new group

[Guest guest]

Personally, I think several things:

A/ you have way too much time on your hands.

B/ since this was announced on an adult list and not on the dwarfism list,

you are out of line posting this on a PG14 list.

C/ as much as you would like to wave the flag of ignorance in righteous

indignation, if you are not a member of any other group I own or start, why

is it your business?

D/ you don't know me. You don't know my partner. You obviously know nothing

about me. If you entertain any notion of " outing me " , take a number, and

stay out of my private life.

Whims

_____

From: dwarfism [mailto:dwarfism ] On Behalf

Of Jim

Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 2:12 PM

dwarfism

Subject: new group

===

[Guest guest]

Jim

How is that any of your business? It was announced on the adult forum not

this one. I am into the scene thank you and I am a LP. Thank you for your

opinion of my lifestyle but it is afterall your opinion.

Chass Brown A.K.A.

Charinthalis Del Sans of the portable chariot

Honorable Recruiter of the House of the Red Shark

Rear Admiral Northern Region Ansteorran Royal Navy - Ship the Red Shark

Muddeler of Mead

new group

>I wantedto bring it to your attention one of our moderators is

> starting a s & M group for lps. I think this is disgusting especially

> when she is average size.

>

[Guest guest]

Jim, I'm more afraid of what your morals must be to be qualified to judge

everyone else. If you are a Xtian ( I shiver in my ruby slippers) I remember

SOME ONE wrote in a book that it's a no no to judge others. Let's take this to

the adult list, I think so many of us would just love to say more.

Nack

_ Groups : festiveforaging_

(festiveforaging/?yguid=8143604)

(http://www.freewebs.com/ffullcircle/index.html) F_Full Circle Farm_

(http://www.freewebs.com/ffullcircle/index.html)

[Guest guest]

so??thats their business and we are just as normal as average height people, we

choose to be who we are and if people dont like it, oh friggin well!!you dont

like it, tough bananas dude cause we are free to be who we are and wanna be!!we

are normal, just not in height, that doesnt make us different or mean we

shouldnt like that sort of thing, and btw, this is a group for all ages, so it

shouldnt even be mentioned on this list!

jayme

Jim <jimcofpa@...> wrote:

I wantedto bring it to your attention one of our moderators is

starting a s & M group for lps. I think this is disgusting especially

when she is average size.

===

[Guest guest]

Chas

The main reason I brought it to this list attention was she is the

co-owner of this list and is responsible for the morality and

behavior of this list.

>

> Jim

> How is that any

[Guest guest]

>

> Chas

> The main reason I brought it to this list attention was she is the

> co-owner of this list and is responsible for the morality and

> behavior of this list.

actually, if you are an adult, you are responsible for your own morals

and behaviours. if you are a minor, your parents are responsible.

and as a member of this list, you are responsible for your own posts.

i and rose moderate those who dont adhere to the guidelines of this

list while trying to keep it as open to messages as possible.

apparently you have confused this list with the adult LP list. please

try to keep them straight, and have the courtesy to ask permission to

cross-post announcements from one list to another.

Whims

[Guest guest]

And that would matter how? Is she mentioning it here? She has been open

about her sexual preferences since I met her on list.. what 2 to 3 years

ago. Do we go to your job screaming your Vanilla? Or tell your boss your

christain? It has no bearing on this list what her sexual desires are since

they never come up on this list as it is PG14. You dragged this up solely to

try and cause her grief and problems. It failed there bubba.. we already

knew .. and some of us are in that life style. So if whips and chains are

not your thing then dont sign up we wont miss you.

Chass Brown A.K.A.

Charinthalis Del Sans of the portable chariot

Honorable Recruiter of the House of the Red Shark

Rear Admiral Northern Region Ansteorran Royal Navy - Ship the Red Shark

Muddeler of Mead

Re: new group

> Chas

> The main reason I brought it to this list attention was she is the

> co-owner of this list and is responsible for the morality and

> behavior of this list.

[Guest guest]

Evidently your ignorance has no bounds.

