Guest guest Posted January 20, 2006 Report Share Posted January 20, 2006 What I mean by that is that I would have demanded that the officer await the arrival of my supervisor and at the same time I would have demanded that the officer's supervisor respond as well. Those medics were no threat to the officer's life or anyone around them. The arrest was uncalled for. If I had to lock myself inside the unit and call 911 to speak to the PD/media, I would have done it. I believe the officer overstepped his boundries. I believe their ordinance states that the service will be ticketed/fined, etc., not the medics. I know of one officer here in the RGV who was fired after he arrested a medic on similiar charges. Fortunately the media has alot of pull. The officer in this case refused to allow the medics to see the patients even though there was no other EMS on-scene. He also refused to sign a refusal. The 911 provider for the area was responding from another city and took a while to show up. Then again the county gives them 20 minutes to show up. Bottom line the officer was fired and the city lost the civil lawsuit. Salvador Capuchino EMT-P --- Mike wrote: > Sal - With regards to your statement " I would of > resisted too " I > refer you to section ( below. > > PENAL CODE § 38.03. RESISTING ARREST, SEARCH, OR > TRANSPORTATION. > > (a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally > prevents or > obstructs a person he knows is a peace officer or a > person acting in a > peace officer's presence and at his direction from > effecting an > arrest, search, or transportation of the actor or > another by using > force against the peace officer or another. > > ( It is no defense to prosecution under this > section that the > arrest or search was unlawful. > > Mike > > On 1/19/06, salvador capuchino > wrote: > > Everything would have been good if they would have > > ticketed the company, not the medics. La Prte > should > > know that the medics really have no say so. We > cannot > > legally refuse a call. And since when do medics > > assist PD with takedowns? I have always believed > that > > these issues are between the head honchos, not the > > medics. I would of resisted too. PD could have > > waited for a supervisor to arrive. Baystar should > > file a complaint with TCLEOSE too. Maybe even the > AG. > > Salvador Capuchino > > EMT-P > > > > --- bearamedic99 wrote: > > > > > Sorry if this got posted already but if it did, > I > > > missed it. > > > > > > > > > http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/metro/3589357.html > > > > > > Paramedics' fracas being investigated > > > Officials trying to determine what led to the > arrest > > > of a Bay Star > > > worker > > > By CINDY HORSWELL > > > Copyright 2006 Houston Chronicle > > > > > > A La Porte homemaker feels caught in the middle > of > > > an escalating > > > battle between two ambulance services that she > says > > > were both trying > > > to help her ailing 84-year-old father. > > > > > > The fight has prompted two investigations: one > by > > > the state into > > > whether emergency services were delayed to the > man > > > and another into > > > the circumstances that landed a paramedic from > one > > > of the services in > > > jail. > > > > > > Now authorities are trying to sort out how two > > > ambulance crews, who > > > are usually the good guys riding to the rescue, > > > became the ones in > > > trouble. > > > > > > " I am so sorry this all happened. Both were only > > > trying to help my > > > father. I am shocked, " said Zwiercan, who > > > telephoned for an > > > ambulance on Dec. 28. Her father, King Hager, > who > > > was transported > > > from Zwiercan's home on Eagle Fork Court to the > > > hospital, is still > > > undergoing treatment there for fluid in his > lungs, > > > dehydration and > > > kidney problems. > > > > > > " We don't want to see EMS people fighting > between > > > each other, " > > > County Assistant District Attorney Wood > said > > > of the squabble > > > between La Porte's ambulance service and Bay > Star, a > > > private service > > > based in Baytown. " We are reviewing the police > > > reports and talking to > > > witnesses to see where things went awry. " > > > > > > Wood is prosecutor for the resisting-arrest > charge > > > filed against Bay > > > Star's paramedic, Jung, who spent one > night > > > in jail. Jung bit > > > the finger of a La Porte paramedic who assisted > in > > > the arrest, said > > > Ray Nolan, who heads La Porte's EMS. > > > > > > But in a written statement, Jung accuses the La > > > Porte paramedic, > > > Peugeot, and the arresting police officer > of > > > being the ones who > > > were abusive. Jung, 21, who will be a pre-med > > > student at the > > > University of St. in the fall, stated the > > > unidentified officer > > > slammed his head into the curb three times after > he > > > was handcuffed. > > > > > > > > > How it started > > > Two Bay Star medics were also ticketed by La > Porte > > > for failing to > > > comply with a new ordinance requiring them to > have a > > > permit to > > > operate in the city. > > > > > > According to Zwiercan and Nolan, the squabble > > > started after Zwiercan > > > telephoned La Porte EMS for an ambulance after > > > congestion in her > > > father's chest worsened. > > > > > > The La Porte dispatcher told her that the city > does > > > not handle non- > > > emergency transports and gave her a list of > private > > > ambulance > > > services from which to chose. > > > > > > Zwiercan picked Bay Star, which she said > promised to > > > have an > > > ambulance there in about 20 minutes. > > > > > > While Zwiercan said she had not considered her > > > father's case an > > > emergency, Bay Star upgraded the run to an > > > " emergency " because the > > > patient was having difficulty breathing. La > Porte > > > dispatch then gave > > > Bay Star a " verbal OK " to " run hot " with sirens > and > > > lights. > > > > > > Following protocol, the La Porte dispatcher > informed > > > La Porte's > > > paramedic supervisor, Peugeot, about Bay Star's > > > emergency run. > > > > > > This news concerned Peugeot because he knew Bay > Star > > > had never > > > applied for an operating permit as required by > the > > > city's new > > > ordinance, Nolan said. > > > > > > > > > New ordinance > > > Under the new ordinance, private ambulances are > > > ordered to handle > > > only non-emergency transports and must transfer > any > > > emergency cases > > > to La Porte to assure that the highest grade of > > > equipment and trained > > > personnel are used, Nolan said. > > > > > > The La Porte dispatcher, who had recently > returned > === message truncated === __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2006 Report Share Posted January 20, 2006 > What I mean by that is that I would have demanded that > the officer await the arrival of my supervisor and at > the same time I would have demanded that the officer's > supervisor respond as well. [...] If I had to lock myself > inside the unit and call 911 to speak to the PD/media, > I would have done it. At this point, from my perspective when working as a police officer, you can take a time-out in the back of my police car to wait for all the supervisors to show up. My job is to control the scene, and if you're going to be irrational then I'll provide you a well-defined space in which to be irrational, and I'll provide the proper restraints to ensure that you don't violate those boundaries. Easier? Just sign the damn citation. It's not an admission of guilt, it's a promise to appear (and contest the charge if you wish). Not signing the citation pretty much guarantees an arrest, commonly referred to as an instanter, meaning that I'm arresting you to take you " instantly " before a magistrate who will inform you of your charges and secure a promise to appear in court. " Instantly " generally means the next morning... The police officer has a job to do, and he's probably as frustrated about it as you are - especially with a violation of city ordinance call. The citation is an end to the call, and it gets everyone out of the situation gracefully and allows the parties to decide whether or not to pursue the issue further (the city consults the city attorney prosecuting