Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 In a message dated 4/24/2004 8:37:33 AM Central Daylight Time, apollodorian@... writes: If ablation is the choice who is definitely the best choice of Doctor in the USA. Thanks and many blessings.. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Dr. Natale at the Cleveland Clinic probably has the best reputation. If you search through our web site you will find other good Dr's. I think atrial flutter ablation is an easier procedure and more reliable that afib ablation. Guy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 In a message dated 4/24/2004 8:37:33 AM Central Daylight Time, apollodorian@... writes: If ablation is the choice who is definitely the best choice of Doctor in the USA. Thanks and many blessings.. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Dr. Natale at the Cleveland Clinic probably has the best reputation. If you search through our web site you will find other good Dr's. I think atrial flutter ablation is an easier procedure and more reliable that afib ablation. Guy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 In a message dated 4/24/2004 8:37:33 AM Central Daylight Time, apollodorian@... writes: If ablation is the choice who is definitely the best choice of Doctor in the USA. Thanks and many blessings.. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Dr. Natale at the Cleveland Clinic probably has the best reputation. If you search through our web site you will find other good Dr's. I think atrial flutter ablation is an easier procedure and more reliable that afib ablation. Guy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 In a message dated 4/24/2004 12:26:56 PM Central Daylight Time, JPindorski@... writes: If anyone is on Amiodorone and has positive results with it would sure be nice to hear from you. P <MI> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I would say that I am having positive results with amiodarone. I too would like an alternative but since I still have breakthroughs about every 2 weeks I doubt any other drugs would work. I have blood work done every 6 mo's and breathing tests every year. So far so good although last Oct my liver enzymes were slightly elevated but were back down 2 mo's later. I have since dropped my dose from 200mg to 150mg per day. I think that is why I have episodes on 2 week intervals. At 200 mg I was having episodes about every mo. but since my attacks are pretty mild and I have been able to get back to NSR by exercising I am going to try and stay at 150. Guy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 In a message dated 4/24/2004 12:26:56 PM Central Daylight Time, JPindorski@... writes: If anyone is on Amiodorone and has positive results with it would sure be nice to hear from you. P <MI> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I would say that I am having positive results with amiodarone. I too would like an alternative but since I still have breakthroughs about every 2 weeks I doubt any other drugs would work. I have blood work done every 6 mo's and breathing tests every year. So far so good although last Oct my liver enzymes were slightly elevated but were back down 2 mo's later. I have since dropped my dose from 200mg to 150mg per day. I think that is why I have episodes on 2 week intervals. At 200 mg I was having episodes about every mo. but since my attacks are pretty mild and I have been able to get back to NSR by exercising I am going to try and stay at 150. Guy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 Hi : The Kansas City Star just ran an article about amiodarone. Here is part of what it said: ======== Kansas City Star =============== Amiodarone can be highly toxic to patients and causes a wide range of serious and life-threatening side effects. As many as 17 percent of patients in some studies have experienced lung damage - with 10 percent dying from it. Others have suffered thyroid, liver and eye problems, including blindness. Because of the drug's significant side effects, the FDA approved it only as a treatment for life-threatening heart conditions called ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation, and only as a treatment of last resort after other drugs have failed. Yet in the past year doctors wrote nearly 2.3 million prescriptions for amiodarone to treat atrial fibrillation and other unapproved conditions - accounting for 82 percent of all amiodarone prescriptions, according to an exclusive Knight Ridder analysis of drug industry data published last fall. =========================================== The toxicity of amiodarone is thought to be, in large part, a function of the iodine that is contained in its molecular structure. I can't imagine anyone talking me into taking it for AF. My internist has commented that cardiologists are comfortable with prescribing this drug, but he cannot imagine himself becoming comfortable. It has a half life of several months, so simply discontinuing the drug when side effects develop does not have an immediate effect on resolving them. On the other hand, skipping a dose accidentally does not affect the drug's efficacy