Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Resisting arrest, [was Re: Follow Up to ....]

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

What I mean by that is that I would have demanded that

the officer await the arrival of my supervisor and at

the same time I would have demanded that the officer's

supervisor respond as well. Those medics were no

threat to the officer's life or anyone around them.

The arrest was uncalled for. If I had to lock myself

inside the unit and call 911 to speak to the PD/media,

I would have done it. I believe the officer

overstepped his boundries. I believe their ordinance

states that the service will be ticketed/fined, etc.,

not the medics. I know of one officer here in the RGV

who was fired after he arrested a medic on similiar

charges. Fortunately the media has alot of pull. The

officer in this case refused to allow the medics to

see the patients even though there was no other EMS

on-scene. He also refused to sign a refusal. The 911

provider for the area was responding from another city

and took a while to show up. Then again the county

gives them 20 minutes to show up. Bottom line the

officer was fired and the city lost the civil lawsuit.

Salvador Capuchino

EMT-P

--- Mike wrote:

> Sal - With regards to your statement " I would of

> resisted too " I

> refer you to section (B) below.

>

> PENAL CODE § 38.03. RESISTING ARREST, SEARCH, OR

> TRANSPORTATION.

>

> (a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally

> prevents or

> obstructs a person he knows is a peace officer or a

> person acting in a

> peace officer's presence and at his direction from

> effecting an

> arrest, search, or transportation of the actor or

> another by using

> force against the peace officer or another.

>

> (B) It is no defense to prosecution under this

> section that the

> arrest or search was unlawful.

>

> Mike :)

>

> On 1/19/06, salvador capuchino

> wrote:

> > Everything would have been good if they would have

> > ticketed the company, not the medics. La Prte

> should

> > know that the medics really have no say so. We

> cannot

> > legally refuse a call. And since when do medics

> > assist PD with takedowns? I have always believed

> that

> > these issues are between the head honchos, not the

> > medics. I would of resisted too. PD could have

> > waited for a supervisor to arrive. Baystar should

> > file a complaint with TCLEOSE too. Maybe even the

> AG.

> > Salvador Capuchino

> > EMT-P

> >

> > --- bearamedic99 wrote:

> >

> > > Sorry if this got posted already but if it did,

> I

> > > missed it.

> > >

> > >

> >

>

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/metro/3589357.html

> > >

> > > Paramedics' fracas being investigated

> > > Officials trying to determine what led to the

> arrest

> > > of a Bay Star

> > > worker

> > > By CINDY HORSWELL

> > > Copyright 2006 Houston Chronicle

> > >

> > > A La Porte homemaker feels caught in the middle

> of

> > > an escalating

> > > battle between two ambulance services that she

> says

> > > were both trying

> > > to help her ailing 84-year-old father.

> > >

> > > The fight has prompted two investigations: one

> by

> > > the state into

> > > whether emergency services were delayed to the

> man

> > > and another into

> > > the circumstances that landed a paramedic from

> one

> > > of the services in

> > > jail.

> > >

> > > Now authorities are trying to sort out how two

> > > ambulance crews, who

> > > are usually the good guys riding to the rescue,

> > > became the ones in

> > > trouble.

> > >

> > > " I am so sorry this all happened. Both were only

> > > trying to help my

> > > father. I am shocked, " said Zwiercan, who

> > > telephoned for an

> > > ambulance on Dec. 28. Her father, King Hager,

> who

> > > was transported

> > > from Zwiercan's home on Eagle Fork Court to the

> > > hospital, is still

> > > undergoing treatment there for fluid in his

> lungs,

> > > dehydration and

> > > kidney problems.

> > >

> > > " We don't want to see EMS people fighting

> between

> > > each other, "

> > > County Assistant District Attorney Wood

> said

> > > of the squabble

> > > between La Porte's ambulance service and Bay

> Star, a

> > > private service

> > > based in Baytown. " We are reviewing the police

> > > reports and talking to

> > > witnesses to see where things went awry. "

> > >

> > > Wood is prosecutor for the resisting-arrest

> charge

> > > filed against Bay

> > > Star's paramedic, Jung, who spent one

> night

> > > in jail. Jung bit

> > > the finger of a La Porte paramedic who assisted

> in

> > > the arrest, said

> > > Ray Nolan, who heads La Porte's EMS.

> > >

> > > But in a written statement, Jung accuses the La

> > > Porte paramedic,

> > > Peugeot, and the arresting police officer

> of

> > > being the ones who

> > > were abusive. Jung, 21, who will be a pre-med

> > > student at the

> > > University of St. in the fall, stated the

> > > unidentified officer

> > > slammed his head into the curb three times after

> he

> > > was handcuffed.

> > >

> > >

> > > How it started

> > > Two Bay Star medics were also ticketed by La

> Porte

> > > for failing to

> > > comply with a new ordinance requiring them to

> have a

> > > permit to

> > > operate in the city.

> > >

> > > According to Zwiercan and Nolan, the squabble

> > > started after Zwiercan

> > > telephoned La Porte EMS for an ambulance after

> > > congestion in her

> > > father's chest worsened.

> > >

> > > The La Porte dispatcher told her that the city

> does

> > > not handle non-

> > > emergency transports and gave her a list of

> private

> > > ambulance

> > > services from which to chose.

> > >

> > > Zwiercan picked Bay Star, which she said

> promised to

> > > have an

> > > ambulance there in about 20 minutes.

> > >

> > > While Zwiercan said she had not considered her

> > > father's case an

> > > emergency, Bay Star upgraded the run to an

> > > " emergency " because the

> > > patient was having difficulty breathing. La

> Porte

> > > dispatch then gave

> > > Bay Star a " verbal OK " to " run hot " with sirens

> and

> > > lights.

> > >

> > > Following protocol, the La Porte dispatcher

> informed

> > > La Porte's

> > > paramedic supervisor, Peugeot, about Bay Star's

> > > emergency run.

> > >

> > > This news concerned Peugeot because he knew Bay

> Star

> > > had never

> > > applied for an operating permit as required by

> the

> > > city's new

> > > ordinance, Nolan said.

> > >

> > >

> > > New ordinance

> > > Under the new ordinance, private ambulances are

> > > ordered to handle

> > > only non-emergency transports and must transfer

> any

> > > emergency cases

> > > to La Porte to assure that the highest grade of

> > > equipment and trained

> > > personnel are used, Nolan said.

> > >

> > > The La Porte dispatcher, who had recently

> returned

>

=== message truncated ===

__________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> What I mean by that is that I would have demanded that

> the officer await the arrival of my supervisor and at

> the same time I would have demanded that the officer's

> supervisor respond as well. [...] If I had to lock myself

> inside the unit and call 911 to speak to the PD/media,

> I would have done it.

At this point, from my perspective when working as a police officer,

you can take a time-out in the back of my police car to wait for all

the supervisors to show up. My job is to control the scene, and if

you're going to be irrational then I'll provide you a well-defined

space in which to be irrational, and I'll provide the proper

restraints to ensure that you don't violate those boundaries.

