Guest guest Posted January 17, 2006 Report Share Posted January 17, 2006 TK--- Do a Doctors Data - Hair Elements which includes the minerals and toxic elements. The other test only looks at toxic elements and does not go over minerals which you need to analyse to look for Hg toxicity. > > There are two tests that can be order it, directly. > 1- hair elements > 2- hair toxic element exposure. > I don't know the difference between the two. > What do you suggest? Thanks > Sardar > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 17, 2006 Report Share Posted January 17, 2006 Sardar: the one you want is hair elements. Hair Analysis Tests > There are two tests that can be order it, directly. > 1- hair elements > 2- hair toxic element exposure. > I don't know the difference between the two. > What do you suggest? Thanks > Sardar > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 17, 2006 Report Share Posted January 17, 2006 >Do a Doctors Data - Hair Elements which includes the minerals and toxic elements.< It was good I asked before requesting the wrong test. Thank you TK, and . Sardar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2006 Report Share Posted February 7, 2006 Here is the correct account of the test result. Sorry for re-posting it again. I need your help to understand what are the deficiencies. I greatly appreciate, thank you. Hair Elements Potentially Toxic Elements Result Reference Range Aluminum 28 <7.0 green Antimony 0.034 0.066 green Arsenic 0.039 0.080 green Beryllium <0.01 0.020 Bismuth 0.029 0.060 green Cadmium 0.080 0.15 green Lead 0.15 2.0 green Mercury 0.038 1.1 green Platinum <0.003 0.005 Thallium <0.001 0.010 Thorium <0.001 0.005 Uranium 0.018 0.060 Nickel 0.07 0.40 green Silver 0.03 0.12 green Tin 0.05 0.30 green Titanium 0.37 1.0 green Essential and Other Elements Result Reference Range Over/Under50% Calcium 1200 200 - 750 white, green, yellow Over Magnesium 82 25 - 75 white,green Over Sodium 27 12 - 90 green, white Under Potassium 7 9 - 40 yellow, green, white Under copper 41 10 - 28 white, green, yellow Over zinc 160 130 -200 green, white Under Manganese 0.09 0.15 -0.65 yellow, green,white Under chromium 0.35 0.20 -0.40 white, green Over vanadium 0.018 0.018-0.065 green, white Under molybdenum 0.021 0.025-0.064 yellow,green,white Under baron 0.15 0.40 -3.0 red,yellow,green,white Und Iodine 0.71 0.25 -1.7 yellow, green, white Over lithium 0.008 0.007-0.023 green, white Under phosphorus 177 160 -250 green, white Under selenium 0.86 0.95-1.7 yellow,green,white Under Strontium 2.9 0.30-3.5 White,green, Over sulfur 46100 44500-5200 green, white Under Barium 0.65 0.16-1.6 white Under cobalt 0,008 0.013-0.035 yellow,green,white Under Iron 7.6 5.4-13 white Under Germanium 0.036 0.045-0.065 yellow,green,white Under Rubidium 0.008 0.011-0.12 yellow,green,white Under Zirconium 0.018 0.020-0.44 yellow,green,white Under Hair Analysis Tests Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2006 Report Share Posted February 7, 2006 Sardar, This is a bit hard to read. In the Toxic section, do the ones with no color have no line or are they low in the green? In the essential section, can you put only the color where the line ends and also put " under " or " over " to indicate if the line extends to the right or left? Also you seem to be missing the essentials from strontium to zirconium. -- > > Here is my hair analysis test result; I need your help to understand > what are the defiencies. I greatly appreciate your help. > > Hair Elements > > Potentially Toxic Elements > Result Reference Range > Aluminum 28 <7.0 green > Antimony 0.034 0.066 green > Arsenic 0.039 0.080 green > Beryllium <0.01 0.020 > Bismuth 0.029 0.060 green > Cadmium 0.080 0.15 green > Lead 0.15 2.0 green > Mercury 0.038 1.1 green > Platinum <0.003 0.005 > Thallium <0.001 0.010 > Thorium <0.001 0.005 > Uranium 0.018 0.060 > Nickel 0.07 0.40 green > Silver 0.03 0.12 green > Tin 0.05 0.30 green > Titanium 0.37 1.0 green > > Essential and Other Elements > > Calcium 1200 200 - 750 white, green, yellow > Magnesium 82 25 - 75 white,green > Sodium 27 12 - 90 green, white > Potassium 7 9 - 40 yellow, green, white > copper 41 10 - 28 white, green, yellow > zinc 160 130 -200 green, white > Manganese 0.09 0.15 -0.65 yellow, green, white > chromium 0.35 0.20 -0.40 white, green > vanadium 0.018 0.018-0.065 green, white > molybdenum 0.021 0.025-0.064 yellow, green, white > baron 0.15 0.40 -3.0 red,yellow,green,white > Iodine 0.71 0.25 -1.7 yellow, green, white > lithium 