either. A different molecule, dronedarone, has completed phase 3 studies and the results suggest that it has side effects " similar " to placebo. What that exactly means is open to interpretation, but amiodarone is so problematic that it should not be hard to beat side-effect wise. Both amiodarone and dronedarone have similar (and multiple) mechanisms of action. Stedicor is also on the horizon, and has completed phase 3 trials. It does not seem to stop AF entirely, but the average duration between episodes was 3 months versus two weeks for placebo. It is said to be much much milder in side effects than any of the other AF drugs. Its mechanism of action is to inhibit two potassium channels in the heart's electrical system which is similar to one of the mechanisms in amiodarone and dronedarone. Most AF drugs that inhibit potassium inhibit just one channel. Drugs that interfere with a potassium channel extend the QT interval, which has the potential to cause torsade de pointes. Torsade is a variant of Ventricular Tachycardia and can be lethal. Torsade patients admitted to the hospital are typically treated in the ICU. If you are looking into disability as an alternative, by all means I would suggest that you look into ablation too. It is difficult to get a firm idea of the risks involved because the " procedure " is not standardized (different docs do it differently and each version is evolving rather rapidly) and appears to be very dependent upon " operator skill " . People have died from the procedure, and others have been seriously injured, with injuries ranging from narrowed pulmonary veins to destroyed mitral valves. Many in this group are waiting for it to evolve further, hopefully into the reliable cure for AF that it appears to be. In the meantime, many others have had it done and are immensely pleased with the results. The risks appear to be lowest when the EP doing the procedure has done 200 or more of them. - OU alum in Kazoo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 Hi : The Kansas City Star just ran an article about amiodarone. Here is part of what it said: ======== Kansas City Star =============== Amiodarone can be highly toxic to patients and causes a wide range of serious and life-threatening side effects. As many as 17 percent of patients in some studies have experienced lung damage - with 10 percent dying from it. Others have suffered thyroid, liver and eye problems, including blindness. Because of the drug's significant side effects, the FDA approved it only as a treatment for life-threatening heart conditions called ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation, and only as a treatment of last resort after other drugs have failed. Yet in the past year doctors wrote nearly 2.3 million prescriptions for amiodarone to treat atrial fibrillation and other unapproved conditions - accounting for 82 percent of all amiodarone prescriptions, according to an exclusive Knight Ridder analysis of drug industry data published last fall. =========================================== The toxicity of amiodarone is thought to be, in large part, a function of the iodine that is contained in its molecular structure. I can't imagine anyone talking me into taking it for AF. My internist has commented that cardiologists are comfortable with prescribing this drug, but he cannot imagine himself becoming comfortable. It has a half life of several months, so simply discontinuing the drug when side effects develop does not have an immediate effect on resolving them. On the other hand, skipping a dose accidentally does not affect the drug's efficacy either. A different molecule, dronedarone, has completed phase 3 studies and the results suggest that it has side effects " similar " to placebo. What that exactly means is open to interpretation, but amiodarone is so problematic that it should not be hard to beat side-effect wise. Both amiodarone and dronedarone have similar (and multiple) mechanisms of action. Stedicor is also on the horizon, and has completed phase 3 trials. It does not seem to stop AF entirely, but the average duration between episodes was 3 months versus two weeks for placebo. It is said to be much much milder in side effects than any of the other AF drugs. Its mechanism of action is to inhibit two potassium channels in the heart's electrical system which is similar to one of the mechanisms in amiodarone and dronedarone. Most AF drugs that inhibit potassium inhibit just one channel. Drugs that interfere with a potassium channel extend the QT interval, which has the potential to cause torsade de pointes. Torsade is a variant of Ventricular Tachycardia and can be lethal. Torsade patients admitted to the hospital are typically treated in the ICU. If you are looking into disability as an alternative, by all means I would suggest that you look into ablation too. It is difficult to get a firm idea of the risks involved because the " procedure " is not standardized (different docs do it differently and each version is evolving rather rapidly) and appears to be very dependent upon " operator skill " . People have died from the procedure, and others have been