Guest guest Posted February 12, 2001 Report Share Posted February 12, 2001 On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, rfransway@y... recommended: http://www.med.nyu.edu/Psych/public.html with the caveat that " I think anyone who was to take these personality tests would be found mentally ill. Try it. Take them all. See how often they refer you to a shrink because of your answers. " My response: I took just the test for personality disorders and was told that I am not just mentally ill but may actually have " schizoid personality disorder " (!)(break out the antipsychotics, y'all!) simply because I: 1. " prefer solitary activities, " ( " The primary cause of all of man's problems is his inability to sit by himself alone in his room. " --Blaise Pascal I suppose if I didn't appreciate my solitude, I'd be cloying for attention and diagnosed " codependent " or " enmeshed, " huh?) 2. am " indifferent to praise or criticism, " (Independence of thought; now we can't have that now can we?! Lock him up!) 3. engage in " magical thinking, " (At least I'm honest about the fact that praying to a Higher Power IS the ultimate magical thinking. I'm a practicing NeoPagan! What other kind of thinking would one expect me to engage in?) 4. have " unstable/intense relationships, " (There are a lot of jerks out there, including, in some cases, relatives. If you've never hooked up with any, consider yourself lucky.) 5. (and) am " preoccupied with unlimited success or ideal love, " (Are being ambitious and/or romantic mental illnesses now too?) As a practicing NeoPagan (in the Eclectic tradition, so I also get to dabble in everything from Gnostic Christianity to Sufi dancing), I also concur with the general consensus that " delusions " that are politically popular ( " Jesus is coming back " ) are protected while those that are not ( " I cast a spell to drive away my roommate from Hell--and it worked! " ) are maligned--e.g., last night, one of my favorite TV shows, The Practice, featured a beloved character, , critically/fatally injured and unconscious, whose estranged mother refused to allow her daughter to have a blood transfusion because the mother claimed they were both Jehovah's Witnesses, despite the fact that , from her acceptance of homosexuality and divorce to her having had an abortion, was apparently not a very " good " JH--a fact Bobby, her lawyer boss, tried to use in court to overthrow the mother's decision. In his passion, he slipped and compared being a JH to practicing " Voodoo. " The mother later took offense to that and used it to claim he was prejudiced against JHs. I'm tempted to write in to the show in mock offense and inform them that one of my ex-lovers and my late best friend's widower both practice " Voodoo " (Santeria, actually) and are two of the most deeply spiritual people I've ever known! (So, by the way, is the atheist minister--yes, " atheist minister " --of the first Unitarian church I ever attended!) Anyway, I think it's all about balance. I spent 15+ years going to therapists who told me that my being raised in a dysfunctional family (like most people?!) and my homosexuality (a state I share with happy millions) were the causes of my suicidal depression. I pointed out classic signs of manic-depression and begged to be put on lithium. They refused: " Too much bloodwork. " Yes, there are still some out there who believe EXCLUSIVELY in " talk " therapy. Finally, about four years ago, I found a psychiatrist who put me on lithium within 15 minutes of meeting me, who had difficulty believing no one had " even tried " me on it. The difference is like night and day. I even refer to my life thus far, not altogether jokingly, as " BL " and " AL. " Yes, technically, lithium is a mineral salt, not a " drug, " but, whatever it is, try to take mine away, and I'll hurt you! Yes, it works best in tandem with psychotherapy, which I'm just now beginning because of the long waiting list at the only affordable option for me, the local County clinic. It also, by the way, helped me stop " self-medicating " my depression with alcohol. Also, by the way, I now get " too much bloodwork " twice a year(!) Interestingly, statistics show that the Japanese have 1/10 as many cases per capita of depression as we do, and many believe it's due to the all of the lithium and omega-3 and -6 fatty acids (building blocks of the nervous system) in all of the fish and seaweed they eat! Are drugs (like Ritalin and Prozac) overprescribed? Hell, yes. Are there people who are subjected to unnecessary treatment when they really just need a good cry? Of course. Does that mean that there aren't people out there who are just plain looney toons and desperately need even very strong antipsychotics to even function or that psychiatric drugs are NEVER useful? Get real! And yes, I also firmly agree with, Nadine Strossman, president of the ACLU, who so eloquently stated in an interview with Stossel for his feature " Sex, Lies, and Consenting Adults " (available on videotape), " consulting adults, in private places, have the absolute right to ingest, imbibe, inhale, or insert anything they wish into their own bodies. " (I love statements like that that concisely combine opposition to both the " War On Drugs " and the " Crimes Against Nature " laws. As one friend put it, " Helms says two men making love is a crime against nature, then goes out and burns down a rain forest! " Society isn't quite ready to recognize Ms. Strossman's " right " yet, but I have faith. As I've implied, it is " the system " that is screwed up, not necessarily any and all of the methods, and so I'll leave you with one group who is trying to change that system. Ever since I heard of such a profession (about age five), I've wanted to be a psychotherapist--if only because I was already so sick of the " small talk " that passed for real conversation in the small (minded) town I grew up in. I gave up that dream in my early 20s when I encountered the same kinds of coercion and corruption in the social sciences that other posters have detailed. I am now back in school, studying psychology, because that dream has been rekindled by the people at the East Side Institute for Short-Term Psychotherapy in New York City, with whom I hope to do eventual postgraduate work. The fact that they are branded as a " cult " by the same media who so blindly and blithely praise AA only further supports their contention that their brand of therapy is, as they put it, " more cultural than scientific and intimately linked to radical/revolutionary social change. " I especially recommend the layperson's magnum opus of their founder, Dr. Fred Newman, " The Myth Of Psychology, " especially, to 12SF people, the chapter entitled, " Addiction is a Myth. " For more " heady " reading, check out his (together with Lois Holzman) " Lev Vygotsky: Revolutionary Scientist " a virtual textbook about their methodological founder. Their website is at http://www.eastsideinstitute.org Check it out! P.S.: Is there anybody out there who, like me, still goes to occasional " less fundamentalist " AA meetings (because there's so little else available locally) while (exactly as they suggest) " maintaining an open mind " (by reading Stanton Peele, RR literature, aadeprogramming.com, etc.)? I may be " indifferent to praise or criticism, " but I still like company. There are even a few of us (AA backsliders) locally who might like to start a " freethinkers/skeptics " group. Has anybody done anything like that, and, if so, what do you call it? (For that matter, what kind of readings do you do?!) Any, to borrow a phrase, " experience, strength, and hope " you can offer would be much appreciated. (My favorite quote): " We don't see things as they are; we see them as we are. " --Anais Nin Take care, y'all. --Clifton T. __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 13, 2001 Report Share Posted February 13, 2001 http://www.jesusmysteries.demon.co.uk/home.html you may find this book interesting. it bascialy comes to conclusion christ is a myth based on pagan lore Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 13, 2001 Report Share Posted February 13, 2001 What an interesting and lengthy post, Clifton. I see that you have a Hungarian surname. I'm Hungarian as well. Born there even. The mental illness questionnaire is just plain stupid. It can be more damaging for people to accept a stigmatizing " diagnosis " than to accept their own quirky personality. As a society, we should be especially careful about stigmatizing children, and labeling them " failure to thrive " children, " borderline personality " or whatever. That can have serious negative reprecussions. It can be as bad as donning the label of lifetime alcoholic for anyone who has a concern about exessive drinking. Your comment on the Japanese diet and their statistics of depression were very interesting to me. I've always been a proponent of listening to what my body craves, and feeding it accordingly. I've always had difficulty during the winter, and in past winters, I've resorted to St. 's Wort, which is very effective for me in controlling seasonal depression. But this winter, I did not choose St. 's Wort, but interestingly, have gravitated to eating a lot of fish and seaweed. I agree that the motivator for many people to continue to go to meetings, is the desire for social contact. That was the hardest thing for me to deal with. The sudden drop of people in my life from hundreds to zero. I've managed to supplement this, by joining other types of groups, but you are right, that 12 step groups are very plentiful. The thing about it, is that people bond over their pain, trauma or weaknesses, versus their strengths or interests. Also, I find that 12 step groups, because of their internal vocabulary, manage to supress an otherwise potential urge for political activism, something that I'm just beginning to develop an interest in. Apple > On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, rfransway@y... recommended: > http://www.med.nyu.edu/Psych/public.html > with the caveat that " I think anyone who was to take > these personality tests would be found mentally ill. > Try it. Take them all. See how often they refer you to > a shrink because of your answers. " > > My response: I took just the test for personality > disorders and was told that I am not just mentally ill > but may actually have " schizoid personality disorder " > (!)