Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Any cure for BILE DUCT CANCER ?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Cholangiocarcinoma is the ticking time bomb that we all worry about.

After it is diagnosed most people are dead in 6 months. If it is

caught very early and you can qualify for the Mayo Clinic

transplant/chemotherapy plan then I read somewhere that there is an

80% 5 year survival. Early detection is very difficult and ERCP

screening programs at this point would probably hurt more people then

it would help.

The question of transplant with MELD less than 15 is different for

PSC patients compared to hepatis and alcoholic liver disease because

of the cholangiocarcinoma risk. If you had hepatitis or alcoholic

liver disease and a MELD less than 15 you would face the operative

mortality with the 10-20% of death in the first year and it may not be

worth it. In PSC if you take the transplant risk you get out from

under the threat of cholangiocarcinma. The risk might be 1% per year.

So if you transplanted at a MELD under 15 instead of waiting another

5 years till the MELD might be 20 then you avoided a 5% risk of

cholangiocarcinoma. Not to mention that you can get on with your life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cholangiocarcinoma is the ticking time bomb that we all worry about.

After it is diagnosed most people are dead in 6 months. If it is

caught very early and you can qualify for the Mayo Clinic

transplant/chemotherapy plan then I read somewhere that there is an

80% 5 year survival. Early detection is very difficult and ERCP

screening programs at this point would probably hurt more people then

it would help.

The question of transplant with MELD less than 15 is different for

PSC patients compared to hepatis and alcoholic liver disease because

of the cholangiocarcinoma risk. If you had hepatitis or alcoholic

liver disease and a MELD less than 15 you would face the operative

mortality with the 10-20% of death in the first year and it may not be

worth it. In PSC if you take the transplant risk you get out from

under the threat of cholangiocarcinma. The risk might be 1% per year.

So if you transplanted at a MELD under 15 instead of waiting another

5 years till the MELD might be 20 then you avoided a 5% risk of

cholangiocarcinoma. Not to mention that you can get on with your life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hubby is now having an ERCP on Monday

> afternoon.

>

Hi prichsy

Best wishes for tomorrow, I am sure all will go well, I will be

thinking of you 'acros the ditch'.

Best wishes from Dipton, NZ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prichsy,

Good luck to you and your husband. I hope ERCP makes his symptoms abate.

I'm having one Friday.

I was told that CCA is more likely in advanced PSC. There is a considerable

debate over

early vs later transplant and the various risks one takes on with either choice.

While the

prognosis isn't good once it is diagnosed, it does probably grow slowly for some

months

to years before diagnosis. There is active research on earlier signs to detect

it before it's

too late. Regular MRI, CT, ERCP for brushings, and CA19-9 levels are all ways to

monitor

CCA, with a positive for any one of these an alert to follow up. In the US there

is an

experimental protocol at the Mayo clinic for radiation/chemo followed by

transplant for

early stage CCA. Several members have done this or are currently being

evaluated. Their

results for cancers detected early are pretty good, with survival times not too

far below

those for transplants without CCA.

BTW, my brother lives in Blenheim NZ on the South Island. He sends us good wine

(and we

were raised in California). He and his family love it in their adopted country.

Someday we

will make it down to visit.

Martha (MA)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prichsy,

Good luck to you and your husband. I hope ERCP makes his symptoms abate.

I'm having one Friday.

I was told that CCA is more likely in advanced PSC. There is a considerable

debate over

early vs later transplant and the various risks one takes on with either choice.

While the

prognosis isn't good once it is diagnosed, it does probably grow slowly for some

months

to years before diagnosis. There is active research on earlier signs to detect

it before it's

too late. Regular MRI, CT, ERCP for brushings, and CA19-9 levels are all ways to

monitor

CCA, with a positive for any one of these an alert to follow up. In the US there

is an

experimental protocol at the Mayo clinic for radiation/chemo followed by

transplant for

early stage CCA. Several members have done this or are currently being

evaluated. Their

results for cancers detected early are pretty good, with survival times not too

far below

those for transplants without CCA.

BTW, my brother lives in Blenheim NZ on the South Island. He sends us good wine

(and we

were raised in California). He and his family love it in their adopted country.

Someday we

will make it down to visit.

Martha (MA)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prichsy,

Good luck to you and your husband. I hope ERCP makes his symptoms abate.

I'm having one Friday.

I was told that CCA is more likely in advanced PSC. There is a considerable

debate over

early vs later transplant and the various risks one takes on with either choice.

While the

prognosis isn't good once it is diagnosed, it does probably grow slowly for some

months

to years before diagnosis. There is active research on earlier signs to detect

it before it's

too late. Regular MRI, CT, ERCP for brushings, and CA19-9 levels are all ways to

monitor

CCA, with a positive for any one of these an alert to follow up. In the US there

is an

experimental protocol at the Mayo clinic for radiation/chemo followed by

transplant for

early stage CCA. Several members have done this or are currently being

evaluated. Their

results for cancers detected early are pretty good, with survival times not too

far below

those for transplants without CCA.

BTW, my brother lives in Blenheim NZ on the South Island. He sends us good wine

(and we

were raised in California). He and his family love it in their adopted country.

