Guest guest Posted August 9, 2005 Report Share Posted August 9, 2005 Judy, It looks like a lot of your essential elements are low, indicative of mercury toxicity, as well as a big indicator (low lithium). As someone who has already gone through all this, I would first purchase and read Dr. Huggins book, " It's all in your head " in which you will find out everything about the toxicity of mercury amalgam fillings, but also the toxicity of other dental materials which include how bad having gold in your mouth along with amalgam and crowns can be. Read his book first as he gives lots of clues and diagnostic markers to help you determine whether your dental materials are at the root of your health problems, and then contact DMAS for a referral to a dentist in your area who is trained by Dr. Huggin's protocol on proper and safe removal, and then buy Andy Cutler's book which we all use, " Amalgam Illness, Diagnosis and Treatment " which will take you through everything else to do step by step. He is a scientist who also became very ill with CFS, found out it was mercury poisoning from his fillings, got them out, did chelation and other nutritional protocols and completely recovered. Good luck DDI Hair Elements Test Results & counting rules DDI Hair Elements Test Results I still have the amalgams and have been diagnosed with Fibromyalgia. I am concerned that it may be mercury causing my long term illness. I have root canals, crowns, amalgam fillings, and gold crowns. I have had them for years. My results from the DDI hair elements test are listed below and I have done the counting rules. I am new at researching mercury as being the cause of my illness and I have read Andy's book. I was surprised that I did not meet the counting rules for mercury poisoning since I have so many things going on in my mouth. I have been taking ALA, MSM, Garlic, and DMSO for several years not knowing that they had anything to do with moving mercury. I have improved with the pain and chronic fatigue but it is a touch and go on what I can do. I would appreciate any input regarding my test. I am trying to find a dentist to help evaluated what I need to do. That has been interesting, I have another analogy but I will not get started on what most dentist say to me if I even mention mercury. POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS Element result ref range color Aluminum 3.7 < 7.0 green Antimony <0.01 <0.050 no line Arsenic 0.038 <0.060 green Beryllium <0.01 <0.020 no line Bismuth 0.010 < 0.10 green Cadmium 0.062 < 0.10 green Lead 0.26 < 1.0 green Mercury 1.3 <1.1 yellow Platinum 0.012 < 0.005 yellow to red Thallium <0.001 <0.010 no line Thorium <0.001 <0.005 no line Uranium 0.014 <0.060 green Nickel 0.22 < 0.40 green Silver 0.03 < 0.15 green Tin 0.17 < 0.30 green Titanium 0.65 < 1.0 green ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS Element result ref range color under/over 50% Calcium 400 300- 1200 green under 50% Magnesium 38 35- 120 green under 50% Sodium 9 12- 90 yellow under 50% Potassium 6 8- 38 yellow under 50% Copper 11 12- 35 yellow under 50% Zinc 210 140- 220 Green above 50% Manganese 0.07 0.15- 0.65 red under 50% Chromium 0.29 0.20- 0.40 white under 50% Vanadium 0.033 0.018- 0.065 white above 50 % Molybdenum 0.043 0.028- 0.056 green above 50% Boron 0.35 0.30- 2.0 green under 50% Iodine 8.6 0.25- 1.3 red above 50% Lithium <0.004 0.007- 0.023 red under 50% Phosphorus 189 160- 250 green under 50% Selenium 2.6 0.95- 1.7 yellow above 50% Strontium 0.35 0.50- 7.6 yellow under 50% Sulfur 48000 44500- 52000 50% Barium 1.1 0.26- 3.0 white above 50% Cobalt 0.011 0.013- 0.050 yellow under 50% Iron 6.5 5.4- 14 green under 50% Germanium 0.044 0.045- 0.065 green under 50% Rubidium 0.006 0.007- 0.096 yellow under 50% Zirconium 0.054 0.020- 0.42 green under 50% RATIOS Ca/Mg 10.5 4- 30 Ca/P 2.12 1- 12 Na/K 1.5 0.5- 10 Zn/Cu 19.1 4- 20 Zn/Cd >999 > 800 COUNTING RULES Step one: number of items above 50% is 5 or less, or number of items above 50% is 18 or more (high probability of mercury poisoning) Mine is 6 Step two: number of items " very elevated " and " very low " red zone is 4 or more. Mine is 3 Step three: number of items entirely inside the middle band (white and green) is 11 or less. Mine is 13 If I did this correct, then I do not meet the criteria for a high probability of mercury poisoning. I am going to a doctor that considers and test for mercury poisoning. I have not been back to him since the hair test and would appreciate your input TK and anyone. Judy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 9, 2005 Report Share Posted August 9, 2005 > DDI Hair Elements Test Results > > I still have the amalgams and have been diagnosed with > Fibromyalgia. I am concerned that it may be mercury causing my long > term illness. I have root canals, crowns, amalgam fillings, and > gold crowns. TK--- The amalgams are bad and multiple metals in your mouth especially if they contact each other makes the problem worse. The root canals could also be a source of problems and should be checked for infection and what they were filled with. I have