Easier? Just sign the damn citation. It's not an admission of guilt,

it's a promise to appear (and contest the charge if you wish). Not

signing the citation pretty much guarantees an arrest, commonly

referred to as an instanter, meaning that I'm arresting you to take

you " instantly " before a magistrate who will inform you of your

charges and secure a promise to appear in court. " Instantly "

generally means the next morning...

The police officer has a job to do, and he's probably as frustrated

about it as you are - especially with a violation of city ordinance

call. The citation is an end to the call, and it gets everyone out of

the situation gracefully and allows the parties to decide whether or

not to pursue the issue further (the city consults the city attorney

prosecuting the case and compares the facts against the ordinance, you

get to consult an attorney and do the same thing).

Mike :/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My parents instilled in me that when you act like a jerk in in public and you

are repeatedly told to calm down, you get what you deserve. There are a lot of

hot headed medics out there and I have worked with many .........Mike, your

comments were well said. I will be glad when this case is finalized and we can

all got back to being positive role models .................

---------------------------------

What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! Autos

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My parents instilled in me that when you act like a jerk in in public and you

are repeatedly told to calm down, you get what you deserve. There are a lot of

hot headed medics out there and I have worked with many .........Mike, your

comments were well said. I will be glad when this case is finalized and we can

all got back to being positive role models .................

---------------------------------

What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! Autos

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uhh… WRONG!

Baystar is NOT the 911 provider for the ‘area’. They are a commercial firm

based and operated from Baytown. Baytown Health Department EMS is the 911

provider for Baytown and the area immediately surrounding Baytown. All

other cities in the immediate area around Baytown/LaPorte have Third Service

or Fire Based EMS except Pasadena, who contracts with ETMC.

Jack

_____

From: [mailto: ] On

Behalf Of salvador capuchino

Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 12:55 PM

To:

Subject: Re: Resisting arrest, [was Re: Follow Up to ....]

“The 911

provider for the area was responding from another city

and took a while to show up.”

Salvador Capuchino

EMT-P

--- Mike wrote:

> Sal - With regards to your statement " I would of

> resisted too " I

> refer you to section (B) below.

>

> PENAL CODE § 38.03. RESISTING ARREST, SEARCH, OR

> TRANSPORTATION.

>

> (a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally

> prevents or

> obstructs a person he knows is a peace officer or a

> person acting in a

> peace officer's presence and at his direction from

> effecting an

> arrest, search, or transportation of the actor or

> another by using

> force against the peace officer or another.

>

> (B) It is no defense to prosecution under this

> section that the

> arrest or search was unlawful.

>

> Mike :)

>

> On 1/19/06, salvador capuchino

> wrote:

> > Everything would have been good if they would have

> > ticketed the company, not the medics. La Prte

> should

> > know that the medics really have no say so. We

> cannot

> > legally refuse a call. And since when do medics

> > assist PD with takedowns? I have always believed

> that

> > these issues are between the head honchos, not the

> > medics. I would of resisted too. PD could have

> > waited for a supervisor to arrive. Baystar should

> > file a complaint with TCLEOSE too. Maybe even the

> AG.

> > Salvador Capuchino

> > EMT-P

> >

> > --- bearamedic99 wrote:

> >

> > > Sorry if this got posted already but if it did,

> I

> > > missed it.

> > >

> > >

> >

>

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/metro/3589357.html

> > >

> > > Paramedics' fracas being investigated

> > > Officials trying to determine what led to the

> arrest

> > > of a Bay Star

> > > worker

> > > By CINDY HORSWELL

> > > Copyright 2006 Houston Chronicle

> > >

> > > A La Porte homemaker feels caught in the middle

> of

> > > an escalating

> > > battle between two ambulance services that she

> says

> > > were both trying

> > > to help her ailing 84-year-old father.

> > >

> > > The fight has prompted two investigations: one

> by

> > > the state into

> > > whether emergency services were delayed to the

> man

> > > and another into

> > > the circumstances that landed a paramedic from

> one

> > > of the services in

> > > jail.

> > >

> > > Now authorities are trying to sort out how two

> > > ambulance crews, who

> > > are usually the good guys riding to the rescue,

> > > became the ones in

> > > trouble.

> > >

> > > " I am so sorry this all happened. Both were only

> > > trying to help my

> > > father. I am shocked, " said Zwiercan, who

> > > telephoned for an

> > > ambulance on Dec. 28. Her father, King Hager,

> who

> > > was transported

> > > from Zwiercan's home on Eagle Fork Court to the

> > > hospital, is still

> > > undergoing treatment there for fluid in his

> lungs,

> > > dehydration and

> > > kidney problems.

> > >

> > > " We don't want to see EMS people fighting

> between

> > > each other, "

> > > County Assistant District Attorney Wood

> said

> > > of the squabble

> > > between La Porte's ambulance service and Bay

> Star, a

> > > private service

> > > based in Baytown. " We are reviewing the police

> > > reports and talking to

> > > witnesses to see where things went awry. "

> > >

> > > Wood is prosecutor for the resisting-arrest

> charge

> > > filed against Bay

> > > Star's paramedic, Jung, who spent one

> night

> > > in jail. Jung bit

> > > the finger of a La Porte paramedic who assisted

> in

> > > the arrest, said

> > > Ray Nolan, who heads La Porte's EMS.

> > >

> > > But in a written statement, Jung accuses the La

> > > Porte paramedic,

> > > Peugeot, and the arresting police officer

> of

> > > being the ones who

> > > were abusive. Jung, 21, who will be a pre-med

> > > student at the

> > > University of St. in the fall, stated the

> > > unidentified officer

> > > slammed his head into the curb three times after

> he

> > > was handcuffed.

> > >

> > >

> > > How it started

> > > Two Bay Star medics were also ticketed by La

> Porte

> > > for failing to

> > > comply with a new ordinance requiring them to

> have a

> > > permit to

> > > operate in the city.

> > >

> > > According to Zwiercan and Nolan, the squabble

> > > started after Zwiercan

> > > telephoned La Porte EMS for an ambulance after

> > > congestion in her

> > > father's chest worsened.

> > >

> > > The La Porte dispatcher told her that the city

> does

> > > not handle non-

> > > emergency transports and gave her a list of

> private

> > > ambulance

> > > services from which to chose.

> > >

> > > Zwiercan picked Bay Star, which she said

> promised to

> > > have an

> > > ambulance there in about 20 minutes.

> > >

> > > While Zwiercan said she had not considered her

> > > father's case an

> > > emergency, Bay Star upgraded the run to an

> > > " emergency " because the

> > > patient was having difficulty breathing. La

> Porte

> > > dispatch then gave

> > > Bay Star a " verbal OK " to " run hot " with sirens

> and

> > > lights.

> > >

> > > Following protocol, the La Porte dispatcher

> informed

> > > La Porte's

> > > paramedic supervisor, Peugeot, about Bay Star's

> > > emergency run.

> > >

> > > This news concerned Peugeot because he knew Bay

> Star

> > > had never

> > > applied for an operating permit as required by

> the

> > > city's new

> > > ordinance, Nolan said.