0.008 0.007-0.023 green, white > phosphorus 177 160 -250 green, white > selenium 0.86 0.95-1.7 yellow, green,white > > Sardar > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2006 Report Share Posted February 7, 2006 My count on this test is that it misses the first rule by two, so sort of close. I think that it would be worth a trial of chelation (provided all amalgams have been safely removed and sources of Hg exposure stopped) to see if there are symptoms. Symptoms with chelation would be diagnositic (I believe). One thing that jumps out is that Ca and Mg are high and Na and K are low meaning weak adrenals, and maybe thyroid problems too. J > Hair Elements > > Potentially Toxic Elements > Result Reference Range > Aluminum 28 <7.0 green > Antimony 0.034 0.066 green > Arsenic 0.039 0.080 green > Beryllium <0.01 0.020 > Bismuth 0.029 0.060 green > Cadmium 0.080 0.15 green > Lead 0.15 2.0 green > Mercury 0.038 1.1 green > Platinum <0.003 0.005 > Thallium <0.001 0.010 > Thorium <0.001 0.005 > Uranium 0.018 0.060 > Nickel 0.07 0.40 green > Silver 0.03 0.12 green > Tin 0.05 0.30 green > Titanium 0.37 1.0 green > > Essential and Other Elements > Result Reference Range Over/Under50% > > Calcium 1200 200 - 750 yellow Over > Magnesium 82 25 - 75 green Over > Sodium 27 12 - 90 white > Potassium 7 9 - 40 white > > copper 41 10 - 28 yellow Over > zinc 160 130 -200 white > Manganese 0.09 0.15 -0.65 white > > chromium 0.35 0.20 -0.40 green Over > vanadium 0.018 0.018-0.065 white > molybdenum 0.021 0.025-0.064 white > baron 0.15 0.40 -3.0 white > > Iodine 0.71 0.25 -1.7 green Over > lithium 0.008 0.007-0.023 white > phosphorus 177 160 -250 white > selenium 0.86 0.95-1.7 white > > Strontium 2.9 0.30-3.5 green Over > sulfur 46100 44500-5200 white > Barium 0.65 0.16-1.6 green over > > cobalt 0,008 0.013-0.035 white > Iron 7.6 5.4-13 white > Germanium 0.036 0.045-0.065 white > Rubidium 0.008 0.011-0.12 white > Zirconium 0.018 0.020-0.44 white > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 >One thing that jumps out is that Ca and Mg are high and Na and K are low meaning weak adrenals, and maybe thyroid problems too.< Hi , I don't know what Na, and K stand for? I have three, benign, goiters. Also, several symptoms of hypothyroid, hyperthyroid, and copper overload. Though, the copper showed high. >I think that it would be worth a trial of chelation (provided all amalgams have been safely removed and sources of Hgexposure stopped) to see if there are symptoms.< The mercury doesn't look high, that is to my reading. I have removed my amalgams 6 years ago; by regular dentist, I don't know if he removed them correctly. Couple years ago, I consulted a ND without any diagnosis. Is it worth to try consult someone else, it is a bit confusing for me. Sardar > Hair Elements > > Potentially Toxic Elements > Result Reference Range > Aluminum 28 <7.0 green > Antimony 0.034 0.066 green > Arsenic 0.039 0.080 green > Beryllium <0.01 0.020 > Bismuth 0.029 0.060 green > Cadmium 0.080 0.15 green > Lead 0.15 2.0 green > Mercury 0.038 1.1 green > Platinum <0.003 0.005 > Thallium <0.001 0.010 > Thorium <0.001 0.005 > Uranium 0.018 0.060 > Nickel 0.07 0.40 green > Silver 0.03 0.12 green > Tin 0.05 0.30 green > Titanium 0.37 1.0 green > > Essential and Other Elements > Result Reference Range Over/Under50% > > Calcium 1200 200 - 750 yellow Over > Magnesium 82 25 - 75 green Over > Sodium 27 12 - 90 white > Potassium 7 9 - 40 white > > copper 41 10 - 28 yellow Over > zinc 160 130 -200 white > Manganese 0.09 0.15 -0.65 white > > chromium 0.35 0.20 -0.40 green Over > vanadium 0.018 0.018-0.065 white > molybdenum 0.021 0.025-0.064 white > baron 0.15 0.40 -3.0 white > > Iodine 0.71 0.25 -1.7 green Over > lithium 0.008 0.007-0.023 white > phosphorus 177 160 -250 white > selenium 0.86 0.95-1.7 white > > Strontium 2.9 0.30-3.5 green Over > sulfur 46100 44500-5200 white > Barium 0.65 0.16-1.6 green over > > cobalt 0,008 0.013-0.035 white > Iron 7.6 5.4-13 white > Germanium 0.036 0.045-0.065 white > Rubidium 0.008 0.011-0.12 white > Zirconium 0.018 0.020-0.44 white > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 Sardar, Have you taken any antifungals (Diflucan, terbinafie) lately? Antifungals do contain high doses av Aluminum and Thalium, in addition to Silicon. Your results are very high on Aluminum and Thalium. Those two damage the liver (check your enzimes), the tyroid, and the other glands. Sven Sardar A wrote: Here is the correct account of the test result. Sorry for re-posting