Guest guest Posted July 27, 2004 Report Share Posted July 27, 2004 I agree with that. Training is critical. And I'd like to see something that requires some sort of control (maintenance checks, initial training, refresher training, readout of case after use, etc.). But having a physician do that is a bit of overkill (it's not medical stuff, more admin and training, and we don't require physicians to teach AEDs). I just don't know how to get that done without overdoing the " big brother " aspect. Is there a way to require some of this stuff without a prescription and without requiring a physician to be involved? Maybe the ECC folks that do the industry-wide guidelines (which comes up again next year) could make it a guideline type standard, and then the states could require compliance with that? =Steve= bfd296 wrote: >But still a CPR/AED course should be a requirement. Many people >still look at me with a blank stare when I mention AED. Training is >a must at least until everyone knows what they are. Remember that >EMS should still be called if though one was used in a home. > >Teaching our teenagers in high school is a great way to pass on the >knowledge of public defib. programs. > > Lee FF/EMT-I, EMS-I, AHA-IT > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 21, 2004 Report Share Posted September 21, 2004 The only problem I can think of with the machine activating when removed from its station, or when it powers on, is false alarms from testing the machine. like those fire exits that alarm when opened, no one goes near them. I think the AED should be popped out every now and then to show ppl how it works, and for training on it and such. Re: Re: AED > Thanks for the compliment (Just don't tell anybody... Might spoil > my image). Actually, I was thinking satellite comms instead of > cellular. Cells are great, but sats have better coverage, and while > cell phones are smaller, sat phones are getting smaller too (my nephew > just joined the Navy and he was looking into getting one when he > completes his training and gets a ship assignment). Besides using voice > comms, a simple trip switch in a mounting where an AED is stored can > also be used to notify 911 (or building security who can contact 911 and > get the location pinpointed), just like an alarm that alerts when a > wired door or window is opened. > I would like to make some coin off of the idea, but I wouldn't know > where to start. Can an idea even be copywrited if a person doesn't know > the mechanics of how to implement it (like I tell my wife, there is a > reason I work on people and not machines)? > > dustdevil31 wrote: > >> Crosby wrote: >> >> >>> Here's a thought. How about getting the AED manufactures to >>> >>> >>install >> >> >>>a something that contacts 911 when the AED is activated (something like >>>the OnStar system). >>> >>> >> >>, that is a stellar idea! In fact, it is so good that I >>encourage you to get it to market FAST before somebody here scoops you! >> >>Red, most cellphones are neither 400mHz nor 800mHz. Most cellphones >>today are multiband, and operate primarily in the 1.3 - 1.4gHz range, >>with the old 800mHz band pretty much relegated to a backup for bad >>signal areas and rural regions. Regardless, satellite technology >>could also be utilized in the AED's. >> >>, you're pretty smart for " just a basic. " >> >>Rob >> >> >> >> >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 21, 2004 Report Share Posted September 21, 2004 Yeah, getting the companies to look at these ideas might be a trick, and making our own brand of AEDs is even less feasable. I guess we could start e-mailing big wigs at the various AED companies and see if we can get through. but they might want specifics on the idea, as opposed to " hey, you should put tracking and coms in your AEDS....and give me a cut on the profits from it " . more companies should be open to ideas like Snap-On. they tell you " if you have a tool idea, draw it up and send it to this address, and if we like it, we'll but it from you " Re: Re: AED >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Thanks for the compliment (Just don't tell anybody... Might spoil >>>>>my image). Actually, I was thinking satellite comms instead of >>>>>cellular. Cells are great, but sats have better coverage, and while >>>>>cell phones are smaller, sat phones are getting smaller too (my nephew >>>>>just joined the Navy and he was looking into getting one when he >>>>>completes his training and gets a ship assignment). Besides using >>>>>voice >>>>>comms, a simple trip switch in a mounting where an AED is stored can >>>>>also be used to notify 911 (or building security who can contact 911 >>>>>and >>>>>get the location pinpointed), just like an alarm that alerts when a >>>>>wired door or window is opened. >>>>> I would like to make some coin off of the idea, but I wouldn't know >>>>>where to start. Can an idea even be copywrited if a person doesn't >>>>>know >>>>>the mechanics of how to implement it (like I tell my wife, there is a >>>>>reason I work on people and not machines)? >>>>> >>>>>dustdevil31 wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Crosby wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Here's a thought. How about getting the AED manufactures to >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>install >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>a something that contacts 911 when the AED is activated (something >>>>>>>like >>>>>>>the OnStar system). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>, that is a stellar idea! In fact, it is so good that I >>>>>>encourage you to get it to market FAST before somebody here scoops >>>>>>you! >>>>>> >>>>>>Red, most cellphones are neither 400mHz nor 800mHz. Most cellphones >>>>>>today are multiband, and operate primarily in the 1.3 - 1.4gHz range, >>>>>>with the old 800mHz band pretty much relegated to a backup for bad >>>>>>signal areas and rural regions. Regardless, satellite technology >>>>>>could also be utilized in the AED's. >>>>>> >>>>>>, you're pretty smart for " just a basic. " >>>>>> >>>>>>Rob >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 21, 2004 Report Share Posted September 21, 2004 A strobe could attract bystanders that could get in the way. In many buildings GPSs can not receive satelite signals. A better process might be two fold. For some locations a GPS with PCS (1.9Ghz) cell phone technology. For other locations that are so electrically noisy a 900Mhz to 2Ghz wireless telephone simi ar to wireless phones in some businesses or homes. Provide a small lojack type device that would be with corporate security or at the reception desk that would provide EMS the ability to locate the device. Ed Walsh Re: Re: AED I don't think the strobe thing would be good for an indicator of where the unit is being used at, only where it came from unless the area in question has a lot of them at regular intervals. Since cell phones can be located by GPS, these units could be as well even if voice coms are impractical for some reason. I recently saw a news story (on channel 5 news in San ) about cell phones that parents can give to their kids that have tracking devices in them so the parents will know where their kids are at (or at least their phones). If its affordable for such use, then the same tech can be applied here for not much money in an AED even if it doesn't have sat com ability. I had forgotten about that story till just now. I wonder if that route would be more practical. It could also be used to track stolen units. I know they sound like an unlikely theft item, but some of the things I've seen stolen over the years where I work have definitely shown me that some gene pools run a might shallow. Anyway, we sure are getting somewhere here, but the question is what do we do with the ideas? Personal financial considerations aside (which might sound strange, but those considerations don't have much hold on me... I must need a drink ;-} ), how does one get the manufacturers to take these ideas seriously enough to look into implementing them? Red wrote: >yeah, calling when the leads plugged in is a good idea, that way the unit >could turned on for testing and such, and the key by-pass for the cabinet is >also a good idea. > >in the cases of AEDs in public places, and a local alarm going off, a strobe >would probably be helpful as well, like on fire alarms, but it only going >off at the station, a strobe on the cabinet or above it, high enough to be >seen easily. so in malls or other large places crowded with alot of people, >it would give us direction if we had vague directions or no escort. > >and in large multistory buildings, an panel next to the fire alarm panel >that would show the location of the cabinet that had been activated, just >like the fire alarm panel. > >we're sure gettin somewhere with this idea! > Re: Re: AED >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Thanks for the compliment (Just don't tell anybody... Might spoil >>>>my image). Actually, I was thinking satellite comms instead of >>>>cellular. Cells are great, but sats have better coverage, and while >>>>cell phones are smaller, sat phones are getting smaller too (my nephew >>>>just joined the Navy and he was looking into getting one when he >>>>completes his training and gets a ship assignment). Besides using voice >>>>comms, a simple trip switch in a mounting where an AED is stored can >>>>also be used to notify 911 (or building security who can contact 911 and >>>>get the location pinpointed), just like an alarm that alerts when a >>>>wired door or window is opened. >>>> I would like to make some coin off of the idea, but I wouldn't know >>>>where to start. Can an idea even be copywrited if a person doesn't know >>>>the mechanics of how to implement it (like I tell my wife, there is a >>>>reason I work on people and not machines)? >>>> >>>>dustdevil31 wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Crosby wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Here's a thought. How about getting the AED manufactures to >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>install >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>a something that contacts 911 when the AED is activated (something like >>>>>>the OnStar system). >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>, that is a stellar idea! In fact, it is so good that I >>>>>encourage you to get it to market FAST before somebody here scoops you! >>>>> >>>>>Red, most cellphones are neither 400mHz nor 800mHz. Most cellphones >>>>>today are multiband, and