Guest guest Posted August 14, 2004 Report Share Posted August 14, 2004 Mild to moderate loss often with amplification they do very well. However what you said about SN is true there is often a distortion factor that isn't helped with amplification. Also anyone who sais that a person has normal hearing with a hearing aid is wrong, it just doesn't sound the same and so while it helps there are always going to be issues. For instance in a crowded room he probably will have a hard time distinguishing sounds, he may hear noise and not be able to really seperate it all. This is why in a classroom setting FM systems are so important. Classrooms can be very loud and the child needs to be able to hear the teacher and not the child next to him who is squirming. mild to severe means that he is missing some important sounds, even though the loss is only mild I am assuming in the low frequency still you miss certain sounds even at that level. So even aided there can be a problem with clearity. I think that getting your son into speech therapy as soon as possable would be a good idea. I personally chose TC with ASL. There has been some discussion lately as to whether or not this is possable, but it is, I don't directly translate what I say, I sign it in ASL word order and I say it in simple english (he's 3 and still has very little language). Many people chose a form of ASL in english word order for TC and others use SEE or SE. I recomend reading up on all of these as well as cued speach which gives visual cues for certain sounds helping people to see what they can't hear. And there is AV which is auditory verbal. I think reading up on all of them is a good idea before deciding on one or the other. Even with a mild loss you need to expect delays in speech and language and at least consider some form of augmentitive communication even if that is AV therapy which does not use sign. Your son is 6 months old which is around the age when he starts babbling more and understanding simple sounds like " no " so now is a key time to start whatever it is to choose. Don't worry about the amount of time it takes to learn because you will always have the oportunity to stay one step ahead. Yes it is good to get 3,4 or 5 steps ahead and at some point that will probably happen, but right now just focus on the basics of whatever you choose, you have a lot to learn and that is very stressful. I have not been offered classes for any form of communication since my son's loss is debatable. I don't see why but that's a long story. My son has been developing and picking up speach and sign very slowly so it on one hand allows me enough time to teach myself, but on the other hand I have plenty of room for him to really start picking it up. Intro & Some Questions Hello: My name is and my son, Will, was diagnosed with mild-mod in one ear and mild-severe in the other. He has been aided since he was 2 months old. He is now 6 months old. I also have a 2.5 year old daughter, Jasmine, who is hearing. I am reading everything I can find on line and trying to learn all I can. I have a few questions: 1) What is the impact of a mild-moderate loss? My audiologist says with amplification his hearing should be normal. However, he has a SN loss, and my research says that it is not just an issue of amplification, but also of clarity. How might this impact his life. 2) I'm interested in people's experiences with ASL or another sign language. I don't know the cause of his hearing loss and don't know if it is stable or if it will deteriorate. I think that it may be important for him to have access to both the hearing and deaf worlds. As a bi-racial person, I know what it is like to grow up caught between two worlds. I want him to be successful, but I also want him to have a place where he feels most comfortable. Also, since he is so young, I don't know whether he will be a really verbal person or if he will have another preferred learning/communication style. I have been thinking about learning ASL and using it with him, in addition to encouraging speech. I know tons of multi-lingual people -- including one profoundly deaf person who is tri-lingual. Is it really that hard for someone to learn ASL and develop spoken English? I would love to hear from people who have experience with this -- especially if their kid has a mild-mod loss. I'm excited about this site -- I have been reading through it for hours. Take care, All messages posted to this list are private and confidential. Each post is the intellectual property of the author and therefore subject to copyright restrictions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2004 Report Share Posted August 14, 2004 Mild to moderate loss often with amplification they do very well. However what you said about SN is true there is often a distortion factor that isn't helped with amplification. Also anyone who sais that a person has normal hearing with a hearing aid is wrong, it just doesn't sound the same and so while it helps there are always going to be issues. For instance in a crowded room he probably will have a hard time distinguishing sounds, he may hear noise and not be able to really seperate it all. This is why in a classroom setting FM systems are so important. Classrooms can be very loud and the child needs to be able to hear the teacher and not the child next to him who is squirming. mild to severe means that he is missing some important sounds, even though the loss is only mild I am assuming in the low frequency still you miss certain sounds even at that level. So even aided there can be a problem with clearity. I think that getting your son into speech therapy as soon as possable would be a good idea. I personally chose TC with ASL. There has been some discussion lately as to whether or not this is possable, but it is, I don't directly translate what I say, I sign it in ASL word order and I say it in simple english (he's 3 and still has very little language). Many people chose a form of ASL in english word order for TC and others use SEE or SE. I recomend reading up on all of these as well as cued speach which gives visual cues for certain sounds helping people to see what they can't hear. And there is AV which is auditory verbal. I think reading up on all of them is a good idea before deciding on one or the other. Even with a mild loss you need to expect delays in speech and language and at least consider some form of augmentitive communication even if that is AV therapy which does not use sign. Your son is 6 months old which is around the age when he starts babbling more and understanding simple sounds like " no " so now is a key time to start whatever it is to choose. Don't worry about the amount of time it takes to learn because you will always have the oportunity to stay one step ahead. Yes it is good to get 3,4 or 5 steps ahead and at some point that will probably happen, but right now just focus on the basics of whatever you choose, you have a lot to learn and that is very stressful. I have not been offered classes for any form of communication since my son's loss is debatable. I don't see why but that's a long story. My son has been developing and picking up speach and sign very slowly so it on one hand allows me enough time to teach myself, but on the other hand I have plenty of room for him to really start picking it