(break out the antipsychotics, y'all!) simply > because I: > 1. " prefer solitary activities, " ( " The primary cause > of all of man's problems is his inability to sit by > himself alone in his room. " --Blaise Pascal I suppose > if I didn't appreciate my solitude, I'd be cloying for > attention and diagnosed " codependent " or " enmeshed, " > huh?) > 2. am " indifferent to praise or criticism, " > (Independence of thought; now we can't have that now > can we?! Lock him up!) > 3. engage in " magical thinking, " (At least I'm honest > about the fact that praying to a Higher Power IS the > ultimate magical thinking. I'm a practicing NeoPagan! > What other kind of thinking would one expect me to > engage in?) > 4. have " unstable/intense relationships, " (There are > a lot of jerks out there, including, in some cases, > relatives. If you've never hooked up with any, > consider yourself lucky.) > 5. (and) am " preoccupied with unlimited success or > ideal love, " (Are being ambitious and/or romantic > mental illnesses now too?) > > As a practicing NeoPagan (in the Eclectic tradition, > so I also get to dabble in everything from Gnostic > Christianity to Sufi dancing), I also concur with the > general consensus that " delusions " that are > politically popular ( " Jesus is coming back " ) are > protected while those that are not ( " I cast a spell to > drive away my roommate from Hell--and it worked! " ) are > maligned--e.g., last night, one of my favorite TV > shows, The Practice, featured a beloved character, > , critically/fatally injured and unconscious, > whose estranged mother refused to allow her daughter > to have a blood transfusion because the mother claimed > they were both Jehovah's Witnesses, despite the fact > that , from her acceptance of homosexuality and > divorce to her having had an abortion, was apparently > not a very " good " JH--a fact Bobby, her lawyer boss, > tried to use in court to overthrow the mother's > decision. In his passion, he slipped and compared > being a JH to practicing " Voodoo. " The mother later > took offense to that and used it to claim he was > prejudiced against JHs. I'm tempted to write in to > the show in mock offense and inform them that one of > my ex-lovers and my late best friend's widower both > practice " Voodoo " (Santeria, actually) and are two of > the most deeply spiritual people I've ever known! > (So, by the way, is the atheist minister--yes, > " atheist minister " --of the first Unitarian church I > ever attended!) > > Anyway, I think it's all about balance. I spent 15+ > years going to therapists who told me that my being > raised in a dysfunctional family (like most people?!) > and my homosexuality (a state I share with happy > millions) were the causes of my suicidal depression. > I pointed out classic signs of manic-depression and > begged to be put on lithium. They refused: " Too much > bloodwork. " Yes, there are still some out there who > believe EXCLUSIVELY in " talk " therapy. Finally, about > four years ago, I found a psychiatrist who put me on > lithium within 15 minutes of meeting me, who had > difficulty believing no one had " even tried " me on it. > The difference is like night and day. I even refer > to my life thus far, not altogether jokingly, as " BL " > and " AL. " Yes, technically, lithium is a mineral > salt, not a " drug, " but, whatever it is, try to take > mine away, and I'll hurt you! Yes, it works best in > tandem with psychotherapy, which I'm just now > beginning because of the long waiting list at the only > affordable option for me, the local County clinic. It > also, by the way, helped me stop " self-medicating " my > depression with alcohol. Also, by the way, I now get > " too much bloodwork " twice a year(!) Interestingly, > statistics show that the Japanese have 1/10 as many > cases per capita of depression as we do, and many > believe it's due to the all of the lithium and omega-3 > and -6 fatty acids (building blocks of the nervous > system) in all of the fish and seaweed they eat! > > Are drugs (like Ritalin and Prozac) overprescribed? > Hell, yes. Are there people who are subjected to > unnecessary treatment when they really just need a > good cry? Of course. Does that mean that there > aren't people out there who are just plain looney > toons and desperately need even very strong > antipsychotics to even function or that psychiatric > drugs are NEVER useful? Get real! > > And yes, I also firmly agree with, Nadine Strossman, > president of the ACLU, who so eloquently stated in an > interview with Stossel for his feature " Sex, > Lies, and Consenting Adults " (available on videotape), > " consulting adults, in private places, have the > absolute right to ingest, imbibe, inhale, or insert > anything they wish into their own bodies. " (I love > statements like that that concisely combine opposition > to both the " War On Drugs " and the " Crimes Against > Nature " laws. As one friend put it, " Helms says > two men making love is a crime against nature, then > goes out and burns down a rain forest! " Society isn't > quite ready to recognize Ms. Strossman's " right " yet, > but I have faith. > > As I've implied, it is " the system " that is screwed > up, not necessarily any and all of the methods, and so > I'll leave you with one group who is trying to change > that system. Ever since I heard of such a profession > (about age five), I've wanted to be a > psychotherapist--if only because I was already so sick > of the " small talk " that passed for real conversation > in the small (minded) town I grew up in. I gave up > that dream in my early 20s when I encountered the same > kinds of coercion and corruption in the social > sciences that other posters have detailed. I am now > back in school, studying psychology, because that > dream has been rekindled by the people at the East > Side Institute for Short-Term Psychotherapy in New > York City, with whom I hope to do eventual > postgraduate work. The fact that they are branded as > a " cult " by the same media who so blindly and blithely > praise AA only further supports their contention that > their brand of therapy is, as they put it, " more > cultural than scientific and intimately linked to > radical/revolutionary social change. " I especially > recommend the layperson's magnum opus of their > founder, Dr. Fred Newman, " The Myth Of Psychology, " > especially, to 12SF people, the chapter entitled, > " Addiction is a Myth. " For more " heady " reading, > check out his (together with Lois Holzman) " Lev > Vygotsky: Revolutionary Scientist " a virtual textbook > about their methodological founder. Their website is > at http://www.eastsideinstitute.org > Check it out! > > P.S.: Is there anybody out there who, like me, still > goes to occasional " less fundamentalist " AA meetings > (because there's so little else available locally) > while (exactly as they suggest) " maintaining an open > mind " (by reading Stanton Peele, RR literature, > aadeprogramming.com, etc.)? I may be " indifferent to > praise or criticism, " but I still like company. There > are even a few of us (AA backsliders) locally who > might like to start a " freethinkers/skeptics " group. > Has anybody done anything like that, and, if so, what > do you call it? (For that matter, what kind of > readings do you do?!) Any, to borrow a phrase, > " experience, strength, and hope " you can offer would > be much appreciated. > > (My favorite quote): " We don't see things as they > are; we see them as we are. " --Anais Nin > > Take care, y'all. --Clifton T. > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 13, 2001 Report Share Posted February 13, 2001 What an interesting and lengthy post, Clifton. I see that you have a Hungarian surname. I'm Hungarian as well. Born there even. The mental illness questionnaire is just plain stupid. It can be more damaging for people to accept a stigmatizing " diagnosis " than to accept their own quirky personality. As a society, we should be especially careful about stigmatizing children, and labeling them " failure to thrive " children, " borderline personality " or whatever. That can have serious negative reprecussions. It can be as bad as donning the label of lifetime alcoholic for anyone who has a concern about exessive drinking. Your comment on the Japanese diet and their statistics of depression were very interesting to me. I've always been a proponent of listening to what my body craves, and feeding it accordingly. I've always had difficulty during the winter, and in past winters, I've resorted to St. 's Wort, which is very effective for me in controlling seasonal depression. But this winter, I did not choose St. 's Wort, but interestingly, have gravitated to eating a lot of fish and seaweed. I agree that the motivator for many people to continue to go to meetings, is the desire for social contact. That was the hardest thing for me to deal with. The sudden drop of people in my life from hundreds to zero. I've managed to supplement this, by joining other types of groups, but you are right, that 12 step groups are very plentiful. The thing about it, is that people bond over their pain, trauma or weaknesses, versus their strengths or interests. Also, I find that 12 step groups, because of their internal vocabulary, manage to supress an otherwise potential urge for political activism, something that I'm just beginning to develop an interest in. Apple > On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, rfransway@y... recommended: > http://www.med.nyu.edu/Psych/public.html > with the caveat that " I think anyone who was to take > these personality tests would be found mentally ill. > Try it. Take them all. See how often they refer you to > a shrink because of your answers. " > > My response: I took just the test for personality > disorders and was told that I am not just mentally ill > but may actually have " schizoid personality disorder " > (!)