Guest guest Posted July 20, 2004 Report Share Posted July 20, 2004 > I am confused! I have the impression that, since ³afib begets afib,² it is > not advisable to stay in afib--if cardioversion or some other means of > converting is available--for more than 24 to 36 hours. Is it accurate to > say that staying in afib can make the condition worse or take a paroxysmal. Kathleen, I think this is somewhat unclear. When I first developed afib, I heard the " afib begets afib " too. However, then I saw postings from various people on this group about how their afib had lessened as they figured out their triggers, made lifestyle changes, got on the right meds, or, of course, had ablations. It does seem to be true that the success rate for ablations for people in afib all the time are somewhat less than for people who go in and out. The one thing I take away from this is to try not to get too disheartened when things get bad, because we have so many cases where the bad times have been followed by good times. I am not sure how this translates into taking measures to get out of an afib attack. What my docs have done (with some nudging from me in the current case) is up my beta blocker dosage and so far that, along with my avoiding exercise has popped me back into sinus, cross fingers so far. Correct me if I'm wrong, someone, but even being rate controled in afib will eventually result in some stretching of the atria, won't it? So I assume getting out of it if possible is a good thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2004 Report Share Posted July 24, 2004 I had a TEE recently and indeed it did detect where my clot probably came from (left atria). This information was not detected in a traditional echo. Obviously the TEE is more definitive, but the test is not exactly a day at the beach. Still It uncovered important information and I would do it again if needed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 25, 2004 Report Share Posted July 25, 2004 I wouldn't call it TEE HEE; my throat was sore for a month. And they said they would sedate me and anesthetize my throat, but the anesthetic was almost as unpleasant as the test. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 25, 2004 Report Share Posted July 25, 2004 I wouldn't call it TEE HEE; my throat was sore for a month. And they said they would sedate me and anesthetize my throat, but the anesthetic was almost as unpleasant as the test. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 25, 2004 Report Share Posted July 25, 2004 I wouldn't call it TEE HEE; my throat was sore for a month. And they said they would sedate me and anesthetize my throat, but the anesthetic was almost as unpleasant as the test. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.