Someday we

will make it down to visit.

Martha (MA)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Detecting and treating cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is difficult and

presents great risk, but a study reported by earlier this

month (msg 88692) gives hope that CCA can be prevented or the risk of

CCA reduced to very low levels. No one in the study developed CCA

after being on Urso for 8.5 years up to the 18 year duration of the

study. The CCA rate for those in the first 2.5 years of the study was

0.58% per year, for the next 6 years it dropped to 0.49%. Beyond that,

they don't speculate due to the zero incidence of CCA, but from the

numbers enrolled in the study I would estimate it is below 0.40% and

perhaps as low as 0.10%. A larger long term study would be needed to

establish those figures.

Tim R

The incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing

cholangitis during longtime treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid.

A. Stiehl

Department of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Germany

Introduction: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) represents a serious

complication of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). In two recent

studies with 604 and 161 patients followed over a median time of 5.7

and 11.5 years the reported incidence rate of CCA was 13.3 and 6.8 %

(A Bergquist et al., J Hepatol 2002; 36: 321–327; K Burak et al.,

Am J Hepatol 2004; 99: 523–526). Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)

possibly may influnce the incidence of CCA in man (B Brandsaeter et

al. J Hepatol 2004; 40: 815–822).

Aim of study: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the

incidence rate of CCA in PSC patients after longtime treatment with

ursodeoxycholic acid.

Patients and methods: The present study was started in May 1987 and

data up to May 2005 were considered in the evaluation. A total of

150 patients (105 men and 45 women) with PSC but without evidence of

CCA at entry were included in the study. Of the patients included

101 had inflammatory bowel disease (93 ulcerative colitis

and 6 Crohn's disease). Altogether 120 patients were treated for 1

year, 107 for 2 years, 97 for 3 years, 83 for 4 years, 72 for 5

years, 62 for 6 years and 57 for 7–18 years. Up to 1995 the patients

were treated with UDCA in a dose of 750 mg/d (8.8–15.3 mg/kg),

starting from 1997 with 13.8–17.4 mg/kg and starting from 2001 with

18–20 mg/kg. A minority of 63 patients who were included in a study

of UDCA absorption intermittently received higher doses of up to 30

mg/kg for up to 3 months. All 72 patients with dominant stenoses

were treated by repeated endoscopic dilatation. Diagnosis of CCA was

established in each case by histologic examination of tissue

obtained at laparotomy or in the explanted liver at the time of

liver transplantation.

Results: The median treatment time of the 150 patients was 6.4

years. Altogether 5 patients developed a CCA during UDCA treatment

yielding an incidence rate of 3.3%. The calculation of CCA per

patient years revealed 0.58 CCA per 100 patient years in years 0–

2.5, 0.49 CCA in years 2.5–8.5, and no CCA thereafter up to 18 years

after entry into the study. The Kaplan Meier estimate of CCA

incidence during UDCA treatment reached a plateau after 8.3 years.

All 5 patients with CCA belonged to the subgroup of patients with

colitis and in addition to the subgroup of patients with dominant

stenosis.

Summary and conclusion: The annual incidence rate of CCA in PSC

treated with UDCA is low and decreases with time of treatment.

Compared with the CCA incidence rates reported in studies on the

natural course of the disease, the CCA incidence after UDCA

treatment was lower than expected.

>

> Cholangiocarcinoma is the ticking time bomb that we all worry about.

> ... . The risk might be 1% per year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Detecting and treating cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is difficult and

presents great risk, but a study reported by earlier this

month (msg 88692) gives hope that CCA can be prevented or the risk of

CCA reduced to very low levels. No one in the study developed CCA

after being on Urso for 8.5 years up to the 18 year duration of the

study. The CCA rate for those in the first 2.5 years of the study was

0.58% per year, for the next 6 years it dropped to 0.49%. Beyond that,

they don't speculate due to the zero incidence of CCA, but from the

numbers enrolled in the study I would estimate it is below 0.40% and

perhaps as low as 0.10%. A larger long term study would be needed to

establish those figures.

Tim R

The incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing

cholangitis during longtime treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid.

A. Stiehl

Department of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Germany

Introduction: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) represents a serious

complication of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). In two recent

studies with 604 and 161 patients followed over a median time of 5.7

and 11.5 years the reported incidence rate of CCA was 13.3 and 6.8 %

(A Bergquist et al., J Hepatol 2002; 36: 321–327; K Burak et al.,

Am J Hepatol 2004; 99: 523–526). Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)

possibly may influnce the incidence of CCA in man (B Brandsaeter et

al. J Hepatol 2004; 40: 815–822).

Aim of study: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the

incidence rate of CCA in PSC patients after longtime treatment with

ursodeoxycholic acid.