the case and compares the facts against the ordinance, you get to consult an attorney and do the same thing). Mike :/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2006 Report Share Posted January 20, 2006 My parents instilled in me that when you act like a jerk in in public and you are repeatedly told to calm down, you get what you deserve. There are a lot of hot headed medics out there and I have worked with many .........Mike, your comments were well said. I will be glad when this case is finalized and we can all got back to being positive role models ................. --------------------------------- What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! Autos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2006 Report Share Posted January 20, 2006 My parents instilled in me that when you act like a jerk in in public and you are repeatedly told to calm down, you get what you deserve. There are a lot of hot headed medics out there and I have worked with many .........Mike, your comments were well said. I will be glad when this case is finalized and we can all got back to being positive role models ................. --------------------------------- What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! Autos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2006 Report Share Posted January 20, 2006 Uhh… WRONG! Baystar is NOT the 911 provider for the ‘area’. They are a commercial firm based and operated from Baytown. Baytown Health Department EMS is the 911 provider for Baytown and the area immediately surrounding Baytown. All other cities in the immediate area around Baytown/LaPorte have Third Service or Fire Based EMS except Pasadena, who contracts with ETMC. Jack _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of salvador capuchino Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 12:55 PM To: Subject: Re: Resisting arrest, [was Re: Follow Up to ....] “The 911 provider for the area was responding from another city and took a while to show up.” Salvador Capuchino EMT-P --- Mike wrote: > Sal - With regards to your statement " I would of > resisted too " I > refer you to section ( below. > > PENAL CODE § 38.03. RESISTING ARREST, SEARCH, OR > TRANSPORTATION. > > (a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally > prevents or > obstructs a person he knows is a peace officer or a > person acting in a > peace officer's presence and at his direction from > effecting an > arrest, search, or transportation of the actor or > another by using > force against the peace officer or another. > > ( It is no defense to prosecution under this > section that the > arrest or search was unlawful. > > Mike > > On 1/19/06, salvador capuchino > wrote: > > Everything would have been good if they would have > > ticketed the company, not the medics. La Prte > should > > know that the medics really have no say so. We > cannot > > legally refuse a call. And since when do medics > > assist PD with takedowns? I have always believed > that > > these issues are between the head honchos, not the > > medics. I would of resisted too. PD could have > > waited for a supervisor to arrive. Baystar should > > file a complaint with TCLEOSE too. Maybe even the > AG. > > Salvador Capuchino > > EMT-P > > > > --- bearamedic99 wrote: > > > > > Sorry if this got posted already but if it did, > I > > > missed it. > > > > > > > > > http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/metro/3589357.html > > > > > > Paramedics' fracas being investigated > > > Officials trying to determine what led to the > arrest > > > of a Bay Star > > > worker > > > By CINDY HORSWELL > > > Copyright 2006 Houston Chronicle > > > > > > A La Porte homemaker feels caught in the middle > of > > > an escalating > > > battle between two ambulance services that she > says > > > were both trying > > > to help her ailing 84-year-old father. > > > > > > The fight has prompted two investigations: one > by > > > the state into > > > whether emergency services were delayed to the > man > > > and another into > > > the circumstances that landed a paramedic from > one > > > of the services in > > > jail. > > > > > > Now authorities are trying to sort out how two > > > ambulance crews, who > > > are usually the good guys riding to the rescue, > > > became the ones in > > > trouble. > > > > > > " I am so sorry this all happened. Both were only > > > trying to help my > > > father. I am shocked, " said Zwiercan, who > > > telephoned for an > > > ambulance on Dec. 28. Her father, King Hager, > who > > > was transported > > > from Zwiercan's home on Eagle Fork Court to the > > > hospital, is still > > > undergoing treatment there for fluid in his > lungs, > > > dehydration and > > > kidney problems. > > > > > > " We don't want to see EMS people fighting > between > > > each other, " > > > County Assistant District Attorney Wood > said > > > of the squabble > > > between La Porte's ambulance service and Bay > Star, a > > > private service > > > based in Baytown. " We are reviewing the police > > > reports and talking to > > > witnesses to see where things went awry. " > > > > > > Wood is prosecutor for the resisting-arrest > charge > > > filed against Bay > > > Star's paramedic, Jung, who spent one > night > > > in jail. Jung bit > > > the finger of a La Porte paramedic who assisted > in > > > the arrest, said > > > Ray Nolan, who heads La Porte's EMS. > > > > > > But in a written statement, Jung accuses the La > > > Porte paramedic, > > > Peugeot, and the arresting police officer > of > > > being the ones who > > > were abusive. Jung, 21, who will be a pre-med > > > student at the > > > University of St. in the fall, stated the > > > unidentified officer > > > slammed his head into the curb three times after > he > > > was handcuffed. > > > > > > > > > How it started > > > Two Bay Star medics were also ticketed by La > Porte > > > for failing to > > > comply with a new ordinance requiring them to > have a > > > permit to > > > operate in the city. > > > > > > According to Zwiercan and Nolan, the squabble > > > started after Zwiercan > > > telephoned La Porte EMS for an ambulance after > > > congestion in her > > > father's chest worsened. > > > > > > The La Porte dispatcher told her that the city > does > > > not handle non- > > > emergency transports and gave her a list of > private > > > ambulance > > > services from which to chose. > > > > > > Zwiercan picked Bay Star, which she said > promised to > > > have an > > > ambulance there in about 20 minutes. > > > > > > While Zwiercan said she had not considered her > > > father's case an > > > emergency, Bay Star upgraded the run to an > > > " emergency " because the > > > patient was having difficulty breathing. La > Porte > > > dispatch then gave > > > Bay Star a " verbal OK " to " run hot " with sirens > and > > > lights. > > > > > > Following protocol, the La Porte dispatcher > informed > > > La Porte's > > > paramedic supervisor, Peugeot, about Bay Star's > > > emergency run. > > > > > > This news concerned Peugeot because he knew Bay > Star > > > had never > > > applied for an operating permit as required by > the > > > city's new > > > ordinance, Nolan said. > > > > > > > > > New ordinance > > > Under the new ordinance, private ambulances are > > > ordered to handle > > > only non-emergency transports and must transfer > any > > > emergency cases > > > to La Porte to assure that the highest grade of > > > equipment and trained > > > personnel are used, Nolan said. > > > > > > The La Porte dispatcher, who had recently > returned > === message truncated === __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2006 Report Share Posted January 20, 2006 Uhh… WRONG! Baystar is NOT the 911 provider for the ‘area’. They are a commercial firm based and operated from Baytown. Baytown Health Department EMS is the 911 provider for Baytown and the area immediately surrounding Baytown. All other cities in the immediate area around Baytown/LaPorte have Third Service or Fire Based EMS except Pasadena, who contracts with ETMC. Jack _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of salvador capuchino Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 12:55 PM To: Subject: Re: Resisting arrest, [was Re: Follow Up to ....] “The 911 provider for the area