Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: You WILL

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

I'm having trouble getting to the actual survey...I didn't see any " button "

except the link to e-mail the (fill in the blanks, I am at a loss for words to

describe these disgusting groupers). Did the HP make it disappear because I'm

unspiritual? I WILL take it.

Nick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> In a message dated 7/7/01 8:55:29 PM US Eastern Standard

Time,

> perkinstommy@h... writes:

>

>

> > Grab a barf bag and scroll down about half way:

> >

>

> Did ya take the putrid survey? I did.

>

> --Mona--

Yes I, too, took the putrid survey (good thing I was stocked up on

barf bags.) I added a story at the end explaining why abandoning

the 12-steps was the healthiest thing I've ever done for my

recovery. Oh, and by the way, today I made a non-12-step

comrade! It was almost efortless, all she needed was to hear

someone say the same things she had been thinking for years, I

wonder how many people like that there are, must be zillions.

Devin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Likewise. I took the survey, and ended with an explanation why I left AA and

why I think

the program is toxic.

I'd be curious to know how many negative responses the guy is getting, and what

he's doing

with the negative responses.

Cheers,

nz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

At 11:07 AM 7/8/01 -0400, you wrote:

>Likewise. I took the survey, and ended with an explanation why I left AA

>and why I think

>the program is toxic.

>

>I'd be curious to know how many negative responses the guy is getting, and

>what he's doing

>with the negative responses.

I wouldn't be surprised if they threw them away as malicious attempts

to misuse the survey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

At 05:54 AM 7/8/01 EDT, MonaHolland@... wrote:

>

>In a message dated 7/7/01 8:55:29 PM US Eastern Standard Time,

>perkinstommy@... writes:

>

>

>Grab a barf bag and scroll down about half way:

>

>

>Did ya take the putrid survey? I did.

The original 'You WILL' post must have prompted many entries/stories,

from us posters, and from lurkers on both sides of the fence, just from

posting of the hazelden.org site on this list of 379 members. I did just

what they wanted (!) and answered all the questions totally honestly.

A few of my answers should be instructive: Total number of meetings

attended: 2000. Number of meetings attended in the last year: 0.

I found it amusing that this form was in a secure website to encrypt

the data sent back, to protect against Internet crackers who might

otherwise intercept this confidential correspondence and publicize it

all over the net.

Here are my comments or 'story':

I spent several years believing that the 12 steps were 'what I needed to

do to recover from the terminal disease of alcoholism', I TOOK (not worked)

the steps as ordered by a sponsor (who read 'how it works as " These are

the steps we TOOK, which are suggested... " ), etc.

To make a long story short, I've since found it much easier just to not

drink. I don't have to go to meetings, call a sponsor, pray, take steps,

believe I have a disease ... these things had taken over my life, and it

took reading every book in library on cults to unlearn them, but I'm okay

now. When it crosses my mind (as when someone directs me to the Hazelden

website), I see that I am not just sober (using the dictionary definiton

of sober, not the AA definition), but abstinent.

In later years of 'recovery' and as a stepping-stone out of AA, I attended

non-12-step meetings and resources (specifically SOS), and found them

supporting of individualism where AA'ers only saw 'terminal uniqueness'.

I was also able to leave such groups and recieve well-wishes, not the

'jails, institutions or death' predictions of those in AA.

>--Mona--

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

When I clicked on the link, it took me to 'Hazelden, Acceptance, Courage,

Wisdom.'. Some

pictures and words, and then a nice green line with 'site map' and 'what's new'.

And directly below, under the link to 'site map', is '12-step survey'. You

click on the

words, and there you go.

Cheers,

nz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Yipes, Pete! We're clicking on the same link, and I'd think we're going to the

same site.

Do you see a sentence, maybe 1/3 of the way down the page, that says, " 12 Step

Survey --

How do you use the 12 Steps in your life? Please take part in our confidential

online

survey running now through August 12. We'll post the results when it is

completed. " ? Do

you see a place that says, " Click here> site map " ? The 12-step survey words

appear below

the site map link. You should be able to click on " 12-step survey " and get

there.

What do you get when you click on the Hazelden URL anyway?

Cheers,

nz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

watts_pete@... wrote:

> Cant see any button to press for this survey. Do you have to register

> w them for it to work?

>

> P.

>

Pete,

The button is missing, but is supposed to point to:

https://www.hazelden.org/research/12stepstudy/survey1.asp

It should work.

Ken

>

>

> > Grab a barf bag and scroll down about half way:

> >

> > http://www.hazelden.org/

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> The button is missing, but is supposed to point to:

>

> https://www.hazelden.org/research/12stepstudy/survey1.asp

>

> It should work.