(break out the antipsychotics, y'all!) simply > because I: > 1. " prefer solitary activities, " ( " The primary cause > of all of man's problems is his inability to sit by > himself alone in his room. " --Blaise Pascal I suppose > if I didn't appreciate my solitude, I'd be cloying for > attention and diagnosed " codependent " or " enmeshed, " > huh?) > 2. am " indifferent to praise or criticism, " > (Independence of thought; now we can't have that now > can we?! Lock him up!) > 3. engage in " magical thinking, " (At least I'm honest > about the fact that praying to a Higher Power IS the > ultimate magical thinking. I'm a practicing NeoPagan! > What other kind of thinking would one expect me to > engage in?) > 4. have " unstable/intense relationships, " (There are > a lot of jerks out there, including, in some cases, > relatives. If you've never hooked up with any, > consider yourself lucky.) > 5. (and) am " preoccupied with unlimited success or > ideal love, " (Are being ambitious and/or romantic > mental illnesses now too?) > > As a practicing NeoPagan (in the Eclectic tradition, > so I also get to dabble in everything from Gnostic > Christianity to Sufi dancing), I also concur with the > general consensus that " delusions " that are > politically popular ( " Jesus is coming back " ) are > protected while those that are not ( " I cast a spell to > drive away my roommate from Hell--and it worked! " ) are > maligned--e.g., last night, one of my favorite TV > shows, The Practice, featured a beloved character, > , critically/fatally injured and unconscious, > whose estranged mother refused to allow her daughter > to have a blood transfusion because the mother claimed > they were both Jehovah's Witnesses, despite the fact > that , from her acceptance of homosexuality and > divorce to her having had an abortion, was apparently > not a very " good " JH--a fact Bobby, her lawyer boss, > tried to use in court to overthrow the mother's > decision. In his passion, he slipped and compared > being a JH to practicing " Voodoo. " The mother later > took offense to that and used it to claim he was > prejudiced against JHs. I'm tempted to write in to > the show in mock offense and inform them that one of > my ex-lovers and my late best friend's widower both > practice " Voodoo " (Santeria, actually) and are two of > the most deeply spiritual people I've ever known! > (So, by the way, is the atheist minister--yes, > " atheist minister " --of the first Unitarian church I > ever attended!) > > Anyway, I think it's all about balance. I spent 15+ > years going to therapists who told me that my being > raised in a dysfunctional family (like most people?!) > and my homosexuality (a state I share with happy > millions) were the causes of my suicidal depression. > I pointed out classic signs of manic-depression and > begged to be put on lithium. They refused: " Too much > bloodwork. " Yes, there are still some out there who > believe EXCLUSIVELY in " talk " therapy. Finally, about > four years ago, I found a psychiatrist who put me on > lithium within 15 minutes of meeting me, who had > difficulty believing no one had " even tried " me on it. > The difference is like night and day. I even refer > to my life thus far, not altogether jokingly, as " BL " > and " AL. " Yes, technically, lithium is a mineral > salt, not a " drug, " but, whatever it is, try to take > mine away, and I'll hurt you! Yes, it works best in > tandem with psychotherapy, which I'm just now > beginning because of the long waiting list at the only > affordable option for me, the local County clinic. It > also, by the way, helped me stop " self-medicating " my > depression with alcohol. Also, by the way, I now get > " too much bloodwork " twice a year(!) Interestingly, > statistics show that the Japanese have 1/10 as many > cases per capita of depression as we do, and many > believe it's due to the all of the lithium and omega-3 > and -6 fatty acids (building blocks of the nervous > system) in all of the fish and seaweed they eat! > > Are drugs (like Ritalin and Prozac) overprescribed? > Hell, yes. Are there people who are subjected to > unnecessary treatment when they really just need a > good cry? Of course. Does that mean that there > aren't people out there who are just plain looney > toons and desperately need even very strong > antipsychotics to even function or that psychiatric > drugs are NEVER useful? Get real! > > And yes, I also firmly agree with, Nadine Strossman, > president of the ACLU, who so eloquently stated in an > interview with Stossel for his feature " Sex, > Lies, and Consenting Adults " (available on videotape), > " consulting adults, in private places, have the > absolute right to ingest, imbibe, inhale, or insert > anything they wish into their own bodies. " (I love > statements like that that concisely combine opposition > to both the " War On Drugs " and the " Crimes Against > Nature " laws. As one friend put it, " Helms says > two men making love is a crime against nature, then > goes out and burns down a rain forest! " Society isn't > quite ready to recognize Ms. Strossman's " right " yet, > but I have faith. > > As I've implied, it is " the system " that is screwed > up, not necessarily any and all of the methods, and so > I'll leave you with one group who is trying to change > that system. Ever since I heard of such a profession > (about age five), I've wanted to be a > psychotherapist--if only because I was already so sick > of the " small talk " that passed for real conversation > in the small (minded) town I grew up in. I gave up > that dream in my early 20s when I encountered the same > kinds of coercion and corruption in the social > sciences that other posters have detailed. I am now > back in school, studying psychology, because that > dream