> > >

> > >

> > > New ordinance

> > > Under the new ordinance, private ambulances are

> > > ordered to handle

> > > only non-emergency transports and must transfer

> any

> > > emergency cases

> > > to La Porte to assure that the highest grade of

> > > equipment and trained

> > > personnel are used, Nolan said.

> > >

> > > The La Porte dispatcher, who had recently

> returned

>

=== message truncated ===

__________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uhh… WRONG!

Baystar is NOT the 911 provider for the ‘area’. They are a commercial firm

based and operated from Baytown. Baytown Health Department EMS is the 911

provider for Baytown and the area immediately surrounding Baytown. All

other cities in the immediate area around Baytown/LaPorte have Third Service

or Fire Based EMS except Pasadena, who contracts with ETMC.

Jack

_____

From: [mailto: ] On

Behalf Of salvador capuchino

Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 12:55 PM

To:

Subject: Re: Resisting arrest, [was Re: Follow Up to ....]

“The 911

provider for the area was responding from another city

and took a while to show up.”

Salvador Capuchino

EMT-P

--- Mike wrote:

> Sal - With regards to your statement " I would of

> resisted too " I

> refer you to section (B) below.

>

> PENAL CODE § 38.03. RESISTING ARREST, SEARCH, OR

> TRANSPORTATION.

>

> (a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally

> prevents or

> obstructs a person he knows is a peace officer or a

> person acting in a

> peace officer's presence and at his direction from

> effecting an

> arrest, search, or transportation of the actor or

> another by using

> force against the peace officer or another.

>

> (B) It is no defense to prosecution under this

> section that the

> arrest or search was unlawful.

>

> Mike :)

>

> On 1/19/06, salvador capuchino

> wrote:

> > Everything would have been good if they would have

> > ticketed the company, not the medics. La Prte

> should

> > know that the medics really have no say so. We

> cannot

> > legally refuse a call. And since when do medics

> > assist PD with takedowns? I have always believed

> that

> > these issues are between the head honchos, not the

> > medics. I would of resisted too. PD could have

> > waited for a supervisor to arrive. Baystar should

> > file a complaint with TCLEOSE too. Maybe even the

> AG.

> > Salvador Capuchino

> > EMT-P

> >

> > --- bearamedic99 wrote:

> >

> > > Sorry if this got posted already but if it did,

> I

> > > missed it.

> > >

> > >

> >

>

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/metro/3589357.html

> > >

> > > Paramedics' fracas being investigated

> > > Officials trying to determine what led to the

> arrest

> > > of a Bay Star

> > > worker

> > > By CINDY HORSWELL

> > > Copyright 2006 Houston Chronicle

> > >

> > > A La Porte homemaker feels caught in the middle

> of

> > > an escalating

> > > battle between two ambulance services that she

> says

> > > were both trying

> > > to help her ailing 84-year-old father.

> > >

> > > The fight has prompted two investigations: one

> by

> > > the state into

> > > whether emergency services were delayed to the

> man

> > > and another into

> > > the circumstances that landed a paramedic from

> one

> > > of the services in

> > > jail.

> > >

> > > Now authorities are trying to sort out how two

> > > ambulance crews, who

> > > are usually the good guys riding to the rescue,

> > > became the ones in

> > > trouble.

> > >

> > > " I am so sorry this all happened. Both were only

> > > trying to help my

> > > father. I am shocked, " said Zwiercan, who

> > > telephoned for an

> > > ambulance on Dec. 28. Her father, King Hager,

> who

> > > was transported

> > > from Zwiercan's home on Eagle Fork Court to the

> > > hospital, is still

> > > undergoing treatment there for fluid in his

> lungs,

> > > dehydration and

> > > kidney problems.

> > >

> > > " We don't want to see EMS people fighting

> between

> > > each other, "

> > > County Assistant District Attorney Wood

> said

> > > of the squabble

> > > between La Porte's ambulance service and Bay

> Star, a

> > > private service

> > > based in Baytown. " We are reviewing the police

> > > reports and talking to

> > > witnesses to see where things went awry. "

> > >

> > > Wood is prosecutor for the resisting-arrest

> charge

> > > filed against Bay

> > > Star's paramedic, Jung, who spent one

> night

> > > in jail. Jung bit

> > > the finger of a La Porte paramedic who assisted

> in

> > > the arrest, said

> > > Ray Nolan, who heads La Porte's EMS.

> > >

> > > But in a written statement, Jung accuses the La

> > > Porte paramedic,

> > > Peugeot, and the arresting police officer

> of

> > > being the ones who

> > > were abusive. Jung, 21, who will be a pre-med

> > > student at the

> > > University of St. in the fall, stated the

> > > unidentified officer

> > > slammed his head into the curb three times after

> he

> > > was handcuffed.

> > >

> > >

> > > How it started

> > > Two Bay Star medics were also ticketed by La

> Porte

> > > for failing to

> > > comply with a new ordinance requiring them to

> have a

> > > permit to

> > > operate in the city.

> > >

> > > According to Zwiercan and Nolan, the squabble

> > > started after Zwiercan

> > > telephoned La Porte EMS for an ambulance after

> > > congestion in her

> > > father's chest worsened.

> > >

> > > The La Porte dispatcher told her that the city

> does

> > > not handle non-

> > > emergency transports and gave her a list of

> private

> > > ambulance

> > > services from which to chose.

> > >

> > > Zwiercan picked Bay Star, which she said

> promised to

> > > have an

> > > ambulance there in about 20 minutes.

> > >

> > > While Zwiercan said she had not considered her

> > > father's case an

> > > emergency, Bay Star upgraded the run to an

> > > " emergency " because the

> > > patient was having difficulty breathing. La

> Porte

> > > dispatch then gave

> > > Bay Star a " verbal OK " to " run hot " with sirens

> and

> > > lights.

> > >

> > > Following protocol, the La Porte dispatcher

> informed

> > > La Porte's

> > > paramedic supervisor, Peugeot, about Bay Star's

> > > emergency run.

> > >

> > > This news concerned Peugeot because he knew Bay

> Star

> > > had never

> > > applied for an operating permit as required by

> the

> > > city's new

> > > ordinance, Nolan said.

> > >

> > >

> > > New ordinance

> > > Under the new ordinance, private ambulances are

> > > ordered to handle

> > > only non-emergency transports and must transfer

> any

> > > emergency cases

> > > to La Porte to assure that the highest grade of

> > > equipment and trained

> > > personnel are used, Nolan said.

> > >

> > > The La Porte dispatcher, who had recently

> returned

>

=== message truncated ===

__________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uhh… WRONG!

Baystar is NOT the 911 provider for the ‘area’. They are a commercial firm

based and operated from Baytown. Baytown Health Department EMS is the 911

provider for Baytown and the area immediately surrounding Baytown. All

other cities in the immediate area around Baytown/LaPorte have Third Service

or Fire Based EMS except Pasadena, who contracts with ETMC.

Jack

_____

From: [mailto: ] On

Behalf Of salvador capuchino

Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 12:55 PM

To:

Subject: Re: Resisting arrest, [was Re: Follow Up to ....]

“The 911

provider for the area was responding from another city

and took a while to show up.”

Salvador Capuchino

EMT-P

--- Mike wrote:

> Sal - With regards to your statement " I would of

> resisted too " I

> refer you to section (B) below.