When individuals outside of the 'community' marginalize those of us

who are dwarfs, their ignorance is compounded by individuals such as

yourself who are dwarfs and who also marginalize us also. As everyone

will (and some have) pointed out; individuals with dwarfism 'can be'

and 'are' a part of all sectors of society.

As has been seen, in 2006 we no longer have to be side show exhibits

because 'some' can dictate roles and opportunities for us. We can

pick and choose what we participate in, especially in our personal time.

Perhaps a more productive moral stand to take would be against

physical abuse of the 'unconsenting', especially children.

Evidently you got up today with your shorts twisted in a knot and

decided to pass moral judgement in an effort to incite a mob scene,

thus assisting in a cover up your own discontent and narrow minded

viewpoint of life. Maybe if Whims was responsible for your 'morality

and behavior' your pain would be channeled in a much more personally

rewarding direction (and out of our sight).

I cringe to think what other behavior folks as yourself frown upon

which we (from the shortest to the tallest) can and do engage in.

Perhaps it's time to take a cruise through the information highway and

discover the liberties associated with living in a democratic society.

You'd be astounded to find out how many of the country's leaders are

members of sectors that you do not appreciate. Privacy (and the right

to choose) in one's personal lives is a liberty that one has to

acknowledge exists (and learn to appreciate) in the good old U.S. of

A. And those who don't appreciate this need to find out what a one way

ticket to China costs these days (or Cuba, for those who prefer the

warmer climate).

I can't say that I have missed your posts, predominately filled with

ignorant comments, that we haven't seen much of in a while.

> >

> > Jim

> > How is that any

>

[Guest guest]

Perhaps this list, certainly, and from what I've seen the only thing I

personally think we could probably have done without was the initial

announcement that the mod has opened a new group /anyway/. They're doing their

jobs here, that's all that we on the list should be concerned about. It's not

like she(?) is running something illegal or immoral. (I'm kind of curious why

S & M would call morality into question anyway...)

[Guest guest]

Jim,

As a former moderator, and a future (potential) minister, I can tell you

your actions are completely beyond the bounds of ethical or moral behavior.

Nowhere, in any post, nor in the administration of THIS list, did Whims

indicate: 1) her sexual preference, 2) her sexual hobbies, 3) an invitation

to anyone to participate in any aspect of her private life, 4) offer an

opinion or judgement (i.e. a " moral " prescription) to anyone on this list,

or 5) place anyone on moderation for any " moral' turpitude based on her own,

private a personal lifestyle.

Her ONLY job, as moderator of THIS list, is to enforce the rules of this

list that were written long before you joined (and, I might add, by joining

you consented to). So far, she has done an excellent job in the execution

her duties.

If your post is supposed to represent a Christian perspective (which I

suspect it does), then I think you need take a course on biblical exegesis.

So much of the modern church, and its doctrines are built upon a dogma of

biblical misinterpretation and passages taken out of context. But one

passage that is never misinterpreted nor taken out of context is from 1

, Chapter 4: " Dear friends, if God so loved us, then we also ought to

love one another. "

And one other thing: this list, the Adult LPs list, and any list Whims

wishes to create on , are private, invitation-only lists. If you don't

like the content or the moderators, feel free to unsubscribe.

-Bill

On 4/6/06, Jim <jimcofpa@...> wrote:

>

> Chas

> The main reason I brought it to this list attention was she is the

> co-owner of this list and is responsible for the morality and

> behavior of this list.

>

>

> >

> > Jim

> > How is that any

>

>

>

>

> ===

>

[Guest guest]

Oooooooooooo....Baby...

S/M????

Satin is sexy....but WHIPS AND CHAINS EXCITE ME!!!!!!

As a fellow LP, theres one thing I've always find a little sad about

the LP community. If you are an LP, that likes to live a somewhat

alternate lifestyle you are almost outcasted but the organization.