was responding from another city and took a while to show up.” Salvador Capuchino EMT-P --- Mike wrote: > Sal - With regards to your statement " I would of > resisted too " I > refer you to section ( below. > > PENAL CODE § 38.03. RESISTING ARREST, SEARCH, OR > TRANSPORTATION. > > (a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally > prevents or > obstructs a person he knows is a peace officer or a > person acting in a > peace officer's presence and at his direction from > effecting an > arrest, search, or transportation of the actor or > another by using > force against the peace officer or another. > > ( It is no defense to prosecution under this > section that the > arrest or search was unlawful. > > Mike > > On 1/19/06, salvador capuchino > wrote: > > Everything would have been good if they would have > > ticketed the company, not the medics. La Prte > should > > know that the medics really have no say so. We > cannot > > legally refuse a call. And since when do medics > > assist PD with takedowns? I have always believed > that > > these issues are between the head honchos, not the > > medics. I would of resisted too. PD could have > > waited for a supervisor to arrive. Baystar should > > file a complaint with TCLEOSE too. Maybe even the > AG. > > Salvador Capuchino > > EMT-P > > > > --- bearamedic99 wrote: > > > > > Sorry if this got posted already but if it did, > I > > > missed it. > > > > > > > > > http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/metro/3589357.html > > > > > > Paramedics' fracas being investigated > > > Officials trying to determine what led to the > arrest > > > of a Bay Star > > > worker > > > By CINDY HORSWELL > > > Copyright 2006 Houston Chronicle > > > > > > A La Porte homemaker feels caught in the middle > of > > > an escalating > > > battle between two ambulance services that she > says > > > were both trying > > > to help her ailing 84-year-old father. > > > > > > The fight has prompted two investigations: one > by > > > the state into > > > whether emergency services were delayed to the > man > > > and another into > > > the circumstances that landed a paramedic from > one > > > of the services in > > > jail. > > > > > > Now authorities are trying to sort out how two > > > ambulance crews, who > > > are usually the good guys riding to the rescue, > > > became the ones in > > > trouble. > > > > > > " I am so sorry this all happened. Both were only > > > trying to help my > > > father. I am shocked, " said Zwiercan, who > > > telephoned for an > > > ambulance on Dec. 28. Her father, King Hager, > who > > > was transported > > > from Zwiercan's home on Eagle Fork Court to the > > > hospital, is still > > > undergoing treatment there for fluid in his > lungs, > > > dehydration and > > > kidney problems. > > > > > > " We don't want to see EMS people fighting > between > > > each other, " > > > County Assistant District Attorney Wood > said > > > of the squabble > > > between La Porte's ambulance service and Bay > Star, a > > > private service > > > based in Baytown. " We are reviewing the police > > > reports and talking to > > > witnesses to see where things went awry. " > > > > > > Wood is prosecutor for the resisting-arrest > charge > > > filed against Bay > > > Star's paramedic, Jung, who spent one > night > > > in jail. Jung bit > > > the finger of a La Porte paramedic who assisted > in > > > the arrest, said > > > Ray Nolan, who heads La Porte's EMS. > > > > > > But in a written statement, Jung accuses the La > > > Porte paramedic, > > > Peugeot, and the arresting police officer > of > > > being the ones who > > > were abusive. Jung, 21, who will be a pre-med > > > student at the > > > University of St. in the fall, stated the > > > unidentified officer > > > slammed his head into the curb three times after > he > > > was handcuffed. > > > > > > > > > How it started > > > Two Bay Star medics were also ticketed by La > Porte > > > for failing to > > > comply with a new ordinance requiring them to > have a > > > permit to > > > operate in the city. > > > > > > According to Zwiercan and Nolan, the squabble > > > started after Zwiercan > > > telephoned La Porte EMS for an ambulance after > > > congestion in her > > > father's chest worsened. > > > > > > The La Porte dispatcher told her that the city > does > > > not handle non- > > > emergency transports and gave her a list of > private > > > ambulance > > > services from which to chose. > > > > > > Zwiercan picked Bay Star, which she said > promised to > > > have an > > > ambulance there in about 20 minutes. > > > > > > While Zwiercan said she had not considered her > > > father's case an > > > emergency, Bay Star upgraded the run to an > > > " emergency " because the > > > patient was having difficulty breathing. La > Porte > > > dispatch then gave > > > Bay Star a " verbal OK " to " run hot " with sirens > and > > > lights. > > > > > > Following protocol, the La Porte dispatcher > informed > > > La Porte's > > > paramedic supervisor, Peugeot, about Bay Star's > > > emergency run. > > > > > > This news concerned Peugeot because he knew Bay > Star > > > had never > > > applied for an operating permit as required by > the > > > city's new > > > ordinance, Nolan said. > > > > > > > > > New ordinance > > > Under the new ordinance, private ambulances are > > > ordered to handle > > > only non-emergency transports and must transfer > any > > > emergency cases > > > to La Porte to assure that the highest grade of > > > equipment and trained > > > personnel are used, Nolan said. > > > > > > The La Porte dispatcher, who had recently > returned > === message truncated === __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2006 Report Share Posted January 20, 2006 Uhh… WRONG! Baystar is NOT the 911 provider for the ‘area’. They are a commercial firm based and operated from Baytown. Baytown Health Department EMS is the 911 provider for Baytown and the area immediately surrounding Baytown. All other cities in the immediate area around Baytown/LaPorte have Third Service or Fire Based EMS except Pasadena, who contracts with ETMC. Jack _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of salvador capuchino Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 12:55 PM To: Subject: Re: Resisting arrest, [was Re: Follow Up to ....] “The 911 provider for the area was responding from another city and took a while to show up.” Salvador Capuchino EMT-P --- Mike wrote: > Sal - With regards to your statement " I would of > resisted too " I > refer you to section ( below. > > PENAL CODE § 38.03. RESISTING ARREST, SEARCH, OR > TRANSPORTATION. > > (a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally > prevents or > obstructs a person he knows is a peace officer or a > person acting in a > peace officer's presence and at his direction from > effecting an > arrest, search, or transportation of the actor or > another by using > force against the peace officer or another. > > ( It is no defense to prosecution under this > section that the > arrest or search was unlawful. > > Mike > > On 1/19/06, salvador capuchino > wrote: > > Everything would have been good if they would have > > ticketed the company, not the medics. La Prte > should > > know that the medics really have no say so. We > cannot > > legally refuse a call. And since when do medics > > assist PD with takedowns? I have always believed > that > > these issues are between the head honchos, not the > > medics. I would of resisted too. PD could have > > waited for a supervisor to arrive. Baystar should > > file a complaint with TCLEOSE too. Maybe even the > AG. > > Salvador Capuchino > > EMT-P > > > > --- bearamedic99 wrote: > > > > > Sorry if this got posted already but if it did, > I > > > missed it. > > > > > > > > > http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/metro/3589357.html > > > > > > Paramedics' fracas being investigated > > > Officials trying to determine what led to the > arrest > > > of a Bay Star > > > worker > > > By CINDY HORSWELL > > > Copyright 2006 Houston Chronicle > > > > > > A La Porte homemaker feels caught in the middle > of > > > an escalating > > > battle between two ambulance services that she > says > > > were both trying > > > to help her ailing 84-year-old father. > > > > > > The