Re: Ideologically proved hearing loss

[Guest guest]

Do you think he is trying to make some mutant form of " etiology " , maybe

" etiologically " ? I know this is not a word, but I'm just throwing this out

there. Will monitor for other answers.

Ideologically proved hearing loss

Help, I am totally lost as to what this doctor is trying to see. Doing one of

those wonderful PE tube placements. The doctor very clearly dictates that the

patient has " chronic serous otitis media with ideologically proved conductive

hearing loss on the left. " Anyone have any idea as to what he means by

ideologically proved. If not, he gets a blank. Not wasting too much time on

this resident who really can't dictate well at all. Margaret

[Guest guest]

I did consider that, but don't really believe that fits either. We do have one

PA who loves to say chest pain, unknown ideology. I always just laugh and

wonder what kind of ideology chest pain can have anyway. Margaret

>>> " CDC " 11/01/01 11:04PM >>>

Do you think he is trying to make some mutant form of " etiology " , maybe

" etiologically " ? I know this is not a word, but I'm just throwing this out

there. Will monitor for other answers.

Ideologically proved hearing loss

Help, I am totally lost as to what this doctor is trying to see. Doing one of

those wonderful PE tube placements. The doctor very clearly dictates that the

patient has " chronic serous otitis media with ideologically proved conductive

hearing loss on the left. " Anyone have any idea as to what he means by

ideologically proved. If not, he gets a blank. Not wasting too much time on

this resident who really can't dictate well at all. Margaret

[Guest guest]

Margaret,

If he is saying unknown etiology, it is spelled this

way, not ideology even if he is pronouncing it that

way. Do you change it to etiology?

Susie

--- Margaret Grant wrote:

> I did consider that, but don't really believe that

> fits either. We do have one PA who loves to say

> chest pain, unknown ideology. I always just laugh

> and wonder what kind of ideology chest pain can have

> anyway. Margaret

>

> >>> " CDC " 11/01/01 11:04PM

> >>>

> Do you think he is trying to make some mutant form

> of " etiology " , maybe " etiologically " ? I know this

> is not a word, but I'm just throwing this out there.

> Will monitor for other answers.

>

>

> Ideologically proved hearing loss

>

>

> Help, I am totally lost as to what this doctor is

> trying to see. Doing one of those wonderful PE tube

> placements. The doctor very clearly dictates that

> the patient has " chronic serous otitis media with

> ideologically proved conductive hearing loss on the

> left. " Anyone have any idea as to what he means by

> ideologically proved. If not, he gets a blank. Not

> wasting too much time on this resident who really

> can't dictate well at all. Margaret

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Well I am not sure about that one. I know etiology is

for history and causes. Ideology, hmm, maybe he is

saying that it is proved by a set of beliefs, which is

strange. lol

Susie

--- Margaret Grant wrote:

> Help, I am totally lost as to what this doctor is

> trying to see. Doing one of those wonderful PE tube

> placements. The doctor very clearly dictates that

> the patient has " chronic serous otitis media with

> ideologically proved conductive hearing loss on the

> left. " Anyone have any idea as to what he means by

> ideologically proved. If not, he gets a blank. Not

> wasting too much time on this resident who really

> can't dictate well at all. Margaret

>

>

__________________________________________________

[Guest guest]

Susie, Yes I always change it to etiology no matter how he pronounces it, I just

always get a chuckle out of it though. I can just see the chest pain sitting

there thinking, " what kind of ideology do I have? " I just find laughing at some

of the funny things the doctors say a lot better than yelling at them for being

so stupid. Got to have fun with this job. Margaret

>>> Susie Reeves 11/01/01 11:18PM >>>

Margaret,

If he is saying unknown etiology, it is spelled this

way, not ideology even if he is pronouncing it that

way. Do you change it to etiology?

Susie

--- Margaret Grant wrote:

> I did consider that, but don't really believe that

> fits either. We do have one PA who loves to say

> chest pain, unknown ideology. I always just laugh

> and wonder what kind of ideology chest pain can have

> anyway. Margaret

>

> >>> " CDC " 11/01/01 11:04PM

> >>>

> Do you think he is trying to make some mutant form

> of " etiology " , maybe " etiologically " ? I know this

> is not a word, but I'm just throwing this out there.

> Will monitor for other answers.

>

>

> Ideologically proved hearing loss

>

>

> Help, I am totally lost as to what this doctor is

> trying to see. Doing one of those wonderful PE tube

> placements. The doctor very clearly dictates that

> the patient has " chronic serous otitis media with

> ideologically proved conductive hearing loss on the

> left. " Anyone have any idea as to what he means by

> ideologically proved. If not, he gets a blank. Not

> wasting too much time on this resident who really

> can't dictate well at all. Margaret

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Google seems to like etiologically. Maybe he is

meaning that the hearing loss is proved by history and

causes??

--- Susie Reeves wrote:

> Well I am not sure about that one. I know etiology

> is

> for history and causes. Ideology, hmm, maybe he is

> saying that it is proved by a set of beliefs, which

> is

> strange. lol

>

> Susie

> --- Margaret Grant wrote:

> > Help, I am totally lost as to what this doctor is

> > trying to see. Doing one of those wonderful PE

> tube

> > placements. The doctor very clearly dictates that

> > the patient has " chronic serous otitis media with

> > ideologically proved conductive hearing loss on

> the

> > left. " Anyone have any idea as to what he means

> by

> > ideologically proved. If not, he gets a blank.