>

> PENAL CODE § 38.03. RESISTING ARREST, SEARCH, OR

> TRANSPORTATION.

>

> (a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally

> prevents or

> obstructs a person he knows is a peace officer or a

> person acting in a

> peace officer's presence and at his direction from

> effecting an

> arrest, search, or transportation of the actor or

> another by using

> force against the peace officer or another.

>

> (B) It is no defense to prosecution under this

> section that the

> arrest or search was unlawful.

>

> Mike :)

>

> On 1/19/06, salvador capuchino

> wrote:

> > Everything would have been good if they would have

> > ticketed the company, not the medics. La Prte

> should

> > know that the medics really have no say so. We

> cannot

> > legally refuse a call. And since when do medics

> > assist PD with takedowns? I have always believed

> that

> > these issues are between the head honchos, not the

> > medics. I would of resisted too. PD could have

> > waited for a supervisor to arrive. Baystar should

> > file a complaint with TCLEOSE too. Maybe even the

> AG.

> > Salvador Capuchino

> > EMT-P

> >

> > --- bearamedic99 wrote:

> >

> > > Sorry if this got posted already but if it did,

> I

> > > missed it.

> > >

> > >

> >

>

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/metro/3589357.html

> > >

> > > Paramedics' fracas being investigated

> > > Officials trying to determine what led to the

> arrest

> > > of a Bay Star

> > > worker

> > > By CINDY HORSWELL

> > > Copyright 2006 Houston Chronicle

> > >

> > > A La Porte homemaker feels caught in the middle

> of

> > > an escalating

> > > battle between two ambulance services that she

> says

> > > were both trying

> > > to help her ailing 84-year-old father.

> > >

> > > The fight has prompted two investigations: one

> by

> > > the state into

> > > whether emergency services were delayed to the

> man

> > > and another into

> > > the circumstances that landed a paramedic from

> one

> > > of the services in

> > > jail.

> > >

> > > Now authorities are trying to sort out how two

> > > ambulance crews, who

> > > are usually the good guys riding to the rescue,

> > > became the ones in

> > > trouble.

> > >

> > > " I am so sorry this all happened. Both were only

> > > trying to help my

> > > father. I am shocked, " said Zwiercan, who

> > > telephoned for an

> > > ambulance on Dec. 28. Her father, King Hager,

> who

> > > was transported

> > > from Zwiercan's home on Eagle Fork Court to the

> > > hospital, is still

> > > undergoing treatment there for fluid in his

> lungs,

> > > dehydration and

> > > kidney problems.

> > >

> > > " We don't want to see EMS people fighting

> between

> > > each other, "

> > > County Assistant District Attorney Wood

> said

> > > of the squabble

> > > between La Porte's ambulance service and Bay

> Star, a

> > > private service

> > > based in Baytown. " We are reviewing the police

> > > reports and talking to

> > > witnesses to see where things went awry. "

> > >

> > > Wood is prosecutor for the resisting-arrest

> charge

> > > filed against Bay

> > > Star's paramedic, Jung, who spent one

> night

> > > in jail. Jung bit

> > > the finger of a La Porte paramedic who assisted

> in

> > > the arrest, said

> > > Ray Nolan, who heads La Porte's EMS.

> > >

> > > But in a written statement, Jung accuses the La

> > > Porte paramedic,

> > > Peugeot, and the arresting police officer

> of

> > > being the ones who

> > > were abusive. Jung, 21, who will be a pre-med

> > > student at the

> > > University of St. in the fall, stated the

> > > unidentified officer

> > > slammed his head into the curb three times after

> he

> > > was handcuffed.

> > >

> > >

> > > How it started

> > > Two Bay Star medics were also ticketed by La

> Porte

> > > for failing to

> > > comply with a new ordinance requiring them to

> have a

> > > permit to

> > > operate in the city.

> > >

> > > According to Zwiercan and Nolan, the squabble

> > > started after Zwiercan

> > > telephoned La Porte EMS for an ambulance after

> > > congestion in her

> > > father's chest worsened.

> > >

> > > The La Porte dispatcher told her that the city

> does

> > > not handle non-

> > > emergency transports and gave her a list of

> private

> > > ambulance

> > > services from which to chose.

> > >

> > > Zwiercan picked Bay Star, which she said

> promised to

> > > have an

> > > ambulance there in about 20 minutes.

> > >

> > > While Zwiercan said she had not considered her

> > > father's case an

> > > emergency, Bay Star upgraded the run to an

> > > " emergency " because the

> > > patient was having difficulty breathing. La

> Porte

> > > dispatch then gave

> > > Bay Star a " verbal OK " to " run hot " with sirens

> and

> > > lights.

> > >

> > > Following protocol, the La Porte dispatcher

> informed

> > > La Porte's

> > > paramedic supervisor, Peugeot, about Bay Star's

> > > emergency run.

> > >

> > > This news concerned Peugeot because he knew Bay

> Star

> > > had never

> > > applied for an operating permit as required by

> the

> > > city's new

> > > ordinance, Nolan said.

> > >

> > >

> > > New ordinance

> > > Under the new ordinance, private ambulances are

> > > ordered to handle

> > > only non-emergency transports and must transfer

> any

> > > emergency cases

> > > to La Porte to assure that the highest grade of

> > > equipment and trained

> > > personnel are used, Nolan said.

> > >

> > > The La Porte dispatcher, who had recently

> returned

>

=== message truncated ===

__________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only problem I have here is that the medics did

nothing wrong in responding. They did as told. The

issue of citing or fining should be between the city

and the owners of the business. Remember, don't shoot

the messenger. As for the hot headed medic, well

maybe he did get what he deserved, if he initiated the

problem. If I am not mistaken, this is the guy who

responded in his POV. Why did he respond? Maybe if

he would not have gone things would have had a

different outcome? This guy should have locked

himself in the unit and called whoever needed to be

called. If the police break windows or anything then

that's excessive use of force. And I am not saying

this is right, but it buys time to get on the phone

and call the right people.

Salvador Capuchino

EMT-P

--- Joe B wrote:

> My parents instilled in me that when you act like a

> jerk in in public and you are repeatedly told to

> calm down, you get what you deserve. There are a

> lot of hot headed medics out there and I have worked

> with many .........Mike, your comments were well

> said. I will be glad when this case is finalized and

> we can all got back to being positive role models

> .................

>

>

> ---------------------------------

>

> What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo!

> Autos

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been

> removed]

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only problem I have here is that the medics did

nothing wrong in responding. They did as told. The

issue of citing or fining should be between the city

and the owners of the business. Remember, don't shoot

the messenger. As for the hot headed medic, well

maybe he did get what he deserved, if he initiated the

problem. If I am not mistaken, this is the guy who

responded in his POV. Why did he respond? Maybe if

he would not have gone things would have had a

different outcome? This guy should have locked

himself in the unit and called whoever needed to be

called. If the police break windows or anything then

that's excessive use of force. And I am not saying

this is right, but it buys time to get on the phone

and call the right people.