seriously injured, with injuries ranging from narrowed pulmonary veins to destroyed mitral valves. Many in this group are waiting for it to evolve further, hopefully into the reliable cure for AF that it appears to be. In the meantime, many others have had it done and are immensely pleased with the results. The risks appear to be lowest when the EP doing the procedure has done 200 or more of them. - OU alum in Kazoo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 Hi : The Kansas City Star just ran an article about amiodarone. Here is part of what it said: ======== Kansas City Star =============== Amiodarone can be highly toxic to patients and causes a wide range of serious and life-threatening side effects. As many as 17 percent of patients in some studies have experienced lung damage - with 10 percent dying from it. Others have suffered thyroid, liver and eye problems, including blindness. Because of the drug's significant side effects, the FDA approved it only as a treatment for life-threatening heart conditions called ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation, and only as a treatment of last resort after other drugs have failed. Yet in the past year doctors wrote nearly 2.3 million prescriptions for amiodarone to treat atrial fibrillation and other unapproved conditions - accounting for 82 percent of all amiodarone prescriptions, according to an exclusive Knight Ridder analysis of drug industry data published last fall. =========================================== The toxicity of amiodarone is thought to be, in large part, a function of the iodine that is contained in its molecular structure. I can't imagine anyone talking me into taking it for AF. My internist has commented that cardiologists are comfortable with prescribing this drug, but he cannot imagine himself becoming comfortable. It has a half life of several months, so simply discontinuing the drug when side effects develop does not have an immediate effect on resolving them. On the other hand, skipping a dose accidentally does not affect the drug's efficacy either. A different molecule, dronedarone, has completed phase 3 studies and the results suggest that it has side effects " similar " to placebo. What that exactly means is open to interpretation, but amiodarone is so problematic that it should not be hard to beat side-effect wise. Both amiodarone and dronedarone have similar (and multiple) mechanisms of action. Stedicor is also on the horizon, and has completed phase 3 trials. It does not seem to stop AF entirely, but the average duration between episodes was 3 months versus two weeks for placebo. It is said to be much much milder in side effects than any of the other AF drugs. Its mechanism of action is to inhibit two potassium channels in the heart's electrical system which is similar to one of the mechanisms in amiodarone and dronedarone. Most AF drugs that inhibit potassium inhibit just one channel. Drugs that interfere with a potassium channel extend the QT interval, which has the potential to cause torsade de pointes. Torsade is a variant of Ventricular Tachycardia and can be lethal. Torsade patients admitted to the hospital are typically treated in the ICU. If you are looking into disability as an alternative, by all means I would suggest that you look into ablation too. It is difficult to get a firm idea of the risks involved because the " procedure " is not standardized (different docs do it differently and each version is evolving rather rapidly) and appears to be very dependent upon " operator skill " . People have died from the procedure, and others have been seriously injured, with injuries ranging from narrowed pulmonary veins to destroyed mitral valves. Many in this group are waiting for it to evolve further, hopefully into the reliable cure for AF that it appears to be. In the meantime, many others have had it done and are immensely pleased with the results. The risks appear to be lowest when the EP doing the procedure has done 200 or more of them. - OU alum in Kazoo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 10 mg of propranolol is almost like taking nothing. Either increase the dose (there is also a 80 mg slow release capsule), or go to medications that are considered more effective (like tombacor, rythmol or sotalol). But you sould appreciate that these medicines have different effect on different people, and furthermore that the more effective the medicine, the more serious side effects you may have to endure. Stay away from amiodarone until (a) you have exhausted all other options and ( you clearly understand the its side effects. Amiodarone is a really SOAB medicine. Down the road there is of course ablation, But you might consider first the suggestions above. Joe Y. Don't know what to take don't know what to do.. HI Everyone...Thanks to everyone who writes to this bulletin board. These personal experiences give many including myself the strength to carry on with this crazy and unpredictable condition. Write your heart out. I have Aphib/Aflutter. I am a professional trumpet player in NYC. It is beginning to have an impact on my career. In fact I am thinking