it again. I need your help to understand what are the deficiencies. I greatly appreciate, thank you. Hair Elements Potentially Toxic Elements Result Reference Range Aluminum 28 <7.0 green Antimony 0.034 0.066 green Arsenic 0.039 0.080 green Beryllium <0.01 0.020 Bismuth 0.029 0.060 green Cadmium 0.080 0.15 green Lead 0.15 2.0 green Mercury 0.038 1.1 green Platinum <0.003 0.005 Thallium <0.001 0.010 Thorium <0.001 0.005 Uranium 0.018 0.060 Nickel 0.07 0.40 green Silver 0.03 0.12 green Tin 0.05 0.30 green Titanium 0.37 1.0 green Essential and Other Elements Result Reference Range Over/Under50% Calcium 1200 200 - 750 white, green, yellow Over Magnesium 82 25 - 75 white,green Over Sodium 27 12 - 90 green, white Under Potassium 7 9 - 40 yellow, green, white Under copper 41 10 - 28 white, green, yellow Over zinc 160 130 -200 green, white Under Manganese 0.09 0.15 -0.65 yellow, green,white Under chromium 0.35 0.20 -0.40 white, green Over vanadium 0.018 0.018-0.065 green, white Under molybdenum 0.021 0.025-0.064 yellow,green,white Under baron 0.15 0.40 -3.0 red,yellow,green,white Und Iodine 0.71 0.25 -1.7 yellow, green, white Over lithium 0.008 0.007-0.023 green, white Under phosphorus 177 160 -250 green, white Under selenium 0.86 0.95-1.7 yellow,green,white Under Strontium 2.9 0.30-3.5 White,green, Over sulfur 46100 44500-5200 green, white Under Barium 0.65 0.16-1.6 white Under cobalt 0,008 0.013-0.035 yellow,green,white Under Iron 7.6 5.4-13 white Under Germanium 0.036 0.045-0.065 yellow,green,white Under Rubidium 0.008 0.011-0.12 yellow,green,white Under Zirconium 0.018 0.020-0.44 yellow,green,white Under Hair Analysis Tests Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 >Your results are very high on Aluminum and Thalium. Those two damage the liver (check your enzimes), the tyroid, and the other glands.< Sven, Aluminum is 2.8 from the reference range of <7.0, and Thallium is <0.001 from the reference range of 0.010. I thought they were low, but obviously, I have no clue reading the result. That applies to the rest of the test. Few times, I used cream on my thigh, but no antifungal medication. I did 24 liver flushes in 18 months. I think I have thyroid peoblem, as well as adrenaline. Sardar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 > > >In the Toxic section, do the ones with no color have no line or are they low in the green? In the essential section, can you put only the color where the line ends and also put " under " or " over " to indicate if the line extends to the right or left? Also you seem to be missing the essentials from strontium to zirconium.< > > Hi , > In the toxic section, only marked green have line drawn, the rest are blanks, with no lines. In the essential section, I think I corrected this time, I hope. > Sardar Comments on this hair test aren't going to be accurate because your colors are not correct. I've marked a few below where the color appears incorrect - I didn't mark all of them, so you'll really need to check each one. Also you are missing some Over/Under labels - are the missing ones all under? I'll be happy to comment if you can make corrections, but it's difficult to read without the correct colors. I don't want to make a mistake and give you a really incorrect reading of your hair test. Just to clarify, you should list the color where the line ends. The center of the white is the starting point - and the end of the line is the farthest point away from the center, either to the right or the left. -- > Hair Elements > > Potentially Toxic Elements > Result Reference Range > Aluminum 28 <7.0 green > Antimony 0.034 0.066 green > Arsenic 0.039 0.080 green > Beryllium <0.01 0.020 > Bismuth 0.029 0.060 green > Cadmium 0.080 0.15 green > Lead 0.15 2.0 green > Mercury 0.038 1.1 green > Platinum <0.003 0.005 > Thallium <0.001 0.010 > Thorium <0.001 0.005 > Uranium 0.018 0.060 > Nickel 0.07 0.40 green > Silver 0.03 0.12 green > Tin 0.05 0.30 green > Titanium 0.37 1.0 green Most of the toxics look like they really are in the green or no line, except aluminum. If the result is really 28, then this is well over the reference range. Is it .28 or 2.8 or 28? > Essential and Other Elements > Result Reference Range Over/Under50% > > Calcium 1200 200 - 750 yellow Over > Magnesium 82 25 - 75 green Over The ref range is 25-75, so 82 must be in the yellow? > Sodium 27 12 - 90 white > Potassium 7 9 - 40 white This result looks below the ref range - is it yellow? > copper 41 10 - 28 yellow Over > zinc 160 130 -200 white > Manganese 0.09 0.15 -0.65 white Is this really in the yellow? > chromium 0.35 0.20 -0.40 green Over > vanadium 0.018 0.018-0.065 white > molybdenum 0.021 0.025-0.064 white > baron 0.15 0.40 -3.0 white This must be either yellow or red... > Iodine 0.71 0.25 -1.7 green Over > lithium 0.008 0.007-0.023 white > phosphorus 177 160 -250 white > selenium 0.86 0.95-1.7 white > > Strontium 2.9 0.30-3.5 green Over > sulfur 46100 44500-5200 white > Barium 0.65 0.16-1.6 green over > > cobalt 0,008 0.013-0.035 white > Iron 7.6 5.4-13 white > Germanium 0.036 0.045-0.065 white > Rubidium 0.008 0.011-0.12 white > Zirconium 0.018 0.020-0.44 white Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 > > > Hair Elements > > > > Potentially Toxic Elements > > Result Reference Range > > Aluminum 28 <7.0 green > > Antimony 0.034 0.066 green > > Arsenic 0.039 0.080 green > > Beryllium <0.01 0.020 > > Bismuth 0.029 0.060 green > > Cadmium 0.080 0.15 green > > Lead 0.15 2.0 green > > Mercury 0.038 1.1 green > > Platinum <0.003 0.005 > > Thallium <0.001 0.010 > > Thorium <0.001 0.005 > > Uranium 0.018 0.060 > > Nickel 0.07 0.40 green > > Silver 0.03 0.12 green > > Tin 0.05 0.30 green > > Titanium 0.37 1.0 green > > > > Essential and Other Elements > > Result Reference Range Over/Under50% > > > > Calcium 1200 200 - 750 yellow Over > > Magnesium 82 25 - 75 green Over > > Sodium 27 12 - 90 white > > Potassium 7 9 - 40 white > > > > copper 41 10 - 28 yellow Over > > zinc 160 130 -200 white > > Manganese 0.09 0.15 -0.65 white > > > > chromium 0.35 0.20 -0.40 green Over > > vanadium 0.018 0.018-0.065 white > > molybdenum 0.021 0.025-0.064 white > > baron 0.15 0.40 -3.0 white > > > > Iodine 0.71 0.25 -1.7 green Over > > lithium 0.008 0.007-0.023 white > > phosphorus 177 160 -250 white > > selenium 0.86 0.95-1.7 white > > > > Strontium 2.9 0.30-3.5 green Over > > sulfur 46100 44500-5200 white > > Barium 0.65 0.16-1.6 green over > > > > cobalt 0,008 0.013-0.035 white > > Iron 7.6 5.4-13 white > > Germanium 0.036 0.045-0.065 white > > Rubidium 0.008 0.011-0.12 white > > Zirconium 0.018 0.020-0.44 white > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 > > > Hair Elements > > > > Potentially Toxic Elements > > Result Reference Range > > Aluminum 28 <7.0 green > > Antimony 0.034 0.066 green > > Arsenic 0.039 0.080 green > > Beryllium <0.01 0.020 > > Bismuth 0.029 0.060 green > > Cadmium 0.080 0.15 green > > Lead 0.15 2.0 green > > Mercury 0.038 1.1 green > > Platinum <0.003 0.005 > > Thallium <0.001 0.010 > > Thorium <0.001 0.005 > > Uranium 0.018 0.060 > > Nickel 0.07 0.40 green > > Silver 0.03 0.12 green > > Tin 0.05 0.30 green > > Titanium 0.37 1.0 green > > > > Essential and Other Elements > > Result Reference Range Over/Under50% > > > > Calcium 1200 200 - 750 yellow Over > > Magnesium 82 25 - 75 green Over > > Sodium 27 12 - 90 white > > Potassium 7 9 - 40 white > > > > copper 41 10 - 28 yellow Over > > zinc 160 130 -200 white > > Manganese 0.09 0.15 -0.65 white > > > > chromium 0.35 0.20 -0.40 green Over > > vanadium 0.018 0.018-0.065 white > > molybdenum 0.021 0.025-0.064 white > > baron 0.15 0.40 -3.0 white > > > > Iodine 0.71 0.25 -1.7 green Over > > lithium 0.008 0.007-0.023 white > > phosphorus 177 160 -250 white > > selenium 0.86 0.95-1.7 white > > > > Strontium 2.9 0.30-3.5 green Over > > sulfur 46100 44500-5200 white > > Barium 0.65 0.16-1.6 green over > > > > cobalt 0,008 0.013-0.035 white > > Iron 7.6 5.4-13 white > > Germanium 0.036 0.045-0.065 white > > Rubidium 0.008 0.011-0.12 white > > Zirconium 0.018 0.020-0.44 white > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 Hi , Thank you for your explanation; some times, it takes me awhile to get it right. This time I have gone through it several times to get it right, hopefully. Here it is; if it doesn't add up, I can send it as an attachment. For I have difficulty dealing with acrobatic form to post the original. Sardar Hair Elements > > Potentially Toxic Elements > Result Reference Range > Aluminum 2.8 <7.0 green > Antimony 0.034 <0.066 green > Arsenic 0.039 <0.080 green > Beryllium <0.01 <0.020 no line > Bismuth 0.029 0.060 green > Cadmium 0.080 0.15 green > Lead 0.15 2.0 green > Mercury 0.038 1.1 green > Platinum <0.003 0.005 no line > Thallium <0.001 0.010 no line > Thorium <0.001 0.005 no line > Uranium 0.018 0.060 green > Nickel 0.07 0.40 green > Silver 0.03 0.12 green > Tin 0.05 0.30 green > Titanium 0.37 1.0 green Most of the toxics look like they really are in the green or no line, except aluminum. If the result is really 28, then this is well over the reference range. Is it .28 or 2.8 or 28?