Salvador Capuchino

EMT-P

--- Joe B wrote:

> My parents instilled in me that when you act like a

> jerk in in public and you are repeatedly told to

> calm down, you get what you deserve. There are a

> lot of hot headed medics out there and I have worked

> with many .........Mike, your comments were well

> said. I will be glad when this case is finalized and

> we can all got back to being positive role models

> .................

>

>

> ---------------------------------

>

> What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo!

> Autos

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been

> removed]

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> issue of citing or fining should be between the city

> and the owners of the business. Remember, don't shoot

> the messenger.

The medics are the on-scene representatives of the company and from

what I understand from the city ordinance are individually required to

be permitted as well as the company, so I'd imagine that the citation

was probably an individual citation for VCO, and that the company may

have/may be getting a citation by mail or other legal process - but

that's just speculation. Either way, the medic is a representative of

the company at the time of the infraction and is an appropriate

recipient of a citation for violation the ordinance.

Now the appropriateness of doing to at the interruption of patient

care is an entirely separate issue. As an officer and paramedic I

can't think of a single situation in which I'd consider interrupting

patient care to investigate and issue a city ordinance violation

citation - that can all be handled after the fact just as well...

> This guy should have locked

> himself in the unit and called whoever needed to be

> called.

No, that's plain stupid. The guy should have signed the citation and

called his supervisor immediately, who calls the company attorney.

Locking himself in the unit to delay the legal process of citation

would get him a charge for PC § 38.15: INTERFERENCE WITH PUBLIC

DUTIES, a Class B Misdemeanor well established by case law. It'd

likely also guarantee an instanter arrest on the citation, and

depending on the circumstances and the mood of the officer, a

charge/citation for FAIL TO ID as well if he was refusing to provide

identification as requested.

> If the police break windows or anything then

> that's excessive use of force.

Really? How do you come to that conclusion? And who's the victim for

excessive use of force? Can you provide a case law citation that

would even set a level for excessive force against property, rather

than against the person themselves? And can you provide case law or

reasonable arguement that supports your claim of unreasonableness?

The reasonable thing to do is to sign the citation, work with your

supervisors and fight the claim in court. And as the esteemed Mr.

Gandy has stated several times, medics should have their OWN attorney

- the company's attorney represents the company, not the medic, and

will hang the medic out to dry to save the company. Note: No

relation to the current case. I don't know BayStar, and I don't know

the relation they have with their employees, attorneys, etc. They may

very well stand by their employee's side to the end, as I personally

think they should. There's just nothing that says they HAVE to.

Mike :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> issue of citing or fining should be between the city

> and the owners of the business. Remember, don't shoot

> the messenger.

The medics are the on-scene representatives of the company and from

what I understand from the city ordinance are individually required to

be permitted as well as the company, so I'd imagine that the citation

was probably an individual citation for VCO, and that the company may

have/may be getting a citation by mail or other legal process - but

that's just speculation. Either way, the medic is a representative of

the company at the time of the infraction and is an appropriate

recipient of a citation for violation the ordinance.

Now the appropriateness of doing to at the interruption of patient

care is an entirely separate issue. As an officer and paramedic I

can't think of a single situation in which I'd consider interrupting

patient care to investigate and issue a city ordinance violation

citation - that can all be handled after the fact just as well...

> This guy should have locked

> himself in the unit and called whoever needed to be

> called.

No, that's plain stupid. The guy should have signed the citation and

called his supervisor immediately, who calls the company attorney.

Locking himself in the unit to delay the legal process of citation

would get him a charge for PC § 38.15: INTERFERENCE WITH PUBLIC

DUTIES, a Class B Misdemeanor well established by case law. It'd

likely also guarantee an instanter arrest on the citation, and

depending on the circumstances and the mood of the officer, a

charge/citation for FAIL TO ID as well if he was refusing to provide

identification as requested.

> If the police break windows or anything then

> that's excessive use of force.

Really? How do you come to that conclusion? And who's the victim for

excessive use of force? Can you provide a case law citation that

would even set a level for excessive force against property, rather

than against the person themselves? And can you provide case law or

reasonable arguement that supports your claim of unreasonableness?

The reasonable thing to do is to sign the citation, work with your

supervisors and fight the claim in court. And as the esteemed Mr.

Gandy has stated several times, medics should have their OWN attorney

- the company's attorney represents the company, not the medic, and

will hang the medic out to dry to save the company. Note: No

relation to the current case. I don't know BayStar, and I don't know

the relation they have with their employees, attorneys, etc. They may

very well stand by their employee's side to the end, as I personally

think they should. There's just nothing that says they HAVE to.

Mike :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the code from LaPorte.

" Sec. 30-80. Licenses required.

(a) No person, either as owner, agent or otherwise shall operate,

conduct, maintain, advertise or otherwise be engaged in or profess to be

engaged in the business of ambulance service upon the streets, alleys or any

public way or place of La Porte, Texas, unless he holds a currently valid

license for an ambulance vehicle and an ambulance company, issued pursuant

to this chapter. "

Source - www.municode.com <http://www.municode.com/>

Our ordinance has similar language. We DO work with the ambulance owners to

come into compliance with our local ordinances, and that generally works.

Right or Wrong, you can issue citations to the ambulance crew as " agents or

otherwise " . It is an enforcement tool to catch the attention of someone who

is blatantly ignoring attempts to bring his company into compliance with

local ordinances.

In addition, their code calls for PERSONNEL to have a permit, separate from

the company. Did the two on the ambulance hold a permit? Was this the

actual violation that they were cited for??

Jack Pitcock

_____

From: [mailto: ] On

Behalf Of salvador capuchino

Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 11:58 PM

To:

Subject: Re: Resisting arrest, [was Re: Follow Up to ....]

The only problem I have here is that the medics did

nothing wrong in responding. They did as told. The

issue of citing or fining should be between the city

and the owners of the business. Remember, don't shoot

the messenger. As for the hot headed medic, well

maybe he did get what he deserved, if he initiated the

problem. If I am not mistaken, this is the guy who

responded in his POV. Why did he respond? Maybe if

he would not have gone things would have had a

different outcome? This guy should have locked

himself in the unit and called whoever needed to be

called. If the police break windows or anything then

that's excessive use of force. And I am not saying

this is right, but it buys time to get on the phone

and call the right people.

Salvador Capuchino

EMT-P

--- Joe B wrote:

> My parents instilled in me that when you act like a

> jerk in in public and you are repeatedly told to

> calm down, you get what you deserve. There are a

> lot of hot headed medics out there and I have worked

> with many .........Mike, your comments were well

> said. I will be glad when this case is finalized and

> we can all got back to being positive role models

> .................

>

>

> ---------------------------------

>

> What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo!

> Autos

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been

> removed]

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the code from LaPorte.

" Sec. 30-80. Licenses required.

(a) No person, either as owner, agent or otherwise shall operate,

conduct, maintain, advertise or otherwise be engaged in or profess to be

engaged in the business of ambulance service upon the streets, alleys or any

public way or place of La Porte, Texas, unless he holds a currently valid

license for an ambulance vehicle and an ambulance company, issued pursuant

to this chapter. "

Source - www.municode.com <http://www.municode.com/>

Our ordinance has similar language. We DO work with the ambulance owners to

come into compliance with our local ordinances, and that generally works.

