Guest guest Posted December 31, 2003 Report Share Posted December 31, 2003 Actually the reverse, Dan…Type O is also known as the “universal donor”, since a Type O donor can donate to any type. A Type O recipient can only accept a Type O donor. The policy modification is an attempt to level the playing field for Type O recipients. The rub, of course, continues to be that the MELD/PELD system is inherently biased against some liver diseases, one of which is PSC. Steve Rahn L Tx 9/6 & 9/8 '85. (Wash. U-STL) (re) Born on the 4th of July, 2003 (U of Iowa) www.presumedconsent.org " Face the Worst, Expect the Best, Do the Most, Forget the Rest " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2003 Report Share Posted December 31, 2003 Dan, I was uncertain who benefited until I reviewed the current Policy 3.6.2.1, which states " or B patients with a MELD or PELD score greater than or equal to 20. " The increase from 20 to 30 further restricts livers from blood type O donors being used for non-O patients. Therefore there will be more type O livers available for transplantation into type O patients (a good thing for type O patients as Steve said). Tim R > This was said: > > " The Board approved modifications to Policy 3.6.2.1 > (Allocation of Blood Type O Donors) stating that, with > the exception of Status 1 patients, blood type O > donors may only be allocated to blood type O patients, > or B patients with a MELD or PELD score greater than > or equal to 30. " > > Im I right in thinking that for a PSC patient with > type O blood that this is not a good change? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.