Guest guest Posted January 8, 2006 Report Share Posted January 8, 2006 I agree Mike, and the regional DSHS office here does too. The main thing they look at is: " as long as no ALS interventions have been performed the BLS can take over without Abandonment being an issue. Myron EMT-B/Coord. SAEC On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 06:27:25 -0600 Mike wrote: > ARGH! > > This is one of the most common frustrations I have. You >do NOT have > to transfer care to someone of " equal training. " You >have to transfer > care to someone able to take care of the patient. In >this case if the > patients are stable and the CNA is capable of >recognizing " oh, this > guy looks worse " and call the RN for the ER they're >ALREADY IN, that > seems legit. Now, I'd be worried as the ER admin that >I'm liable for > the care provided (or not provided) by these CNA's due >to EMTALA and > the fact that the patient has presented to my ER. In >many cases if > the ER is full and making you wait, dropping the patient >with the > triage nurse works wonders. One or two ALS patients >dropped in > triage, IV's, reports and all will change things... > > Anyhow, if my MICU rolls up on a major accident and >calls for mutual > aid, and a BLS truck arrives, I can transfer a patient >that only needs > BLS interventions from the care of me or my partner, a >paramedic, to > the BLS crew. That's not abandonment. In some cases, >it's probably > not abandonment even if they DO need ALS care, if >someone else needs > it MORE - in that case, you're just handing them off for >transport. > > Abandonment means leaving the patient without the >ability to get care. > It does not mean ensuring the provider you leave them >with can > perform every skill you can, else many RN's wouldn't be >able to take > patients from medics who can administer paralytics and >perform > intubations... > > </rant> > > Mike :/ > > >> salvador capuchino wrote: But >>these CNAs are hired by the ambulance company to >> relieve medics at the hospital when they are going to >> hold the medics for a long time. >> I was under the impression that the CNAs were hospital >>staff; thank you for clarifying that. It seems, then, >>that the ambulance service is willing to aid and abet >>patient abandonment, in fact facilitating that by hiring >>the CNAs! That makes communication between a hospital RN >>and a non-hospital CNA; even poorer than normal. >> >> Unless the ambulance service is under the impression >>that the transfer of care is to a person of equal >>training.... the phrase " warm body " comes to mind. >> >> >> " The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in >>front of him, but because he loves what is behind him. " - >> GK Chesterton >> >> >> >> --------------------------------- >> Yahoo! Photos – Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover >> Photo Books. You design it and we'll bind it! >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2006 Report Share Posted January 8, 2006 I agree Mike, and the regional DSHS office here does too. The main thing they look at is: " as long as no ALS interventions have been performed the BLS can take over without Abandonment being an issue. Myron EMT-B/Coord. SAEC On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 06:27:25 -0600 Mike wrote: > ARGH! > > This is one of the most common frustrations I have. You >do NOT have > to transfer care to someone of " equal training. " You >have to transfer > care to someone able to take care of the patient. In >this case if the > patients are stable and the CNA is capable of >recognizing " oh, this > guy looks worse " and call the RN for the ER they're >ALREADY IN, that > seems legit. Now, I'd be worried as the ER admin that >I'm liable for > the care provided (or not provided) by these CNA's due >to EMTALA and > the fact that the patient has presented to my ER. In >many cases if > the ER is full and making you wait, dropping the patient >with the > triage nurse works wonders. One or two ALS patients >dropped in > triage, IV's, reports and all will change things... > > Anyhow, if my MICU rolls up on a major accident and >calls for mutual > aid, and a BLS truck arrives, I can transfer a patient >that only needs > BLS interventions from the care of me or my partner, a >paramedic, to > the BLS crew. That's not abandonment. In some cases, >it's probably > not abandonment even if they DO need ALS care, if >someone else needs > it MORE - in that case, you're just handing them off for >transport. > > Abandonment means leaving the patient without the >ability to get care. > It does not mean ensuring the provider you leave them >with can > perform every skill you can, else many RN's wouldn't be >able to take > patients from medics who can administer paralytics and >perform > intubations... > > </rant> > > Mike :/ > > >> salvador capuchino wrote: But >>these CNAs are hired by the ambulance company to >> relieve medics at the hospital when they are going to >> hold the medics for a long time. >> I was under the impression that the CNAs were hospital >>staff; thank you for clarifying that. It seems, then, >>that the ambulance service is willing to aid and abet >>patient abandonment, in fact facilitating that by hiring >>the CNAs! That makes communication between a hospital RN >>and a non-hospital CNA; even poorer than normal. >> >> Unless the ambulance service is under the impression >>that the transfer of care is to a person of equal >>training.... the phrase " warm body " comes to mind. >> >> >> " The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in >>front of him, but because he loves what is behind him. " - >> GK Chesterton >> >> >> >> --------------------------------- >> Yahoo! Photos – Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover >> Photo Books. You design it and we'll bind it! >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.