has been rekindled by the people at the East > Side Institute for Short-Term Psychotherapy in New > York City, with whom I hope to do eventual > postgraduate work. The fact that they are branded as > a " cult " by the same media who so blindly and blithely > praise AA only further supports their contention that > their brand of therapy is, as they put it, " more > cultural than scientific and intimately linked to > radical/revolutionary social change. " I especially > recommend the layperson's magnum opus of their > founder, Dr. Fred Newman, " The Myth Of Psychology, " > especially, to 12SF people, the chapter entitled, > " Addiction is a Myth. " For more " heady " reading, > check out his (together with Lois Holzman) " Lev > Vygotsky: Revolutionary Scientist " a virtual textbook > about their methodological founder. Their website is > at http://www.eastsideinstitute.org > Check it out! > > P.S.: Is there anybody out there who, like me, still > goes to occasional " less fundamentalist " AA meetings > (because there's so little else available locally) > while (exactly as they suggest) " maintaining an open > mind " (by reading Stanton Peele, RR literature, > aadeprogramming.com, etc.)? I may be " indifferent to > praise or criticism, " but I still like company. There > are even a few of us (AA backsliders) locally who > might like to start a " freethinkers/skeptics " group. > Has anybody done anything like that, and, if so, what > do you call it? (For that matter, what kind of > readings do you do?!) Any, to borrow a phrase, > " experience, strength, and hope " you can offer would > be much appreciated. > > (My favorite quote): " We don't see things as they > are; we see them as we are. " --Anais Nin > > Take care, y'all. --Clifton T. > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2001 Report Share Posted February 14, 2001 >P.S.: Is there anybody out there who, like me, still >goes to occasional " less fundamentalist " AA meetings >(because there's so little else available locally) >while (exactly as they suggest) " maintaining an open >mind " (by reading Stanton Peele, RR literature, >aadeprogramming.com, etc.)? I may be " indifferent to >praise or criticism, " but I still like company. There >are even a few of us (AA backsliders) locally who >might like to start a " freethinkers/skeptics " group. >Has anybody done anything like that, and, if so, what >do you call it? (For that matter, what kind of >readings do you do?!) Any, to borrow a phrase, > " experience, strength, and hope " you can offer would >be much appreciated. Clifton, My boyfriend and I go to meetings once a week. This guy holds Rational Recovery meetings on Wednesdays, SOS meetings on Thursdays, and is talking about starting SMART meetings. We really like these meetings. We talk about any temptation to use, how to overcome that temptation, and read/discuss/watch videos of different abstinence methods (RR/AVTT, etc). The meetings are all upbeat and positive, and we've learned a lot in the months we've been going. I think it would be great if you started a skeptics group, not only for the company, but it would also satisfy the requirement for many court-ordered folks. BTW, all of you who decry court-ordered AA: an attorney says you're never *forced* to go to AA by the courts. You always have a choice--jail. So those of y ou who dislike any court-mandated program, go to jail and serve out your term. Those of you who believe the courts have an interest in ordering people into some kind of treatment, fight to make AA alternatives acceptable to the courts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2001 Report Share Posted February 14, 2001 >P.S.: Is there anybody out there who, like me, still >goes to occasional " less fundamentalist " AA meetings >(because there's so little else available locally) >while (exactly as they suggest) " maintaining an open >mind " (by reading Stanton Peele, RR literature, >aadeprogramming.com, etc.)? I may be " indifferent to >praise or criticism, " but I still like company. There >are even a few of us (AA backsliders) locally who >might like to start a " freethinkers/skeptics " group. >Has anybody done anything like that, and, if so, what >do you call it? (For that matter, what kind of >readings do you do?!) Any, to borrow a phrase, > " experience, strength, and hope " you can offer would >be much appreciated. Clifton, My boyfriend and I go to meetings once a week. This guy holds Rational Recovery meetings on Wednesdays, SOS meetings on Thursdays, and is talking about starting SMART meetings. We really like these meetings. We talk about any temptation to use, how to overcome that temptation, and read/discuss/watch videos of different abstinence methods (RR/AVTT, etc). The meetings are all upbeat and positive, and we've learned a lot in the months we've been going. I think it would be great if you started a skeptics group, not only for the company, but it would also satisfy the requirement for many court-ordered folks. BTW, all of you who decry court-ordered AA: an attorney says you're never *forced* to go to AA by the courts. You always have a choice--jail. So those of y ou who dislike any court-mandated program, go to jail and serve out your term. Those of you who believe the courts have an interest in ordering people into some kind of treatment, fight to make AA alternatives acceptable to the courts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2001 Report Share Posted February 14, 2001 >P.S.: Is there anybody out there who, like me, still >goes to occasional " less fundamentalist " AA meetings >(because there's so little else available locally) >while (exactly as they suggest) " maintaining an open >mind " (by reading Stanton Peele, RR literature, >aadeprogramming.com, etc.)