Re: We know amalgams are toxic. What about composites?

[Guest guest]

Hi, ,

I can totally relate to your eperience and feelings. Likewise, I have suffered

unnecesarily more than enough at the hands of dentistry.

Unfortunately, I don't have the immediate answer for you about whether

composites are safe or not. Being a late stage rookie, I just don't have the

energy to find out the answer right now. However, I remember my betrusted

bio-logical dentist said that it is important to use bio-compatible materials in

our dental work. You may want to check out the following website which has tons

of info. http://www.icnr.com/main.html

I hope this helps. When I feel better, I'll certainly look for the answers

for you.

Take care,

-

corvulusthemighty wrote:

Hi everyone,

As all of us in this group knows, mercury amalgams are very bad news.

But does anyone know if Andy Cutler or others have ideas about how

safe composites are. I wouldn't trust the ADA to truthfully tell me

the time of the day, and I know that some of the compounds in the

composites are extremely toxic, so toxic that they've been

investigated as carcinogens. The quinones. The thinking is that the

they are released in such minimal quantities that the body is able to

deal with it. But this is is the same demented - and dementing -

thinking that we are told applies to amalgams. By my lights, the ADA

is an organization to be distrusted.

I have suffered more than enough at the hands of dentistry and am

mildly tempted to just go and have all my teeth with fillings in them

pulled. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice shame on me!

Apparently when you yank out teeth this has a detrimental impact on

your overall health because the subtle energies that flow through

acupuncture meridians are no longer able to flow as well, and you

notice things that the body doesn't do as well anymore.

Has anyone put any thought into this?

__________________________________________________

[Guest guest]

Hi, ,

I can totally relate to your eperience and feelings. Likewise, I have suffered

unnecesarily more than enough at the hands of dentistry.

Unfortunately, I don't have the immediate answer for you about whether

composites are safe or not. Being a late stage rookie, I just don't have the

energy to find out the answer right now. However, I remember my betrusted

bio-logical dentist said that it is important to use bio-compatible materials in

our dental work. You may want to check out the following website which has tons

of info. http://www.icnr.com/main.html

I hope this helps. When I feel better, I'll certainly look for the answers

for you.

Take care,

-

corvulusthemighty wrote:

Hi everyone,

As all of us in this group knows, mercury amalgams are very bad news.

But does anyone know if Andy Cutler or others have ideas about how

safe composites are. I wouldn't trust the ADA to truthfully tell me

the time of the day, and I know that some of the compounds in the

composites are extremely toxic, so toxic that they've been

investigated as carcinogens. The quinones. The thinking is that the

they are released in such minimal quantities that the body is able to

deal with it. But this is is the same demented - and dementing -

thinking that we are told applies to amalgams. By my lights, the ADA

is an organization to be distrusted.

I have suffered more than enough at the hands of dentistry and am

mildly tempted to just go and have all my teeth with fillings in them

pulled. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice shame on me!

Apparently when you yank out teeth this has a detrimental impact on

your overall health because the subtle energies that flow through

acupuncture meridians are no longer able to flow as well, and you

notice things that the body doesn't do as well anymore.

Has anyone put any thought into this?

__________________________________________________

[Guest guest]

" But does anyone know if Andy Cutler or others have ideas about how

safe composites are. "

There is a compatability test you can get to see what composite your immune

system least reacts to. This isn't a cheap test, and I will likely not get it

done.

Russ, on the mercury forum, is recommending DiamondLite, I think. You can also

get a MSDS (materials safety data sheet) to see what is in a certain composite

before you get it. I learned that I have aluminum in the composites I have, and

I did have some aluminum in my hair. Right now I am worrying about getting my

amalgam replaced. After that I will investigate these older composites some

more...

-Olif

[Guest guest]

" But does anyone know if Andy Cutler or others have ideas about how

safe composites are. "

There is a compatability test you can get to see what composite your immune

system least reacts to. This isn't a cheap test, and I will likely not get it

done.

Russ, on the mercury forum, is recommending DiamondLite, I think. You can also

get a MSDS (materials safety data sheet) to see what is in a certain composite

before you get it. I learned that I have aluminum in the composites I have, and

I did have some aluminum in my hair. Right now I am worrying about getting my

amalgam replaced. After that I will investigate these older composites some

more...

-Olif

[Guest guest]

" But does anyone know if Andy Cutler or others have ideas about how

safe composites are. "

There is a compatability test you can get to see what composite your immune

system least reacts to. This isn't a cheap test, and I will likely not get it

done.

Russ, on the mercury forum, is recommending DiamondLite, I think. You can also

get a MSDS (materials safety data sheet) to see what is in a certain composite

before you get it. I learned that I have aluminum in the composites I have, and

I did have some aluminum in my hair. Right now I am worrying about getting my

amalgam replaced. After that I will investigate these older composites some

more...