up. Intro & Some Questions Hello: My name is and my son, Will, was diagnosed with mild-mod in one ear and mild-severe in the other. He has been aided since he was 2 months old. He is now 6 months old. I also have a 2.5 year old daughter, Jasmine, who is hearing. I am reading everything I can find on line and trying to learn all I can. I have a few questions: 1) What is the impact of a mild-moderate loss? My audiologist says with amplification his hearing should be normal. However, he has a SN loss, and my research says that it is not just an issue of amplification, but also of clarity. How might this impact his life. 2) I'm interested in people's experiences with ASL or another sign language. I don't know the cause of his hearing loss and don't know if it is stable or if it will deteriorate. I think that it may be important for him to have access to both the hearing and deaf worlds. As a bi-racial person, I know what it is like to grow up caught between two worlds. I want him to be successful, but I also want him to have a place where he feels most comfortable. Also, since he is so young, I don't know whether he will be a really verbal person or if he will have another preferred learning/communication style. I have been thinking about learning ASL and using it with him, in addition to encouraging speech. I know tons of multi-lingual people -- including one profoundly deaf person who is tri-lingual. Is it really that hard for someone to learn ASL and develop spoken English? I would love to hear from people who have experience with this -- especially if their kid has a mild-mod loss. I'm excited about this site -- I have been reading through it for hours. Take care, All messages posted to this list are private and confidential. Each post is the intellectual property of the author and therefore subject to copyright restrictions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2004 Report Share Posted August 14, 2004 Mild to moderate loss often with amplification they do very well. However what you said about SN is true there is often a distortion factor that isn't helped with amplification. Also anyone who sais that a person has normal hearing with a hearing aid is wrong, it just doesn't sound the same and so while it helps there are always going to be issues. For instance in a crowded room he probably will have a hard time distinguishing sounds, he may hear noise and not be able to really seperate it all. This is why in a classroom setting FM systems are so important. Classrooms can be very loud and the child needs to be able to hear the teacher and not the child next to him who is squirming. mild to severe means that he is missing some important sounds, even though the loss is only mild I am assuming in the low frequency still you miss certain sounds even at that level. So even aided there can be a problem with clearity. I think that getting your son into speech therapy as soon as possable would be a good idea. I personally chose TC with ASL. There has been some discussion lately as to whether or not this is possable, but it is, I don't directly translate what I say, I sign it in ASL word order and I say it in simple english (he's 3 and still has very little language). Many people chose a form of ASL in english word order for TC and others use SEE or SE. I recomend reading up on all of these as well as cued speach which gives visual cues for certain sounds helping people to see what they can't hear. And there is AV which is auditory verbal. I think reading up on all of them is a good idea before deciding on one or the other. Even with a mild loss you need to expect delays in speech and language and at least consider some form of augmentitive communication even if that is AV therapy which does not use sign. Your son is 6 months old which is around the age when he starts babbling more and understanding simple sounds like " no " so now is a key time to start whatever it is to choose. Don't worry about the amount of time it takes to learn because you will always have the oportunity to stay one step ahead. Yes it is good to get 3,4 or 5 steps ahead and at some point that will probably happen, but right now just focus on the basics of whatever you choose, you have a lot to learn and that is very stressful. I have not been offered classes for any form of communication since my son's loss is debatable. I don't see why but that's a long story. My son has been developing and picking up speach and sign very slowly so it on one hand allows me enough time to teach myself, but on the other hand I have plenty of room for him to really start picking it up. Intro & Some Questions Hello: My name is and my son, Will, was diagnosed with mild-mod in one ear and mild-severe in the other. He has been aided since he was 2 months old. He is now 6 months old. I also have a 2.5 year old daughter, Jasmine, who is hearing. I am reading everything I can find on line and trying to learn all I can. I have a few questions: 1) What is the impact of a mild-moderate loss? My audiologist says with amplification his hearing should be normal. However, he has a SN loss, and my research says that it is not just an issue of amplification, but also of clarity. How might this impact his life. 2) I'm interested in people's experiences with ASL or another sign language. I don't know the cause of his hearing loss and don't know if it is stable or if it will deteriorate. I think that it may be important for him to have access to both the hearing and deaf worlds. As a bi-racial person, I know what it is like to grow up caught between two worlds. I want him to be successful, but I also want him to have a place where he feels most comfortable. Also, since he is so young, I don't know whether he will be a really verbal person or if he will have another preferred learning/communication style. I have been thinking about learning ASL and using it with him, in addition to encouraging speech. I know tons of multi-lingual people -- including one profoundly deaf person who is tri-lingual. Is it really that hard for someone to learn ASL and develop spoken English? I would love to hear from people who have experience with this -- especially if their kid has a mild-mod loss. I'm excited about this site -- I have been reading through it for hours. Take care, All messages posted to this list are private and confidential. Each post is the intellectual property of the author and therefore subject to copyright restrictions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2004 Report Share Posted August 14, 2004 Hi - welcome! I have two boys, both have hearing loss. My older son, Tommy is 12 with a severe/profound loss; my younger son Sam is 9 with a profound loss. Hearing aids - at least at this point - don't make hearing 20/20 like glasses can do for vision. My boys also have a SN (sensorineural) hearing loss so not only do they need amplification, the sounds still are distorted. Also, hearing aids don't do a good job of localizing sound. I'll call to one of my boys and see them look all around the room trying to find me if they can't see me. Your son will want an FM system in addition to his hearing aids. My boys have used their FM system in school but others on this list use their child's FMs all the time. Little " boots " snap on to the bottom of the hearing aids that give the aids more