We are so worried because everything we do together as LPs we do

with all age groups. I am 34 years old and ever since I was 21 I

never felt when I went to an LP get together I could be myself. I

have people complain because I was drinking a beer when younger LPs

were around, can not be open about my liberal ideas cause the

majority of LPs are conservative. This is one reason why I don't go

to functions anymore. Just as normal society is changing to where

more and more people of alternate lifestyles are coming out, it'll

soon be showing up in the LP community. So I hope you are ready for

it. I'm sorry but not all LPs are conservative christians (and if

you are there is nothing wrong with it!!! Just respect the liberal

minded is all.)

I am a very openminded person and certain adult things intrigue me

and do other things I will not say. I wish there was more of that

out there involving lps but there isn't or just people don't want to

open up because they are afraid to, I don't know. All I'm saying is

LP or BP, they should have the right to let people know what is

available for them. Because there are people like myself that might

just be interested in that, and if the person is a BP so what.

Delete the message and go on. It's not going to corrupt the world,

and if your worried about minors its the parents responsibility not

yours, and if the parent doesn't not take the action they are fools.

Well I think I made my point I hope, I know I can go off on a rant,

and I don't mean too, just please don't dwell on things you don't

like, you very much likely have better things to worry about, and

let the parents regulate their kids, its their job, not yours, only

your kids are the ones you are responsible for.

[Guest guest]

Bill --

I've been staying out of this until now. So far, the lack of support for

Jim's position suggests that perhaps this won't blow up into that big a

controversy.

Like other posters, I disagree with Jim's belief that Whim's outside

activities somehow affect her ability to administer this list. But I do want

to stand up for Jim on one minor aspect of this: he does not deserve to be

attacked for posting truthful information. He did not obtain it

surreptitiously.

You're right that this list and the AdultLPs list are private, in a sense,

but this list isn't invitation-only, and I don't believe the adult list is

either. Posts are freely available to be read by anyone. It's not like Jim

raided Whims's mailbox.

I also thought Whims was out of line to tell Jim he was violating the PG-14

sensibility of the Dwarfism List. Since when is a non-explicit, non-sexual

reference to S & M something that 14-year-olds can't know anything about? I

think she was just trying to shut him .

It looks like this flame-war-in-the-making is already about to fizzle out.

Great! I urge Whims to stop pouring gas on the glowing embers.

Dan Kennedy

On 4/7/06 12:13 AM, " Bill Bradford " <tslug1@...> wrote:

> Jim,

> As a former moderator, and a future (potential) minister, I can tell you

> your actions are completely beyond the bounds of ethical or moral behavior.

> Nowhere, in any post, nor in the administration of THIS list, did Whims

> indicate: 1) her sexual preference, 2) her sexual hobbies, 3) an invitation

> to anyone to participate in any aspect of her private life, 4) offer an

> opinion or judgement (i.e. a " moral " prescription) to anyone on this list,

> or 5) place anyone on moderation for any " moral' turpitude based on her own,

> private a personal lifestyle.

> Her ONLY job, as moderator of THIS list, is to enforce the rules of this

> list that were written long before you joined (and, I might add, by joining

> you consented to). So far, she has done an excellent job in the execution

> her duties.

>

> If your post is supposed to represent a Christian perspective (which I

> suspect it does), then I think you need take a course on biblical exegesis.

> So much of the modern church, and its doctrines are built upon a dogma of

> biblical misinterpretation and passages taken out of context. But one

> passage that is never misinterpreted nor taken out of context is from 1

> , Chapter 4: " Dear friends, if God so loved us, then we also ought to

> love one another. "

>

> And one other thing: this list, the Adult LPs list, and any list Whims

> wishes to create on , are private, invitation-only lists. If you don't

> like the content or the moderators, feel free to unsubscribe.

>

> -Bill

>

>

>

> On 4/6/06, Jim <jimcofpa@...> wrote:

>>

>> Chas

>> The main reason I brought it to this list attention was she is the

>> co-owner of this list and is responsible for the morality and

>> behavior of this list.