( all the lines are in the green zone.it is 2.8) Essential and Other Elements Result Reference Range Under/Over50% Calcium 1200 200 - 750 yellow Over Magnesium 82 25 -75 yellow over Sodium 27 12 - 90 green under Potassium 7 9 - 40 yellow under copper 41 10 -28 yellow over zinc 160 130 -200 green under Manganese 0.09 0.15 -0.65 yellow under chromium 0.35 0.20 -0.40 green over vanadium 0.018 0.018-0.065 green under molybdenum 0.021 0.025-0.064 yellow under baron 0.15 0.40 -3.0 Red under Iodine 0.71 0.25 -1.7 green over lithium 0.008 0.007-0.023 green under phosphorus 177 160 -250 green under selenium 0.86 0.95-1.7 yellow under Strontium 2.9 0.30-3.5 green Over sulfur 46100 44500-5200 green under Barium 0.65 0.16-1.6 green over cobalt 0,008 0.013-0.035 yellow under Iron 7.6 5.4-13 just white Germanium 0.036 0.045-0.065 yellow under Rubidium 0.008 0.011-0.12 yellow under Zirconium 0.018 0.020-0.44 yellow under Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 Hi , Thank you for your explanation; some times, it takes me awhile to get it right. This time I have gone through it several times to get it right, hopefully. Here it is; if it doesn't add up, I can send it as an attachment. For I have difficulty dealing with acrobatic form to post the original. Sardar Hair Elements > > Potentially Toxic Elements > Result Reference Range > Aluminum 2.8 <7.0 green > Antimony 0.034 <0.066 green > Arsenic 0.039 <0.080 green > Beryllium <0.01 <0.020 no line > Bismuth 0.029 0.060 green > Cadmium 0.080 0.15 green > Lead 0.15 2.0 green > Mercury 0.038 1.1 green > Platinum <0.003 0.005 no line > Thallium <0.001 0.010 no line > Thorium <0.001 0.005 no line > Uranium 0.018 0.060 green > Nickel 0.07 0.40 green > Silver 0.03 0.12 green > Tin 0.05 0.30 green > Titanium 0.37 1.0 green Most of the toxics look like they really are in the green or no line, except aluminum. If the result is really 28, then this is well over the reference range. Is it .28 or 2.8 or 28?( all the lines are in the green zone.it is 2.8) Essential and Other Elements Result Reference Range Under/Over50% Calcium 1200 200 - 750 yellow Over Magnesium 82 25 -75 yellow over Sodium 27 12 - 90 green under Potassium 7 9 - 40 yellow under copper 41 10 -28 yellow over zinc 160 130 -200 green under Manganese 0.09 0.15 -0.65 yellow under chromium 0.35 0.20 -0.40 green over vanadium 0.018 0.018-0.065 green under molybdenum 0.021 0.025-0.064 yellow under baron 0.15 0.40 -3.0 Red under Iodine 0.71 0.25 -1.7 green over lithium 0.008 0.007-0.023 green under phosphorus 177 160 -250 green under selenium 0.86 0.95-1.7 yellow under Strontium 2.9 0.30-3.5 green Over sulfur 46100 44500-5200 green under Barium 0.65 0.16-1.6 green over cobalt 0,008 0.013-0.035 yellow under Iron 7.6 5.4-13 just white Germanium 0.036 0.045-0.065 yellow under Rubidium 0.008 0.011-0.12 yellow under Zirconium 0.018 0.020-0.44 yellow under Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 Steph, Does this one meet counting rule 3?? (I'm getting dizzy looking at it : ) > > Hi , > Thank you for your explanation; some times, it takes me awhile to get it right. This time I have gone through it several times to get it right, hopefully. Here it is; if it doesn't add up, I can send it as an attachment. For I have difficulty dealing with acrobatic form to post the original. Sardar > Hair Elements > > > > Potentially Toxic Elements > > Result Reference Range > > Aluminum 2.8 <7.0 green > > Antimony 0.034 <0.066 green > > Arsenic 0.039 <0.080 green > > Beryllium <0.01 <0.020 no line > > Bismuth 0.029 0.060 green > > Cadmium 0.080 0.15 green > > Lead 0.15 2.0 green > > Mercury 0.038 1.1 green > > Platinum <0.003 0.005 no line > > Thallium <0.001 0.010 no line > > Thorium <0.001 0.005 no line > > Uranium 0.018 0.060 green > > Nickel 0.07 0.40 green > > Silver 0.03 0.12 green > > Tin 0.05 0.30 green > > Titanium 0.37 1.0 green > > Most of the toxics look like they really are in the green > or no line, except aluminum. If the result is really 28, > then this is well over the reference range. Is it .28 > or 2.8 or 28?