Nahla, hair test

[Guest guest]

>

>

>

> TK--- you can be toxic even if you are in range for the Hg on the

> hair test. frank Hg showing on the test out of reference range

> shows obvious toxicity.

>

> _I thought you could be _,_._,___

> Nahla--- I thought you could be considered toxic even if your

mercury level is in the low range, if your elements are " scattered " ?

My hair analysis came back below the range and Huggins claimed it to

be " retention toxicity " .

>

I don't understand why Huggins uses DDI hair tests and doesn't get the

full results. I looked at your test, but there are so many elements

missing that I don't think counting rules can be applied.

Calcium and magnesium low, with sodium and potassium high, indicates

too much adrenaline but not enough cortisol.

http://www.noamalgam.com/hairtestbook.html

I think that what Huggins in calling retention toxicity means that the

body isn't excreting mercury very well, and thus it is low on the test

(but likely high in the body). This is very common with toxic people.

It would be more useful to get the complete test.

> BTW... I am trying to post it for counting rules and feedback,

but I don't know how to make the file smaller. I will try again tonight.

>

It's at this link, hairtest no 15

http://www.livingnetwork.co.za/healingnetwork/hairtest.html

I notice that your serum calcium was slightly high. I would suggest

getting your doctor to repeat the test and include 25 hydroxy vitamin

D and parathyroid hormone.

I don't know what the high protein, high globulin and low BUN could

indicate. Maybe a doctor would know ??? Maybe someone else

understands the CBC?

J

>

>

>

>

> kind regards,

> Nahla Abbo

>

> " The best way to predict your future...is to invent it "

> -unknown

>

>

>

>