Re: CMO, British cure

November 1, 2000

Hi ,

It's interesting what you say about the " British Cure " - the implications of

this seem to me to be that the " cure " should be taken in conjunction with

antibiotics. This does not seem to have been mentioned in any of the reports

I've read.

> First CMO: I tried it about 5 years ago. It is supposed to work or show

> signs of working within a month or your money back. Well guess what: I

> wouldn't be on this list if it worked! I got my money back, and like so

> many other things I've tried--it did nothing. At least I got my money back.

>

> Second, the cure: I even saw it reported on my local CBS news last night. I

> thought that was pretty amazing. The reporter said that scientists had

> found the 'cure' for RA and that it would take 5 years for the drug to be

> out on the market and then RA would be a thing of the past. I'm always

> hopeful!

>

> Also, the reason these B cells are plausable is this: someone asked if it

> was the B cells why are we taking the antibiotics. This was explained to me

> by Dr. Franco on my last visit when I asked him why if the hyperbarics

> treatment I just finished killed off something I've had in my gut for 20

> years, why didn't my swelling go down if that too was caused by a bacteria.

> At 40+ feet hyperbarics kills all anerobic bacteria (I also might need some

> more treatments do get there as well). Dr. Franco explained that we (I and

> other rheumatics) may no longer even have the bacteria living inside the

> cell wall anymore. When the bacteria was there, it mimicked the cell wall

> to disguise itself. Thus, our immune systems attacks the cell wall as well

> as the bacteria. Once the bacteria is gone, the high anti-body titers

> continue to fool the immune system into thinking the bacteria is still there

> in the form of it's mimicry--the cell wall. Voila, imflammation still. Thus

> minocin, which is immunimodulatory as well as antibacterial.

>

>

Recommended Posts