-Olif

[Guest guest]

Hi

I had what's called a reactivity blood test which cross references the

thousand or so of dental materials to my blood, and identifies compatible

materials based upon their extensive data base. There are several labs that

do this. The one I used is called Clifford labs. I believe it is used by Dr

Huggins in Colorado. My local dentist in Illinois also uses it. I had all

my amalgams taken out by a biological dentist who replaced them with

composites.

Although, I'm just reading another book which basically says the safest

material to go with is porcelain, since the composites (plastics) are

petroleum based and have plenty of chemicals in them, for which no large

scale tests have been done to see what these materials do to the body over

time.

Regards, Steve

_____

From: frequent-dose-chelation

[mailto:frequent-dose-chelation ] On Behalf Of

corvulusthemighty

Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 3:22 AM

To: frequent-dose-chelation

Subject: We know amalgams are toxic. What about

composites?

Hi everyone,

As all of us in this group knows, mercury amalgams are very bad news.

But does anyone know if Andy Cutler or others have ideas about how

safe composites are. I wouldn't trust the ADA to truthfully tell me

the time of the day, and I know that some of the compounds in the

composites are extremely toxic, so toxic that they've been

investigated as carcinogens. The quinones. The thinking is that the

they are released in such minimal quantities that the body is able to

deal with it. But this is is the same demented - and dementing -

thinking that we are told applies to amalgams. By my lights, the ADA

is an organization to be distrusted.

I have suffered more than enough at the hands of dentistry and am

mildly tempted to just go and have all my teeth with fillings in them

pulled. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice shame on me!

Apparently when you yank out teeth this has a detrimental impact on

your overall health because the subtle energies that flow through

acupuncture meridians are no longer able to flow as well, and you

notice things that the body doesn't do as well anymore.

Has anyone put any thought into this?

[Guest guest]

Hi

I had what's called a reactivity blood test which cross references the

thousand or so of dental materials to my blood, and identifies compatible

materials based upon their extensive data base. There are several labs that

do this. The one I used is called Clifford labs. I believe it is used by Dr

Huggins in Colorado. My local dentist in Illinois also uses it. I had all

my amalgams taken out by a biological dentist who replaced them with

composites.

Although, I'm just reading another book which basically says the safest

material to go with is porcelain, since the composites (plastics) are

petroleum based and have plenty of chemicals in them, for which no large

scale tests have been done to see what these materials do to the body over

time.

Regards, Steve

_____

From: frequent-dose-chelation

[mailto:frequent-dose-chelation ] On Behalf Of

corvulusthemighty

Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 3:22 AM

To: frequent-dose-chelation

Subject: We know amalgams are toxic. What about

composites?

Hi everyone,

As all of us in this group knows, mercury amalgams are very bad news.

But does anyone know if Andy Cutler or others have ideas about how

safe composites are. I wouldn't trust the ADA to truthfully tell me

the time of the day, and I know that some of the compounds in the

composites are extremely toxic, so toxic that they've been

investigated as carcinogens. The quinones. The thinking is that the

they are released in such minimal quantities that the body is able to

deal with it. But this is is the same demented - and dementing -

thinking that we are told applies to amalgams. By my lights, the ADA

is an organization to be distrusted.

I have suffered more than enough at the hands of dentistry and am

mildly tempted to just go and have all my teeth with fillings in them

pulled. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice shame on me!

Apparently when you yank out teeth this has a detrimental impact on

your overall health because the subtle energies that flow through

acupuncture meridians are no longer able to flow as well, and you

notice things that the body doesn't do as well anymore.

Has anyone put any thought into this?

[Guest guest]

Hi

I had what's called a reactivity blood test which cross references the

thousand or so of dental materials to my blood, and identifies compatible

materials based upon their extensive data base. There are several labs that

do this. The one I used is called Clifford labs. I believe it is used by Dr

Huggins in Colorado. My local dentist in Illinois also uses it. I had all

my amalgams taken out by a biological dentist who replaced them with

composites.

Although, I'm just reading another book which basically says the safest

material to go with is porcelain, since the composites (plastics) are

petroleum based and have plenty of chemicals in them, for which no large

scale tests have been done to see what these materials do to the body over

time.

Regards, Steve

_____

From: frequent-dose-chelation

[mailto:frequent-dose-chelation ] On Behalf Of

corvulusthemighty

Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 3:22 AM

To: frequent-dose-chelation

Subject: We know amalgams are toxic. What about

composites?

Hi everyone,

As all of us in this group knows, mercury amalgams are very bad news.

But does anyone know if Andy Cutler or others have ideas about how

safe composites are. I wouldn't trust the ADA to truthfully tell me

the time of the day, and I know that some of the compounds in the

composites are extremely toxic, so toxic that they've been

investigated as carcinogens. The quinones. The thinking is that the

they are released in such minimal quantities that the body is able to

deal with it. But this is is the same demented - and dementing -

thinking that we are told applies to amalgams. By my lights, the ADA

is an organization to be distrusted.

I have suffered more than enough at the hands of dentistry and am

mildly tempted to just go and have all my teeth with fillings in them

pulled. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice shame on me!