Right or Wrong, you can issue citations to the ambulance crew as " agents or

otherwise " . It is an enforcement tool to catch the attention of someone who

is blatantly ignoring attempts to bring his company into compliance with

local ordinances.

In addition, their code calls for PERSONNEL to have a permit, separate from

the company. Did the two on the ambulance hold a permit? Was this the

actual violation that they were cited for??

Jack Pitcock

_____

From: [mailto: ] On

Behalf Of salvador capuchino

Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 11:58 PM

To:

Subject: Re: Resisting arrest, [was Re: Follow Up to ....]

The only problem I have here is that the medics did

nothing wrong in responding. They did as told. The

issue of citing or fining should be between the city

and the owners of the business. Remember, don't shoot

the messenger. As for the hot headed medic, well

maybe he did get what he deserved, if he initiated the

problem. If I am not mistaken, this is the guy who

responded in his POV. Why did he respond? Maybe if

he would not have gone things would have had a

different outcome? This guy should have locked

himself in the unit and called whoever needed to be

called. If the police break windows or anything then

that's excessive use of force. And I am not saying

this is right, but it buys time to get on the phone

and call the right people.

Salvador Capuchino

EMT-P

--- Joe B wrote:

> My parents instilled in me that when you act like a

> jerk in in public and you are repeatedly told to

> calm down, you get what you deserve. There are a

> lot of hot headed medics out there and I have worked

> with many .........Mike, your comments were well

> said. I will be glad when this case is finalized and

> we can all got back to being positive role models

> .................

>

>

> ---------------------------------

>

> What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo!

> Autos

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been

> removed]

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't ask how many he has, ask how many have been substantiated. Two

very different things.

Mike :)

> In reference to this excessive force issue does anyone know this

> officer? Just how many excessive force complaints does he have??

> Rumor mill says there are a few?!?! Again that is the rumor mill!!!

>

>

>

>

> >

> > > My parents instilled in me that when you act like a

> > > jerk in in public and you are repeatedly told to

> > > calm down, you get what you deserve. There are a

> > > lot of hot headed medics out there and I have worked

> > > with many .........Mike, your comments were well

> > > said. I will be glad when this case is finalized and

> > > we can all got back to being positive role models

> > > .................

> > >

> > >

> > > ---------------------------------

> > >

> > > What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo!

> > > Autos

> > >

> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > > removed]

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't ask how many he has, ask how many have been substantiated. Two

very different things.

Mike :)

> In reference to this excessive force issue does anyone know this

> officer? Just how many excessive force complaints does he have??

> Rumor mill says there are a few?!?! Again that is the rumor mill!!!

>

>

>

>

> >

> > > My parents instilled in me that when you act like a

> > > jerk in in public and you are repeatedly told to

> > > calm down, you get what you deserve. There are a

> > > lot of hot headed medics out there and I have worked

> > > with many .........Mike, your comments were well

> > > said. I will be glad when this case is finalized and

> > > we can all got back to being positive role models

> > > .................

> > >

> > >

> > > ---------------------------------

> > >

> > > What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo!

> > > Autos

> > >

> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > > removed]

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't ask how many he has, ask how many have been substantiated. Two

very different things.

Mike :)

> In reference to this excessive force issue does anyone know this

> officer? Just how many excessive force complaints does he have??

> Rumor mill says there are a few?!?! Again that is the rumor mill!!!

>

>

>

>

> >

> > > My parents instilled in me that when you act like a

> > > jerk in in public and you are repeatedly told to

> > > calm down, you get what you deserve. There are a

> > > lot of hot headed medics out there and I have worked

> > > with many .........Mike, your comments were well

> > > said. I will be glad when this case is finalized and

> > > we can all got back to being positive role models

> > > .................

> > >

> > >

> > > ---------------------------------

> > >

> > > What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo!

> > > Autos

> > >

> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > > removed]

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My question is: Why couldn't the supervisor go in with the crew and begin

treating the patient? Then, when the other unit got there, they could transport.

Then after the patient is gone, deal with the citation. Patient gets care, La

Porte gets to transport, citation is dealt with - Everybody wins. Is it really

that difficult??

If anyone is at fault, I personally believe it is the supervisor from La

Porte. This person intentionally prevented patient care; thank whomever you pray

to that he didn't die. When did paperwork and pissing contests become more

important than the people we care for?? And if that is the case, what are we

doing here? And we wonder why EMS cannot come together and set a good example

for the public??

Plain, simple fact - EMS is about quality patient care and transport. So put

aside your egos, your pride, and your citation books and remember why we're

really here in the first place - TO HELP OTHERS.

--Lala EMT-B

---------------------------------

Yahoo! Autos. Looking for a sweet ride? Get pricing, reviews, & more on new and

used cars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My question is: Why couldn't the supervisor go in with the crew and begin

treating the patient? Then, when the other unit got there, they could transport.

Then after the patient is gone, deal with the citation. Patient gets care, La

Porte gets to transport, citation is dealt with - Everybody wins. Is it really

that difficult??

If anyone is at fault, I personally believe it is the supervisor from La

Porte. This person intentionally prevented patient care; thank whomever you pray

to that he didn't die. When did paperwork and pissing contests become more

important than the people we care for?? And if that is the case, what are we

doing here? And we wonder why EMS cannot come together and set a good example

for the public??

Plain, simple fact - EMS is about quality patient care and transport. So put

aside your egos, your pride, and your citation books and remember why we're

really here in the first place - TO HELP OTHERS.

--Lala EMT-B

---------------------------------

Yahoo! Autos. Looking for a sweet ride? Get pricing, reviews, & more on new and

used cars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My question is: Why couldn't the supervisor go in with the crew and begin

treating the patient? Then, when the other unit got there, they could transport.

Then after the patient is gone, deal with the citation. Patient gets care, La

Porte gets to transport, citation is dealt with - Everybody wins. Is it really

that difficult??

If anyone is at fault, I personally believe it is the supervisor from La

Porte. This person intentionally prevented patient care; thank whomever you pray

to that he didn't die. When did paperwork and pissing contests become more

important than the people we care for?? And if that is the case, what are we

doing here? And we wonder why EMS cannot come together and set a good example

for the public??

Plain, simple fact - EMS is about quality patient care and transport. So put

aside your egos, your pride, and your citation books and remember why we're

really here in the first place - TO HELP OTHERS.

--Lala EMT-B

---------------------------------

Yahoo! Autos. Looking for a sweet ride? Get pricing, reviews, & more on new and

used cars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand what you are saying. As far as even

individual permits go it is still the company's

responsibility to ensure their employees and company

have permits. The company is in violation by both

standards. All I am saying is that the no officer

should issue a citation involving a violation of city

ordinance to a medic. These issues should be taken up

with the management. Thank god the officers here in

the Valley have learned this. Most issues in regard

to city ordinaces rest with the FDs. Of course if a

medic is being an ass then he deserves whatever

happens. I can understand being placed under arrest

if I resist after being a dick, but not because I am

requesting for the officer to await the arrival of

my/their supervisor. All in all, yes we are reps of

our companies and should act accordingly.