settings; then the person talking wears a microphone (there are several types) so the sound goes to the wearer's ear. You can set the FM so that it's just the voice of the speaker (FM setting) or speaker plus background noise (FM + HA). The speaker's voice is about 6 db louder than the background noise, whch is pretty significant. The FM helps my boys immensely in school. As to how it might impact his life? Every child is so different so that's hard to say. My boys - even with their significant hearing loss - have done very well and neither was identified as early as your son. My younger son, who has the more significant hearing loss (he's 95-100 db audiogram) is going into 4th grade. He was identified at 15 months and aided almost immediately. He tested out of special ed at the end of first grade and has done very, very well - he had a report card at the end of third grade that a hearing child would be pleased to have! Sam's a jock - loves " any sport with a ball " (which thank goodness excludes hockey so we don't have to get up for 4:00 a.m. ice time!). Both boys have good, close friends. Our older son was identified at 3-1/4 years - pretty late - so we played catch-up with him. We did hold him back a school year (although he is also young - he has a late summer birthday) - he's doing very well now and going into - gasp! - 6th grade which is middle school here. Tom loves Greek classics (why do I - the math/computer nerd - find that amazing?!) and is an avid reader and studies Taekwondo. Tom also has ADHD which is a really, er, interesting co-diagnosis. Tommy is engaging, funny, smart - but he goes 1000 miles per hour so can drive you nuts! Both my boys communicate orally and both wear hearing aids with FM systems. Hope this helps! I'm glad you're here. Barbara --- You wrote: 1) What is the impact of a mild-moderate loss? My audiologist says with amplification his hearing should be normal. However, he has a SN loss, and my research says that it is not just an issue of amplification, but also of clarity. How might this impact his life. --- end of quote --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2004 Report Share Posted August 14, 2004 Hi - welcome! I have two boys, both have hearing loss. My older son, Tommy is 12 with a severe/profound loss; my younger son Sam is 9 with a profound loss. Hearing aids - at least at this point - don't make hearing 20/20 like glasses can do for vision. My boys also have a SN (sensorineural) hearing loss so not only do they need amplification, the sounds still are distorted. Also, hearing aids don't do a good job of localizing sound. I'll call to one of my boys and see them look all around the room trying to find me if they can't see me. Your son will want an FM system in addition to his hearing aids. My boys have used their FM system in school but others on this list use their child's FMs all the time. Little " boots " snap on to the bottom of the hearing aids that give the aids more settings; then the person talking wears a microphone (there are several types) so the sound goes to the wearer's ear. You can set the FM so that it's just the voice of the speaker (FM setting) or speaker plus background noise (FM + HA). The speaker's voice is about 6 db louder than the background noise, whch is pretty significant. The FM helps my boys immensely in school. As to how it might impact his life? Every child is so different so that's hard to say. My boys - even with their significant hearing loss - have done very well and neither was identified as early as your son. My younger son, who has the more significant hearing loss (he's 95-100 db audiogram) is going into 4th grade. He was identified at 15 months and aided almost immediately. He tested out of special ed at the end of first grade and has done very, very well - he had a report card at the end of third grade that a hearing child would be pleased to have! Sam's a jock - loves " any sport with a ball " (which thank goodness excludes hockey so we don't have to get up for 4:00 a.m. ice time!). Both boys have good, close friends. Our older son was identified at 3-1/4 years - pretty late - so we played catch-up with him. We did hold him back a school year (although he is also young - he has a late summer birthday) - he's doing very well now and going into - gasp! - 6th grade which is middle school here. Tom loves Greek classics (why do I - the math/computer nerd - find that amazing?!) and is an avid reader and studies Taekwondo. Tom also has ADHD which is a really, er, interesting co-diagnosis. Tommy is engaging, funny, smart - but he goes 1000 miles per hour so can drive you nuts! Both my boys communicate orally and both wear hearing aids with FM systems. Hope this helps! I'm glad you're here. Barbara --- You wrote: 1) What is the impact of a mild-moderate loss? My audiologist says with amplification his hearing should be normal. However, he has a SN loss, and my research says that it is not just an issue of amplification, but also of clarity. How might this impact his life. --- end of quote --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2004 Report Share Posted August 14, 2004 Hi - welcome! I have two boys, both have hearing loss. My older son, Tommy is 12 with a severe/profound loss; my younger son Sam is 9 with a profound loss. Hearing aids - at least at this point - don't make hearing 20/20 like glasses can do for vision. My boys also have a SN (sensorineural) hearing loss so not only do they need amplification, the sounds still are distorted. Also, hearing aids don't do a good job of localizing sound. I'll call to one of my boys and see them look all around the room trying to find me if they can't see me. Your son will want an FM system in addition to his hearing aids. My boys have used their FM system in school but others on this list use their child's FMs all the time. Little " boots " snap on to the bottom of the hearing aids that give the aids more settings; then the person talking wears a microphone (there are several types) so the sound goes to the wearer's ear. You can set the FM so that it's just the voice of the speaker (FM setting) or speaker plus background noise (FM + HA). The speaker's voice is about 6 db louder than the background noise, whch is pretty significant. The FM helps my boys immensely in school. As to how it might impact his life? Every child is so different so that's hard to say. My boys - even with their significant hearing loss - have done very well and neither was identified as early as your son. My younger son, who has the more significant hearing loss (he's 95-100 db audiogram) is going into 4th grade. He was identified at 15 months and aided almost immediately. He tested out of special ed at the end of first grade and has done very, very well - he had a report card at the end of third grade that a hearing child would be pleased to have! Sam's a jock - loves " any sport with a ball " (which thank goodness excludes hockey so we don't have to get up for 4:00 a.m. ice time!). Both boys have good, close friends. Our older son was identified at 3-1/4 years - pretty late - so we played catch-up with him. We did hold him back a school year (although he is also young - he has a late summer birthday) - he's doing very well now and going into - gasp! - 6th grade which is middle school here. Tom loves Greek classics (why do I - the math/computer nerd - find that amazing?!) and is an avid reader and studies Taekwondo. Tom also has ADHD which is a really, er, interesting co-diagnosis. Tommy is engaging, funny, smart - but he goes 1000 miles per hour so can drive you nuts! Both my boys communicate orally and both wear hearing aids with FM systems. Hope this helps! I'm glad you're here. Barbara --- You wrote: 1) What is the impact of a mild-moderate loss? My audiologist says with amplification his hearing should be normal. However, he has a SN loss, and my research says that it is not just an issue of amplification, but also of clarity. How might this impact his life. --- end of quote --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2004 Report Share Posted August 14, 2004 I would echo Kerry's comments here. Sam, my younger son with a profound loss, tested out of speech and language two years ago when he was 7 (at the end of first grade). We've monitored his progress very closely given his level of hearing loss - so far, so good. He had an " on grade level " with a plus after it for reading and language arts - and he wasn't diagnosed at birth but at 15 months. Every child is different and I agree with Kerry that the sky is the limit for all our kids. I think care should be taken in making blanket statements. Tom, with his severe/profound loss wasn't as far ahead in 3rd grade as Sam, with a profound loss. I think there are many factors at play including the fact that Tom has ADHD, he was diagnosed later, and heck, Tom just has a laid back, but really eccentric personality whereas Sam's drive is almost scary! Bottom line is they are totally different kids. I've been told by several audiologists and teachers of the deaf that they review Sam's audiogram prior to meeting him that they expect one thing and then are blown away when they meet him and see his language and speech levels. Everyone - I mean everyone - told me that both my boys would have problems with reading (Sam's at an 8th grade level going into 4th grade), language, etc. - so far we haven't seen that so I'm glad I just moved ahead with what seemed right for Sam and for Tom. I hope this doesn't sound like I'm bragging - I'm very proud of both my boys - but serves to emphasize that all along I was told " a child with his level of hearing loss " has actually baffled all the experts. You just never know. Your mileage may vary! :>) Barbara --- You wrote: <Even with a mild loss you need to expect delays in speech and language , please excuse me for pulling this comment out because I know your son's situation is different and I understand why you wrote it. But, for kids who are only dealing with a hearing loss and no other medical issues, we don't need to expect delays or lower our expectations for their progress. Your son has been identified so early and aided quickly-- expect the world for him. --- end of quote --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2004 Report Share Posted August 14, 2004 I would echo Kerry's comments here. Sam, my younger son with a profound loss, tested out of speech and language two years ago when he was 7 (at the end of first grade). We've monitored his progress very closely given his level of hearing loss - so far, so good. He had an " on grade level " with a plus after it for reading and language arts - and he wasn't diagnosed at birth but at 15 months. Every child is different and I agree with Kerry that the sky is the limit for all our kids. I think care should be taken in making blanket statements. Tom, with his severe/profound loss wasn't as far ahead in 3rd grade as Sam, with a profound loss. I think there are many factors at play including the fact that Tom has ADHD, he was diagnosed later, and heck, Tom just has a laid back, but really eccentric personality whereas Sam's drive is almost scary! Bottom line is they are totally different kids. I've been told by several audiologists and teachers of the deaf that they review Sam's audiogram prior to meeting him that they expect one thing and then are blown away when they meet him and see his language and speech levels. Everyone - I mean everyone - told me that both my boys would have problems with reading (Sam's at an 8th grade level going into 4th grade), language, etc. - so far we haven't seen that so I'm glad I just moved ahead with what seemed right for Sam and for Tom. I hope this doesn't sound like I'm bragging - I'm very proud of both my boys - but serves to emphasize that all along I was told " a child with his level of hearing loss " has actually baffled all the experts. You just never know. Your mileage may vary! :>) Barbara --- You wrote: <Even with a mild loss you need to expect delays in speech and language , please excuse me for pulling this comment out because I know your son's situation is different and I understand why you wrote it. But, for kids who are only dealing with a hearing loss and no other medical issues, we don't need to expect delays or lower our expectations for their progress. Your son has been identified so early and aided quickly-- expect the world for him. --- end of quote --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2004 Report Share Posted August 14, 2004 I would echo Kerry's comments here. Sam, my younger son with a profound loss, tested out of speech and language two years ago when he was 7 (at the end of first grade). We've monitored his progress very closely given his level of hearing loss - so far, so good. He had an " on grade level " with a plus after it for reading and language arts - and he wasn't diagnosed at birth but at 15 months. Every child is different and I agree with Kerry that the sky is the limit for all our kids. I think care should be taken in making blanket statements. Tom, with his severe/profound loss wasn't as far ahead in 3rd grade as Sam, with a profound loss. I think there are many factors at play including the fact that Tom has ADHD, he was diagnosed later, and heck, Tom just has a laid back, but really eccentric personality whereas Sam's drive is almost scary! Bottom line is they are totally different kids. I've been told by several audiologists and teachers of the deaf that they review Sam's audiogram prior to meeting him that they expect one thing and then are blown away when they meet him and see his language and speech levels. Everyone - I mean everyone - told me that both my boys would have problems with reading (Sam's at an 8th grade level going into 4th grade), language, etc. - so far we haven't seen that so I'm glad I just moved ahead with what seemed right for Sam and for Tom. I hope this doesn't sound like I'm bragging - I'm very proud of both my boys - but serves to emphasize that all along I was told " a child with his level of hearing loss " has actually baffled all the experts. You just never know. Your mileage may vary! :>) Barbara --- You wrote: <Even with a mild loss you need to expect delays in speech and language , please excuse me for pulling this comment out because I know your son's situation is different and I understand why you wrote it. But, for kids who are only dealing with a hearing loss and no other medical issues, we don't need to expect delays or lower our expectations for their progress. Your son has been identified so early and aided quickly-- expect the world for him. --- end of quote --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2004 Report Share Posted August 14, 2004 Welcome, . My daughter is " nearly 3 " as she likes to call it, and has a severe bilateral sensorineural loss that was diagnosed at birth. She was aided at 6 months and started auditory-verbal therapy the next day. I just wanted to highlight two of the comments made in earlier posts. <My audiologist says with amplification his hearing should be normal. The rough rule of thumb is that an aid can cut the hearing loss to half. So, a mild-moderate hearing loss could absolutely be improved to the normal hearing level 0-20dB). Previous posters are correct in saying that clarity is a bit compromised by the hearing aids and localization can be tricky, but kids adapt easily (especially when they are identified and aided so young, like Will-- good for you!). Hadley's loss is around 70dB, and she often tests at 15dB in the sound booth, and anecdotal evidence from life at home suggest she gets about the same improvement from her aids when environmental sounds and background noise are there. <Even with a mild loss you need to expect delays in speech and language , please excuse me for pulling this comment out because I know your son's situation is different and I understand why you wrote it. But, for kids who are only dealing with a hearing loss and no other medical issues, we don't need to expect delays or lower our expectations for their progress. Your son has been identified so early and aided quickly-- expect the world for him. There's a good book out there, " Not Deaf Enough " that tells the story of a family whose daughter has a mild hearing loss by P.A.M. Candlish (http://www.hardofhearingchildren.com). There aren't tons of resources out there that discuss the impact of a mild hearing loss. Carol Flexer also has an article on the impact in the classroom: http://www.totalhearing.net/child_faq_management.htm While both these authors are personal proponents of AVT, I don't think their communication choices interfere with their message about the significance of a mild loss. There are, of course, a ton of resources for more severe losses and by going through the Listen-Up site, you'll find most of them! Good luck with your decision making on what communication choice is right for your family. Kerry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2004 Report Share Posted August 14, 2004 Welcome, . My daughter is " nearly 3 " as she likes to call it, and has a severe bilateral sensorineural loss that was diagnosed at birth. She was aided at 6 months and started auditory-verbal therapy the next day. I just wanted to highlight two of the comments made in earlier posts. <My audiologist says with amplification his hearing should be normal. The rough rule of thumb is that an aid can cut the hearing loss to half. So, a mild-moderate hearing loss could absolutely be improved to the normal hearing level 0-20dB). Previous posters are correct in saying that clarity is a bit compromised by the hearing aids and localization can be tricky, but kids adapt easily (especially when they are identified and aided so young, like Will-- good for you!). Hadley's loss is around 70dB, and she often tests at 15dB in the sound booth, and anecdotal evidence from life at home suggest she gets about the same improvement from her aids when environmental sounds and background noise are there. <Even with a mild loss you need to expect delays in speech and language , please excuse me for pulling this comment out because I know your son's situation is different and I understand why you wrote it. But, for kids who are only dealing with a hearing loss and no other medical issues, we don't need to expect delays or lower our expectations for their progress. Your son has been identified so early and aided quickly-- expect the world for him. There's a good book out there, " Not Deaf Enough " that tells the story of a family whose daughter has a mild hearing loss by P.A.M. Candlish (http://www.hardofhearingchildren.com). There aren't tons of resources out there that discuss the impact of a mild hearing loss. Carol Flexer also has an article on the impact in the classroom: http://www.totalhearing.net/child_faq_management.htm While both these authors are personal proponents of AVT, I don't think their communication choices interfere with their message about the significance of a mild loss. There are, of course, a ton of resources for more severe losses and by going through the Listen-Up site, you'll find most of them! Good luck with your decision making on what communication choice is right for your family. Kerry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2004 Report Share Posted August 14, 2004 Welcome, . My daughter is " nearly 3 " as she likes to call it, and has a severe bilateral sensorineural loss that was diagnosed at birth. She was aided at 6 months and started auditory-verbal therapy the next day. I just wanted to highlight two of the comments made in earlier posts. <My audiologist says with amplification his hearing should be normal. The rough rule of thumb is that an aid can cut the hearing loss to half. So, a mild-moderate hearing loss could absolutely be improved to the normal hearing level 0-20dB). Previous posters are correct in saying that clarity is a bit compromised by the hearing aids and localization can be tricky, but kids adapt easily (especially when they are identified and aided so young, like Will-- good for you!). Hadley's loss is around 70dB, and she often tests at 15dB in the sound booth, and anecdotal evidence from life at home suggest she gets about the same improvement from her aids when environmental sounds and background noise are there. <Even with a mild loss you need to expect delays in speech and language , please excuse me for pulling this comment out because I know your son's situation is different and I understand why you wrote it. But, for kids who are only dealing with a hearing loss and no other medical issues, we don't need to expect delays or lower our expectations for their progress. Your son has been identified so early and aided quickly-- expect the world for him. There's a good book out there, " Not Deaf Enough " that tells the story of a family whose daughter has a mild hearing loss by P.A.M. Candlish (http://www.hardofhearingchildren.com). There aren't tons of resources out there that discuss the impact of a mild hearing loss. Carol Flexer also has an article on the impact in the classroom: http://www.totalhearing.net/child_faq_management.htm While both these authors are personal proponents of AVT, I don't think their communication choices interfere with their message about the significance of a mild loss. There are, of course, a ton of resources for more severe losses and by going through the Listen-Up site, you'll find most of them! Good luck with your decision making on what communication choice is right for your family. Kerry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2004 Report Share Posted August 14, 2004 I think the main thing to remember is if the school (like many have) makes a blanket statement like " hearing impaired/deaf kids just don't advance past a 3rd grade reading level " then that is a red flag waving that the school will not have many expectations for your child. I feel we need to be realistic but put tons