2nd article - Smallpox outbreak: What to do - by Sherri Tenpenny DO

[Guest guest]

This is the SECOND article, the one after the one just posted. It is

better, i think, in terms of info. The article on the public forum was from

June 7 in St Louis. The one below was completed July 7, after the CDC

meeting in Atlanta.

Everyone has permission to repost, just have my name and contact

information with the article, please! (www.nmaseminars.com). You can also

find this on www.mercola.com

Sherri

----------------------------------------

Smallpox outbreak: What to do

July 7, 2002

by Sherri Tenpenny, DO

www.nmaseminars.com

© 2002

" We interrupt the current programming to bring you this important news

update…there has been a reported case of smallpox in Washington, D.C… "

What will happen next? Pandemonium. The press has done its job over the

last few months reinforcing the belief that an epidemic is about to occur,

potentially causing millions of deaths. Americans thousands of miles from

Washington will demand the smallpox vaccine, a vaccine with the highest

risk of complications of any vaccine ever manufactured and with a dubious

track record for success.

However, because you are informed, you will have a different response. You

will not panic. You will turn off the TV. You won't listen to your

hysterical neighbors. And more importantly, you won't rush to be

vaccinated. Here's why:

On June 20, 2002, I attended the Center for Disease Control's (CDC) meeting

of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices (ACIP) and listened to

one and a half days of testimony prior to posting the recommendations for

smallpox vaccination that are currently being considered by the CDC and the

Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS.) Many testimonies and

comments were presented by public participants and by various physicians

and researchers associated with the CDC. Noting that two weeks have past

since the June 20th meeting and the media has still not reported on this

historic event, I decided it was imperative to report the content and

outcome of this meeting to the general public. After reading this report

you will gain a new perspective on smallpox and, hopefully, in the event of

an outbreak, you will understand that you have nothing to fear.

Generally accepted facts

Nearly every article or news headliner regarding smallpox is designed to

instill and continually reinforce fear in the minds of the general public.

Apparently the goal is to make everyone demand the vaccine as soon as it is

available and/or in the event of an outbreak. A very similar media campaign

was developed prior to the release of the Salk polio vaccine in 1955. The

polio vaccine had been in development for more than a year prior to its

release and was an untested " investigational new drug, " just as the

smallpox vaccine will be. The difference is that the potential side effects

and complications of the smallpox vaccine are already known, and they are

extensive.

Generally accepted facts about smallpox include:

1. Smallpox is highly contagious and could spread rapidly, killing millions

2. Smallpox can be spread by casual contact with an infected person

3. The death rate from smallpox is thought to be 30%.

4. There is no treatment for smallpox

5. The smallpox vaccine will protect a person from getting the disease

As it turns out, these " accepted facts " are not the " real facts. "

Myth 1: Smallpox is highly contagious

" Smallpox has a slow transmission and is not highly contagious, " stated

Kuritsky, MD, director of the National Immunization Program and Early

Smallpox Response and Planning at the CDC. This statement is a direct

contradiction to nearly everything we have ever heard or read about

smallpox. However, keep in mind that this comes " straight from the horse's

mouth " and should be considered the " real story " regarding how smallpox is

spread.

Even if a person is exposed to a known bioterrorist attack with smallpox,

it doesn't mean that he will contract smallpox. The signs and symptoms of

the disease will not occur immediately, and there is time to plan. The

infection has an incubation period of 3 to 17 days, and the first symptom

will be the development of a high fever (>101º F), accompanied by nausea,

vomiting, headache, severe abdominal cramping and low back pain. The person

will be ill and most likely bed-ridden; not out mixing with the general

public.

Even with a fever, it is critically important to realize that at this point

the person is still not contagious. In fact, the fever may be caused by

something else, such as the flu.

However, if a smallpox infection is developing, the characteristic rash

will begin to develop within two to four days after the onset of the fever.

The person becomes contagious and has the ability to spread the infection

only after the development of the rash. " The characteristic rash of

variola major is difficult to misdiagnose, " stated Walter A. Orenstein,

M.D., Director of the National Immunization Program (NIP) at the CDC. The

classic smallpox rash is a round, firm pustule that can spread and become

confluent. The lesions are all in the same stage of development over the

entire body and appear to be distributed more on the palms, soles and face

than on the trunk or extremities.

ACTION ITEM: In the event of an exposure, it is imperative that you do

everything you can to improve the functioning of your immune system so that

an " exposure " does not have to result in an " outbreak. "

a. Stop eating all foods that contain refined white sugar products, since

sugar inhibits the functioning of your white blood cells, your first line

of defense.

