely they will create an

electromagnetic charge at that point in the body that can attract more metals

towards it. I mean why not?

The more metals that are attracted ton this site, the higher the overall

magnetic field becomes, and more metals are attracted there. I'm sure this may

be conjecture, but I'm wondering if magnetics has been studied in any depth with

regard to chelation. I'm sure most people will dismiss it and I know it is not

part of this protocol, but I'd be grateful to know of any information related to

this question if it exists.

I have known of many people that got worse after the safely removing of metals

from the mouth (without any form of chelation however) and I wondering if the

metals that are released are attracted to already formed bioaccumulation sites

once the electromagnetic pull from the mouth subsides with removal of amalgams,

for example the pituitary. If the magnetic pull is stronger inside the brain

surely it could pull metals from the blood into it based solely on charge.

I'm not sure if I have verbalised it properly, but from a laymen's perspective

the interaction between magnetism and metals seems important to at least to

consider.

On another note, I have also wondered how metals in the mouth interact with

electromagnetic radiation that permeates our current existence.

Dean

[Guest guest]

I don't have an answer for you Dean, but your question raised another question

for me, so I am interested in the answer also. I've been much worse this fall

since my appendix ruptured, had an upper GI for a cyst near my stomach, two

courses of antibiotics--Levaquin, and 3 or 4 CATscans of my abdomen. I was

blaming the Levaquin for giving me symptoms of redistribution, but lately I've

been wondering about everything else, like the anesthesia and the CATscans.

Aren't CATscans magnetic? Something certainly caused a huge setback for me this

fall, and it would be nice to know what it was, although I think I never

will.---------Jackie

In frequent-dose-chelation , DeanNetwork wrote:

>He also followed the 7-14-21 day immune cycle thing, where you don't have

your work done on the same day of the week. >This is another Huggins thing, and

I don't know if it is true or not, but seemed simple enough to do, so that's

what we did. So >if I went in on a Tuesday the first time, then my next visit

would be on any day of the week but Tuesday, etc.------------>Jackie

Thanks for your response Jackie.

Like you say the measuring of the fillings and 7-14-21 day rules are so simple

to follow they might as well be done when possible.

I have long wondered about how the magnetic effect of metals in the mouth

affects the concentration of mercury/metals in the head/brain area.

I'm not well-versed in magnetics, but am following the assumption that metals

tend towards each other based on an attractive force if their charges are

opposite. Just like beads of mercury are pulled towards each other (if close) by

some force and metal shavings are attracted by a magnet, I wonder what effect

magnetic fields in the body have on the accumulation of metals?

When mercury or other metals form deposits surely they will create an

electromagnetic charge at that point in the body that can attract more metals

towards it. I mean why not?

The more metals that are attracted ton this site, the higher the overall

magnetic field becomes, and more metals are attracted there. I'm sure this may

be conjecture, but I'm wondering if magnetics has been studied in any depth with

regard to chelation. I'm sure most people will dismiss it and I know it is not

part of this protocol, but I'd be grateful to know of any information related to

this question if it exists.

I have known of many people that got worse after the safely removing of metals

from the mouth (without any form of chelation however) and I wondering if the

metals that are released are attracted to already formed bioaccumulation sites

once the electromagnetic pull from the mouth subsides with removal of amalgams,

for example the pituitary. If the magnetic pull is stronger inside the brain

surely it could pull metals from the blood into it based solely on charge.

I'm not sure if I have verbalised it properly, but from a laymen's perspective

the interaction between magnetism and metals seems important to at least to

consider.

On another note, I have also wondered how metals in the mouth interact with

electromagnetic radiation that permeates our current existence.

Dean

[Guest guest]

I don't have an answer for you Dean, but your question raised another question

for me, so I am interested in the answer also. I've been much worse this fall

since my appendix ruptured, had an upper GI for a cyst near my stomach, two

courses of antibiotics--Levaquin, and 3 or 4 CATscans of my abdomen. I was

blaming the Levaquin for giving me symptoms of redistribution, but lately I've

been wondering about everything else, like the anesthesia and the CATscans.