of hope into what our kids will become. Our two deaf daughters were both adopted at a later age and neither one had any form of amplification at 6 and 9 when they came home. I know they will always have severe language delays, but I won't believe the statement from any teacher of the deaf that we shouldn't expect them to advance past the 3 or 4th grade reading level. That kind of statement only saves someone's rear end and makes them look unaccountable. I agree with Barbara that we need to take our own individual circumstances into consideration and look at our whole child, but never, NEVER, expect less from anyone dealing with your child than they would expect out of their own child in the same situation. This day and age and the technology it offers is an awesome time to help our kids with hearing loss. And no one cares as much about our kids as we do ourselves. We will be their best advocate and will then teach them that they will have to advocate for themselves. Tish > Every child is different and I agree with Kerry that the sky is the limit for > all our kids. I think care should be taken in making blanket statements. Tom, > with his severe/profound loss wasn't as far ahead in 3rd grade as Sam, with a > profound loss. I think there are many factors at play including the fact that > Tom has ADHD, he was diagnosed later, and heck, Tom just has a laid back, but > really eccentric personality whereas Sam's drive is almost scary! Bottom line > is they are totally different kids. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2004 Report Share Posted August 14, 2004 I think the main thing to remember is if the school (like many have) makes a blanket statement like " hearing impaired/deaf kids just don't advance past a 3rd grade reading level " then that is a red flag waving that the school will not have many expectations for your child. I feel we need to be realistic but put tons of hope into what our kids will become. Our two deaf daughters were both adopted at a later age and neither one had any form of amplification at 6 and 9 when they came home. I know they will always have severe language delays, but I won't believe the statement from any teacher of the deaf that we shouldn't expect them to advance past the 3 or 4th grade reading level. That kind of statement only saves someone's rear end and makes them look unaccountable. I agree with Barbara that we need to take our own individual circumstances into consideration and look at our whole child, but never, NEVER, expect less from anyone dealing with your child than they would expect out of their own child in the same situation. This day and age and the technology it offers is an awesome time to help our kids with hearing loss. And no one cares as much about our kids as we do ourselves. We will be their best advocate and will then teach them that they will have to advocate for themselves. Tish > Every child is different and I agree with Kerry that the sky is the limit for > all our kids. I think care should be taken in making blanket statements. Tom, > with his severe/profound loss wasn't as far ahead in 3rd grade as Sam, with a > profound loss. I think there are many factors at play including the fact that > Tom has ADHD, he was diagnosed later, and heck, Tom just has a laid back, but > really eccentric personality whereas Sam's drive is almost scary! Bottom line > is they are totally different kids. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2004 Report Share Posted August 14, 2004 I think the main thing to remember is if the school (like many have) makes a blanket statement like " hearing impaired/deaf kids just don't advance past a 3rd grade reading level " then that is a red flag waving that the school will not have many expectations for your child. I feel we need to be realistic but put tons of hope into what our kids will become. Our two deaf daughters were both adopted at a later age and neither one had any form of amplification at 6 and 9 when they came home. I know they will always have severe language delays, but I won't believe the statement from any teacher of the deaf that we shouldn't expect them to advance past the 3 or 4th grade reading level. That kind of statement only saves someone's rear end and makes them look unaccountable. I agree with Barbara that we need to take our own individual circumstances into consideration and look at our whole child, but never, NEVER, expect less from anyone dealing with your child than they would expect out of their own child in the same situation. This day and age and the technology it offers is an awesome time to help our kids with hearing loss. And no one cares as much about our kids as we do ourselves. We will be their best advocate and will then teach them that they will have to advocate for themselves. Tish > Every child is different and I agree with Kerry that the sky is the limit for > all our kids. I think care should be taken in making blanket statements. Tom, > with his severe/profound loss wasn't as far ahead in 3rd grade as Sam, with a > profound loss. I think there are many factors at play including the fact that > Tom has ADHD, he was diagnosed later, and heck, Tom just has a laid back, but > really eccentric personality whereas Sam's drive is almost scary! Bottom line > is they are totally different kids. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2004 Report Share Posted August 14, 2004 ----- Original Message ----- .....I hope this doesn't sound like I'm bragging - I'm very proud of both my boys......... Barbara ---------------------------------- Barbara, I just wanted to say that I love reading success stories and found this very useful when I first found out about my daughter's hearing loss. It's not bragging. I adopted my daughter at 12 months and I knew about her hearing loss beforehand, but was not expecting it. While I was going through the lsong process of adoption, I had a very strong feeling that my child would have a love of music like my mother did. My mom died 2 years before Jessie came home. I felt strongly that my Mom and my child would share this connection of music -- hard to explain. Some may think its odd and some may understand just how I feel. Anyway, when I found out about the hearing loss, I just assumed that a love of music was just not going to happen and my strong maternal instinct was wrong. I thought that she may hear and like music; but really loving music was probably not going to happen. But, I found out otherwise. My daughter loves music and will often be the only child dancing in a large group of kids when music is playing. She even dances to the country music that is on the radio when we are standing in line at the local store. I've also learned quickly not to limit my expectations. My daughter has a moderate/borderline severe loss. She is oral but we did use some ASL at first which helped tremendously. I feel that I need to do everything possible to help with her hearing loss. You can't just put HA or implants in/on and just forget it. Any loss can have a very big impact on learning. But, I agree totally that the sky is the limit for my daughter. My daughter turned 3 last month and is catching up very quickly in language and tests above age level cognitively. H. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2004 Report Share Posted August 14, 2004 ----- Original Message ----- .....I hope this doesn't sound like I'm bragging - I'm very proud of both my boys......... Barbara ---------------------------------- Barbara, I just wanted to say that I love reading success stories and found this very useful when I first found out about my daughter's hearing loss. It's not bragging. I adopted my daughter at 12 months and I knew about her hearing loss beforehand, but was not expecting it. While I was going through the lsong process of adoption, I had a very strong feeling that my child would have a love of music like my mother did. My mom died 2 years before Jessie came home. I felt strongly that my Mom and my child would share this connection of music -- hard to explain. Some may think its odd and some may understand just how I feel. Anyway, when I found out about the hearing loss, I just assumed that a love of music was just not going to happen and my strong maternal instinct was wrong. I thought that she may hear and like music; but really loving music was probably not going to happen. But, I found out otherwise. My daughter loves music and will often be the only child dancing in a large group of kids when music is playing. She even dances to the country music that is on the radio when we are standing in line at the local store. I've also learned quickly not to limit my expectations. My daughter has a moderate/borderline severe loss. She is oral but we did use some ASL at first which helped tremendously. I feel that I need to do everything possible to help with her hearing loss. You can't just put HA or implants in/on and just forget it. Any loss can have a very big impact on learning. But, I agree totally that the sky is the limit for my daughter. My daughter turned 3 last month and is catching up very quickly in language and tests above age level cognitively. H. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2004 Report Share Posted August 14, 2004 ----- Original Message ----- .....I hope this doesn't sound like I'm bragging - I'm very proud of both my boys......... Barbara ---------------------------------- Barbara, I just wanted to say that I love reading success stories and found this very useful when I first found out about my daughter's hearing loss. It's not bragging. I adopted my daughter at 12 months and I knew about her hearing loss beforehand, but was not expecting it. While I was going through the lsong process of adoption, I had a very strong feeling that my child would have a love of music like my mother did. My mom died 2 years before Jessie came home. I felt strongly that my Mom and my child would share this connection of music -- hard to explain. Some may think its odd and some may understand just how I feel. Anyway, when I found out about the hearing loss, I just assumed that a love of music was just not going to happen and my strong maternal instinct was wrong. I thought that she may hear and like music; but really loving music was probably not going to happen. But, I found out otherwise. My daughter loves music and will often be the only child dancing in a large group of kids when music is playing. She even dances to the country music that is on the radio when we are standing in line at the local store. I've also learned quickly not to limit my expectations. My daughter has a moderate/borderline severe loss. She is oral but we did use some ASL at first which helped tremendously. I feel that I need to do everything possible to help with her hearing loss. You can't just put HA or implants in/on and just forget it. Any loss can have a very big impact on learning. But, I agree totally that the sky is the limit for my daughter. My daughter turned 3 last month and is catching up very quickly in language and tests above age level cognitively. H. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2004 Report Share Posted August 16, 2004 Hi and welcome to the group, My daughter will be 4 in November and has a bilateral SN moderate loss. She was aided at 12 months. I have been reading the other comments, and I agree - it is not right to make blanket statements about any child, especially to someone who is still dealing with the news that their child is hearing impaired. It's good to be warned about possible problems but we also need to focus on the positives. When was first diagnosed, after I dealt with the shock and disappointment, I was so optimistic and just expected her to be fine because I knew she was a bright kid and I would work hard at helping her, but I was constantly being told doom and gloom things like to expect her to be behind in speech and reading etc. and that we'd have to work at catching her up all the time. Well, my optimism was on the right track, because she is doing fantastically and I'm so glad I didn't accept she would be behind, or I might not have had such high expectations for her (if my expectations were ever low, she would prove me wrong over and over). Yes, at times she finds it harder to hear, but she simply asks me to repeat myself if she misses something. She accepts her hearing aids are part of her and proudly shows them to people when asked. She wears them all day long and reluctantly takes them out at bed time (boy, I wish I could see this in a crystal ball in those early months when she pulled them out 100 times a day! LOL - it stopped after 4 months) She was recently assessed through a study she is involved in and her receptive vocabulary (at 3 1/2 yrs) was equal to that of a hearing 5 year old child. As a hearing impaired child she was expected to fall in the below average range as the test is based on hearing children. 's " age equivalent score " based on her average scores in all sections of the test was 4 years 2 months. The average standardised score for a normally hearing child in receptive and expressive language for this test is 100 - scored 120 and 104 respectively. (insert incredibly proud and relieved mother here) :-) This is just our experience and naturally will not happen with every child, but I think it's important you hear some success stories to keep your spirits up and know that anything is possible! Have high expectations for Will and treat him as you would have without his hearing loss - treasure his successes and help him through the rough spots. The fact that you're here in this group and doing all the research shows that he has a wonderful mother who will always be there to help him. As for the FM systems, that is something that will come later (he is only 6 months so thinking about what he will need when he is at school is probably not in the front of your mind just yet!). There's plenty of time to think about all that later and you will learn lots about FM's through the group as you go along. As for signing, it's not something I've really looked into for because she hears so well with her hearing aids and can hear me well enough without them (in the bath, at the pool etc), so it hasn't become an issue for us. Again, there are plenty of people here who will happily help you with this - just ask! Take care and I look forward to hearing more from you, Kerryn (Melbourne, Australia) (, 3.9, mod; , 11 months hearing) Intro & Some Questions > Hello: > > My name is and my son, Will, was diagnosed with mild-mod in > one ear and mild-severe in the other. He has been aided since he > was 2 months old. He is now 6 