? I may be " indifferent to >praise or criticism, " but I still like company. There >are even a few of us (AA backsliders) locally who >might like to start a " freethinkers/skeptics " group. >Has anybody done anything like that, and, if so, what >do you call it? (For that matter, what kind of >readings do you do?!) Any, to borrow a phrase, > " experience, strength, and hope " you can offer would >be much appreciated. Clifton, My boyfriend and I go to meetings once a week. This guy holds Rational Recovery meetings on Wednesdays, SOS meetings on Thursdays, and is talking about starting SMART meetings. We really like these meetings. We talk about any temptation to use, how to overcome that temptation, and read/discuss/watch videos of different abstinence methods (RR/AVTT, etc). The meetings are all upbeat and positive, and we've learned a lot in the months we've been going. I think it would be great if you started a skeptics group, not only for the company, but it would also satisfy the requirement for many court-ordered folks. BTW, all of you who decry court-ordered AA: an attorney says you're never *forced* to go to AA by the courts. You always have a choice--jail. So those of y ou who dislike any court-mandated program, go to jail and serve out your term. Those of you who believe the courts have an interest in ordering people into some kind of treatment, fight to make AA alternatives acceptable to the courts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2001 Report Share Posted February 14, 2001 > BTW, all of you who decry court-ordered AA: an >attorney says you're never *forced* to go to AA by >the courts. You always have a choice--jail. So those >of you who dislike any court-mandated program, go to >jail and serve out your term. Those of you who >believe the courts have an interest in ordering >people into some kind of treatment, fight to make AA >alternatives acceptable to the courts. I don't think so. Neither did the majority justices in , Kerr, Warner, et. al. Future Supreme Court Justice Holmes might have thought so, when he wrote that a person " may have a constitutional right to talk politics, but he has no constitutional right to be a policeman. " McAuliffe v. Mayor of New Bedford, 29 N.E. 517, 518 (Mass. 1892) but that doctrine was repudiated by the Supreme Court in 1970 and that repudiation was upheld in the above decisions. Giving someone a " choice " between joining a religious orginazition sounds repugnant to the Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses notwithstanding what your attorney might have said. I was in court in Roxboro, NC and a man pled guilty to his upteenth public intoxication charge. The judge ordered him into a " treatment program " (undoubetly 12-step indoctrination). The defendant said he preferred a jail sentence. The judge refused to hear him and moved on to the next case. How many others have had the " choice " this man had? Are you sure you belong on this list and not one advocating " meetings " of some sort for " alcoholics " and/or forced drugging and/or the " war on drugs " ?! You have occcasionally expressed a token objection to XA (or to the lack of alternatives thereto) in the posts of yours I have read but I believe that you do not subscribe to the unstated principle that most people on this list do: To attend meetings or take drugs of any kind is a personal choice that should not be taken away by any authority. ------------------------------------------------------- Get your free, secure email at http://www.medmail.com - the e-mail service for the medical community Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2001 Report Share Posted February 14, 2001 > BTW, all of you who decry court-ordered AA: an >attorney says you're never *forced* to go to AA by >the courts. You always have a choice--jail. So those >of you who dislike any court-mandated program, go to >jail and serve out your term. Those of you who >believe the courts have an interest in ordering >people into some kind of treatment, fight to make AA >alternatives acceptable to the courts. I don't think so. Neither did the majority justices in , Kerr, Warner, et. al. Future Supreme Court Justice Holmes might have thought so, when he wrote that a person " may have a constitutional right to talk politics, but he has no constitutional right to be a policeman. " McAuliffe v. Mayor of New Bedford, 29 N.E. 517, 518 (Mass. 1892) but that doctrine was repudiated by the Supreme Court in 1970 and that repudiation was upheld in the above decisions. Giving someone a " choice " between joining a religious orginazition sounds repugnant to the Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses notwithstanding what