( all the lines are in the green zone.it is 2.8) > > > Essential and Other Elements > Result Reference Range Under/Over50% > > Calcium 1200 200 - 750 yellow Over > Magnesium 82 25 -75 yellow over > Sodium 27 12 - 90 green under > Potassium 7 9 - 40 yellow under > copper 41 10 -28 yellow over zinc 160 130 -200 green under > Manganese 0.09 0.15 -0.65 yellow under > > > > chromium 0.35 0.20 -0.40 green over > vanadium 0.018 0.018-0.065 green under > molybdenum 0.021 0.025-0.064 yellow under > baron 0.15 0.40 -3.0 Red under Iodine 0.71 0.25 -1.7 green over > lithium 0.008 0.007-0.023 green under > phosphorus 177 160 -250 green under selenium 0.86 0.95-1.7 yellow under > Strontium 2.9 0.30-3.5 green Over > sulfur 46100 44500-5200 green under Barium 0.65 0.16-1.6 green over cobalt 0,008 0.013-0.035 yellow under Iron 7.6 5.4-13 just white Germanium 0.036 0.045-0.065 yellow under > Rubidium 0.008 0.011-0.12 yellow under Zirconium 0.018 0.020-0.44 yellow under > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 > > > > Hi , > > Thank you for your explanation; some times, it takes me awhile to > get it right. This time I have gone through it several times to get > it right, hopefully. Here it is; if it doesn't add up, I can send it > as an attachment. For I have difficulty dealing with acrobatic form > to post the original. Sardar > > Hair Elements > > > > > > Potentially Toxic Elements > > > Result Reference Range > > > Aluminum 2.8 <7.0 green > > > Antimony 0.034 <0.066 green > > > Arsenic 0.039 <0.080 green > > > Beryllium <0.01 <0.020 no line > > > Bismuth 0.029 0.060 green > > > Cadmium 0.080 0.15 green > > > Lead 0.15 2.0 green > > > Mercury 0.038 1.1 green > > > Platinum <0.003 0.005 no line > > > Thallium <0.001 0.010 no line > > > Thorium <0.001 0.005 no line > > > Uranium 0.018 0.060 green > > > Nickel 0.07 0.40 green > > > Silver 0.03 0.12 green > > > Tin 0.05 0.30 green > > > Titanium 0.37 1.0 green > > > > Most of the toxics look like they really are in the green > > or no line, except aluminum. If the result is really 28, > > then this is well over the reference range. Is it .28 > > or 2.8 or 28?( all the lines are in the green zone.it is 2.8) > > > > > > Essential and Other Elements > > Result Reference Range Under/Over50% > > > > Calcium 1200 200 - 750 yellow Over > > Magnesium 82 25 -75 yellow over > > Sodium 27 12 - 90 green under > > Potassium 7 9 - 40 yellow under > > copper 41 10 -28 yellow over > zinc 160 > 130 -200 green under > > Manganese 0.09 0.15 -0.65 yellow under > > > > > > > > chromium 0.35 0.20 -0.40 green over > > > vanadium 0.018 0.018-0.065 green under > > molybdenum 0.021 0.025-0.064 yellow under > > baron 0.15 0.40 -3.0 Red under > Iodine 0.71 0.25 -1.7 green over > > > lithium 0.008 0.007-0.023 green under > > phosphorus 177 160 -250 green under > selenium 0.86 0.95-1.7 yellow under > > Strontium 2.9 0.30-3.5 green Over > > sulfur 46100 44500-5200 green under Barium > 0.65 0.16-1.6 green over cobalt > 0,008 0.013-0.035 yellow under Iron 7.6 > 5.4-13 just white Germanium 0.036 > 0.045-0.065 yellow under > > Rubidium 0.008 0.011-0.12 yellow under > Zirconium 0.018 0.020-0.44 yellow under > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 Sardar, I'll assume everything's accurate now. I know it can be hard sometimes to get things to post correctly. I believe you meet counting rule #4 (11 or less in the green and white), meaning deranged mercury transport and mercury toxicity. If you have no amalgams, then you should chelate. already pointed out that Ca and Mg high with Na and K low is an adrenal sign. You need some adrenal support. The directions of these elements indicate that exercise will make you feel better. Na/Ca ratio is extremely low. This indicates low thyroid. As I understand it if the thyroid is not functioning, the adrenals try to take over and become exhausted. So you likely need to treat adrenals first and in short order add some thyroid support. Are already taking thyroid? If so, I'd say you need more, or at least you need to add the adrenal support. Your Ca/P ratio is a bit high at 6.8. Over 6, Andy says is a slow metabolizer You also have low Na/Mg. These two ratios together suggest your mood and energy might be better with B6, B12, tyrosine, trimethylglycine and folic acid. -- > > Hi , > Thank you for your explanation; some times, it takes me awhile to get it right. This time I have gone through it several times to get it right, hopefully. Here it is; if it doesn't add up, I can send it as an attachment. For I have difficulty dealing with acrobatic form to post the original. Sardar > Hair Elements > > > > Potentially Toxic Elements > > Result Reference Range > > Aluminum 2.8 <7.0 green > > Antimony 0.034 <0.066 green > > Arsenic 0.039 <0.080 green > > Beryllium <0.01 <0.020 no line > > Bismuth 0.029 0.060 green > > Cadmium 0.080 0.15 green > > Lead 0.15 2.0 green > > Mercury 0.038 1.1 green > > Platinum <0.003 0.005 no line > > Thallium <0.001 0.010 no line > > Thorium <0.001 0.005 no line > > Uranium 0.018 0.060 green > > Nickel 0.07 0.40 green > > Silver 0.03 0.12 green > > Tin 0.05 0.30 green > > Titanium 0.37 1.0 green > > Most of the toxics look like they really are in the green > or no line, except aluminum. If the result is really 28, > then this is well over the reference range. Is it .28 > or 2.8 or 28?