Salvador Capuchino

EMT-P

--- Mike wrote:

> On 1/20/06, salvador capuchino

> wrote:

> > issue of citing or fining should be between the

> city

> > and the owners of the business. Remember, don't

> shoot

> > the messenger.

>

> The medics are the on-scene representatives of the

> company and from

> what I understand from the city ordinance are

> individually required to

> be permitted as well as the company, so I'd imagine

> that the citation

> was probably an individual citation for VCO, and

> that the company may

> have/may be getting a citation by mail or other

> legal process - but

> that's just speculation. Either way, the medic is a

> representative of

> the company at the time of the infraction and is an

> appropriate

> recipient of a citation for violation the ordinance.

>

> Now the appropriateness of doing to at the

> interruption of patient

> care is an entirely separate issue. As an officer

> and paramedic I

> can't think of a single situation in which I'd

> consider interrupting

> patient care to investigate and issue a city

> ordinance violation

> citation - that can all be handled after the fact

> just as well...

>

> > This guy should have locked

> > himself in the unit and called whoever needed to

> be

> > called.

>

> No, that's plain stupid. The guy should have signed

> the citation and

> called his supervisor immediately, who calls the

> company attorney.

> Locking himself in the unit to delay the legal

> process of citation

> would get him a charge for PC § 38.15: INTERFERENCE

> WITH PUBLIC

> DUTIES, a Class B Misdemeanor well established by

> case law. It'd

> likely also guarantee an instanter arrest on the

> citation, and

> depending on the circumstances and the mood of the

> officer, a

> charge/citation for FAIL TO ID as well if he was

> refusing to provide

> identification as requested.

>

> > If the police break windows or anything then

> > that's excessive use of force.

>

> Really? How do you come to that conclusion? And

> who's the victim for

> excessive use of force? Can you provide a case law

> citation that

> would even set a level for excessive force against

> property, rather

> than against the person themselves? And can you

> provide case law or

> reasonable arguement that supports your claim of

> unreasonableness?

> The reasonable thing to do is to sign the citation,

> work with your

> supervisors and fight the claim in court. And as

> the esteemed Mr.

> Gandy has stated several times, medics should have

> their OWN attorney

> - the company's attorney represents the company, not

> the medic, and

> will hang the medic out to dry to save the company.

> Note: No

> relation to the current case. I don't know BayStar,

> and I don't know

> the relation they have with their employees,

> attorneys, etc. They may

> very well stand by their employee's side to the end,

> as I personally

> think they should. There's just nothing that says

> they HAVE to.

>

> Mike :)

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand what you are saying. As far as even

individual permits go it is still the company's

responsibility to ensure their employees and company

have permits. The company is in violation by both

standards. All I am saying is that the no officer

should issue a citation involving a violation of city

ordinance to a medic. These issues should be taken up

with the management. Thank god the officers here in

the Valley have learned this. Most issues in regard

to city ordinaces rest with the FDs. Of course if a

medic is being an ass then he deserves whatever

happens. I can understand being placed under arrest

if I resist after being a dick, but not because I am

requesting for the officer to await the arrival of

my/their supervisor. All in all, yes we are reps of

our companies and should act accordingly.

Salvador Capuchino

EMT-P

--- Mike wrote:

> On 1/20/06, salvador capuchino

> wrote:

> > issue of citing or fining should be between the

> city

> > and the owners of the business. Remember, don't

> shoot

> > the messenger.

>

> The medics are the on-scene representatives of the

> company and from

> what I understand from the city ordinance are

> individually required to

> be permitted as well as the company, so I'd imagine

> that the citation

> was probably an individual citation for VCO, and

> that the company may

> have/may be getting a citation by mail or other

> legal process - but

> that's just speculation. Either way, the medic is a

> representative of

> the company at the time of the infraction and is an

> appropriate

> recipient of a citation for violation the ordinance.

>

> Now the appropriateness of doing to at the

> interruption of patient

> care is an entirely separate issue. As an officer

> and paramedic I

> can't think of a single situation in which I'd

> consider interrupting

> patient care to investigate and issue a city

> ordinance violation

> citation - that can all be handled after the fact

> just as well...

>

> > This guy should have locked

> > himself in the unit and called whoever needed to

> be

> > called.

>

> No, that's plain stupid. The guy should have signed

> the citation and

> called his supervisor immediately, who calls the

> company attorney.

> Locking himself in the unit to delay the legal

> process of citation

> would get him a charge for PC § 38.15: INTERFERENCE

> WITH PUBLIC

> DUTIES, a Class B Misdemeanor well established by

> case law. It'd

> likely also guarantee an instanter arrest on the

> citation, and

> depending on the circumstances and the mood of the

> officer, a

> charge/citation for FAIL TO ID as well if he was

> refusing to provide

> identification as requested.

>

> > If the police break windows or anything then

> > that's excessive use of force.

>

> Really? How do you come to that conclusion? And

> who's the victim for

> excessive use of force? Can you provide a case law

> citation that

> would even set a level for excessive force against

> property, rather

> than against the person themselves? And can you

> provide case law or

> reasonable arguement that supports your claim of

> unreasonableness?

> The reasonable thing to do is to sign the citation,

> work with your

> supervisors and fight the claim in court. And as

> the esteemed Mr.

> Gandy has stated several times, medics should have

> their OWN attorney

> - the company's attorney represents the company, not

> the medic, and

> will hang the medic out to dry to save the company.

> Note: No

> relation to the current case. I don't know BayStar,

> and I don't know

> the relation they have with their employees,

> attorneys, etc. They may

> very well stand by their employee's side to the end,

> as I personally

> think they should. There's just nothing that says

> they HAVE to.

>

> Mike :)

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand what you are saying. As far as even

individual permits go it is still the company's

responsibility to ensure their employees and company

have permits. The company is in violation by both

standards. All I am saying is that the no officer

should issue a citation involving a violation of city

ordinance to a medic. These issues should be taken up

with the management. Thank god the officers here in

the Valley have learned this. Most issues in regard

to city ordinaces rest with the FDs. Of course if a

medic is being an ass then he deserves whatever

happens. I can understand being placed under arrest

if I resist after being a dick, but not because I am

requesting for the officer to await the arrival of

my/their supervisor. All in all, yes we are reps of

our companies and should act accordingly.

Salvador Capuchino

EMT-P

--- Mike wrote:

> On 1/20/06, salvador capuchino

> wrote:

> > issue of citing or fining should be between the

> city

> > and the owners of the business. Remember, don't

> shoot

> > the messenger.

>

> The medics are the on-scene representatives of the

> company and from

> what I understand from the city ordinance are

> individually required to

> be permitted as well as the company, so I'd imagine

> that the citation

> was probably an individual citation for VCO, and

> that the company may

> have/may be getting a citation by mail or other

> legal process - but

> that's just speculation. Either way, the medic is a

> representative of

> the company at the time of the infraction and is an

> appropriate

> recipient of a citation for violation the ordinance.