[Guest guest]

Lee,

I do agree with your views concerning the right to express yourself (As

everyone should) without the restrictions of the mass. I do believe that while

I personally (an AP) don't have much interest in learning ANYTHING about such an

(dare I say it?) interesting form of sexual expression, Other people - pretty,

ugly, short or tall, black, white, red and yellow, DO have the interest and not

only have the right to learn more about it, they owe it to themselves to do what

they feel good doing behind closed doors. What ever floats your boat AND IT IS

NOBODYS BUSINESS! I don't understand why the response to such a group should be

negative. It is a common way for PEOPLE to express themselves intimately and

while I am personally not willing to ever experiment with painful pleasure, I

unterstand the intrigue.

What about gay/lesbian support groups and date networking? I don't see too

much negativity regarding such an alternative lifestyle. I am not a lesbian. I

don't understand it at all. I hope that none of my kids discover they are

gay/lesbian. It doesn't mean I am against it. It's just not for me. I WOULD

SUPPORT my child in ANY relationship that isn't causing him/her harm. Just like

gay people are BORN that way, I'm sure that some people are born pre destined to

be more open sexually and probably more adventurous in other areas of thier

lives. It doesn't make you a sadistic person and people do not have the right

to pass such judgements. The only issue that matters in ANY SEXUAL VENTURE is

that BOTH/all partners want to engage and both/all partners are ADULTS and of

sound mind.

The only thing I disagree with in your response Lee is that you say things

like you can't have a beer with children around and it is ONLY the

responsibility of the PARENT to concern themselves with the child. Here you

are WRONG, WRONG WRONG. Yes it is MOSTLY up to the parent to watch out for the

influences around thier children. Like, you don't take a kid to a family

resteraunt/pub, choose to sit near the bar and pool tables and then complain

because people are drinking, swearing and actinig obnoxious. You go to said

resteraunt and sit on the resteraunt side and be away from the drinking crowd.

On the other hand, a family is invited to a cookout (invitation doesn't say

leave your kids at home) and the family gets there, and learns people are all

drinking. Most parents don't have a problem with this. I don't either IN

MODERATION. But if I go to an event where children are present, I PERSONALLY

hold myself responsible as an adult and a member of 'The Village' to be

responsible. Yes I will have a beer or two and I would think anyone should feel

very comfortable doing this. When a parent complains about any drinking you do

or if you personally feel guilty when you have a beer or two then it is more

likely that your 'beer or two' is like a six pack or more. It is when you show

lack of restraint that you'll likely upset a parent. Your dwarfism has nothing

to do with what people say about you drinking around kids. It is how parents

feel about ALL PEOPLE who drink in front of their children. Think of it like

this, public intoxication gets you put into

protective custody in order to protect you AND the rest of society. So, maybe

you think children are not in that group? They are the most innocent,

volnerable and in need of protection from others as well as themselves.

Amy Spencer

Lee Nesto <leenesto@...> wrote:

Oooooooooooo

[Guest guest]

But now yer tryin to spoil Whims fun:-)

----- Original Message -----

From: Dan Kennedy

Great! I urge Whims to stop pouring gas on the glowing embers.

Dan Kennedy

[Guest guest]

Dan,

Jim's error was in cross-posting a message from the Adult LPs list to this

one, regardless if it was PG-14 or not; and regardless if it was truthful or

not. I thought we were in agreement about the prohibition of this kind of

activity when we were moderators.

Adult LPs was created for exact type of posts that Whims posted. This list

was NOT.

It's a good thing you and I aren't both still moderators. We'd be fighting

over whether or not to place Jim on moderation. ;-)

(Personally, I'm glad it's not my problem, and I can FLAME away. If Whims

doesn't throw gas on the fire, Fred and I will...LOL)

-Bill

On 4/7/06, Dan Kennedy <dkennedy@...> wrote:

>

> Bill --

>

> I've been staying out of this until now. So far, the lack of support for

> Jim's position suggests that perhaps this won't blow up into that big a

> controversy.