( all the lines are in the green zone.it is 2.8) > > > Essential and Other Elements > Result Reference Range Under/Over50% > > Calcium 1200 200 - 750 yellow Over > Magnesium 82 25 -75 yellow over > Sodium 27 12 - 90 green under > Potassium 7 9 - 40 yellow under > copper 41 10 -28 yellow over zinc 160 130 -200 green under > Manganese 0.09 0.15 -0.65 yellow under > > > > chromium 0.35 0.20 -0.40 green over > vanadium 0.018 0.018-0.065 green under > molybdenum 0.021 0.025-0.064 yellow under > baron 0.15 0.40 -3.0 Red under Iodine 0.71 0.25 -1.7 green over > lithium 0.008 0.007-0.023 green under > phosphorus 177 160 -250 green under selenium 0.86 0.95-1.7 yellow under > Strontium 2.9 0.30-3.5 green Over > sulfur 46100 44500-5200 green under Barium 0.65 0.16-1.6 green over cobalt 0,008 0.013-0.035 yellow under Iron 7.6 5.4-13 just white Germanium 0.036 0.045-0.065 yellow under > Rubidium 0.008 0.011-0.12 yellow under Zirconium 0.018 0.020-0.44 yellow under > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 Sardar, I forgot to mention a couple of things. First, in a previous post you mentioned the low level of mercury in the toxic section. In a hair test, this simply means you are not excreting mercury. Deranged mineral transport (as determined by Andy's counting rules) indicates a high probability of mercury poisoning, even when the mercury level appears low. When mineral transport is deranged, the levels of the other toxic elements are generally not meaningful either (with some exceptions). Your copper level is probably not significant. I'm a little hesitant about this because the low K/Ca can mean either low thyroid or copper excess. But since you have prior evidence of a thyroid problem, that seems more likely. I made an error below. Na/Ca should read K/Ca. Sorry about that. -- > > > > Hi , > > Thank you for your explanation; some times, it takes me awhile to > get it right. This time I have gone through it several times to get > it right, hopefully. Here it is; if it doesn't add up, I can send it > as an attachment. For I have difficulty dealing with acrobatic form > to post the original. Sardar > > Hair Elements > > > > > > Potentially Toxic Elements > > > Result Reference Range > > > Aluminum 2.8 <7.0 green > > > Antimony 0.034 <0.066 green > > > Arsenic 0.039 <0.080 green > > > Beryllium <0.01 <0.020 no line > > > Bismuth 0.029 0.060 green > > > Cadmium 0.080 0.15 green > > > Lead 0.15 2.0 green > > > Mercury 0.038 1.1 green > > > Platinum <0.003 0.005 no line > > > Thallium <0.001 0.010 no line > > > Thorium <0.001 0.005 no line > > > Uranium 0.018 0.060 green > > > Nickel 0.07 0.40 green > > > Silver 0.03 0.12 green > > > Tin 0.05 0.30 green > > > Titanium 0.37 1.0 green > > > > Most of the toxics look like they really are in the green > > or no line, except aluminum. If the result is really 28, > > then this is well over the reference range. Is it .28 > > or 2.8 or 28?( all the lines are in the green zone.it is 2.8) > > > > > > Essential and Other Elements > > Result Reference Range Under/Over50% > > > > Calcium 1200 200 - 750 yellow Over > > Magnesium 82 25 -75 yellow over > > Sodium 27 12 - 90 green under > > Potassium 7 9 - 40 yellow under > > copper 41 10 -28 yellow over > zinc 160 > 130 -200 green under > > Manganese 0.09 0.15 -0.65 yellow under > > > > > > > > chromium 0.35 0.20 -0.40 green over > > > vanadium 0.018 0.018-0.065 green under > > molybdenum 0.021 0.025-0.064 yellow under > > baron 0.15 0.40 -3.0 Red under > Iodine 0.71 0.25 -1.7 green over > > > lithium 0.008 0.007-0.023 green under > > phosphorus 177 160 -250 green under > selenium 0.86 0.95-1.7 yellow under > > Strontium 2.9 0.30-3.5 green Over > > sulfur 46100 44500-5200 green under Barium > 0.65 0.16-1.6 green over cobalt > 0,008 0.013-0.035 yellow under Iron 7.6 > 5.4-13 just white Germanium 0.036 > 0.045-0.065 yellow under > > Rubidium 0.008 0.011-0.12 yellow under > Zirconium 0.018 0.020-0.44 yellow under > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 Sardar, I forgot to