about looking into my insurance's dissability program next week. Blowing screeming high notes and aphib aren't compatible. My episodes are about two weeks apart, 8-12 hours and I only take medications when I am in aphib/flutter...10mg propranolol and an aspirin. If it doesn't convert in 6 hours I take another propranolol. It seems that my arrythmia is not just one pattern. In fact it races very quickly and steadily (148 wrist pulse) then shuffles off into a irregular washing machine feeling. My electrocardiogist said to ablate the flutter (there is a possibility that it starts as flutter and then degenerates to Aphib) and see what happens or go on amioderone or tambocor. My research has showed that ablating the flutter will probably not fix my problems. So my questions for all you aphib pros out are: What Drugs should I try or do I go for an ablation? If ablation is the choice who is definitely the best choice of Doctor in the USA. Thanks and many blessings.. Web Page - http://www.afibsupport.com <http://www.afibsupport.com> List owner: AFIBsupport-owner For help on how to use the group, including how to drive it via email, send a blank email to AFIBsupport-help Nothing in this message should be considered as medical advice, or should be acted upon without consultation with one's physician. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 Hi, , You are not on much medication. I think someone else posted that playing a trumpet was a trigger for him. Since it is your livelihood, you probably can't just avoid it. Amiodarone has a bad reputation in here - side effects inlude irreversible eye, lung, and thyroid damage. A number of people here have had good luck with dofetilide, including being able to engage in very strenuous activity. My own doc has been talking about flecainide for me, and he says it is safer than dofetilide, however he is a new doc for me and I don't know how good he is. The best U.S. doc for afib ablations seems to be Dr. Natale at Cleveland Clinic, who also works out of Marin, CA once a month. However, since you aren't taking much med now, I would consider sking about increasing the beta blocker first and seeing if that was sufficient. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 Hi, , You are not on much medication. I think someone else posted that playing a trumpet was a trigger for him. Since it is your livelihood, you probably can't just avoid it. Amiodarone has a bad reputation in here - side effects inlude irreversible eye, lung, and thyroid damage. A number of people here have had good luck with dofetilide, including being able to engage in very strenuous activity. My own doc has been talking about flecainide for me, and he says it is safer than dofetilide, however he is a new doc for me and I don't know how good he is. The best U.S. doc for afib ablations seems to be Dr. Natale at Cleveland Clinic, who also works out of Marin, CA once a month. However, since you aren't taking much med now, I would consider sking about increasing the beta blocker first and seeing if that was sufficient. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 The toxicity of amiodarone is thought to be, in large part, a function of the iodine that is contained in its molecular structure. I can't imagine anyone talking me into taking it for AF. My internist has commented that cardiologists are comfortable with prescribing this drug, but he cannot imagine himself becoming comfortable. It has a half life of several months, so simply discontinuing the drug when side effects develop does not have an immediate effect on resolving them. On the other hand, skipping a dose accidentally does not affect the drug's efficacy either. ---------------------------- Amiodarone is indeed nasty stuff. I've taken it for about three years. It has only one redeeming factor. It works for me, and the quality of life that comes without rhythm control is even less acceptable than the dice roll on the side effects. At this point, I'm using it as a bridge to my ablation. I wouldn't want to be on it for another 20 years. For what I can see, that would almost insure that some of the side effects would kick in. But as a short term symptom suppressant, it seems like a reasonable bet. But I'm looking forward to being shut of it. Bill Manson " When [] put on a uniform, something happened to him. He turned into Manson's cousin, Manson. " -- Ken Kaiser Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 The toxicity of amiodarone is thought to be, in large part, a function of the iodine that is contained in its molecular structure. I can't imagine anyone talking me into taking it for AF. My internist has commented that cardiologists are comfortable with prescribing this drug, but he cannot imagine himself becoming comfortable. It has a half life of several months, so simply discontinuing the drug when side effects develop does not have an immediate effect on resolving them. On the other hand, skipping a dose accidentally does not affect the drug's efficacy either. ---------------------------- Amiodarone is indeed nasty stuff. I've taken it for about three years. It has only one redeeming