Re: Hanger

[Guest guest]

I'd love if you could point out to me how my initial response to you

was presented badly? I congratulated you on finding a good ortho

and gave you a little background on what makes the DOCband different

(training, experience), b/c you were saying it was different only

b/c of the label basically. I said that " in the right hands there

are compareable helmets out there " and that " a helmet can only be as

good as the ortho. " I'm fully supportive of you and am thrilled

that you found a good ortho. That's half the battle!

> > > > > I talked to Hanger today, and The man I talked

> > to was very

> > nice

> > > and

> > > > he

> > > > > new his info. He knows about the docband and

> > several other

> > bands.

> > > I

> > > > > felt more comfortable talking to him than I

> > did with CT. He

> > > actually

> > > > > made me feel that he was concerned about

> > Briley and wanted to

> > > help.

> > > > > Hanger has new technology. They don't use the

> > plaster, they

> > > actually

> > > > > have a laser that makes a 3-D image of the

> > child's head; it

> > has

> > > less

> > > > > room for error. I was also able to get Briley

> > in their today

> > to

> > > see

> > > > > him. I think I am going to try them. I

> > definately feel that

> > > Docbands

> > > > > are great, but maybe it's kinda like namebrand

> > clothes, but

> > there

> > > are

> > > > > comparable items out their that work just as

> > well. I don't

> > know, I

> > > > > just want Briley's head to get better, that's

> > all I want.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> >

> === message truncated ===

>

>

>

>

> __________________________________

> Discover

> Find restaurants, movies, travel and more fun for the weekend.

Check it out!

> http://discover./weekend.html