Apparently when you yank out teeth this has a detrimental impact on

your overall health because the subtle energies that flow through

acupuncture meridians are no longer able to flow as well, and you

notice things that the body doesn't do as well anymore.

Has anyone put any thought into this?

[Guest guest]

Hi

>I had what's called a reactivity blood test which cross references the

>thousand or so of dental materials to my blood, and identifies compatible

>materials based upon their extensive data base. There are several labs that

>do this. The one I used is called Clifford labs. I believe it is used by Dr

>Huggins in Colorado. My local dentist in Illinois also uses it. I had all

>my amalgams taken out by a biological dentist who replaced them with

>composites.

>Although, I'm just reading another book which basically says the safest

>material to go with is porcelain, since the composites (plastics) are

>petroleum based and have plenty of chemicals in them, for which no large

>scale tests have been done to see what these materials do to the body over

>time.

A large group of us in South Africa chose to go with Diamond Lite for fillings

and Diamond Crown for crowns,

We have put up the info here that includes a link to the Clifford Labs.

http://www.livingnetwork.co.za/drclarknetwork/metal-free.html

We have had only good results from it (except sometime they remains sensitive to

cold and hot for a couple of months).

But those that I know that have had Diamond Lite and Diamond Crown tested for

biocompatibility have always tested clear with these compounds.

They had them tested with the Clifford reactivity test and others with

bioelectronics testing (biocom machine).

Other people tested okay for a compound called Adoro - also a plastic one also.

We chose to follow Dr advice about how to harden plastics electronically

so that they do not seep toxins.

She teaches us to use a tooth zapper :

http://www.livingnetwork.co.za/drclarknetwork/tooth_zapper.html

which does the electronic hardening;. Cheap and permanent. She also claims that

this device can clear small cavitations (but don't use if you have metals in

your mouth!)

We have had good results with it.

She also advises against porcelain usage- I think she says it has a high

Urananium content?

I would go with Diamond Lite and Crown. I have never heard of anyone reacting

badly to it yet.

But if you have the funds the Clifford reactivity test is the best.

Dean

[Guest guest]

Hi

>I had what's called a reactivity blood test which cross references the

>thousand or so of dental materials to my blood, and identifies compatible

>materials based upon their extensive data base. There are several labs that

>do this. The one I used is called Clifford labs. I believe it is used by Dr

>Huggins in Colorado. My local dentist in Illinois also uses it. I had all

>my amalgams taken out by a biological dentist who replaced them with

>composites.

>Although, I'm just reading another book which basically says the safest

>material to go with is porcelain, since the composites (plastics) are

>petroleum based and have plenty of chemicals in them, for which no large

>scale tests have been done to see what these materials do to the body over

>time.

A large group of us in South Africa chose to go with Diamond Lite for fillings

and Diamond Crown for crowns,

We have put up the info here that includes a link to the Clifford Labs.

http://www.livingnetwork.co.za/drclarknetwork/metal-free.html

We have had only good results from it (except sometime they remains sensitive to

cold and hot for a couple of months).

But those that I know that have had Diamond Lite and Diamond Crown tested for

biocompatibility have always tested clear with these compounds.

They had them tested with the Clifford reactivity test and others with

bioelectronics testing (biocom machine).

Other people tested okay for a compound called Adoro - also a plastic one also.

We chose to follow Dr advice about how to harden plastics electronically

so that they do not seep toxins.

She teaches us to use a tooth zapper :

http://www.livingnetwork.co.za/drclarknetwork/tooth_zapper.html

which does the electronic hardening;. Cheap and permanent. She also claims that

this device can clear small cavitations (but don't use if you have metals in

your mouth!)

We have had good results with it.

She also advises against porcelain usage- I think she says it has a high

Urananium content?

I would go with Diamond Lite and Crown. I have never heard of anyone reacting

badly to it yet.

But if you have the funds the Clifford reactivity test is the best.

Dean

[Guest guest]

>

> Hi everyone,

>

> As all of us in this group knows, mercury amalgams are very bad news.

>

> But does anyone know if Andy Cutler or others have ideas about how

> safe composites are. I wouldn't trust the ADA to truthfully tell me

> the time of the day, and I know that some of the compounds in the

> composites are extremely toxic, so toxic that they've been

> investigated as carcinogens. The quinones. The thinking is that the

> they are released in such minimal quantities that the body is able to

> deal with it. But this is is the same demented - and dementing -

> thinking that we are told applies to amalgams. By my lights, the ADA

> is an organization to be distrusted.

>

> I have suffered more than enough at the hands of dentistry and am

> mildly tempted to just go and have all my teeth with fillings in them

> pulled. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice shame on me!

>

> Apparently when you yank out teeth this has a detrimental impact on

> your overall health because the subtle energies that flow through

> acupuncture meridians are no longer able to flow as well, and you

> notice things that the body doesn't do as well anymore.

>

> Has anyone put any thought into this?

>

>

>

Don't forget that mercury is the most toxic non-radioactive element.

Even if there is a posibility of composite being toxic I bet it's not

even a fraction of the toxicity mercury carries.