fight has prompted two investigations: one > by > > > the state into > > > whether emergency services were delayed to the > man > > > and another into > > > the circumstances that landed a paramedic from > one > > > of the services in > > > jail. > > > > > > Now authorities are trying to sort out how two > > > ambulance crews, who > > > are usually the good guys riding to the rescue, > > > became the ones in > > > trouble. > > > > > > " I am so sorry this all happened. Both were only > > > trying to help my > > > father. I am shocked, " said Zwiercan, who > > > telephoned for an > > > ambulance on Dec. 28. Her father, King Hager, > who > > > was transported > > > from Zwiercan's home on Eagle Fork Court to the > > > hospital, is still > > > undergoing treatment there for fluid in his > lungs, > > > dehydration and > > > kidney problems. > > > > > > " We don't want to see EMS people fighting > between > > > each other, " > > > County Assistant District Attorney Wood > said > > > of the squabble > > > between La Porte's ambulance service and Bay > Star, a > > > private service > > > based in Baytown. " We are reviewing the police > > > reports and talking to > > > witnesses to see where things went awry. " > > > > > > Wood is prosecutor for the resisting-arrest > charge > > > filed against Bay > > > Star's paramedic, Jung, who spent one > night > > > in jail. Jung bit > > > the finger of a La Porte paramedic who assisted > in > > > the arrest, said > > > Ray Nolan, who heads La Porte's EMS. > > > > > > But in a written statement, Jung accuses the La > > > Porte paramedic, > > > Peugeot, and the arresting police officer > of > > > being the ones who > > > were abusive. Jung, 21, who will be a pre-med > > > student at the > > > University of St. in the fall, stated the > > > unidentified officer > > > slammed his head into the curb three times after > he > > > was handcuffed. > > > > > > > > > How it started > > > Two Bay Star medics were also ticketed by La > Porte > > > for failing to > > > comply with a new ordinance requiring them to > have a > > > permit to > > > operate in the city. > > > > > > According to Zwiercan and Nolan, the squabble > > > started after Zwiercan > > > telephoned La Porte EMS for an ambulance after > > > congestion in her > > > father's chest worsened. > > > > > > The La Porte dispatcher told her that the city > does > > > not handle non- > > > emergency transports and gave her a list of > private > > > ambulance > > > services from which to chose. > > > > > > Zwiercan picked Bay Star, which she said > promised to > > > have an > > > ambulance there in about 20 minutes. > > > > > > While Zwiercan said she had not considered her > > > father's case an > > > emergency, Bay Star upgraded the run to an > > > " emergency " because the > > > patient was having difficulty breathing. La > Porte > > > dispatch then gave > > > Bay Star a " verbal OK " to " run hot " with sirens > and > > > lights. > > > > > > Following protocol, the La Porte dispatcher > informed > > > La Porte's > > > paramedic supervisor, Peugeot, about Bay Star's > > > emergency run. > > > > > > This news concerned Peugeot because he knew Bay > Star > > > had never > > > applied for an operating permit as required by > the > > > city's new > > > ordinance, Nolan said. > > > > > > > > > New ordinance > > > Under the new ordinance, private ambulances are > > > ordered to handle > > > only non-emergency transports and must transfer > any > > > emergency cases > > > to La Porte to assure that the highest grade of > > > equipment and trained > > > personnel are used, Nolan said. > > > > > > The La Porte dispatcher, who had recently > returned > === message truncated === __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2006 Report Share Posted January 20, 2006 The only problem I have here is that the medics did nothing wrong in responding. They did as told. The issue of citing or fining should be between the city and the owners of the business. Remember, don't shoot the messenger. As for the hot headed medic, well maybe he did get what he deserved, if he initiated the problem. If I am not mistaken, this is the guy who responded in his POV. Why did he respond? Maybe if he would not have gone things would have had a different outcome? This guy should have locked himself in the unit and called whoever needed to be called. If the police break windows or anything then that's excessive use of force. And I am not saying this is right, but it buys time to get on the phone and call the right people. Salvador Capuchino EMT-P --- Joe B wrote: > My parents instilled in me that when you act like a > jerk in in public and you are repeatedly told to > calm down, you get what you deserve. There are a > lot of hot headed medics out there and I have worked > with many .........Mike, your comments were well > said. I will be glad when this case is finalized and > we can all got back to being positive role models > ................. > > > --------------------------------- > > What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! > Autos > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2006 Report Share Posted January 20, 2006 The only problem I have here is that the medics did nothing wrong in responding. They did as told. The issue of citing or fining should be between the city and the owners of the business. Remember, don't shoot the messenger. As for the hot headed medic, well maybe he did get what he deserved, if he initiated the problem. If I am not mistaken, this is the guy who responded in his POV. Why did he respond? Maybe if he would not have gone things would have had a different outcome? This guy should have locked himself in the unit and called whoever needed to be called. If the police break windows or anything then that's excessive use of force. And I am not saying this is right, but it buys time to get on the phone and call the right people. Salvador Capuchino EMT-P --- Joe B wrote: > My parents instilled in me that when you act like a > jerk in in public and you are repeatedly told to > calm down, you get what you deserve. There are a > lot of hot headed medics out there and I have worked > with many .........Mike, your comments were well > said. I will be glad when this case is finalized and > we can all got back to being positive role models > ................. > > > --------------------------------- > > What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! > Autos > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2006 Report Share Posted January 21, 2006 > issue of citing or fining should be between the city > and the owners of the business. Remember, don't shoot > the messenger. The medics are the on-scene representatives of the company and from what I understand from the city ordinance are individually required to be permitted as well as the company, so I'd imagine that the citation was probably an individual citation for VCO, and that the company may have/may be getting a citation by mail or other legal process - but that's just speculation. Either way, the medic is a representative of the company at the time of the infraction and is an appropriate recipient of a citation for violation the ordinance. Now the appropriateness of doing to at the interruption of patient care is an entirely separate issue. As an officer and paramedic I can't think of a single situation in which I'd consider interrupting patient care to investigate and issue a city ordinance violation citation - that can all be handled after the fact just as well... > This guy should have locked > himself in the unit and called whoever needed to be > called. No, that's plain stupid. The guy should have signed the citation and called his supervisor immediately, who calls the company attorney. Locking himself in the unit to delay the legal process of citation would get him a charge for PC § 38.15: INTERFERENCE WITH PUBLIC DUTIES, a Class B Misdemeanor well established by case law. It'd likely also guarantee an instanter arrest on the citation, and depending on the circumstances and the mood of the officer, a charge/citation for FAIL TO ID as well if he was refusing to provide identification as requested. > If the police break windows or anything then > that's excessive use of force. Really? How do you come to that conclusion? And who's the victim for excessive use of force? Can you provide a case law citation that would even set a level for excessive force against property, rather than against the person themselves? And can you provide case law or reasonable arguement that supports your claim of unreasonableness? The reasonable thing to do is to sign the citation, work with your supervisors and fight the claim in court. And as the esteemed Mr. Gandy has stated several times, medics should have their OWN attorney - the company's attorney represents the company, not the medic, and will hang the medic out to dry to save the company. Note: No relation to the current case. I don't know BayStar, and I don't know the relation they have with their employees, attorneys, etc. They may very well stand by their employee's side to the end, as I personally think they should. There's just nothing that says they HAVE to. Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2006 Report Share Posted January 21, 2006 > issue of citing or fining should be between the city > and the owners of the business. Remember, don't shoot > the messenger. The medics are the on-scene representatives of the company and from what I understand from the city ordinance are individually required to be permitted as well as the company, so I'd imagine that the citation was probably an individual citation for VCO, and that the company may have/may be getting a citation by mail or other legal process - but that's just speculation. Either way, the medic is a representative of the company at the time of the infraction and is an appropriate recipient of a citation for violation the ordinance. Now the appropriateness of doing to at the interruption of patient care is an entirely separate issue. As an officer and paramedic I can't think of a single situation in which I'd consider interrupting patient care to investigate and issue a city ordinance violation citation - that can all be handled after the fact just as well... > This guy should have locked > himself in the unit and called whoever needed to be > called. No, that's plain stupid. The guy should have signed the citation and called his supervisor immediately, who calls the company attorney. Locking himself in the unit to delay the legal process of citation would get him a charge for PC § 38.15: INTERFERENCE WITH PUBLIC DUTIES, a Class B Misdemeanor well established by case law. It'd likely also guarantee an instanter arrest on the citation, and depending on the circumstances and the mood of the officer, a charge/citation for FAIL TO ID as well if he was refusing to provide identification as requested. > If the police break windows or anything then > that's excessive use of force. Really? How do you come to that conclusion? And who's the victim for excessive use of force? Can you provide a case law citation that would even set a level for excessive force against property, rather than against the person themselves? And can you provide case law or reasonable arguement that supports your claim of unreasonableness? The reasonable thing to do is to sign the citation, work with your supervisors and fight the claim in court. And as the esteemed Mr. Gandy has stated several times, medics should have their OWN attorney - the company's attorney represents the company, not the medic, and will hang the medic out to dry to save the company. Note: No relation to the current case. I don't know BayStar, and I don't know the relation they have with their employees, attorneys, etc. They may very well stand by their employee's side to the end, as I personally think they should. There's just nothing that says they HAVE to. Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2006 Report Share Posted January 21, 2006 Here's the code from LaPorte. " Sec. 30-80. Licenses required. (a) No person, either as owner, agent or otherwise shall operate, conduct, maintain, advertise or otherwise be engaged in or profess to be engaged in the business of ambulance service upon the streets, alleys or any public way or place of La Porte, Texas, unless he holds a currently valid license for an ambulance vehicle and an ambulance company, issued pursuant to this chapter. " Source - www.municode.com <http://www.municode.com/> Our ordinance has similar language. We DO work with the ambulance owners to come into compliance with our local ordinances, and that generally works. Right or Wrong, you can issue citations to the ambulance crew as " agents or otherwise " . It is an enforcement tool to catch the attention of someone who is blatantly ignoring attempts to bring his company into compliance with local ordinances. In addition, their code calls for PERSONNEL to have a permit, separate from the company. Did the two on the ambulance hold a permit? Was this the actual violation that they were cited for?? Jack Pitcock _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of salvador capuchino Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 11:58 PM To: Subject: Re: Resisting arrest, [was Re: Follow Up to ....] The only problem I have here is that the medics did nothing wrong in responding. They did as told. The issue of citing or fining should be between the city and the owners of the business. Remember, don't shoot the messenger. As for the hot headed medic, well maybe he did get what he deserved, if he initiated the problem. If I am not mistaken, this is the guy who responded in his POV. Why did he respond? Maybe if he would not have gone things would have had a different outcome? This guy should have locked himself in the unit and called whoever needed to be called. If the police break windows or anything then that's excessive use of force. And I am not saying this is right, but it buys time to get on the phone and call the right people. Salvador Capuchino EMT-P --- Joe B wrote: > My parents instilled in me that when you act like a > jerk in in public and you are repeatedly told to > calm down, you get what you deserve. There are a > lot of hot headed medics out there and I have worked > with many .........Mike, your comments were well > said. I will be glad when this case is finalized and > we can all got back to being positive role models > ................. > > > --------------------------------- > > What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! > Autos > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2006 Report Share Posted January 21, 2006 Here's the code from LaPorte. " Sec. 30-80. Licenses required. (a) No person, either as owner, agent or otherwise shall operate, conduct, maintain, advertise or otherwise be engaged in or profess to be engaged in the business of ambulance service upon the streets, alleys or any public way or place of La Porte, Texas, unless he holds a currently valid license for an ambulance vehicle and an ambulance company, issued pursuant to this chapter. " Source - www.municode.com <http://www.municode.com/> Our ordinance has similar language. We DO work with the ambulance owners to come into compliance with our local ordinances, and that generally works. Right or Wrong, you can issue citations to the ambulance crew as " agents or otherwise " . It is an enforcement tool to catch the attention of someone who is blatantly ignoring attempts to bring his company into compliance with local ordinances. In addition, their code calls for PERSONNEL to have a permit, separate from the company. Did the two on the ambulance hold a permit? Was this the actual violation that they were cited for?? Jack Pitcock _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of salvador capuchino Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 11:58 PM To: Subject: Re: Resisting arrest, [was Re: Follow Up to ....] The only problem I have here is that the medics did nothing wrong in responding. They did as told. The issue of citing or fining should be between the city and the owners of the business. Remember, don't shoot the messenger. As for the hot headed medic, well maybe he did get what he deserved, if he initiated the problem. If I am not mistaken, this is the guy who responded in his POV. Why did he respond? Maybe if he would not have gone things would have had a different outcome? This guy should have locked himself in the unit and called whoever needed to be