Guest guest Posted March 13, 2004 Report Share Posted March 13, 2004 [sNIP different types of ablation] > Success rates for people like me are roughly the same, 75 to 80% n > both types. They both speak very highly of each other and assured me > I would be in great hands no matter which one of them did their > different procedures on me. They also told me there has been no > direct comparisons on which is better. They said there will one day > be a protocol set up to compare the different types in the future. > So what to do? > P <MI> Hi I believe this might be a comparison of the two http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/108/19/2355 It's also worth taking a look at Steve's site... http://www.a-fib.com/NewResearch.htm#Circumferential vs Segmental Ablation and this http://www.med.umich.edu/opm/newspage/2003/atrialfibrillation.htm It's a tricky one to answer and looking at an individuals success rate and how well you get on with them is a big factor. hope this helps all the best -- D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.