operate primarily in the 1.3 - 1.4gHz range, >>>>>with the old 800mHz band pretty much relegated to a backup for bad >>>>>signal areas and rural regions. Regardless, satellite technology >>>>>could also be utilized in the AED's. >>>>> >>>>>, you're pretty smart for " just a basic. " >>>>> >>>>>Rob >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 21, 2004 Report Share Posted September 21, 2004 A strobe could attract bystanders that could get in the way. In many buildings GPSs can not receive satelite signals. A better process might be two fold. For some locations a GPS with PCS (1.9Ghz) cell phone technology. For other locations that are so electrically noisy a 900Mhz to 2Ghz wireless telephone simi ar to wireless phones in some businesses or homes. Provide a small lojack type device that would be with corporate security or at the reception desk that would provide EMS the ability to locate the device. Ed Walsh Re: Re: AED I don't think the strobe thing would be good for an indicator of where the unit is being used at, only where it came from unless the area in question has a lot of them at regular intervals. Since cell phones can be located by GPS, these units could be as well even if voice coms are impractical for some reason. I recently saw a news story (on channel 5 news in San ) about cell phones that parents can give to their kids that have tracking devices in them so the parents will know where their kids are at (or at least their phones). If its affordable for such use, then the same tech can be applied here for not much money in an AED even if it doesn't have sat com ability. I had forgotten about that story till just now. I wonder if that route would be more practical. It could also be used to track stolen units. I know they sound like an unlikely theft item, but some of the things I've seen stolen over the years where I work have definitely shown me that some gene pools run a might shallow. Anyway, we sure are getting somewhere here, but the question is what do we do with the ideas? Personal financial considerations aside (which might sound strange, but those considerations don't have much hold on me... I must need a drink ;-} ), how does one get the manufacturers to take these ideas seriously enough to look into implementing them? Red wrote: >yeah, calling when the leads plugged in is a good idea, that way the unit >could turned on for testing and such, and the key by-pass for the cabinet is >also a good idea. > >in the cases of AEDs in public places, and a local alarm going off, a strobe >would probably be helpful as well, like on fire alarms, but it only going >off at the station, a strobe on the cabinet or above it, high enough to be >seen easily. so in malls or other large places crowded with alot of people, >it would give us direction if we had vague directions or no escort. > >and in large multistory buildings, an panel next to the fire alarm panel >that would show the location of the cabinet that had been activated, just >like the fire alarm panel. > >we're sure gettin somewhere with this idea! > Re: Re: AED >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Thanks for the compliment (Just don't tell anybody... Might spoil >>>>my image). Actually, I was thinking satellite comms instead of >>>>cellular. Cells are great, but sats have better coverage, and while >>>>cell phones are smaller, sat phones are getting smaller too (my nephew >>>>just joined the Navy and he was looking into getting one when he >>>>completes his training and gets a ship assignment). Besides using voice >>>>comms, a simple trip switch in a mounting where an AED is stored can >>>>also be used to notify 911 (or building security who can contact 911 and >>>>get the location pinpointed), just like an alarm that alerts when a >>>>wired door or window is opened. >>>> I would like to make some coin off of the idea, but I wouldn't know >>>>where to start. Can an idea even be copywrited if a person doesn't know >>>>the mechanics of how to implement it (like I tell my wife, there is a >>>>reason I work on people and not machines)? >>>> >>>>dustdevil31 wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Crosby wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Here's a thought. How about getting the AED manufactures to >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>install >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>a something that contacts 911 when the AED is activated (something like >>>>>>the OnStar system). >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>, that is a stellar idea! In fact, it is so good that I >>>>>encourage you to get it to market FAST before somebody here scoops you! >>>>> >>>>>Red, most cellphones are neither 400mHz nor 800mHz. Most cellphones >>>>>today are multiband, and operate primarily in the 1.3 - 1.4gHz range, >>>>>with the old 800mHz band pretty much relegated to a backup for bad >>>>>signal areas and rural regions. Regardless, satellite technology >>>>>could also be utilized in the AED's. >>>>> >>>>>, you're pretty smart for " just a basic. " >>>>> >>>>>Rob >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 21, 2004 Report Share Posted September 21, 2004 Where would I go to get a provisional patent? Would I have to go through a patent attorney? Can you get a