Guest guest Posted April 8, 2004 Report Share Posted April 8, 2004 I am frustrated. We took in for his audiogram yesterday and I just can't say how frustrated I am. He responded to music at 5 dB I give her that one, but he is 3 years old his response should be obvious and direct, they do visual reinforcement because that is all we can do, and well she was taking any tiny turn of his head and saying that was a response. I'm thinking the child is not 3 months old he is 3 years old his response should be as it was with some of the other responses where he looked directly at the sound, then he would barely move his head to one side not looking at anything in particular, just moving as 3 year olds do and she wrote that down as a respons. I don't understand how she is getting that this is a normal 3 year old response, when it so clearly is not. My problem here is that he is not responding to language the way he should and his ABR and OAE show a problem and they both say exactly the same thing by the way that in one ear in the low frequencies his hearing is slightly less than the other and in the other ear his high frequencies is not there and in the other ear in the 5000 Hz range that has not been tested is not there. My point is that the ABR and the OAE are confirming themselves but then they take him in to the booth and write down every twitch of the head even though when he hears something he so clearly looks that way, but even still they were writing down everything from a twitch to a direct look. Of course they are going to get a normal response they are writing down responses that aren't responses. I am so frustrated, because we were approved for CRS and are no obligated to see their audi's but I don't like them for obvious resasons. How much is a hearing screaning if I pay for it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2004 Report Share Posted April 11, 2004 Elaine, Thanks. I am still really doubtful that will catch on to a play game like that, but I guess it is worth a try. I'm not sure why they haven't suggested we try it and at least work on developing the skills to do it. They have never even suggested it. There was a time when I know he wouldn't do it, but now I think he might, but not really sure. might not catch on. We can't tell him what to do so he would have to realize the point is to drop something in when we play the noise, he isn't too keen on waiting for one, and we can't give him any instructions for two, but it might be worth a try. Re: interpretation of audiogram Jake started doing Conditioned Response audiometry when he was 2 and caught on really quick with a fun game. We have used things like those stackable toys, connect four, pegs in the board, etc. When he was really obstinate we used pennies dropped in a cup or skittles dropped in a cup and he got them when it was over. (However, once at a research appt I offered him $10 to cooperate with the group and he piped up, " I NEED $20! " hehe) Our audi's have great toys. You can use a really fun game to train them and take your game with you if you think that will help! Have done that too, just in case he didn't like their stuff. Our audiograms run around $82 for play audiometry. Jake can do the adult audiograms but he prefers the games as he can be a tad uncooperative himself. Elaine All messages posted to this list are private and confidential. Each post is the intellectual property of the author and therefore subject to copyright restrictions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2004 Report Share Posted April 11, 2004 Elaine, Thanks. I am still really doubtful that will catch on to a play game like that, but I guess it is worth a try. I'm not sure why they haven't suggested we try it and at least work on developing the skills to do it. They have never even suggested it. There was a time when I know he wouldn't do it, but now I think he might, but not really sure. might not catch on. We can't tell him what to do so he would have to realize the point is to drop something in when we play the noise, he isn't too keen on waiting for one, and we can't give him any instructions for two, but it might be worth a try. Re: interpretation of audiogram Jake started doing Conditioned Response audiometry when he was 2 and caught on really quick with a fun game. We have used things like those stackable toys, connect four, pegs in the board, etc. When he was really obstinate we used pennies dropped in a cup or skittles dropped in a cup and he got them when it was over. (However, once at a research appt I offered him $10 to cooperate with the group and he piped up, " I NEED $20! " hehe) Our audi's have great toys. You can use a really fun game to train them and take your game with you if you think that will help! Have done that too, just in case he didn't like their stuff. Our audiograms run around $82 for play audiometry. Jake can do the adult audiograms but he prefers the games as he can be a tad uncooperative himself. Elaine All messages posted to this list are private and confidential. Each post is the intellectual property of the author and therefore subject to copyright restrictions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.