factor. It works for me, and the quality of life that comes without rhythm control is even less acceptable than the dice roll on the side effects. At this point, I'm using it as a bridge to my ablation. I wouldn't want to be on it for another 20 years. For what I can see, that would almost insure that some of the side effects would kick in. But as a short term symptom suppressant, it seems like a reasonable bet. But I'm looking forward to being shut of it. Bill Manson " When [] put on a uniform, something happened to him. He turned into Manson's cousin, Manson. " -- Ken Kaiser Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 Here's one near you that appears to have a good rep. Their webpage is one of the two or three best that I've run across. http://www.med.nyu.edu/heartrhythm/patients/ablation.html Bill Manson " When [] put on a uniform, something happened to him. He turned into Manson's cousin, Manson. " -- Ken Kaiser Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 Here's one near you that appears to have a good rep. Their webpage is one of the two or three best that I've run across. http://www.med.nyu.edu/heartrhythm/patients/ablation.html Bill Manson " When [] put on a uniform, something happened to him. He turned into Manson's cousin, Manson. " -- Ken Kaiser Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 Here's one near you that appears to have a good rep. Their webpage is one of the two or three best that I've run across. http://www.med.nyu.edu/heartrhythm/patients/ablation.html Bill Manson " When [] put on a uniform, something happened to him. He turned into Manson's cousin, Manson. " -- Ken Kaiser Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 > Hi : > > The Kansas City Star just ran an article about amiodarone. Here is part > of what it said: > > ======== Kansas City Star =============== , do you have the url for the entire article, or could you post the whole thing? Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 > Hi : > > The Kansas City Star just ran an article about amiodarone. Here is part > of what it said: > > ======== Kansas City Star =============== , do you have the url for the entire article, or could you post the whole thing? Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 What research did you do that would demonstrate the an ablation for the flutter won't help you? I have been led to believe that abalation has been very very successful with flutter. In fact, my Dad had it a few years back and it (nor aFib which he also had before the flutter) has returned. No pacemaker. No nothing. Larry > HI Everyone...Thanks to everyone who writes to this bulletin board. > These personal experiences give many including myself the strength > to carry on with this crazy and unpredictable condition. Write your > heart out. > > I have Aphib/Aflutter. I am a professional trumpet player in NYC. > It is beginning to have an impact on my career. In fact I am > thinking about looking into my insurance's dissability program next > week. Blowing screeming high notes and aphib aren't compatible. My > episodes are about two weeks apart, 8-12 hours and I only take > medications when I am in aphib/flutter...10mg propranolol and an > aspirin. If it doesn't convert in 6 hours I take another > propranolol. It seems that my arrythmia is not just one pattern. > In fact it races very quickly and steadily (148 wrist pulse) then > shuffles off into a irregular washing machine feeling. > > My electrocardiogist said to ablate the flutter (there is a > possibility that it starts as flutter and then degenerates to Aphib) > and see what happens or go on amioderone or tambocor. My research > has showed that ablating the flutter will probably not fix my > problems. So my questions for all you aphib pros out are: What > Drugs should I try or do I go for an ablation? If ablation is the > choice who is definitely the best choice of Doctor in the USA. > Thanks and many blessings.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 What research did you do that would demonstrate the an ablation for the flutter won't help you? I have been led to believe that abalation has been very very successful with flutter. In fact, my Dad had it a few years back and it (nor aFib which he also had before the flutter) has returned. No pacemaker. No nothing. Larry > HI Everyone...Thanks to everyone who writes to this bulletin board. > These personal experiences give many including myself the strength > to carry on with this crazy and unpredictable condition. Write your > heart out. > > I have Aphib/Aflutter. I am a professional trumpet player in NYC. > It is beginning to have an impact on my career. In fact I am > thinking about looking into my insurance's dissability program next > week. Blowing screeming high notes and aphib aren't compatible. My > episodes are about two weeks apart, 8-12 hours and I only take > medications when I am in aphib/flutter...10mg propranolol and an > aspirin. If it doesn't convert in 6 hours I take another > propranolol. It seems that my arrythmia is not just one pattern. > In fact it races very quickly and steadily (148 wrist pulse) then > shuffles off into a irregular washing machine feeling. > > My electrocardiogist said to ablate the flutter (there is a > possibility that it starts as flutter and then degenerates to Aphib) > and see what happens or go on amioderone or tambocor. My research > has showed that ablating the flutter will probably not fix my > problems. So my questions for all you aphib pros out are: What > Drugs should I try or do I go for an ablation? If ablation is the > choice who is definitely the best choice of Doctor in the USA. > Thanks and many blessings.