called. If the police break windows or anything then that's excessive use of force. And I am not saying this is right, but it buys time to get on the phone and call the right people. Salvador Capuchino EMT-P --- Joe B wrote: > My parents instilled in me that when you act like a > jerk in in public and you are repeatedly told to > calm down, you get what you deserve. There are a > lot of hot headed medics out there and I have worked > with many .........Mike, your comments were well > said. I will be glad when this case is finalized and > we can all got back to being positive role models > ................. > > > --------------------------------- > > What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! > Autos > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2006 Report Share Posted January 21, 2006 Don't ask how many he has, ask how many have been substantiated. Two very different things. Mike > In reference to this excessive force issue does anyone know this > officer? Just how many excessive force complaints does he have?? > Rumor mill says there are a few?!?! Again that is the rumor mill!!! > > > > > > > > > My parents instilled in me that when you act like a > > > jerk in in public and you are repeatedly told to > > > calm down, you get what you deserve. There are a > > > lot of hot headed medics out there and I have worked > > > with many .........Mike, your comments were well > > > said. I will be glad when this case is finalized and > > > we can all got back to being positive role models > > > ................. > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > > > > > What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! > > > Autos > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2006 Report Share Posted January 21, 2006 Don't ask how many he has, ask how many have been substantiated. Two very different things. Mike > In reference to this excessive force issue does anyone know this > officer? Just how many excessive force complaints does he have?? > Rumor mill says there are a few?!?! Again that is the rumor mill!!! > > > > > > > > > My parents instilled in me that when you act like a > > > jerk in in public and you are repeatedly told to > > > calm down, you get what you deserve. There are a > > > lot of hot headed medics out there and I have worked > > > with many .........Mike, your comments were well > > > said. I will be glad when this case is finalized and > > > we can all got back to being positive role models > > > ................. > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > > > > > What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! > > > Autos > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2006 Report Share Posted January 21, 2006 Don't ask how many he has, ask how many have been substantiated. Two very different things. Mike > In reference to this excessive force issue does anyone know this > officer? Just how many excessive force complaints does he have?? > Rumor mill says there are a few?!?! Again that is the rumor mill!!! > > > > > > > > > My parents instilled in me that when you act like a > > > jerk in in public and you are repeatedly told to > > > calm down, you get what you deserve. There are a > > > lot of hot headed medics out there and I have worked > > > with many .........Mike, your comments were well > > > said. I will be glad when this case is finalized and > > > we can all got back to being positive role models > > > ................. > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > > > > > What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! > > > Autos > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2006 Report Share Posted January 21, 2006 My question is: Why couldn't the supervisor go in with the crew and begin treating the patient? Then, when the other unit got there, they could transport. Then after the patient is gone, deal with the citation. Patient gets care, La Porte gets to transport, citation is dealt with - Everybody wins. Is it really that difficult?? If anyone is at fault, I personally believe it is the supervisor from La Porte. This person intentionally prevented patient care; thank whomever you pray to that he didn't die. When did paperwork and pissing contests become more important than the people we care for?? And if that is the case, what are we doing here? And we wonder why EMS cannot come together and set a good example for the public?? Plain, simple fact - EMS is about quality patient care and transport. So put aside your egos, your pride, and your citation books and remember why we're really here in the first place - TO HELP OTHERS. --Lala EMT-B --------------------------------- Yahoo! Autos. Looking for a sweet ride? Get pricing, reviews, & more on new and used cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2006 Report Share Posted January 21, 2006 My question is: Why couldn't the supervisor go in with the crew and begin treating the patient? Then, when the other unit got there, they could transport. Then after the patient is gone, deal with the citation. Patient gets care, La Porte gets to transport, citation is dealt with - Everybody wins. Is it really that difficult?? If anyone is at fault, I personally believe it is the supervisor from La Porte. This person intentionally prevented patient care; thank whomever you pray to that he didn't die. When did paperwork and pissing contests become more important than the people we care for?? And if that is the case, what are we doing here? And we wonder why EMS cannot come together and set a good example for the public?? Plain, simple fact - EMS is about quality patient care and transport. So put aside your egos, your pride, and your citation books and remember why we're really here in the first place - TO HELP OTHERS. --Lala EMT-B --------------------------------- Yahoo! Autos. Looking for a sweet ride? Get pricing, reviews, & more on new and used cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2006 Report Share Posted January 21, 2006 My question is: Why couldn't the supervisor go in with the crew and begin treating the patient? Then, when the other unit got there, they could transport. Then after the patient is gone, deal with the citation. Patient gets care, La Porte gets to transport, citation is dealt with - Everybody wins. Is it really that difficult?? If anyone is at fault, I personally believe it is the supervisor from La Porte. This person intentionally prevented patient care; thank whomever you pray to that he didn't die. When did paperwork and pissing contests become more important than the people we care for?? And if that is the case, what are we doing here? And we wonder why EMS cannot come together and set a good example for the public?? Plain, simple fact - EMS is about quality patient care and transport. So put aside your egos, your pride, and your citation books and remember why we're really here in the first place - TO HELP OTHERS. --Lala EMT-B --------------------------------- Yahoo! Autos. Looking for a sweet ride? Get pricing, reviews, & more on new and used cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2006 Report Share Posted January 21, 2006 I understand what you are saying. As far as even individual permits go it is still the company's responsibility to ensure their employees and company have permits. The company is in violation by both standards. All I am saying is that the no officer should issue a citation involving a violation of city ordinance to a medic. These issues should be taken up with the management. Thank god the officers here in the Valley have learned this. Most issues in regard to city ordinaces rest with the FDs. Of course if a medic is being an ass then he deserves whatever happens. I can understand being placed under arrest if I resist after being a dick, but not because I am requesting for the officer to await the arrival of my/their supervisor. All in all, yes we are reps of our companies and should act accordingly. Salvador Capuchino EMT-P --- Mike wrote: > On 1/20/06, salvador capuchino > wrote: > > issue of citing or fining should be between the > city > > and the owners of the business. Remember, don't > shoot > > the messenger. > > The medics are the on-scene representatives of the > company and from > what I understand