patent on something that used other patented technologies as a component? T. Walsh wrote: >FYI, > >Create a provisional patent. From what I remember it is relatively inexpensive. This protects you for 1 year. The put the idea together. Work with a local Electrical Engineering department at the University. There might be a BS or MS student needin > a project to complete their degree to help put the idea together. Of course they might want any part of the money made on the design. But 50?f the patent proceeds would be better than 100?f nothing. > >Ed Walsh > > > Re: Re: AED > >Yeah, getting the companies to look at these ideas might be a trick, and >making our own brand of AEDs is even less feasable. I guess we could start >e-mailing big wigs at the various AED companies and see if we can get >through. but they might want specifics on the idea, as opposed to " hey, you >should put tracking and coms in your AEDS....and give me a cut on the >profits from it " . > >more companies should be open to ideas like Snap-On. they tell you " if you >have a tool idea, draw it up and send it to this address, and if we like it, >we'll but it from you " > > > Re: Re: AED >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Thanks for the compliment (Just don't tell anybody... Might spoil >>>>>>my image). Actually, I was thinking satellite comms instead of >>>>>>cellular. Cells are great, but sats have better coverage, and while >>>>>>cell phones are smaller, sat phones are getting smaller too (my nephew >>>>>>just joined the Navy and he was looking into getting one when he >>>>>>completes his training and gets a ship assignment). Besides using >>>>>>voice >>>>>>comms, a simple trip switch in a mounting where an AED is stored can >>>>>>also be used to notify 911 (or building security who can contact 911 >>>>>>and >>>>>>get the location pinpointed), just like an alarm that alerts when a >>>>>>wired door or window is opened. >>>>>>I would like to make some coin off of the idea, but I wouldn't know >>>>>>where to start. Can an idea even be copywrited if a person doesn't >>>>>>know >>>>>>the mechanics of how to implement it (like I tell my wife, there is a >>>>>>reason I work on people and not machines)? >>>>>> >>>>>>dustdevil31 wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Crosby wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Here's a thought. How about getting the AED manufactures to >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>install >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>a something that contacts 911 when the AED is activated (something >>>>>>>>like >>>>>>>>the OnStar system). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>, that is a stellar idea! In fact, it is so good that I >>>>>>>encourage you to get it to market FAST before somebody here scoops >>>>>>>you! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Red, most cellphones are neither 400mHz nor 800mHz. Most cellphones >>>>>>>today are multiband, and operate primarily in the 1.3 - 1.4gHz range, >>>>>>>with the old 800mHz band pretty much relegated to a backup for bad >>>>>>>signal areas and rural regions. Regardless, satellite technology >>>>>>>could also be utilized in the AED's. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>, you're pretty smart for " just a basic. " >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Rob >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 21, 2004 Report Share Posted September 21, 2004 Where would I go to get a provisional patent? Would I have to go through a patent attorney? Can you get a patent on something that used other patented technologies as a component? T. Walsh wrote: >FYI, > >Create a provisional patent. From what I remember it is relatively inexpensive. This protects you for 1 year. The put the idea together. Work with a local Electrical Engineering department at the University. There might be a BS or MS student needin > a project to complete their degree to help put the idea together. Of course they might want any part of the money made on the design. But 50?f the patent proceeds would be better than 100?f nothing. > >Ed Walsh > > > Re: Re: AED > >Yeah, getting the companies to look at these ideas might be a trick, and >making our own brand of AEDs is even less feasable. I guess we could start >e-mailing big wigs at the various AED companies and see if we can get >through. but they might want specifics on the idea, as opposed to " hey, you >should put tracking and coms in your AEDS....and give me a cut on the >profits from it " . > >more companies should be open to ideas like Snap-On. they tell you " if you >have a tool idea, draw it up and send it to this address, and if we like it, >we'll but it from you " > > > Re: Re: AED >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Thanks for the compliment (Just don't tell anybody... Might spoil >>>>>>my image). Actually, I was thinking satellite comms instead of >>>>>>cellular. Cells are great, but sats have better coverage, and while >>>>>>cell phones are smaller, sat phones are getting smaller too (my nephew >>>>>>just joined the Navy and he was looking into getting one when he >>>>>>completes his training and gets a ship assignment). Besides using >>>>>>voice >>>>>>comms, a simple trip switch in a mounting where