>

> Now the appropriateness of doing to at the

> interruption of patient

> care is an entirely separate issue. As an officer

> and paramedic I

> can't think of a single situation in which I'd

> consider interrupting

> patient care to investigate and issue a city

> ordinance violation

> citation - that can all be handled after the fact

> just as well...

>

> > This guy should have locked

> > himself in the unit and called whoever needed to

> be

> > called.

>

> No, that's plain stupid. The guy should have signed

> the citation and

> called his supervisor immediately, who calls the

> company attorney.

> Locking himself in the unit to delay the legal

> process of citation

> would get him a charge for PC § 38.15: INTERFERENCE

> WITH PUBLIC

> DUTIES, a Class B Misdemeanor well established by

> case law. It'd

> likely also guarantee an instanter arrest on the

> citation, and

> depending on the circumstances and the mood of the

> officer, a

> charge/citation for FAIL TO ID as well if he was

> refusing to provide

> identification as requested.

>

> > If the police break windows or anything then

> > that's excessive use of force.

>

> Really? How do you come to that conclusion? And

> who's the victim for

> excessive use of force? Can you provide a case law

> citation that

> would even set a level for excessive force against

> property, rather

> than against the person themselves? And can you

> provide case law or

> reasonable arguement that supports your claim of

> unreasonableness?

> The reasonable thing to do is to sign the citation,

> work with your

> supervisors and fight the claim in court. And as

> the esteemed Mr.

> Gandy has stated several times, medics should have

> their OWN attorney

> - the company's attorney represents the company, not

> the medic, and

> will hang the medic out to dry to save the company.

> Note: No

> relation to the current case. I don't know BayStar,

> and I don't know

> the relation they have with their employees,

> attorneys, etc. They may

> very well stand by their employee's side to the end,

> as I personally

> think they should. There's just nothing that says

> they HAVE to.

>

> Mike :)

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> All I am saying is that the no officer

> should issue a citation involving a violation of city

> ordinance to a medic.

Unless, of course, the officer is under orders to strictly enforce

this ordinance through the issuance of citations...

Mike :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> All I am saying is that the no officer

> should issue a citation involving a violation of city

> ordinance to a medic.

Unless, of course, the officer is under orders to strictly enforce

this ordinance through the issuance of citations...

Mike :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK now I have to speak up. I have worked in Dallas,

and there is a permiting process for the service AND

the crews. Now,if the crew is not carring a permit and

they are stopped by a LEO or a CITY DOT INSPECTOR they

will be cited. And the service will be repremanded as

well.It is a condition of employment that each person

SHALL apply for a City Of Dallas permit without fail.

Now,1) Should the medics have been cited? If they were

informed during the hiring process of the permit

regs,and they did not obtain the permit,then yes. As

well as the service should be cited as well. 2) Should

the medic have been placed in custody? WERE ANY OF US

THERE? DID ANY OF US SEE THE INCIDENT TAKE PLACE? If

you did then speak up. I know I did not,so I do not

know if or how the incident transpired.All LEOs whom

are employed by a City Police Department have the

ability to cite for ANY city ordnance violation at

his/her own will. In this case,I am not sure the the

officer in question used sound judgement with regard

to Patient Condition and care. But again I was not

there. This issue will be played out in the media,in

court,AND in the court of public opinion. The thing

that must be addressed is DID THE PATIENT THAT BAYSTAR

WAS CALLED FOR,INCUR ANY TYPE OF UNDUE

HARM DUE TO THE SITUATION THAT OCCURED LESS THAN A

BLOCK FROM THE INCIDENT LOCATION? And is this

situation likely to occur

in other cities that have these type of codes? Patient

Care is the formost situation at hand,not whom is THE

BIGGEST DOG ON THE STREET.

--- salvador capuchino wrote:

> I understand what you are saying. As far as even

> individual permits go it is still the company's

> responsibility to ensure their employees and company

> have permits. The company is in violation by both

> standards. All I am saying is that the no officer

> should issue a citation involving a violation of

> city

> ordinance to a medic. These issues should be taken

> up

> with the management. Thank god the officers here in

> the Valley have learned this. Most issues in regard

> to city ordinaces rest with the FDs. Of course if a

> medic is being an ass then he deserves whatever

> happens. I can understand being placed under arrest

> if I resist after being a dick, but not because I am

> requesting for the officer to await the arrival of

> my/their supervisor. All in all, yes we are reps of

> our companies and should act accordingly.

> Salvador Capuchino

> EMT-P

>

> --- Mike wrote:

>

> > On 1/20/06, salvador capuchino

> > wrote:

> > > issue of citing or fining should be between the

> > city

> > > and the owners of the business. Remember, don't

> > shoot

> > > the messenger.

> >

> > The medics are the on-scene representatives of the

> > company and from

> > what I understand from the city ordinance are

> > individually required to

> > be permitted as well as the company, so I'd

> imagine

> > that the citation

> > was probably an individual citation for VCO, and

> > that the company may

> > have/may be getting a citation by mail or other

> > legal process - but

> > that's just speculation. Either way, the medic is

> a

> > representative of

> > the company at the time of the infraction and is

> an

> > appropriate

> > recipient of a citation for violation the

> ordinance.

> >

> > Now the appropriateness of doing to at the

> > interruption of patient

> > care is an entirely separate issue. As an officer

> > and paramedic I

> > can't think of a single situation in which I'd

> > consider interrupting

> > patient care to investigate and issue a city

> > ordinance violation

> > citation - that can all be handled after the fact

> > just as well...

> >

> > > This guy should have locked

> > > himself in the unit and called whoever needed to

> > be

> > > called.

> >

> > No, that's plain stupid. The guy should have

> signed

> > the citation and

> > called his supervisor immediately, who calls the

> > company attorney.

> > Locking himself in the unit to delay the legal

> > process of citation

> > would get him a charge for PC § 38.15:

> INTERFERENCE

> > WITH PUBLIC

> > DUTIES, a Class B Misdemeanor well established by

> > case law. It'd

> > likely also guarantee an instanter arrest on the

> > citation, and

> > depending on the circumstances and the mood of the

> > officer, a

> > charge/citation for FAIL TO ID as well if he was

> > refusing to provide

> > identification as requested.

> >

> > > If the police break windows or anything then

> > > that's excessive use of force.

> >

> > Really? How do you come to that conclusion? And

> > who's the victim for

> > excessive use of force? Can you provide a case

> law

> > citation that

> > would even set a level for excessive force against

> > property, rather

> > than against the person themselves? And can you

> > provide case law or

> > reasonable arguement that supports your claim of

> > unreasonableness?

> > The reasonable thing to do is to sign the

> citation,

> > work with your

> > supervisors and fight the claim in court. And as

> > the esteemed Mr.

> > Gandy has stated several times, medics should have

> > their OWN attorney

> > - the company's attorney represents the company,

> not

> > the medic, and

> > will hang the medic out to dry to save the

> company.

> > Note: No

> > relation to the current case. I don't know

> BayStar,

> > and I don't know

> > the relation they have with their employees,

> > attorneys, etc. They may

> > very well stand by their employee's side to the

> end,

> > as I personally

> > think they should. There's just nothing that says

> > they HAVE to.

> >

> > Mike :)

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...