(There are many other health-conscious dietary considerations to consider,

but that is beyond the scope of this article.)

b. Start taking large doses of Vitamin C. Vitamin C has been proven in

hundreds of studies to be effective in protecting the body from viral

infections, including smallpox. For an extensive scientific review on

the use of this nutrient and a " dosing recipe " , read " Vitamin C, The Master

Nutrient, by Goodman, Ph.D.

http://www.positivehealth.com/permit/Articles/Nutrition/vitcpre.htm

c. If you develop a fever, you still have time to plan. Purchase enough

fresh, organic produce and filtered water to last three weeks. Move the

kids to grandma's or the neighbor's house. Remember: YOU MAY NOT GET THE

INFECTION AND YOU ARE NOT CONTAGIOUS UNTIL YOU GET THE RASH!

Myth 2: Smallpox is easily spread by casual contact with an infected person

Smallpox will not rapidly disseminate throughout the community. Even after

the development of the rash, the infection is slow to spread. " The

infection is spread by droplet contamination and coughing or sneezing are

not generally part of the infection. Smallpox will not spread like

wildfire, " said Orenstein. He stated that the spread of smallpox to casual

contacts is the " exception to the rule. " Only 8% of cases in Africa were

contracted by accidental contact.

Transmission of smallpox occurs only after intense contact, defined as

" constant exposure of a person that is within 6-7 feet for a minimum of 6-7

days. " Dr. Orenstein reported that in Africa, 92% of all cases came from

close associations and in India, all cases came from prolonged personal

contact. Dr. Tom Mack from the University of Southern California stated

that in Pakistan, 27% of cases demonstrated no transmission to close

associates. Nearly 37% had a transmission of only one generation, meaning

that the second person to contract smallpox did not pass it onto the third

person. These statistics directly contradict models that predict an

exponential spread to millions.

Even without medical care, isolation was the best way to stop the spread of

smallpox in Third World, population dense areas. With a slow transmission

rate and an informed public, Mack estimated that the total number of

smallpox cases in America would be less than 10, a far cry from the

millions postulated by the press.

Dr. Kuritsky said at the CDC Public Forum on Smallpox on June 8 in St.

Louis, " Given the slow transmission rate and that people need to be in

close contact for nearly a week to spread the infection, the scenario in

which a terrorist could infect himself with smallpox and contaminate an

entire city by walking through the streets touching people is purely fiction. "

Point to ponder: Mass vaccination was halted in Third World countries

because it didn't work. In India, villages with an 88% vaccination rate

still had outbreaks. After the World Health Organization began a

surveillance and containment campaign, actively seeking cases of smallpox,

isolating them in their homes, and vaccinating family members and close

contacts, outbreaks were virtually eliminated within 2 years. The CDC and

the WHO organization attribute the eradication of smallpox to the ring

vaccination of close contacts. However, since the infection runs its course

in 3-6 weeks, perhaps ISOLATION ALONE would have effectively accomplished

the same thing.

Myth #3: The death rate from smallpox is 30%

Nearly every newspaper and journal article quotes this statistic. However,

as pointed out in the presentation by Dr. Tom Mack, it appears that the

" 30% fatality rate " has come from skewed data. Dr. Mack has worked with

smallpox extensively and saw more than 120 outbreaks in Pakistan throughout

the early 1970s. Villages would apparently have " an importation " every 5-10

years, regardless of vaccination status, and the outbreak could always be

predicated by living conditions and social arrangements. There were many

small outbreaks and individual cases that never came to the attention of

the local authorities.

Mack stated that even with poor medical care, the case fatality rate in

adults was " much lower than is generally advertised " and thought to be

10-15%. He said that the statistics were " loaded with children that had a

much higher fatality, " making the average death rate reported to be much

higher. Amazingly, he revealed his opinion that even without mass

vaccination, " smallpox would have died out anyway. It just would have taken

longer. "

Even so, people died. Why? After all, smallpox is a skin disease and " other

organs are seldom involved. " I posed this question to the committee on

two separate occasions. Kathi of the National Vaccine Information

Center asked this question at the Institute of Medicine meeting on June

15th. On June 20, an answer was finally forthcoming when a member of the

ACIP committee said, " That is a good question. Does anyone know the actual

cause of death from smallpox? "