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 What research did you do that would demonstrate the an ablation for the flutter won't help you? I have been led to believe that abalation has been very very successful with flutter. In fact, my Dad had it a few years back and it (nor aFib which he also had before the flutter) has returned. No pacemaker. No nothing. Larry > HI Everyone...Thanks to everyone who writes to this bulletin board. > These personal experiences give many including myself the strength > to carry on with this crazy and unpredictable condition. Write your > heart out. > > I have Aphib/Aflutter. I am a professional trumpet player in NYC. > It is beginning to have an impact on my career. In fact I am > thinking about looking into my insurance's dissability program next > week. Blowing screeming high notes and aphib aren't compatible. My > episodes are about two weeks apart, 8-12 hours and I only take > medications when I am in aphib/flutter...10mg propranolol and an > aspirin. If it doesn't convert in 6 hours I take another > propranolol. It seems that my arrythmia is not just one pattern. > In fact it races very quickly and steadily (148 wrist pulse) then > shuffles off into a irregular washing machine feeling. > > My electrocardiogist said to ablate the flutter (there is a > possibility that it starts as flutter and then degenerates to Aphib) > and see what happens or go on amioderone or tambocor. My research > has showed that ablating the flutter will probably not fix my > problems. So my questions for all you aphib pros out are: What > Drugs should I try or do I go for an ablation? If ablation is the > choice who is definitely the best choice of Doctor in the USA. > Thanks and many blessings.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 > ======== Kansas City Star =============== > Amiodarone can be highly toxic to patients and causes a wide range of > serious and life-threatening side effects. ..................................................... Can Amiodorone be dangerous? Sure. Can that danger be reduced to an acceptable level? I think so. With the proper monitoring I have no qualms about taking it. Although I will admit that the more negative things I read about it the more I think about it. I was on Ami 400mg's a day after my afib was first discovered. I was loaded and cardioverted and stayed in NSR for two years. The dose was eventually reduced to 200mg's a day. Then my thyroid became over active and the doctors reduced the dosage to 100mg's a day which fixed the thyroid but wasn't enough to keep me in NRS for any length of time. I was switched to Sotalol which did not work very well at all and made me feel terrible. Now, at my own request, I am now back on the Ami since December and my recent blood draws and chest xray have shown that everything is fine. My EP told me as long as I'm aware of the side effects and agree to close monitoring he had no problem with putting me back on it. I know I will be needing a PVI but hopefully I will be able to hold off long enough so that the rapidly advancing technology will be available and FDA approved. And if, and that's a big " IF " it can buy me some time before an ablation so that these things can happen then it will have done it's job. P <MI> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 > ======== Kansas City Star =============== > Amiodarone can be highly toxic to patients and causes a wide range of > serious and life-threatening side effects. ..................................................... Can Amiodorone be dangerous? Sure. Can that danger be reduced to an acceptable level? I think so. With the proper monitoring I have no qualms about taking it. Although I will admit that the more negative things I read about it the more I think about it. I was on Ami 400mg's a day after my afib was first discovered. I was loaded and cardioverted and stayed in NSR for two years. The dose was eventually reduced to 200mg's a day. Then my thyroid became over active and the doctors reduced the dosage to 100mg's a day which fixed the thyroid but wasn't enough to keep me in NRS for any length of time. I was switched to Sotalol which did not work very well at all and made me feel terrible. Now, at my own request, I am now back on the Ami since December and my recent blood draws and chest xray have shown that everything is fine. My EP told me as long as I'm aware of the side effects and agree to close monitoring he had no problem with putting me back on it. I know I will be needing a PVI but hopefully I will be able to hold off long enough so that the rapidly advancing technology