> Not

> > wasting too much time on this resident who really

> > can't dictate well at all. Margaret

> >

> >

>

>

> __________________________________________________

>

[Guest guest]

I don't know, I am about ready to kill one of my ortho

docs. Geez, I think he thinks if he speed talks he

gets a cheaper rate. I find myself listening to him

and thinking TAKE A BREATH ALREADY!! lol

--- Margaret Grant wrote:

> Susie, Yes I always change it to etiology no matter

> how he pronounces it, I just always get a chuckle

> out of it though. I can just see the chest pain

> sitting there thinking, " what kind of ideology do I

> have? " I just find laughing at some of the funny

> things the doctors say a lot better than yelling at

> them for being so stupid. Got to have fun with this

> job. Margaret

>

> >>> Susie Reeves 11/01/01

> 11:18PM >>>

> Margaret,

>

> If he is saying unknown etiology, it is spelled this

> way, not ideology even if he is pronouncing it that

> way. Do you change it to etiology?

>

> Susie

> --- Margaret Grant wrote:

> > I did consider that, but don't really believe that

> > fits either. We do have one PA who loves to say

> > chest pain, unknown ideology. I always just laugh

> > and wonder what kind of ideology chest pain can

> have

> > anyway. Margaret

> >

> > >>> " CDC " 11/01/01

> 11:04PM

> > >>>

> > Do you think he is trying to make some mutant form

> > of " etiology " , maybe " etiologically " ? I know this

> > is not a word, but I'm just throwing this out

> there.

> > Will monitor for other answers.

> >

> >

> > Ideologically proved hearing

> loss

> >

> >

> > Help, I am totally lost as to what this doctor

> is

> > trying to see. Doing one of those wonderful PE

> tube

> > placements. The doctor very clearly dictates that

> > the patient has " chronic serous otitis media with

> > ideologically proved conductive hearing loss on

> the

> > left. " Anyone have any idea as to what he means

> by

> > ideologically proved. If not, he gets a blank.

> Not

> > wasting too much time on this resident who really

> > can't dictate well at all. Margaret

> >

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

What about the hearing test: otologically proved?

Aliceanne

On Thu, 01 Nov 2001 23:13:11 -0500 " Margaret Grant "

writes:

> I did consider that, but don't really believe that fits either. We

> do have one PA who loves to say chest pain, unknown ideology. I

> always just laugh and wonder what kind of ideology chest pain can

> have anyway. Margaret

>

> >>> " CDC " 11/01/01 11:04PM >>>

> Do you think he is trying to make some mutant form of " etiology " ,

> maybe " etiologically " ? I know this is not a word, but I'm just

> throwing this out there. Will monitor for other answers.

>

>

> Ideologically proved hearing loss

>

>

> Help, I am totally lost as to what this doctor is trying to see.

> Doing one of those wonderful PE tube placements. The doctor very

> clearly dictates that the patient has " chronic serous otitis media

> with ideologically proved conductive hearing loss on the left. "

> Anyone have any idea as to what he means by ideologically proved.

> If not, he gets a blank. Not wasting too much time on this resident

> who really can't dictate well at all. Margaret

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Thanks for the laugh.

Aliceanne

On Fri, 2 Nov 2001 08:13:04 -0500 Alice A Sawyer

writes:

> What about the hearing test: otologically proved?

> Aliceanne

> On Thu, 01 Nov 2001 23:13:11 -0500 " Margaret Grant "

>

> writes:

> > I did consider that, but don't really believe that fits either.

> We

> > do have one PA who loves to say chest pain, unknown ideology. I

> > always just laugh and wonder what kind of ideology chest pain can

>

> > have anyway. Margaret

> >

> > >>> " CDC " 11/01/01 11:04PM >>>

> > Do you think he is trying to make some mutant form of " etiology " ,

>

> > maybe " etiologically " ? I know this is not a word, but I'm just

> > throwing this out there. Will monitor for other answers.

> >

> >

> > Ideologically proved hearing loss

> >

> >

> > Help, I am totally lost as to what this doctor is trying to see.

>

> > Doing one of those wonderful PE tube placements. The doctor very

>

> > clearly dictates that the patient has " chronic serous otitis media

>

> > with ideologically proved conductive hearing loss on the left. "

> > Anyone have any idea as to what he means by ideologically proved.

>

> > If not, he gets a blank. Not wasting too much time on this

> resident

> > who really can't dictate well at all. Margaret

> >

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

Aliceanne, Thanks, That gets me going in the right direction. I'll bet it was

either otologically or audiologically. That one went in last night but if I

ever hear it again, I will know which way to go. Don't know why I didn't think

of that last night. Margaret

>>> Alice A Sawyer 11/02/01 08:13AM >>>

What about the hearing test: otologically proved?

Aliceanne

On Thu, 01 Nov 2001 23:13:11 -0500 " Margaret Grant "

writes:

> I did consider that, but don't really believe that fits either. We

> do have one PA who loves to say chest pain, unknown ideology. I

> always just laugh and wonder what kind of ideology chest pain can

> have anyway. Margaret

>

> >>> " CDC " 11/01/01 11:04PM >>>

> Do you think he is trying to make some mutant form of " etiology " ,

> maybe " etiologically " ? I know this is not a word, but I'm just

> throwing this out there. Will monitor for other answers.

>

>

> Ideologically proved hearing loss

>

>

> Help, I am totally lost as to what this doctor is trying to see.

> Doing one of those wonderful PE tube placements. The doctor very

> clearly dictates that the patient has " chronic serous otitis media

> with ideologically proved conductive hearing loss on the left. "

> Anyone have any idea as to what he means by ideologically proved.

> If not, he gets a blank. Not wasting too much time on this resident

> who really can't dictate well at all. Margaret

>

>

>