Guest guest Posted February 27, 2003 Report Share Posted February 27, 2003 has it bad also. Actually, it comes and goes. Sometimes it is worse than others. It gets red all over her lower legs and her feet. She scratches them and they bleed. She's had several bacterial infections because of it. We also give her claritan anti- histamine when she's really bad. Her eczema is always the worst during the summer because she loves to swim. This fall she got a thing called molluscum. It's little pox bumps. I took her to the pediatrician instead of a dermatologist or the allergist. He said to put a heavy duty steroid on it (instead of protopic), that made the molluscum worse. She got hundreds of molluscum bumps. The steroid cream made it worse. We use protopic also. I also use aquaphor instead of vaseline. It really does seem to work pretty well. We also have Cetaphil lotion. She also has sensory issues, so it's been a battle because of the sensory problems. Her sensory problems are a lot better in the past year, so now she doesn't mind me putting the lotion and creams on. I thought the scratch test was useful. Mainly, we knew she wasn't allergic to foods. Nothing stood out that she is allergic too, so we don't have to eliminate anything. I use either aveeno soap on her, or johson's baby soap. It's a pain. My parents always say something about it. They say " She's scratching. Shouldn't you put something to keep her from scratching. " When they were babysitting, they wanted to put alcohol on her. I'm so glad they asked before they did that. It would have hurt and made the situation worse. Try the aveeno, and I would ask for a scratch test. Good luck. Suzi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 27, 2003 Report Share Posted February 27, 2003 Thanks Suzi, Tonight-if we can ever get a moment alone(yeah right), I have lots to discuss with my husband regarding and his many " problems " . I hope he agrees to do the scratch test. I think he will. Good Luck, Brock --- " luckygmstwife <suzi_knowles@...> " <suzi_knowles@...> wrote: > has it bad also. Actually, it comes and goes. > Sometimes it is > worse than others. It gets red all over her lower > legs and her > feet. She scratches them and they bleed. She's had > several > bacterial infections because of it. We also give > her claritan anti- > histamine when she's really bad. > > Her eczema is always the worst during the summer > because she loves > to swim. > > This fall she got a thing called molluscum. It's > little pox bumps. > I took her to the pediatrician instead of a > dermatologist or the > allergist. He said to put a heavy duty steroid on > it (instead of > protopic), that made the molluscum worse. She got > hundreds of > molluscum bumps. The steroid cream made it worse. > > We use protopic also. I also use aquaphor instead > of vaseline. It > really does seem to work pretty well. We also have > Cetaphil lotion. > > She also has sensory issues, so it's been a battle > because of the > sensory problems. Her sensory problems are a lot > better in the > past year, so now she doesn't mind me putting the > lotion and creams > on. > > I thought the scratch test was useful. Mainly, we > knew she wasn't > allergic to foods. Nothing stood out that she is > allergic too, so > we don't have to eliminate anything. > > I use either aveeno soap on her, or johson's baby > soap. > > It's a pain. > > My parents always say something about it. They say > " She's > scratching. Shouldn't you put something to keep her > from > scratching. " When they were babysitting, they > wanted to put alcohol > on her. I'm so glad they asked before they did > that. It would have > hurt and made the situation worse. > > Try the aveeno, and I would ask for a scratch test. > > > Good luck. > > Suzi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 28, 2003 Report Share Posted February 28, 2003 I was told that the scratch test is NOT accurate for testing food allergies, that a blood test is the better way to go. Does anyone have any thoughts on this? Tammy > I thought the scratch test was useful. Mainly, we knew she wasn't > allergic to foods. Nothing stood out that she is allergic too, so > we don't have to eliminate anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 28, 2003 Report Share Posted February 28, 2003 Tammy - I can tell you that my younger son is deathly allergic to peanuts and a scratch test was PLENTY. I've not heard what you're talking about, but I can tell you that if you're wondering about intolerance vs. allergy, a scratch test wouldn't show that. For instance, if you are lactose deficient (aka " allergic to milk " ) it's not a true allergy in that your body doesn't produce histamine in response to it. A deficient person cannot process it correctly and it produces digestive " issues " . In terms of the GFCF diet, these children also cannot tolerate glutein and casein, but it's not an allergy. A blood test would probably determine if it was spilling into their bloodstream. I'm a bit out of my league here - help? Marina > I was told that the scratch test is NOT accurate for testing food allergies, > that a blood test is the better way to go. Does anyone have any thoughts on > this? > > Tammy > > > I thought the scratch test was useful. Mainly, we knew she wasn't > > allergic to foods. Nothing stood out that she is allergic too, so > > we don't have to eliminate anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 28, 2003 Report Share Posted February 28, 2003 Ah, Marina, that would make sense. I had my son who has autism tested (skin) for some allergies after his face, tongue, lips etc broke out in hives (and swelling) after he ate some Doritos at a Special Olympics function. While they were testing, I asked them to do the gluten and casein as well. They were negative. We still don't know what made his face do that either. But, I was speaking to our naturalpath who told me that the skin tests weren't really good for indicating FOOD allergies. Perhaps he was thinking along your lines. Is your son allergic to only peanuts? I am