I'm too tired to do this right now and I need to think but I'll

definitely go back to it. Note how it talks about it remaining

anonymous depsite asking for initials, dob, and ZIP code of all

things. You see so much crock about how research cant be done on XA

because of anonymity and yet these guys can do it of course. Boy is

he going to get a shock when he sees the 12sf replies. I think as many

folks as possible should do that survey so that they might " get the

message " . I might try to keep a look out for the results and see how

he handles them. wouldnt it be a crack if there were more 12sf

replies than stepper?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hey Folks

Maybe they deleted the button until they could work out a way to stop

us pesky 12sf folks from responding?

Our replies were too much " On the Button " .

P., Powerless over Poker

> > > Grab a barf bag and scroll down about half way:

> > >

> > > http://www.hazelden.org/

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> Hey Folks

>

> Maybe they deleted the button until they could work out a way to

stop

> us pesky 12sf folks from responding?

>

> Our replies were too much " On the Button " .

It kept saying I had missed answering the questions when I responded

" never " on using the each of the steps. I tried to continue, but it

froze up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

watts_pete@... wrote:

> Hey Folks

>

> Maybe they deleted the button until they could work out a way to stop

> us pesky 12sf folks from responding?

>

> Our replies were too much " On the Button " .

>

> P., Powerless over Poker

Pete,

There is a java script in the source which gives the file the button should

run. I'll wager that the button appears in some browsers and not in others.

Ken

>

>

>

> > > > Grab a barf bag and scroll down about half way:

> > > >

> > > > http://www.hazelden.org/

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

>

> > The button is missing, but is supposed to point to:

> >

> > https://www.hazelden.org/research/12stepstudy/survey1.asp

> >

> > It should work.

>

> I'm too tired to do this right now and I need to think but I'll

> definitely go back to it. Note how it talks about it remaining

> anonymous depsite asking for initials, dob, and ZIP code of all

> things. You see so much crock about how research cant be done on

XA

> because of anonymity and yet these guys can do it of course. Boy

is

> he going to get a shock when he sees the 12sf replies. I think as

many

> folks as possible should do that survey so that they might " get the

> message " . I might try to keep a look out for the results and see

how

> he handles them. wouldnt it be a crack if there were more 12sf

> replies than

stepper?

Would need a miracle.....so keep the faith!

netty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

At 08:41 PM 7/8/01 -0700, you wrote:

>There is a java script in the source which gives the file the button should

>run. I'll wager that the button appears in some browsers and not in others.

I didn't notice any javascript button either, but there is a plain

old ordinary link to it. But at any rate, going directly to the

survey should also work. Again, that's

https://www.hazelden.org/research/12stepstudy/

to read the survey info first, or

https://www.hazelden.org/research/12stepstudy/survey1.asp

to dive right into the questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

>

> I didn't notice any javascript button either, but there is a plain

> old ordinary link to it. But at any rate, going directly to the

> survey should also work. Again, that's

>

> https://www.hazelden.org/research/12stepstudy/

>

The guy(?) sez:

" This endeavor is the last phase of my doctorate. After my

dissertation/field study has been successfully defended, I will share

some of my findings via the web. " ^^^^^^^^^^^^**!!

Confident isn't he! Hmmm, I think I chose the wrong subject - Maybe I

should've researched... Alchemy. lol

Mack

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

At 11:41 AM 7/9/01 +0000, you wrote:

>The guy(?) sez:

>

> " This endeavor is the last phase of my doctorate. After my

>dissertation/field study has been successfully defended, I will share

>some of my findings via the web. " ^^^^^^^^^^^^**!!

>

>Confident isn't he! Hmmm, I think I chose the wrong subject - Maybe I

>should've researched... Alchemy. lol

I like the implicit belief that he thinks he can get valid survey data

from a self-selected sample on the web. This is not science. But

this voodoo will be cited by other steppers as " research " on the

importance of the steps in everyday life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> ...This is not science. But

> this voodoo will be cited by other steppers as " research " on the

> importance of the steps in everyday life.

>

>

I'm always intrigued by these " qualifications " ... Was checking out

one of the responses to Pete's query on the GSO list:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gso/message/852

Look at all those letters! ;-) But the amusing thing is that if you

click on the persons name, you don't get an " biography " - You get a

link to something that looks suspiciously like a pyramid sales scam!

" YOU can easily get 5000-8000 members under your position in a month "

The ultimate in Sponsorship? LOL

Mack

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> > ...This is not science. But

> > this voodoo will be cited by other steppers as " research " on

the

> > importance of the steps in everyday life.

> >

> >

>

> I'm always intrigued by these " qualifications " ... Was checking

out

> one of the responses to Pete's query on the GSO list:

>

> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gso/message/852

>

> Look at all those letters! ;-) But the amusing thing is that if you

> click on the persons name, you don't get an " biography " - You

get a

> link to something that looks suspiciously like a pyramid sales

scam!