will be available and FDA approved. And if, and that's a big " IF " it can buy me some time before an ablation so that these things can happen then it will have done it's job. P <MI> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 > > The toxicity of amiodarone is thought to be, in large part, a function > of the iodine that is contained in its molecular structure. I can't > imagine anyone talking me into taking it for AF. My internist has > commented that cardiologists are comfortable with prescribing this drug, > but he cannot imagine himself becoming comfortable. It has a half life > of several months, so simply discontinuing the drug when side effects > develop does not have an immediate effect on resolving them. On the > other hand, skipping a dose accidentally does not affect the drug's > efficacy either. > > A different molecule, dronedarone, has completed phase 3 studies and the > results suggest that it has side effects " similar " to placebo. What that > exactly means is open to interpretation, but amiodarone is so > problematic that it should not be hard to beat side-effect wise. > > Both amiodarone and dronedarone have similar (and multiple) mechanisms > of action. > - OU alum in Kazoo ....................................................... , as you know I take Amiodorone. If I had a choice, I wouldn't. And I certainly wouldn't have it as the first drug I'd try to control the afib. But it's the only alternative I have right now besides being in constant afib or having a PVI which I will have if the Ami stops working or starts having deleterious effects on my body. Hopefully the Dronedarone will be available soon and I can get off the Ami. With the EP/PVI field expanding so rapidly (magnetic navigation to mention just one thing) I know that holding off as long as possible for the PVI is to my advantage. I just got back from a wild turkey hunt. I awoke very early, humped through the woods all day long, drove home (200 miles) the same day and was totally exhausted. I was very worried that I would go into afib. I stayed in NSR. I equate that to the fact that I'm on Ami. When I did that same routine last November, when I was currently on Sotalol, I went into afib. I'll be giving the Ami another test run this week and hopefully get lucky and have a turkey for the kettle. So the Ami is letting me get on with my life and hopefully it won't harm my body. If it does start to effect me I'm sure the doctors will pick up on it because of the close monitoring and testing schedule they have me on. If anyone is on Amiodorone and has positive results with it would sure be nice to hear from you. P <MI> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 > > The toxicity of amiodarone is thought to be, in large part, a function > of the iodine that is contained in its molecular structure. I can't > imagine anyone talking me into taking it for AF. My internist has > commented that cardiologists are comfortable with prescribing this drug, > but he cannot imagine himself becoming comfortable. It has a half life > of several months, so simply discontinuing the drug when side effects > develop does not have an immediate effect on resolving them. On the > other hand, skipping a dose accidentally does not affect the drug's > efficacy either. > > A different molecule, dronedarone, has completed phase 3 studies and the > results suggest that it has side effects " similar " to placebo. What that > exactly means is open to interpretation, but amiodarone is so > problematic that it should not be hard to beat side-effect wise. > > Both amiodarone and dronedarone have similar (and multiple) mechanisms > of action. > - OU alum in Kazoo ....................................................... , as you know I take Amiodorone. If I had a choice, I wouldn't. And I certainly wouldn't have it as the first drug I'd try to control the afib. But it's the only alternative I have right now besides being in constant afib or having a PVI which I will have if the Ami stops working or starts having deleterious effects on my body. Hopefully the Dronedarone will be available soon and I can get off the Ami. With the EP/PVI field expanding so rapidly (magnetic navigation to mention just one thing) I know that holding off as long as possible for the PVI is to my advantage. I just got back from a wild turkey hunt. I awoke very early, humped through the woods all day long, drove home (200 miles) the same day and was totally exhausted. I was very worried that I would go into afib. I stayed in NSR. I equate that to the fact that I'm on Ami. When I did that same routine last November, when I was currently on Sotalol, I went into afib. I'll be giving the Ami another test run this week and hopefully get lucky and have a turkey for the kettle. So the Ami is letting me get on with my life and hopefully it won't harm my body. If it does start to effect me I'm sure the doctors will pick up on it because of the close monitoring and testing schedule they have me on. If anyone is on Amiodorone and has positive results with it would sure be nice to hear from you. P <MI> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.