an AED is stored can >>>>>>also be used to notify 911 (or building security who can contact 911 >>>>>>and >>>>>>get the location pinpointed), just like an alarm that alerts when a >>>>>>wired door or window is opened. >>>>>>I would like to make some coin off of the idea, but I wouldn't know >>>>>>where to start. Can an idea even be copywrited if a person doesn't >>>>>>know >>>>>>the mechanics of how to implement it (like I tell my wife, there is a >>>>>>reason I work on people and not machines)? >>>>>> >>>>>>dustdevil31 wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Crosby wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Here's a thought. How about getting the AED manufactures to >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>install >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>a something that contacts 911 when the AED is activated (something >>>>>>>>like >>>>>>>>the OnStar system). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>, that is a stellar idea! In fact, it is so good that I >>>>>>>encourage you to get it to market FAST before somebody here scoops >>>>>>>you! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Red, most cellphones are neither 400mHz nor 800mHz. Most cellphones >>>>>>>today are multiband, and operate primarily in the 1.3 - 1.4gHz range, >>>>>>>with the old 800mHz band pretty much relegated to a backup for bad >>>>>>>signal areas and rural regions. Regardless, satellite technology >>>>>>>could also be utilized in the AED's. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>, you're pretty smart for " just a basic. " >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Rob >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 21, 2004 Report Share Posted September 21, 2004 Where would I go to get a provisional patent? Would I have to go through a patent attorney? Can you get a patent on something that used other patented technologies as a component? T. Walsh wrote: >FYI, > >Create a provisional patent. From what I remember it is relatively inexpensive. This protects you for 1 year. The put the idea together. Work with a local Electrical Engineering department at the University. There might be a BS or MS student needin > a project to complete their degree to help put the idea together. Of course they might want any part of the money made on the design. But 50?f the patent proceeds would be better than 100?f nothing. > >Ed Walsh > > > Re: Re: AED > >Yeah, getting the companies to look at these ideas might be a trick, and >making our own brand of AEDs is even less feasable. I guess we could start >e-mailing big wigs at the various AED companies and see if we can get >through. but they might want specifics on the idea, as opposed to " hey, you >should put tracking and coms in your AEDS....and give me a cut on the >profits from it " . > >more companies should be open to ideas like Snap-On. they tell you " if you >have a tool idea, draw it up and send it to this address, and if we like it, >we'll but it from you " > > > Re: Re: AED >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Thanks for the compliment (Just don't tell anybody... Might spoil >>>>>>my image). Actually, I was thinking satellite comms instead of >>>>>>cellular. Cells are great, but sats have better coverage, and while >>>>>>cell phones are smaller, sat phones are getting smaller too (my nephew >>>>>>just joined the Navy and he was looking into getting one when he >>>>>>completes his training and gets a ship assignment). Besides using >>>>>>voice >>>>>>comms, a simple trip switch in a mounting where an AED is stored can >>>>>>also be used to notify 911 (or building security who can contact 911 >>>>>>and >>>>>>get the location pinpointed), just like an alarm that alerts when a >>>>>>wired door or window is opened. >>>>>>I would like to make some coin off of the idea, but I wouldn't know >>>>>>where to start. Can an idea even be copywrited if a person doesn't >>>>>>know >>>>>>the mechanics of how to implement it (like I tell my wife, there is a >>>>>>reason I work on people and not machines)? >>>>>> >>>>>>dustdevil31 wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Crosby wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Here's a thought. How about getting the AED manufactures to >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>install >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>a something that contacts 911 when the AED is activated (something >>>>>>>>like >>>>>>>>the OnStar system). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>, that is a stellar idea! In fact, it is so good that I >>>>>>>encourage you to get it to market FAST before somebody here scoops >>>>>>>you! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Red, most cellphones are neither 400mHz nor 800mHz. Most cellphones >>>>>>>today are multiband, and operate primarily in the 1.3 - 1.4gHz range, >>>>>>>with the old 800mHz band pretty much relegated to a backup for bad >>>>>>>signal areas and rural regions. Regardless, satellite technology >>>>>>>could also be utilized in the AED's. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>, you're pretty smart for " just a basic. " >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Rob >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.