had them for years. My results from the DDI > hair elements test are listed below and I have done the counting > rules. I am new at researching mercury as being the cause of my > illness and I have read Andy's book. I was surprised that I did not > meet the counting rules for mercury poisoning since I have so many > things going on in my mouth. TK--- Amalgam quantity and contact between it and other metals is what will cause toxicity. > > I have been taking ALA, MSM, Garlic, and DMSO for several years not > knowing that they had anything to do with moving mercury. I have > improved with the pain and chronic fatigue but it is a touch and go > on what I can do. > > I would appreciate any input regarding my test. I am trying to find > a dentist to help evaluated what I need to do. That has been > interesting, I have another analogy but I will not get started on > what most dentist say to me if I even mention mercury. > > POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS > Element result ref range color > Aluminum 3.7 < 7.0 green > Antimony <0.01 <0.050 no line > Arsenic 0.038 <0.060 green > Beryllium <0.01 <0.020 no line > Bismuth 0.010 < 0.10 green > Cadmium 0.062 < 0.10 green > Lead 0.26 < 1.0 green > Mercury 1.3 <1.1 yellow > Platinum 0.012 < 0.005 yellow to red > Thallium <0.001 <0.010 no line > Thorium <0.001 <0.005 no line > Uranium 0.014 <0.060 green > Nickel 0.22 < 0.40 green > Silver 0.03 < 0.15 green > Tin 0.17 < 0.30 green > Titanium 0.65 < 1.0 green > > ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS > Element result ref range color under/over 50% > Calcium 400 300- 1200 green under 50% > Magnesium 38 35- 120 green under 50% > Sodium 9 12- 90 yellow under 50% > Potassium 6 8- 38 yellow under 50% > Copper 11 12- 35 yellow under 50% > Zinc 210 140- 220 Green above 50% > Manganese 0.07 0.15- 0.65 red under 50% > Chromium 0.29 0.20- 0.40 white under 50% > Vanadium 0.033 0.018- 0.065 white above 50 % > Molybdenum 0.043 0.028- 0.056 green above 50% > Boron 0.35 0.30- 2.0 green under 50% > Iodine 8.6 0.25- 1.3 red above 50% > Lithium <0.004 0.007- 0.023 red under 50% > Phosphorus 189 160- 250 green under 50% > Selenium 2.6 0.95- 1.7 yellow above 50% > Strontium 0.35 0.50- 7.6 yellow under 50% > Sulfur 48000 44500- 52000 50% > Barium 1.1 0.26- 3.0 white above 50% > Cobalt 0.011 0.013- 0.050 yellow under 50% > Iron 6.5 5.4- 14 green under 50% > Germanium 0.044 0.045- 0.065 green under 50% > Rubidium 0.006 0.007- 0.096 yellow under 50% > Zirconium 0.054 0.020- 0.42 green under 50% > > RATIOS > Ca/Mg 10.5 4- 30 > Ca/P 2.12 1- 12 > Na/K 1.5 0.5- 10 > Zn/Cu 19.1 4- 20 > Zn/Cd >999 > 800 > > COUNTING RULES > > Step one: number of items above 50% is 5 or less, or number of > items above 50% is 18 or more (high probability of mercury > poisoning) > > Mine is 6 > > Step two: number of items " very elevated " and " very low " red zone is > 4 or more. > > Mine is 3 > > Step three: number of items entirely inside the middle band (white > and green) is 11 or less. > > Mine is 13 > > If I did this correct, then I do not meet the criteria for a high > probability of mercury poisoning. TK--- Correct > > I am going to a doctor that considers and test for mercury > poisoning. TK--- Tests How ? I have not been back to him since the hair test and > would appreciate your input TK and anyone. TK--- If you do not meet the counting rules probability is low, not everyone is toxic. The amalgams IMO should still be removed properly with the proper precautions if you have health problems [they do not help]. Then consider using some chelation with DMPS or DMSA [depending on how many you actually remove] after to help remove any possibility of redistribution from the removal or regular sauna depending on how you continue to feel after removal. > > Judy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 10, 2005 Report Share Posted August 10, 2005 >> DDI Hair Elements Test Results >> >> I still have the amalgams and have been diagnosed with >> Fibromyalgia. I am concerned that it may be mercury causing my long >> term illness. I have root canals, crowns, amalgam fillings, and >> gold crowns. >TK--- The amalgams are bad and multiple metals in your mouth >especially if they contact each other makes the problem worse. The >root canals could also be a source of problems and should be checked >for infection and what they were filled with. Thanks for your reply. I am concerned about the root canals and plan to have them removed because I do not think that it is a good option to keep them. Two are filled with the silver amalgams that I know of and suspect there is more under crowns. >>I have had them for years. My results from the DDI >> hair elements test are listed below and I have done the counting >> rules. I am new at researching mercury as being the cause of my >> illness and I have read Andy's book. >> I was surprised that I did not >> meet the counting rules for mercury poisoning since I have so many >> things going on in my mouth. >TK--- Amalgam quantity and contact between it and other metals is >what will cause toxicity. I am not sure what