Re: U/S uploaded (pg/mc ment)

March 4, 2003

I finally got my 6w1d u/s uploaded....the first pix really shows where the

baby is implanted and has a good view of the fundal dip on the left of the

picture (looks like a slope to the left) It is a pretty deep dip, but

nothing like the bunny ears of the textbook UD defintion. The next picture

shows both the right (pg) and left (non-pg) uteri with the big black void

between them, but you can't see the fundal dip. I know that U/s cannot be

used as a good dx tool....but what do you ladies think.....and do you

agree that it doesn't look like the baby is implanted on any of the tissue

(whether it is myometrium or avascular) between the two uteri?

I know I am grasping for answers, but I can't help it.

UD

March 4, 2003

Hi ,

Well, to me, the baby might have been implanted partially on the

" septum " area. The sac is floating in the middle of the horn, from

what I see. This actually means that the rudimentary placenta

could be either on the fundus, left or right walls. You can't tell

just from the sac, I think. But I'm not an u/s tech, however, I'd say

you can't rule it out from the u/s.

Will you consider chromosome testing on the baby? Because

that might give you some answers as to why things happened

the way they did.

I think another MRI is a great idea. It's unlikely, but good to rule

out that you aren't a BU/SU bicollis.

Still sending you massive cheeto bags and hugs,

Jill

SU resected

Recommended Posts