>

> Like other posters, I disagree with Jim's belief that Whim's outside

> activities somehow affect her ability to administer this list. But I do

> want

> to stand up for Jim on one minor aspect of this: he does not deserve to be

> attacked for posting truthful information. He did not obtain it

> surreptitiously.

>

> You're right that this list and the AdultLPs list are private, in a sense,

> but this list isn't invitation-only, and I don't believe the adult list is

> either. Posts are freely available to be read by anyone. It's not like Jim

> raided Whims's mailbox.

>

> I also thought Whims was out of line to tell Jim he was violating the

> PG-14

> sensibility of the Dwarfism List. Since when is a non-explicit, non-sexual

> reference to S & M something that 14-year-olds can't know anything about? I

> think she was just trying to shut him .

>

> It looks like this flame-war-in-the-making is already about to fizzle out.

> Great! I urge Whims to stop pouring gas on the glowing embers.

>

> Dan Kennedy

>

> On 4/7/06 12:13 AM, " Bill Bradford " <tslug1@...> wrote:

>

> > Jim,

> > As a former moderator, and a future (potential) minister, I can tell you

> > your actions are completely beyond the bounds of ethical or moral

> behavior.

> > Nowhere, in any post, nor in the administration of THIS list, did Whims

> > indicate: 1) her sexual preference, 2) her sexual hobbies, 3) an

> invitation

> > to anyone to participate in any aspect of her private life, 4) offer an

> > opinion or judgement (i.e. a " moral " prescription) to anyone on this

> list,

> > or 5) place anyone on moderation for any " moral' turpitude based on her

> own,

> > private a personal lifestyle.

> > Her ONLY job, as moderator of THIS list, is to enforce the rules of this

> > list that were written long before you joined (and, I might add, by

> joining

> > you consented to). So far, she has done an excellent job in the

> execution

> > her duties.

> >

> > If your post is supposed to represent a Christian perspective (which I

> > suspect it does), then I think you need take a course on biblical

> exegesis.

> > So much of the modern church, and its doctrines are built upon a dogma

> of

> > biblical misinterpretation and passages taken out of context. But one

> > passage that is never misinterpreted nor taken out of context is from 1

> > , Chapter 4: " Dear friends, if God so loved us, then we also ought

> to

> > love one another. "

> >

> > And one other thing: this list, the Adult LPs list, and any list Whims

> > wishes to create on , are private, invitation-only lists. If you

> don't

> > like the content or the moderators, feel free to unsubscribe.

> >

> > -Bill

> >

> >

> >

> > On 4/6/06, Jim <jimcofpa@...> wrote:

> >>

> >> Chas

> >> The main reason I brought it to this list attention was she is the

> >> co-owner of this list and is responsible for the morality and

> >> behavior of this list.

>

>

>

> ===

>

[Guest guest]

Bill --

Since we're now allowed five posts a day, I'll respond. ;-) Since my earlier

post, I have learned that AdultLPs is indeed invitation-only, in the sense

that the moderators get to approve who's a member and who isn't. On that

basis, I would now have to agree that Jim should not have posted something

he learned on the adult list.

Dan

On 4/7/06 7:25 PM, " Bill Bradford " <tslug1@...> wrote:

> Dan,

> Jim's error was in cross-posting a message from the Adult LPs list to this

> one, regardless if it was PG-14 or not; and regardless if it was truthful or

> not. I thought we were in agreement about the prohibition of this kind of

> activity when we were moderators.

>

> Adult LPs was created for exact type of posts that Whims posted. This list

> was NOT.

>

> It's a good thing you and I aren't both still moderators. We'd be fighting

> over whether or not to place Jim on moderation. ;-)

> (Personally, I'm glad it's not my problem, and I can FLAME away. If Whims

> doesn't throw gas on the fire, Fred and I will...LOL)

>

> -Bill

>

>

> On 4/7/06, Dan Kennedy <dkennedy@...> wrote:

>>

>> Bill --

>>

>> I've been staying out of this until now. So far, the lack of support for

>> Jim's position suggests that perhaps this won't blow up into that big a

>> controversy.