you mean but I think you are saying I could have mercury toxicity even though I do not meet the counting rules, or toxicity of something other than mercury. >> I am going to a doctor that considers and test for mercury >> poisoning. TK--- Tests How ? He has not discussed this with me, but I know of another person that goes to him and the DMSP challenge test was used. This person is doing fine and has a high percent of mercury in the body. I will ask for other test other than this one. >>I have not been back to him since the hair test and > >would appreciate your input TK and anyone. >TK--- If you do not meet the counting rules probability is low, not >everyone is toxic. The amalgams IMO should still be removed properly >with the proper precautions if you have health problems [they do not >help]. Then consider using some chelation with DMPS or DMSA >[depending on how many you actually remove] after to help remove any >possibility of redistribution from the removal or regular sauna >depending on how you continue to feel after removal. I feel the same. I have so much work already done in my mouth that I feel that is will be impossible to save many teeth. My upper is totally bridges and crowns with three root canals. My first attempt to find a dentist through the DAMS list was an awful experience. Just because they are on the list it does not mean they are equipped to do the work. He could talk the talk, but his office was in a shed behind his house. It was dirty and I could hardly wait until I got out of that place. I am very depressed in trying to find a dentist that is qualified, but will keep searching and paying money to the quacks along the way. Judy _____ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 10, 2005 Report Share Posted August 10, 2005 _____ --- In frequent-dose-chelation " On Behalf Of S Gikas " >Judy, >It looks like a lot of your essential elements are low, indicative of mercury toxicity, as well as a big indicator (low >lithium). As someone who has already gone through all this, I would first purchase and read Dr. Huggins book, " It's all >in your head " in which you will find out everything about the toxicity of mercury amalgam fillings, but also the toxicity >of other dental materials which include how bad having gold in your mouth along with amalgam and crowns can be. Read his >book first as he gives lots of clues and diagnostic markers to help you determine whether your dental materials are at >the root of your health problems, and then contact DMAS for a referral to a dentist in your area who is trained by Dr. >Huggin's protocol on proper and safe removal, and then buy Andy Cutler's book which we all use, " Amalgam Illness, >Diagnosis and Treatment " which will take you through everything else to do step by step. He is a scientist who also >became very ill with CFS, found out it was mercury poisoning from his fillings, got them out, did chelation and other >nutritional protocols and completely recovered. >Good luck > Thank you for your reply. I am low in the essential elements. I had to have two hair test done by this doctor. The test from ARL stated that these were the four-low-electrolytes and it indicated that I had exhausted adrenals. The booklet that I received from them has suggestions on how to build the adrenals back by supplements, diet, and life changes. I have also been reading a lot about this on this forum. I have not been back to see the doctor and he stated that I need to wait until my next visit before he makes his recommendation. I am currently addressing the GI track. I also noticed the low lithium and I do not know what that indicates and you think this is because of mercury toxicity. I have the DAMS referral for a dentist and I have gone to one on the list. He was not a dentist that needs to be on the list. He has set up shop in a shed behind his house and the place of dirty and I could go on and on. I was very glad to get out of the place and wasted my money. I will keep looking though. I have the book " Amalgam Illness by Andy Cutler and have read the book. That is why I did the counting rules on the DDI hair test. I know it is not an easy process and I will continue to look for someone to get the silver fillings and root canals out of the mouth. That is the first step. Again thank you for your input. Judy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2005 Report Share Posted August 17, 2005 > > You meet counting rule #5, listed on p. 25 of Cutler's hair > > test book: " If any two of the above counts come up one short of the > > rule, mineral transport is deranged. " > > For some reason, this rule is omitted here: > > http://home.earthlink.net/~moriam/HOW_TO_hair_test.html#counting_rules > > But it is in the book, and is treated as just as solid a rule as the > others. As far as I'm aware, Andy added #5 after the file (at URL above) was written. My guess is that over time he codified things he was thinking about results that are " close " and turned it into a rule. I'm guessing there, but it would make sense to me. Moria Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.