curious because I was tested probably 15 years ago now and I wasn't allergic then but I think I am now because whenever I eat nuts of most any kind, my throat begins to hurt and my tongue and mouth tingle and start swelling. But curiously, I still seem to be able to eat peanut butter. That I don't understand. Maybe you do? Thanks for your input, Tammy [ ] Re: Milk Substitute-Suzi > Tammy - > I can tell you that my younger son is deathly allergic to peanuts and > a scratch test was PLENTY. I've not heard what you're talking about, > but I can tell you that if you're wondering about intolerance vs. > allergy, a scratch test wouldn't show that. For instance, if you are > lactose deficient (aka " allergic to milk " ) it's not a true allergy in > that your body doesn't produce histamine in response to it. A > deficient person cannot process it correctly and it produces > digestive " issues " . > In terms of the GFCF diet, these children also cannot tolerate > glutein and casein, but it's not an allergy. A blood test would > probably determine if it was spilling into their bloodstream. I'm a > bit out of my league here - help? > Marina Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 28, 2003 Report Share Posted February 28, 2003 I know that I came up positive for several different foods. Most of mine were mild and I don't have the problems associated with a food allergy, so I haven't changed my diet. Suzi > I was told that the scratch test is NOT accurate for testing food allergies, > that a blood test is the better way to go. Does anyone have any thoughts on > this? > > Tammy > > > I thought the scratch test was useful. Mainly, we knew she wasn't > > allergic to foods. Nothing stood out that she is allergic too, so > > we don't have to eliminate anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2003 Report Share Posted March 1, 2003 Hi OK GFCF IS NOTHING TO DO WITH ALLERIGIES OR 'CONVENTIONAL' INTOLERANCE LOL !!!! Capitals for emphasis - i'm not shouting !! If your child is gluten casein 'intolerant' - it is not an allergic response and is it not coeliac - although confusingly your child could well have these too. With children like mine something has caused the lining of the gut to become more leaky than it should be . This can be caused in a number of ways like use of anti- biotic or the measles virus living in the gut . If the gut lining becomes leaky then the proteins in gluten and casein will leak through the gut . If they do this they transfer in the blood stream into caseomorphine and glutomorphine . These cause problems when they hit the brain and have the perverse effect of making the body crave them . Once this gut dysbiosis occurs aditional problems may start ,including things relating to the bodies ability to take the goodness from vitamin and mineral intake ...and also the bodies ability to excrete toxins ( sulphation transfer) . These things will lead to additional symptoms which may show up as allergic type responses . There are few specific physical symptoms beyongd the restricted food choices , red ears/cheeks, dark circles under the eyes, loose bowels/constipation, excesive thirst, night sweating.... Most other symptoms will be behavioural BUT a child that is getting gluten and casein top ups all day will not usually have a big reaction to any specific food There are only two tests that show up this very specific condition ..in the UK it is the test done by the ARU at the University of Sunderland..in the States it is done at the GReat plains laboratory and is called a urine peptides test . Any other intolerance testing , or allergy testing ( blood or urine) will show additional or associated problems but will NOT tell you if your child has a leaky gut .This is a very specific condition. I really HTH ..and really - I'm not shouting LOL !!! Thanks for listening Regards Deborah --- > > I was told that the scratch test is NOT accurate for testing food > allergies, > > that a blood test is the better way to go. Does anyone have any > thoughts on > > this? > > > > Tammy > > > > > I thought the scratch test was useful. Mainly, we knew she wasn't > > > allergic to foods. Nothing stood out that she is allergic too, so > > > we don't have to eliminate anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2003 Report Share Posted March 1, 2003 Hey - peanuts are not nuts, they are legumes. If you have any reaction to peanuts (butter or not) stay AWAY from them until you see an allergist. What you're describing could be the precursors to an anaphalactic reaction - kind of odd (I think) to have it happen this late in life, but nothing to kid around with. Also - if your reaction is to nuts (walnuts, pecans, etc.) they are often processed with a variety of chemicals which could be causing the reaction. Esp walnuts - which are fairly " toxic " themselves - did you know that nothing will grow under a walnut tree because it gives off a natural herbicide? Since you're having a reaction, I would go see a really good allergist - food allergies shouldn't be messed with. Marina > Ah, Marina, that would make sense. I had my son who has autism tested > (skin) for some allergies after his face, tongue, lips etc broke out in > hives (and swelling) after he ate some Doritos at a Special Olympics > function. While they were testing, I asked them to do the gluten and casein > as well. They were negative. We still don't know what made his face do > that either. But, I was speaking to our naturalpath who told me that the > skin tests weren't really good for indicating FOOD allergies. Perhaps he > was thinking along your lines. > > Is your son allergic to only peanuts? I am curious because I was tested > probably 15 years ago now and I wasn't allergic then but I think I am now > because whenever I eat nuts of most any kind, my throat begins to hurt and > my tongue and mouth tingle and start swelling. But curiously, I still seem > to be able to eat peanut butter. That I don't understand. Maybe you do? > > Thanks for your input, > Tammy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.