Patients and methods: The present study was started in May 1987 and

data up to May 2005 were considered in the evaluation. A total of

150 patients (105 men and 45 women) with PSC but without evidence of

CCA at entry were included in the study. Of the patients included

101 had inflammatory bowel disease (93 ulcerative colitis

and 6 Crohn's disease). Altogether 120 patients were treated for 1

year, 107 for 2 years, 97 for 3 years, 83 for 4 years, 72 for 5

years, 62 for 6 years and 57 for 7–18 years. Up to 1995 the patients

were treated with UDCA in a dose of 750 mg/d (8.8–15.3 mg/kg),

starting from 1997 with 13.8–17.4 mg/kg and starting from 2001 with

18–20 mg/kg. A minority of 63 patients who were included in a study

of UDCA absorption intermittently received higher doses of up to 30

mg/kg for up to 3 months. All 72 patients with dominant stenoses

were treated by repeated endoscopic dilatation. Diagnosis of CCA was

established in each case by histologic examination of tissue

obtained at laparotomy or in the explanted liver at the time of

liver transplantation.

Results: The median treatment time of the 150 patients was 6.4

years. Altogether 5 patients developed a CCA during UDCA treatment

yielding an incidence rate of 3.3%. The calculation of CCA per

patient years revealed 0.58 CCA per 100 patient years in years 0–

2.5, 0.49 CCA in years 2.5–8.5, and no CCA thereafter up to 18 years

after entry into the study. The Kaplan Meier estimate of CCA

incidence during UDCA treatment reached a plateau after 8.3 years.

All 5 patients with CCA belonged to the subgroup of patients with

colitis and in addition to the subgroup of patients with dominant

stenosis.

Summary and conclusion: The annual incidence rate of CCA in PSC

treated with UDCA is low and decreases with time of treatment.

Compared with the CCA incidence rates reported in studies on the

natural course of the disease, the CCA incidence after UDCA

treatment was lower than expected.

>

> Cholangiocarcinoma is the ticking time bomb that we all worry about.

> ... . The risk might be 1% per year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Detecting and treating cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is difficult and

presents great risk, but a study reported by earlier this

month (msg 88692) gives hope that CCA can be prevented or the risk of

CCA reduced to very low levels. No one in the study developed CCA

after being on Urso for 8.5 years up to the 18 year duration of the

study. The CCA rate for those in the first 2.5 years of the study was

0.58% per year, for the next 6 years it dropped to 0.49%. Beyond that,

they don't speculate due to the zero incidence of CCA, but from the

numbers enrolled in the study I would estimate it is below 0.40% and

perhaps as low as 0.10%. A larger long term study would be needed to

establish those figures.

Tim R

The incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing

cholangitis during longtime treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid.

A. Stiehl

Department of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Germany

Introduction: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) represents a serious

complication of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). In two recent

studies with 604 and 161 patients followed over a median time of 5.7

and 11.5 years the reported incidence rate of CCA was 13.3 and 6.8 %

(A Bergquist et al., J Hepatol 2002; 36: 321–327; K Burak et al.,

Am J Hepatol 2004; 99: 523–526). Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)

possibly may influnce the incidence of CCA in man (B Brandsaeter et

al. J Hepatol 2004; 40: 815–822).

Aim of study: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the

incidence rate of CCA in PSC patients after longtime treatment with

ursodeoxycholic acid.

Patients and methods: The present study was started in May 1987 and

data up to May 2005 were considered in the evaluation. A total of

150 patients (105 men and 45 women) with PSC but without evidence of

CCA at entry were included in the study. Of the patients included

101 had inflammatory bowel disease (93 ulcerative colitis

and 6 Crohn's disease). Altogether 120 patients were treated for 1

year, 107 for 2 years, 97 for 3 years, 83 for 4 years, 72 for 5

years, 62 for 6 years and 57 for 7–18 years. Up to 1995 the patients

were treated with UDCA in a dose of 750 mg/d (8.8–15.3 mg/kg),

starting from 1997 with 13.8–17.4 mg/kg and starting from 2001 with

18–20 mg/kg. A minority of 63 patients who were included in a study

of UDCA absorption intermittently received higher doses of up to 30

mg/kg for up to 3 months. All 72 patients with dominant stenoses

were treated by repeated endoscopic dilatation. Diagnosis of CCA was

established in each case by histologic examination of tissue

obtained at laparotomy or in the explanted liver at the time of

liver transplantation.

Results: The median treatment time of the 150 patients was 6.4

years. Altogether 5 patients developed a CCA during UDCA treatment

yielding an incidence rate of 3.3%. The calculation of CCA per

patient years revealed 0.58 CCA per 100 patient years in years 0–

2.5, 0.49 CCA in years 2.5–8.5, and no CCA thereafter up to 18 years

after entry into the study. The Kaplan Meier estimate of CCA

incidence during UDCA treatment reached a plateau after 8.3 years.

All 5 patients with CCA belonged to the subgroup of patients with

colitis and in addition to the subgroup of patients with dominant

stenosis.

Summary and conclusion: The annual incidence rate of CCA in PSC

treated with UDCA is low and decreases with time of treatment.

Compared with the CCA incidence rates reported in studies on the

natural course of the disease, the CCA incidence after UDCA

treatment was lower than expected.

>

> Cholangiocarcinoma is the ticking time bomb that we all worry about.

> ... . The risk might be 1% per year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...