>>

>> Like other posters, I disagree with Jim's belief that Whim's outside

>> activities somehow affect her ability to administer this list. But I do

>> want

>> to stand up for Jim on one minor aspect of this: he does not deserve to be

>> attacked for posting truthful information. He did not obtain it

>> surreptitiously.

>>

>> You're right that this list and the AdultLPs list are private, in a sense,

>> but this list isn't invitation-only, and I don't believe the adult list is

>> either. Posts are freely available to be read by anyone. It's not like Jim

>> raided Whims's mailbox.

>>

>> I also thought Whims was out of line to tell Jim he was violating the

>> PG-14

>> sensibility of the Dwarfism List. Since when is a non-explicit, non-sexual

>> reference to S & M something that 14-year-olds can't know anything about? I

>> think she was just trying to shut him .

>>

>> It looks like this flame-war-in-the-making is already about to fizzle out.

>> Great! I urge Whims to stop pouring gas on the glowing embers.

>>

>> Dan Kennedy

>>

>> On 4/7/06 12:13 AM, " Bill Bradford " <tslug1@...> wrote:

>>

>>> Jim,

>>> As a former moderator, and a future (potential) minister, I can tell you

>>> your actions are completely beyond the bounds of ethical or moral

>> behavior.

>>> Nowhere, in any post, nor in the administration of THIS list, did Whims

>>> indicate: 1) her sexual preference, 2) her sexual hobbies, 3) an

>> invitation

>>> to anyone to participate in any aspect of her private life, 4) offer an

>>> opinion or judgement (i.e. a " moral " prescription) to anyone on this

>> list,

>>> or 5) place anyone on moderation for any " moral' turpitude based on her

>> own,

>>> private a personal lifestyle.

>>> Her ONLY job, as moderator of THIS list, is to enforce the rules of this

>>> list that were written long before you joined (and, I might add, by

>> joining

>>> you consented to). So far, she has done an excellent job in the

>> execution

>>> her duties.

>>>

>>> If your post is supposed to represent a Christian perspective (which I

>>> suspect it does), then I think you need take a course on biblical

>> exegesis.

>>> So much of the modern church, and its doctrines are built upon a dogma

>> of

>>> biblical misinterpretation and passages taken out of context. But one

>>> passage that is never misinterpreted nor taken out of context is from 1

>>> , Chapter 4: " Dear friends, if God so loved us, then we also ought

>> to

>>> love one another. "

>>>

>>> And one other thing: this list, the Adult LPs list, and any list Whims

>>> wishes to create on , are private, invitation-only lists. If you

>> don't

>>> like the content or the moderators, feel free to unsubscribe.

>>>

>>> -Bill

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> On 4/6/06, Jim <jimcofpa@...> wrote:

>>>>

>>>> Chas

>>>> The main reason I brought it to this list attention was she is the

>>>> co-owner of this list and is responsible for the morality and

>>>> behavior of this list.

[Guest guest]

Best way to end all this?

Join the Dwarf adults list.

Say whatever you want.

No Invites.

No Screening.

No Flaming.

Anything Goes up. And very little fighting.

Almost 300 members

On Apr 7, 2006, at 7:51 PM, Dan Kennedy wrote:

> Bill --

>

> Since we're now allowed five posts a day, I'll respond. ;-) Since

> my earlier

> post, I have learned that AdultLPs is indeed invitation-only, in

> the sense

> that the moderators get to approve who's a member and who isn't. On

> that

> basis, I would now have to agree that Jim should not have posted

> something

> he learned on the adult list.

>

> Dan

[Guest guest]

I am only a professional mother and have no affiliation, but I would LOVE to

be able to read the information. Any chance of being accepted as a member

with a restriction to " read only " or " no posting " ?

On 5/18/06, oparker@... <oparker@...> wrote:

>

>

> I decided to create a new list to allow people within the industry have

> discussions without bias and confusion to others. I hope this will cut

> down

> on tensions within other groups and allow for the free flowing information

> without anyone feeling indifferent about posting. My intent is not to

> exclude anyone, but a more professional atmosphere by which people can

> feel

> free to discuss relative issues.

