Re: DMSA -

[Guest guest]

>

> Citrus Punch

>

> My chelation doctor has been doing this for a long time and has

observed patients over long-term chelation. I know we have stated

here over and over that the urine tests are useless to track mercury

chelation, but I just would like to address something that came up

the other day.

I had another urine test in which I collected my urine over a 24

hour period during my fourth day of chelation with DMSA and ALA.

Great Smokies did the post challenge test. I came out showing no

measurable mercury excreted.

TK--- This doesn't necessarily mean you have no more Hg.

I've been chelating for nine months now and this is the 3rd urine

test they've done on me. The first one showed high mercury

excretion. The second one showed none and this third one showed

none. However, each one of them showed high lead excretion. So l

got my results yesterday and my doctor said that they see this over

and over again, that DMSA will pull lead first and they've had

patients who don't even START to pull mercury for a year or so. Is

this true? Could I be chelating for nine months doing Andy's

protocol and only be pulling lead and no mercury? I could

understand if I were just taking DMSA and it was pulling lead first,

but what about the ALA I'm taking? Shouldn't that be pulling some

mercury out of my brain?

>

> TK: I know that if you see this post, you might be thinking that

these urine tests are useless, but even in " Amalgam Illness " Andy

says " continue chelation until mercury urine excretion is low " . So

they must have some validity if he says that.

TK--- for the purpose he states, Hg is not released consistently

when chelating which makes urine challenge tests unreliable but you

did do it correctly during a chelation round. You may have a bigger

lead problem than Hg or it may be comming out first. Andy would be

the best to consult on these results.

>

>

>

>

>

>