>

> " YOU can easily get 5000-8000 members under your position

in a month "

>

> The ultimate in Sponsorship? LOL

>

> Mack

I read the response to Pete's post also. I might note that " Came

to scoff, and stayed to pray, " is not a quote from Bill . It's

much older than that, I don't know where it originated,

may have used the quote, but it's not his original.

Devin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

At 01:51 PM 7/9/01 -0000, manypaths@... wrote:

>

>> > ...This is not science. But

Not only is it bad science because of the subjects' self-selection

(as you were saying but it got trimmed), but I expect my response and

many others to get thrown out as 'spurious responses.' It would be easy

enough to justify tossing my response because I stay abstinent without

taking the steps, proving that I'm not really an alcoholic. Maybe

he will at least keep all the raw data. If not, he's at least read my

response, maybe it will, uh, " plant a seed. "

>> > this voodoo will be cited by other steppers as " research " on

>the

>> > importance of the steps in everyday life.

>> >

>> >

>>

>> I'm always intrigued by these " qualifications " ... Was checking

>out

>> one of the responses to Pete's query on the GSO list:

>>

>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gso/message/852

>>

>> Look at all those letters! ;-) But the amusing thing is that if you

>> click on the persons name, you don't get an " biography " - You

>get a

>> link to something that looks suspiciously like a pyramid sales

>scam!

>>

>> " YOU can easily get 5000-8000 members under your position

>in a month "

>>

>> The ultimate in Sponsorship? LOL

That's funny. I'm sure this scam is " a progam of honesty. " I've

often wondered if there was a correlation between 12-steppers and

pyramid scammers (such as " FOUR REPORTS " spammers).

>>

>> Mack

>

>I read the response to Pete's post also. I might note that " Came

>to scoff, and stayed to pray, " is not a quote from Bill . It's

>much older than that, I don't know where it originated,

>may have used the quote, but it's not his original.

It's easy enough to attribute to as he wrote most of the big

book - I thought it came from the end of Chapter 1 " Bill's Story " ,

myself. But a two-second search of an online big book text finds it:

it's the last sentence in " The Doctor's Opinion " , just before Chapter 1

in the big book:

I earnestly advise every alcoholic to read this book through, and

though perhaps he came to scoff, he may remain to pray.

D. Silkworth, MD

" Yes, I have to get down on my knees and pray twice a day. Doctor's

orders. "

>Devin

----------

http://listen.to/benbradley

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> >

> > I didn't notice any javascript button either, but there is a plain

> > old ordinary link to it. But at any rate, going directly to the

> > survey should also work. Again, that's

> >

> > https://www.hazelden.org/research/12stepstudy/

> >

>

> The guy(?) sez:

>

> " This endeavor is the last phase of my doctorate. After my

> dissertation/field study has been successfully defended, I will

share

> some of my findings via the web. " ^^^^^^^^^^^^**!!

>

> Confident isn't he! Hmmm, I think I chose the wrong subject - Maybe

I

> should've researched... Alchemy. lol

>

> Mack

Mack <LOL>, I thought the very same. Especially after it wouldn't

accept my list of " nevers " when asked my frequency of using the steps.

I, too really liked the one " General Human Condition " . :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> I like the implicit belief that he thinks he can get valid survey

data

> from a self-selected sample on the web. This is not science. But

> this voodoo will be cited by other steppers as " research " on the

> importance of the steps in everyday life.

Indeed. Of course, given that it had=s come to 12sf attention, he

might not get what he expects. I wouldnt be surprised if the systme

jams if you say you never use the steps. He wont have anticipated

that. One reason I have been slow to complete it is because I

actually *cant* say never, becasue I am still very much iunfluenced by

them, but not necessarily in healthy ways at all. So how do I answer

this survey?

P.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

At 04:13 PM 7/9/01 +0000, you wrote:

>

>

> > I like the implicit belief that he thinks he can get valid survey

>data

> > from a self-selected sample on the web. This is not science. But

> > this voodoo will be cited by other steppers as " research " on the

> > importance of the steps in everyday life.

>

>Indeed. Of course, given that it had=s come to 12sf attention, he

>might not get what he expects. I wouldnt be surprised if the systme

>jams if you say you never use the steps.

It didn't do that for me, actually. But it did squawk about

not answering all the questions on a different page (on which

I had in fact answered them all).

I figure the script is just a little broken.

> He wont have anticipated

>that. One reason I have been slow to complete it is because I

>actually *cant* say never, becasue I am still very much iunfluenced by

>them, but not necessarily in healthy ways at all. So how do I answer

>this survey?

But do you *use* them? Being influenced by them isn't the

same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...