>

>

>

> The professional group of people within the (HBOT) hyperbaric field, or

> industry to discuss all relative issues surrounding HBOT. Forum To allow

> professionals to ask each other questions and provide each other support.

> The forum allows professionals only with affiliations to professional

> entities. All members must join and sign all postings with their

> respective

> affiliation. Such affiliations may be verified by the moderator.

>

>

>

> HBOTforP

>

> HBOTforP

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

I tried to join and was denied. What do you classify as

a " professional " ?

Thanks

[Guest guest]

Hi Steve,

I am not the moderator nor am I affiliated but I do believe that the

site is for MD's, technicians, registered nurses, and any other

hyperbaric medical professional....There is a group for caregivers

and parents to ask their questions.

Hope this helps,

best regards,

Sudylo RN / CHT

>

> I tried to join and was denied. What do you classify as

> a " professional " ?

> Thanks

>

[Guest guest]

I did not see your request yet Steve and I think you are the one who just

spoke With Elaine out at the safety course in Texas? Please try to join @

HBOTforP

[ ] Re: New group

Hi Steve,

I am not the moderator nor am I affiliated but I do believe that the

site is for MD's, technicians, registered nurses, and any other

hyperbaric medical professional....There is a group for caregivers

and parents to ask their questions.

Hope this helps,

best regards,

Sudylo RN / CHT

>

> I tried to join and was denied. What do you classify as

> a " professional " ?

> Thanks

>

" I know the plans I have for you, " declares the Lord, " plans to prosper you

and not to harm you, plans to give you a future and a hope. " [

29:11]

_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.

Join the International Hyperbaric Medical Association

http://www.hyperbaricmedicalassociation.org/docs/JOIN_Friends_Apr04.pdf

Is HBOT at your hospital?

http://apps.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/directories/index.cfm

EPSDT decisions http://healthlaw.org/pubs/200308.epsdtdocket.html

Unrestricted downloads of 50+ pdf files on HBOT efficacy

medicaid/files/ ,

2/files/ and

http://www.drneubauerhbo.com/papers.htm

Download your state EPSDT program

http://www.hcfa.gov/medicaid/stateplan/Map.asp by doing a search on the word

" ameliorate " . State Medicaid websites

http://www.medi-cal.ca.gov/RelSites_Oth_States.asp . Medicaid waiver

programs: http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/Villa/1029/medicaid.html

Find a hyperbaric clinic http://www.netnet.net/mums/hbolistAK-FL.htm,

http://www.netnet.net/mums/hbolistGA-NC.htm,

http://www.netnet.net/mums/hbolistOH-WI.htm

HBOT can save billions of dollars and millions of heartaches. Subscribe to

by sending a blank email to

mailto:medicaid-subscribe

[Guest guest]

I tried to join and was denied. What do you classify as

a " professional " ?

Thanks

[Guest guest]

" Troublemakers " ?

[ ] New Group

If anyone is interested, there is a new group called Alternatives for

Chronic Diseases. Troublemakers will be banned. The purpose of this

group is to teach others about alternative therapies while learning

about different therapies ourselves. Thank-you!

altchronicdx/<http://health.groups..co\

m/group/altchronicdx/>

[Guest guest]

I just started a new group (I think) called The Long Distance Grandmother, for

those of use whose grandchildren live away. Please feel free to join if you can

contribute and would like to share.

[Guest guest]

ops...you did give the address but it wasn't as a "click on"...sorry about that...i am technically challenged..as are many of us on this list...lolFrom: "jb50192@..." <jb50192@...> Sent: Tue, August 31, 2010 2:12:16 PMSubject: Fwd: New

Group Reply-to: To: Sent: 8/31/2010 2:10:00 P.M. Eastern Daylight TimeSubj: Re: New Group Send an e-mail to LIGHT-subscribe