from the city ordinance are > individually required to > be permitted as well as the company, so I'd imagine > that the citation > was probably an individual citation for VCO, and > that the company may > have/may be getting a citation by mail or other > legal process - but > that's just speculation. Either way, the medic is a > representative of > the company at the time of the infraction and is an > appropriate > recipient of a citation for violation the ordinance. > > Now the appropriateness of doing to at the > interruption of patient > care is an entirely separate issue. As an officer > and paramedic I > can't think of a single situation in which I'd > consider interrupting > patient care to investigate and issue a city > ordinance violation > citation - that can all be handled after the fact > just as well... > > > This guy should have locked > > himself in the unit and called whoever needed to > be > > called. > > No, that's plain stupid. The guy should have signed > the citation and > called his supervisor immediately, who calls the > company attorney. > Locking himself in the unit to delay the legal > process of citation > would get him a charge for PC § 38.15: INTERFERENCE > WITH PUBLIC > DUTIES, a Class B Misdemeanor well established by > case law. It'd > likely also guarantee an instanter arrest on the > citation, and > depending on the circumstances and the mood of the > officer, a > charge/citation for FAIL TO ID as well if he was > refusing to provide > identification as requested. > > > If the police break windows or anything then > > that's excessive use of force. > > Really? How do you come to that conclusion? And > who's the victim for > excessive use of force? Can you provide a case law > citation that > would even set a level for excessive force against > property, rather > than against the person themselves? And can you > provide case law or > reasonable arguement that supports your claim of > unreasonableness? > The reasonable thing to do is to sign the citation, > work with your > supervisors and fight the claim in court. And as > the esteemed Mr. > Gandy has stated several times, medics should have > their OWN attorney > - the company's attorney represents the company, not > the medic, and > will hang the medic out to dry to save the company. > Note: No > relation to the current case. I don't know BayStar, > and I don't know > the relation they have with their employees, > attorneys, etc. They may > very well stand by their employee's side to the end, > as I personally > think they should. There's just nothing that says > they HAVE to. > > Mike > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2006 Report Share Posted January 21, 2006 I understand what you are saying. As far as even individual permits go it is still the company's responsibility to ensure their employees and company have permits. The company is in violation by both standards. All I am saying is that the no officer should issue a citation involving a violation of city ordinance to a medic. These issues should be taken up with the management. Thank god the officers here in the Valley have learned this. Most issues in regard to city ordinaces rest with the FDs. Of course if a medic is being an ass then he deserves whatever happens. I can understand being placed under arrest if I resist after being a dick, but not because I am requesting for the officer to await the arrival of my/their supervisor. All in all, yes we are reps of our companies and should act accordingly. Salvador Capuchino EMT-P --- Mike wrote: > On 1/20/06, salvador capuchino > wrote: > > issue of citing or fining should be between the > city > > and the owners of the business. Remember, don't > shoot > > the messenger. > > The medics are the on-scene representatives of the > company and from > what I understand from the city ordinance are > individually required to > be permitted as well as the company, so I'd imagine > that the citation > was probably an individual citation for VCO, and > that the company may > have/may be getting a citation by mail or other > legal process - but > that's just speculation. Either way, the medic is a > representative of > the company at the time of the infraction and is an > appropriate > recipient of a citation for violation the ordinance. > > Now the appropriateness of doing to at the > interruption of patient > care is an entirely separate issue. As an officer > and paramedic I > can't think of a single situation in which I'd > consider interrupting > patient care to investigate and issue a city > ordinance violation > citation - that can all be handled after the fact > just as well... > > > This guy should have locked > > himself in the unit and called whoever needed to > be > > called. > > No, that's plain stupid. The guy should have signed > the citation and > called his supervisor immediately, who calls the > company attorney. > Locking himself in the unit to delay the legal > process of citation > would get him a charge for PC § 38.15: INTERFERENCE > WITH PUBLIC > DUTIES, a Class B Misdemeanor well established by > case law. It'd > likely also guarantee an instanter arrest on the > citation, and > depending on the circumstances and the mood of the > officer, a > charge/citation for FAIL TO ID as well if he was > refusing to provide > identification as requested. > > > If the police break windows or anything then > > that's excessive use of force. > > Really? How do you come to that conclusion? And > who's the victim for > excessive use of force? Can you provide a case law > citation that > would even set a level for excessive force against > property, rather > than against the person themselves? And can you > provide case law or > reasonable arguement that supports your claim of > unreasonableness? > The reasonable thing to do is to sign the citation, > work with your > supervisors and fight the claim in court. And as > the esteemed Mr. > Gandy has stated several times, medics should have > their OWN attorney > - the company's attorney represents the company, not > the medic, and > will hang the medic out to dry to save the company. > Note: No > relation to the current case. I don't know BayStar, > and I don't know > the relation they have with their employees, > attorneys, etc. They may > very well stand by their employee's side to the end, > as I personally > think they should. There's just nothing that says > they HAVE to. > > Mike > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2006 Report Share Posted January 21, 2006 I understand what you are saying. As far as even individual permits go it is still the company's responsibility to ensure their employees and company have permits. The company is in violation by both standards. All I am saying is that the no officer should issue a citation involving a violation of city ordinance to a medic. These issues should be taken up with the management. Thank god the officers here in the Valley have learned this. Most issues in regard to city ordinaces rest with the FDs. Of course if a medic is being an ass then he deserves whatever happens. I can understand being placed under arrest if I resist after being a dick, but not because I am requesting for the officer to await the arrival of my/their supervisor. All in all, yes we are reps of our companies and should act accordingly. Salvador Capuchino EMT-P --- Mike wrote: > On 1/20/06, salvador capuchino > wrote: > > issue of citing or fining should be between the > city > > and the owners of the business. Remember, don't > shoot > > the messenger. > > The medics are the on-scene representatives of the > company and from > what I understand from the city ordinance are > individually required to > be permitted as well as the company, so I'd imagine > that the citation > was probably an individual citation for VCO, and > that the company may > have/may be getting a citation by mail or other > legal process - but > that's just speculation. Either way, the medic is a > representative of > the company at the time of the infraction and is an > appropriate > recipient of a citation for violation the ordinance. > > Now the appropriateness of doing to at the > interruption of patient > care is an entirely separate issue. As an officer > and paramedic I > can't think of a single