months old. I also have a 2.5 year > old daughter, Jasmine, who is hearing. I am reading everything I > can find on line and trying to learn all I can. I have a few > questions: > > 1) What is the impact of a mild-moderate loss? My audiologist says > with amplification his hearing should be normal. However, he has a > SN loss, and my research says that it is not just an issue of > amplification, but also of clarity. How might this impact his life. > > 2) I'm interested in people's experiences with ASL or another sign > language. I don't know the cause of his hearing loss and don't know > if it is stable or if it will deteriorate. I think that it may be > important for him to have access to both the hearing and deaf > worlds. As a bi-racial person, I know what it is like to grow up > caught between two worlds. I want him to be successful, but I also > want him to have a place where he feels most comfortable. Also, > since he is so young, I don't know whether he will be a really > verbal person or if he will have another preferred > learning/communication style. I have been thinking about learning > ASL and using it with him, in addition to encouraging speech. I > know tons of multi-lingual people -- including one profoundly deaf > person who is tri-lingual. Is it really that hard for someone to > learn ASL and develop spoken English? I would love to hear from > people who have experience with this -- especially if their kid has > a mild-mod loss. > > I'm excited about this site -- I have been reading through it for > hours. > > Take care, > > > > > > All messages posted to this list are private and confidential. Each post is the intellectual property of the author and therefore subject to copyright restrictions. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2004 Report Share Posted August 16, 2004 -- I remember so well when we found out that our daughter had a moderate to severe hearing loss. I remember many of your same fears/questions/concerns. I can tell you that we went with what our hearts told us to and I can tell you that in the last two years we have changed our techniques and have followed my daughter's lead(she is 2 1/2 years old). When she was first diagnosed we went out and got the hearing aids and chose Total Communication for her. That meant that we were being very oral with her but combining this with sign. Well, two things happened in the course of the next 18 months that changed this all for us. Annika understood many, many signs but refused, yes refused to use them herself. We would try to do hand over hand with her and she didn't like it. She also lost more of her hearing. She now had a profound hearing loss in both ears(left she heard nothing and right she was at 90 dcbl). Well, this really surprised me because she was using her hearing aid better than what the audi told us was possible. Well, through a lot of research and decisions we decided to have her implanted. Two main reasons we chose this-1. we believed that her right ear would continue to deteriate and 2. she had shown us she wanted to be oral not a signer. On 3/1/04 we had her bilaterally implanted. And to say that she is doing just great is somewhat of an understatement. She has blown almost all of her goals written on her current IIIP down the tubes(part of this is because the school district refused to set high goals for her but that is a whole other story) I am trying to keep this short and yet also want to explain my point in this response. I want to tell you that you will make it through this. You will make a choice and go with it but remember that if you don't think it is working then you can always change. Especially when your child is older and is able to show you his preference or tell you. I am not a parent that will swear by a certain method for every child. Each child is different as is every family. You need to find what will work for your family and then go with it. Also I wanted to let you know that if he loses more of his hearing there are other options out there. He could possibly become a candidate for an implant. I don't know. I was told at first that Annika was not going to be a candidate for an implant and then when we went for a second opinion(a year later) I was told that was not true and she was a very good candidate. No, implants are not the answer for everyone but I wanted to say that there are other options if you want them for a child if their hearing condition worsens. I can also tell you that I have a friend who has a little boy who has a moderate hearing loss. He is about 20 months old and is totally oral. She won't let anyone use sign with him but he has picked up on some. But he is doing just great. I think he has about 50-60 words right now and is just starting to take off with his language. As far as FM systems(I saw this in another post and thought I would put in my input), we did have a FM system for Annika to use at home before we implanted her. I really liked this. She was able to watch cartoons and movies and was able to hear the language without me turning up the volume so no one could sit in the room with her. I also used the FM in the car, and in group settings. It was hard for us to use it because the BTE was so big for her little ears but I don't ever regret the decision to pursue a FM for her. I really believe that helped her with her language as she lost more of her hearing and also made it easier for her to adjust to her implant and be where she is language wise right now with her CI. I hope this isn't too much info for you. I just want to say you are doing just great. You are asking questions but do your own research and find what works for you and your family and your son. Good luck to you all. Mom of 4 Marcus 14 12 Jon 10 Annika 2.5 bilaterally implanted 3/1 hookup 3/25 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2004 Report Share Posted August 16, 2004 , My son Caleb was diagnosed with a " mild to moderate " sensory-neural high frequency hearing loss at around 18 months old. He is now five and his loss has grown more severe, especially in the highest 2 frequencies on the audiogram. He is speaking quite well, but he mixes up a lot of consonant sounds since he hears mostly vowels, and since these sounds overshadow the others, especially " s " and " f " which he can not hear at all without his aids. We have always had him in speech therapy because it was suggested to us by the developmental center where he was first tested, and because it was offered by our state (Florida) until age three and then through the school system thereafter; but we have only just recently inquired about Auditory/Verbal therapy. It has been difficult to find certified therapists in our area, and AV therapy is not something that anyone has ever mentioned to us, not even our audiologist. But it is something that I wish I had know about for Caleb a few years ago. I feel that we've finally found a " therapy " and a therapist that understands how to approach speech and language development in a child with hearing loss, however mild it may be. What everyone has been saying about aids not being like glasses is right on the money. Good luck to you as you continue to find what's best for your family. Caleb - almost 5 years (bilateral sensory-neural loss) - age 7 hearing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.