your attorney might have said. I was in court in Roxboro, NC and a man pled guilty to his upteenth public intoxication charge. The judge ordered him into a " treatment program " (undoubetly 12-step indoctrination). The defendant said he preferred a jail sentence. The judge refused to hear him and moved on to the next case. How many others have had the " choice " this man had? Are you sure you belong on this list and not one advocating " meetings " of some sort for " alcoholics " and/or forced drugging and/or the " war on drugs " ?! You have occcasionally expressed a token objection to XA (or to the lack of alternatives thereto) in the posts of yours I have read but I believe that you do not subscribe to the unstated principle that most people on this list do: To attend meetings or take drugs of any kind is a personal choice that should not be taken away by any authority. ------------------------------------------------------- Get your free, secure email at http://www.medmail.com - the e-mail service for the medical community Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 15, 2001 Report Share Posted February 15, 2001 From dixie@...: >My boyfriend and I go to meetings once a week. This guy holds Rational >Recovery meetings on Wednesdays, He may be calling them that, but there is no such thing as a Rational Recovery meeting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 15, 2001 Report Share Posted February 15, 2001 P.S.: Is there anybody out there who, like me, still >goes to occasional " less fundamentalist " AA meetings No. Once one realizes AA is BS, you can't go back. However, you mentioned you still like the company, so did I. My problem was lonliness or boredom or insecurity blah, blah, blah. My brother used to think I was BS'ing myself with AA...I would go to tons of meetings and finally realized that if I didn't go to the AA Christmas party, I really didn't have a Christmas party to go to. Same with the fishing trip etc. I would spend all my time trying to convince him how wrong he was, and how he too suffered from the disease of codependency (there's no end to AA stupidity) He had the " too each his own " attitude...he took night courses, joined all kinds of sports teams, took up the drums, joined a jazz band etc. He was living...I was sucked in by a cult My brother was right! AA was a waste of time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 15, 2001 Report Share Posted February 15, 2001 wrote: > > >From dixie@...: > > >My boyfriend and I go to meetings once a week. This guy holds Rational > >Recovery meetings on Wednesdays, > > He may be calling them that, but there is no such thing as a Rational Recovery meeting. > > > , I wonder how Dixie would diagnose someone who opened his own hamburger stand and called it Mcs. Ken Ragge Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 15, 2001 Report Share Posted February 15, 2001 wrote: > > >From dixie@...: > > >My boyfriend and I go to meetings once a week. This guy holds Rational > >Recovery meetings on Wednesdays, > > He may be calling them that, but there is no such thing as a Rational Recovery meeting. > > > , I wonder how Dixie would diagnose someone who opened his own hamburger stand and called it Mcs. Ken Ragge Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 15, 2001 Report Share Posted February 15, 2001 wrote: > > >From dixie@...: > > >My boyfriend and I go to meetings once a week. This guy holds Rational > >Recovery meetings on Wednesdays, > > He may be calling them that, but there is no such thing as a Rational Recovery meeting. > > > , I wonder how Dixie would diagnose someone who opened his own hamburger stand and called it Mcs. Ken Ragge Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 15, 2001 Report Share Posted February 15, 2001 >I wonder how Dixie would diagnose someone who opened his own hamburger >stand and called it Mcs. Or someone who regularly corresponds with Jack Trimpey, bought Trimpey's tapes and books, and choose to continue offering RR meetings after Trimpey blindly cancelled them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 15, 2001 Report Share Posted February 15, 2001 >I wonder how Dixie would diagnose someone who opened his own hamburger >stand and called it Mcs. Or someone who regularly corresponds with Jack Trimpey, bought Trimpey's tapes and books, and choose to continue offering RR meetings after Trimpey blindly cancelled them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2001 Report Share Posted February 16, 2001 dixie@... wrote: > >I wonder how Dixie would diagnose someone who opened his own hamburger > >stand and called it Mcs. > > Or someone who regularly corresponds with Jack Trimpey, bought Trimpey's > tapes and books, and choose to continue offering RR meetings after Trimpey > blindly cancelled them. The merits of Trimpey's decision to stop having RR meetings are irrelevant. You may want to give yourself a basic primer on the law's concerning intellectual property rights, in particular copy right laws. Anyone claiming to have RR or Rational Recovery meeting is in violation of the aforementioned laws, just as someone would be if he opened a restaurant and called it Mc's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.