situation in which I'd > consider interrupting > patient care to investigate and issue a city > ordinance violation > citation - that can all be handled after the fact > just as well... > > > This guy should have locked > > himself in the unit and called whoever needed to > be > > called. > > No, that's plain stupid. The guy should have signed > the citation and > called his supervisor immediately, who calls the > company attorney. > Locking himself in the unit to delay the legal > process of citation > would get him a charge for PC § 38.15: INTERFERENCE > WITH PUBLIC > DUTIES, a Class B Misdemeanor well established by > case law. It'd > likely also guarantee an instanter arrest on the > citation, and > depending on the circumstances and the mood of the > officer, a > charge/citation for FAIL TO ID as well if he was > refusing to provide > identification as requested. > > > If the police break windows or anything then > > that's excessive use of force. > > Really? How do you come to that conclusion? And > who's the victim for > excessive use of force? Can you provide a case law > citation that > would even set a level for excessive force against > property, rather > than against the person themselves? And can you > provide case law or > reasonable arguement that supports your claim of > unreasonableness? > The reasonable thing to do is to sign the citation, > work with your > supervisors and fight the claim in court. And as > the esteemed Mr. > Gandy has stated several times, medics should have > their OWN attorney > - the company's attorney represents the company, not > the medic, and > will hang the medic out to dry to save the company. > Note: No > relation to the current case. I don't know BayStar, > and I don't know > the relation they have with their employees, > attorneys, etc. They may > very well stand by their employee's side to the end, > as I personally > think they should. There's just nothing that says > they HAVE to. > > Mike > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2006 Report Share Posted January 21, 2006 > All I am saying is that the no officer > should issue a citation involving a violation of city > ordinance to a medic. Unless, of course, the officer is under orders to strictly enforce this ordinance through the issuance of citations... Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2006 Report Share Posted January 21, 2006 > All I am saying is that the no officer > should issue a citation involving a violation of city > ordinance to a medic. Unless, of course, the officer is under orders to strictly enforce this ordinance through the issuance of citations... Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2006 Report Share Posted January 21, 2006 OK now I have to speak up. I have worked in Dallas, and there is a permiting process for the service AND the crews. Now,if the crew is not carring a permit and they are stopped by a LEO or a CITY DOT INSPECTOR they will be cited. And the service will be repremanded as well.It is a condition of employment that each person SHALL apply for a City Of Dallas permit without fail. Now,1) Should the medics have been cited? If they were informed during the hiring process of the permit regs,and they did not obtain the permit,then yes. As well as the service should be cited as well. 2) Should the medic have been placed in custody? WERE ANY OF US THERE? DID ANY OF US SEE THE INCIDENT TAKE PLACE? If you did then speak up. I know I did not,so I do not know if or how the incident transpired.All LEOs whom are employed by a City Police Department have the ability to cite for ANY city ordnance violation at his/her own will. In this case,I am not sure the the officer in question used sound judgement with regard to Patient Condition and care. But again I was not there. This issue will be played out in the media,in court,AND in the court of public opinion. The thing that must be addressed is DID THE PATIENT THAT BAYSTAR WAS CALLED FOR,INCUR ANY TYPE OF UNDUE HARM DUE TO THE SITUATION THAT OCCURED LESS THAN A BLOCK FROM THE INCIDENT LOCATION? And is this situation likely to occur in other cities that have these type of codes? Patient Care is the formost situation at hand,not whom is THE BIGGEST DOG ON THE STREET. --- salvador capuchino wrote: > I understand what you are saying. As far as even > individual permits go it is still the company's > responsibility to ensure their employees and company > have permits. The company is in violation by both > standards. All I am saying is that the no officer > should issue a citation involving a violation of > city > ordinance to a medic. These issues should be taken > up > with the management. Thank god the officers here in > the Valley have learned this. Most issues in regard > to city ordinaces rest with the FDs. Of course if a > medic is being an ass then he deserves whatever > happens. I can understand being placed under arrest > if I resist after being a dick, but not because I am > requesting for the officer to await the arrival of > my/their supervisor. All in all, yes we are reps of > our companies and should act accordingly. > Salvador Capuchino > EMT-P > > --- Mike wrote: > > > On 1/20/06, salvador capuchino > > wrote: > > > issue of citing or fining should be between the > > city > > > and the owners of the business. Remember, don't > > shoot > > > the messenger. > > > > The medics are the on-scene representatives of the > > company and from > > what I understand from the city ordinance are > > individually required to > > be permitted as well as the company, so I'd > imagine > > that the citation > > was probably an individual citation for VCO, and > > that the company may > > have/may be getting a citation by mail or other > > legal process - but > > that's just speculation. Either way, the medic is > a > > representative of > > the company at the time of the infraction and is > an > > appropriate > > recipient of a citation for violation the > ordinance. > > > > Now the appropriateness of doing to at the > > interruption of patient > > care is an entirely separate issue. As an officer > > and paramedic I > > can't think of a single situation in which I'd > > consider interrupting > > patient care to investigate and issue a city > > ordinance violation > > citation - that can all be handled after the fact > > just as well... > > > > > This guy should have locked > > > himself in the unit and called whoever needed to > > be > > > called. > > > > No, that's plain stupid. The guy should have > signed > > the citation and > > called his supervisor immediately, who calls the > > company attorney. > > Locking himself in the unit to delay the legal > > process of citation > > would get him a charge for PC § 38.15: > INTERFERENCE > > WITH PUBLIC > > DUTIES, a Class B Misdemeanor well established by > > case law. It'd > > likely also guarantee an instanter arrest on the > > citation, and > > depending on the circumstances and the mood of the > > officer, a > > charge/citation for FAIL TO ID as well if he was > > refusing to provide > > identification as requested. > > > > > If the police break windows or anything then > > > that's excessive use of force. > > > > Really? How do you come to that conclusion? And > > who's the victim for > > excessive use of force? Can you provide a case > law > > citation that > > would even set a level for excessive force against > > property, rather > > than against the person themselves? And can you > > provide case law or > > reasonable arguement that supports your claim of > > unreasonableness? > > The reasonable thing to do is to sign the > citation, > > work with your > > supervisors and fight the claim in court. And as > > the esteemed Mr. > > Gandy has stated several times, medics should have > > their OWN attorney > > - the company's attorney represents the company, > not > > the medic, and > > will hang the medic out to dry to save the > company. > > Note: No > > relation to the current case. I don't know > BayStar, > > and I don't know > > the relation they have with their employees, > > attorneys, etc. They may > > very well stand by their employee's side to the > end, > > as I personally > > think they should. There's just nothing that says > > they HAVE to. > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.