Aren't CATscans magnetic? Something certainly caused a huge setback for me this

fall, and it would be nice to know what it was, although I think I never

will.---------Jackie

In frequent-dose-chelation , DeanNetwork wrote:

>He also followed the 7-14-21 day immune cycle thing, where you don't have

your work done on the same day of the week. >This is another Huggins thing, and

I don't know if it is true or not, but seemed simple enough to do, so that's

what we did. So >if I went in on a Tuesday the first time, then my next visit

would be on any day of the week but Tuesday, etc.------------>Jackie

Thanks for your response Jackie.

Like you say the measuring of the fillings and 7-14-21 day rules are so simple

to follow they might as well be done when possible.

I have long wondered about how the magnetic effect of metals in the mouth

affects the concentration of mercury/metals in the head/brain area.

I'm not well-versed in magnetics, but am following the assumption that metals

tend towards each other based on an attractive force if their charges are

opposite. Just like beads of mercury are pulled towards each other (if close) by

some force and metal shavings are attracted by a magnet, I wonder what effect

magnetic fields in the body have on the accumulation of metals?

When mercury or other metals form deposits surely they will create an

electromagnetic charge at that point in the body that can attract more metals

towards it. I mean why not?

The more metals that are attracted ton this site, the higher the overall

magnetic field becomes, and more metals are attracted there. I'm sure this may

be conjecture, but I'm wondering if magnetics has been studied in any depth with

regard to chelation. I'm sure most people will dismiss it and I know it is not

part of this protocol, but I'd be grateful to know of any information related to

this question if it exists.

I have known of many people that got worse after the safely removing of metals

from the mouth (without any form of chelation however) and I wondering if the

metals that are released are attracted to already formed bioaccumulation sites

once the electromagnetic pull from the mouth subsides with removal of amalgams,

for example the pituitary. If the magnetic pull is stronger inside the brain

surely it could pull metals from the blood into it based solely on charge.

I'm not sure if I have verbalised it properly, but from a laymen's perspective

the interaction between magnetism and metals seems important to at least to

consider.

On another note, I have also wondered how metals in the mouth interact with

electromagnetic radiation that permeates our current existence.

Dean

[Guest guest]

>I don't have an answer for you Dean, but your question raised another question

for me, so I am interested in the answer also. >I've been much worse this fall

since my appendix ruptured, had an upper GI for a cyst near my stomach, two

courses of >antibiotics--Levaquin, and 3 or 4 CATscans of my abdomen. I was

blaming the Levaquin for giving me symptoms of >redistribution, but lately I've

been wondering about everything else, like the anesthesia and the CATscans.

Aren't CATscans >magnetic? Something certainly caused a huge setback for me this

fall, and it would be nice to know what it was, although I >think I never

will.---------Jackie

Hi Jackie.

MRI scan's use large magnets and if you have metals on/or in your body these are

contra-indicated. Whenever one of my clients goes for an MRI I tell them to

inform the operator that they have metal crowns or amalgams in their mouth (if

they do), to create awareness and because I'm genuinely worried that some

unknown interaction could hurt them.

Every single time the technicians and doctors dismiss the fact that their dental

metals in mouth despite the contra-indications. When quizzed further they can

never give a reason and just laugh it off.

I have even had clients with brain tumours with nice scans of their heads. On

the scan you have see about 20 fillings, many metal crowns etc. They are lit up

brightly on the scan. When I ask what their neurologist says about the metals in

their mouth - they say either nothing, or he doesn't think it is a problem. That

is despite them being less that an inch away from their brain.

We cannot see what we don't have the will or consciousness to grasp. It is a

pity it causes such devastating consequences to real people, as we know. Unless

you are informed medicine is a very dangerous place. And when you are armed with

information most doctors are too intimidated to work with you.

CT Scans on the other hand use multiple x-rays to take scans and metals are not

contraindicated in this case. But some sources say that this radiation is

accumulative over life and can cause damage. I don't know if some people are

sensitive to x-rays.

I try not to dismiss anything anymore without strong evidence to do so, and I

don't know if they could have affected you?

What about further mercury exposure to any of the medications you had in

hospital?

With MRI scans however metals are directly affected. It would be illogical to

say that dental amalgams or metals are not affected - we just don't know what

the clinical significance is. A small atom of mercury is just as easily affected

as a large amalgam, but again I don't have the knowledge to explain why and wish

there was strong research to tell me more.

It would be interesting for someone to measure the charges of their amalgams

before and after a MRI...although if I had amalgams still in my mouth I'm not

sure I'd like that experiment done on me.