mention a couple of things. First, in a previous post you mentioned the low level of mercury in the toxic section. In a hair test, this simply means you are not excreting mercury. Deranged mineral transport (as determined by Andy's counting rules) indicates a high probability of mercury poisoning, even when the mercury level appears low. When mineral transport is deranged, the levels of the other toxic elements are generally not meaningful either (with some exceptions). Your copper level is probably not significant. I'm a little hesitant about this because the low K/Ca can mean either low thyroid or copper excess. But since you have prior evidence of a thyroid problem, that seems more likely. I made an error below. Na/Ca should read K/Ca. Sorry about that. -- > > > > Hi , > > Thank you for your explanation; some times, it takes me awhile to > get it right. This time I have gone through it several times to get > it right, hopefully. Here it is; if it doesn't add up, I can send it > as an attachment. For I have difficulty dealing with acrobatic form > to post the original. Sardar > > Hair Elements > > > > > > Potentially Toxic Elements > > > Result Reference Range > > > Aluminum 2.8 <7.0 green > > > Antimony 0.034 <0.066 green > > > Arsenic 0.039 <0.080 green > > > Beryllium <0.01 <0.020 no line > > > Bismuth 0.029 0.060 green > > > Cadmium 0.080 0.15 green > > > Lead 0.15 2.0 green > > > Mercury 0.038 1.1 green > > > Platinum <0.003 0.005 no line > > > Thallium <0.001 0.010 no line > > > Thorium <0.001 0.005 no line > > > Uranium 0.018 0.060 green > > > Nickel 0.07 0.40 green > > > Silver 0.03 0.12 green > > > Tin 0.05 0.30 green > > > Titanium 0.37 1.0 green > > > > Most of the toxics look like they really are in the green > > or no line, except aluminum. If the result is really 28, > > then this is well over the reference range. Is it .28 > > or 2.8 or 28?( all the lines are in the green zone.it is 2.8) > > > > > > Essential and Other Elements > > Result Reference Range Under/Over50% > > > > Calcium 1200 200 - 750 yellow Over > > Magnesium 82 25 -75 yellow over > > Sodium 27 12 - 90 green under > > Potassium 7 9 - 40 yellow under > > copper 41 10 -28 yellow over > zinc 160 > 130 -200 green under > > Manganese 0.09 0.15 -0.65 yellow under > > > > > > > > chromium 0.35 0.20 -0.40 green over > > > vanadium 0.018 0.018-0.065 green under > > molybdenum 0.021 0.025-0.064 yellow under > > baron 0.15 0.40 -3.0 Red under > Iodine 0.71 0.25 -1.7 green over > > > lithium 0.008 0.007-0.023 green under > > phosphorus 177 160 -250 green under > selenium 0.86 0.95-1.7 yellow under > > Strontium 2.9 0.30-3.5 green Over > > sulfur 46100 44500-5200 green under Barium > 0.65 0.16-1.6 green over cobalt > 0,008 0.013-0.035 yellow under Iron 7.6 > 5.4-13 just white Germanium 0.036 > 0.045-0.065 yellow under > > Rubidium 0.008 0.011-0.12 yellow under > Zirconium 0.018 0.020-0.44 yellow under > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 Sardar, It says Al 28 on your e-mail - not 2.8. Thallium has half life of 30 days - you have had serious Thallium exposure about 2 years ago (judging from the value now). You need to take a second test at another lab (GSDL) and compare the results. High Copper usually is associated with 's Disease. Sven ---- Hair Elements Potentially Toxic Elements Result Reference Range Aluminum 28 <7.0 green ---- Sardar A wrote: >Your results are very high on Aluminum and Thalium. Those two damage the liver (check your enzimes), the tyroid, and the other glands.< Sven, Aluminum is 2.8 from the reference range of <7.0, and Thallium is <0.001 from the reference range of 0.010. I thought they were low, but obviously, I have no clue reading the result. That applies to the rest of the test. Few times, I used cream on my thigh, but no antifungal medication. I did 24 liver flushes in 18 months. I think I have thyroid peoblem, as well as adrenaline. Sardar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2006 Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 > I am sorry, I don't know why the lines were moved. Even now, while aligning some lines, I had to align them twice, I hope this time stands. It is annoying. > Sardar > Thanks Sardar. I was just 'trying' to be funny. :0) Your test does meet a counting rule. And there are signs of poor adrenal and thyroid function. Do you have Andy's Amalgam Illness book? Ask all the questions you feel like. Discussions help all of us (I believe). J Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.