Guest guest Posted July 10, 1999 Report Share Posted July 10, 1999 " Cooling of on Global Warming. [Commentary]. " Washington Times, 8 July 99, A15. Fumento, senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, responds to a report from the nonprofit group Public Agenda that found that overall, Americans say they are less concerned about environmental problems such as water pollution, toxic waste, air pollution, ozone layer damage, and global warming than they were in 1989. Fumento suggests that in some areas, like air pollution, people are less concerned because there have been actual drops in the amount of air pollution. He goes on to conclude that the drop in concern over global warming is due to a lack of firm science to support the theory, and states that " three-fourths of the public thing Mr. Clinton, Mr. Gore, Newsweek, and the mainstream media are blowing hot air. " 's take on the world, as we all know is slanted towards protecting the hand that feeds him. In order to read the truth about the above quotes go http://www.agu.org/sci_soc/attitude_study.html " Waiting for a Signal: Public Attitudes toward Global Warming, the Environment and Geophysical Research " In a nutshell, it reports that people care very much about the environment and environmental issues - but they are frustrated and unsure about what they can do to make a difference. " The public's attitudes toward the environment are complex and are affected by a number of different factors. On many aspects of the issue, the public is already convinced of the gravity of the problems. But, other considerations and complexities sap their energy for thinking further or dealing with these problems. For one, these issues are so complex and technical that scientists themselves don't agree about them. Furthermore, many people doubt there are viable solutions to these problems. Many respondents in our focus groups were convinced that the underlying cause of environmental problems (such as pollution and toxic waste) is a pervasive climate of rampant selfishness and greed, and since they see this moral deterioration to be irreversible, they feel that environmental problems are unsolvable. As a result, convincing people of the seriousness of the problems is at best only part of the solution, and may, in fact, be counterproductive. " " The issue is not that people are apathetic, but that they are frustrated and confused. More talk about the seriousness of the problems -- without also convincing people that something can be done to alleviate them -- may only increase their sense of hopelessness rather than lead to productive debate and dialogue. " http://www.agu.org/sci_soc/attitude_study.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.