Re: Should I go for band #2.....seeking some advice PLEASE!!!

[Guest guest]

Cranial Technologies did my son's measurements but they didn't do so

until we went in for his casting appointment. The only reason why

they did them again was per my requests since I'm debating on band

#2. It sounds as if your son has VERY VERY mild flattening. Does he

have facial asymmetry? If so, this may be why he's a candidate for

the band. We've had wonderful results and couldn't be happier with

our son's progress with the Doc Band. Good Luck :-)

> >

> > Hello,

> >

> > My son Tanner was banded at 4 months 3 weeks and has been in his

> > band for 5 weeks. He's completely outgrowing the band and got

his

> > last adjustment yesterday. Now I have one week to decide

whether

> > or not we continue treatment with band #2. His measurements are

> as

> > follows:

> >

> > Original Measurements as of 1/6/2006:

> >

> > Cranial Vault Asymmetry: 22mm

> > Mid-Face Asymmetry (eyes): 6mm

> > Skull-Base Asymmetry (ears): 8mm

> >

> > Current measurements as of 2/21/2006:

> >

> > Cranial Vault Asymmetry: 10mm

> > Mid-Face Asymmetry (eyes): 4mm

> > Skull-Base Asymmetry (ears): 4mm

> >

> >

> > I also posted his before and after pictures under " T " but I

don't

> > see them. Maybe it takes a while for them to upload onto the

> > site????

> >

> > I'm so torn on making " another decision " . We are extremely

happy

> > with his results but know his Asymmetry's can improve even more

if

> > we continue treatment for another 4-6 weeks. The 10mm Asymmetry

> > concerns us as we'd hope for all measurements to be less than

6mm

> > (considered mild). We have great insurance so money isn't an

> > issue. Little Tanner is totally adjusted to the band and so is

> the

> > family so that's not an issue as well. I guess our only issue

is;

> > are we being too critical and wanting too much perfection by

> > choosing band #2. I would appreciate any and all the advice I

can

> > get.

> >

>

>

>

>

>

>

> For more plagio info

[Guest guest]

Cranial Technologies did my son's measurements but they didn't do so

until we went in for his casting appointment. The only reason why

they did them again was per my requests since I'm debating on band

#2. It sounds as if your son has VERY VERY mild flattening. Does he

have facial asymmetry? If so, this may be why he's a candidate for

the band. We've had wonderful results and couldn't be happier with

our son's progress with the Doc Band. Good Luck :-)

> >

> > Hello,

> >

> > My son Tanner was banded at 4 months 3 weeks and has been in his

> > band for 5 weeks. He's completely outgrowing the band and got

his

> > last adjustment yesterday. Now I have one week to decide

whether

> > or not we continue treatment with band #2. His measurements are

> as

> > follows:

> >

> > Original Measurements as of 1/6/2006:

> >

> > Cranial Vault Asymmetry: 22mm

> > Mid-Face Asymmetry (eyes): 6mm

> > Skull-Base Asymmetry (ears): 8mm

> >

> > Current measurements as of 2/21/2006:

> >

> > Cranial Vault Asymmetry: 10mm

> > Mid-Face Asymmetry (eyes): 4mm

> > Skull-Base Asymmetry (ears): 4mm

> >

> >

> > I also posted his before and after pictures under " T " but I

don't

> > see them. Maybe it takes a while for them to upload onto the

> > site????

> >

> > I'm so torn on making " another decision " . We are extremely

happy

> > with his results but know his Asymmetry's can improve even more

if

> > we continue treatment for another 4-6 weeks. The 10mm Asymmetry

> > concerns us as we'd hope for all measurements to be less than

6mm

> > (considered mild). We have great insurance so money isn't an

> > issue. Little Tanner is totally adjusted to the band and so is

> the

> > family so that's not an issue as well. I guess our only issue

is;

> > are we being too critical and wanting too much perfection by

> > choosing band #2. I would appreciate any and all the advice I

can

> > get.

> >

>

>

>

>

>

>

> For more plagio info