At that point, Dr. D.A. , from the Hopkins University

Department of Epidemiology volunteered a comment. Dr. directed

the World Health Organization's global smallpox eradication campaign

(1966-1977) and helped initiate WHO's global program of immunization in

1974. He approached the microphone and stated, " Well, it appears that the

cause of death of smallpox is a 'mystery.' " He stated that a medical

resident had been asked to do a complete review of the literature and " not

much information " was found. It is postulated that the people died from a

" generalized toxemia " and that those with the most severe forms of

smallpox-the hemorrhagic or confluent malignant types-died of complications

of skin sloughing, similar to a burn. However, he concluded by saying,

" it's frustrating, because we don't really know. "

COMMENT: I find this to be extremely frightening. If we knew why people

died when they contracted smallpox, perhaps current medical technology

could treat the complications, making the death rate much lower.

Considering that the last known case of smallpox in the U.S. was in Texas

in 1949, continuing to report that smallpox has a 30% death rate is similar

to saying that all heart attacks are fatal. Based on 1949 technology, that

would be accurate reporting. But in 2002, all heart attacks are NOT fatal.

Neither would smallpox have a mortality rate of 30%.

Myth #4: There is no treatment for smallpox

A more accurate statement is " there are no pharmaceutical drugs for the

treatment for smallpox. " But they are working on that too. There are 274

antiviral drug compounds and testing is underway to see if one can be

useful in the treatment of smallpox. One such drug is called

hexadecylosypropyl-cidofovir (HDP-CDV). Not yet available for human use,

it has been found to be 100 times more potent than its cousin, cidofovir, a

drug used to treat retinal infections in HIV patients. If studies pan out,

HDP-CDV will be offered in a pill or capsule form over 5-14 days for the

prevention and treatment of people exposed to smallpox. Unfortunately,

this drug is being developed in Europe and will most likely be kept out of

the US market until long after the general public has been subjected to

mass vaccination.

It is important to note that there are several different presentations of a

smallpox infection. The most common is called " ordinary discrete " smallpox,

occurring in more than 40% of the cases. The outbreak is seen as a small

scattering of pustules distributed across the body. The person with this

type of smallpox needs minimal medical care and the reported death rate is

<10%.

For mild cases of smallpox, adequate hydration and anti-fever products are

essential for comfort and maintaining a temperature below 102ºF. Keeping

the skin clean to prevent secondary bacterial infections is also important.

A 1927 Textbook of Medicine recommends applying gauzed soaked in carbolic

acid to " decrease itching and prevent extensive scarring. " Carbolic acid

is used acutely for burns that tend to ulcerate and other skin conditions

that cause burning or prickling pain. Homeopathic forms of carbolic acid

are also available.

For the severe complications of smallpox, modern day treatment options are

available. The hemorrhagic type of smallpox, occurring in approximately 3%

of cases, presents as hypotensive shock and can be treated accordingly. In

another 3% of serious cases, the confluent-type has extensive skin

involvement. These patients can be treated the same as a burn patient. All

severe cases need to be treated for dehydration and watched for signs of

bacterial suprainfection.

Research done by Dr. Havens, MS, MD from the Medical College of

Wisconsin postulated that death from smallpox was due to multisystem organ

failure, a complication of an untreated acute cytokine (inflammatory)

response. Massive oxidative stress occurs, leading to free-radical damage

in the kidneys and other internal organs. However, Dr. Havens estimates

that modern medical technology would indeed decrease the death rate, to

possibly as low as 2-3%.

COMMENT: The treatment of choice for severe free-radical stress is high

dose intravenous Vitamin C. If conventional medicine would recognize the

value of this treatment, they would also be forced to realize mass

vaccination is simply not necessary.

Treating severely ill patients would require hospitalization and

unfortunately, smallpox spreads the most quickly in the hospital setting

due to poor isolation techniques. In addition, most patients in hospitals

are ill and immunosuppressed by disease or medication, making them more

susceptible to infection. Dr. Mike Lane, former director of the CDC's

smallpox eradication program in the 1970s, said severely ill smallpox

patients could be treated in a suburban motel or remote government

building. " You can bring care to the patient if you elect to use the Motel

6 on the edge of town " rather than put smallpox victims in a hospital where

the disease could spread to patients with weakened immune systems.

Side bar with Dr. Mike Lane:

Dr. Lane and I had a private conversation during a coffee break. During his

presentation, he had been adamant that those within the " first ring " would

need to be mandatorily vaccinated with 100% compliance. The " first ring "

includes those that have had immediate, close contact with patients who had

confirmed cases of smallpox. Lane stated that this was the only way that

" ring vaccination would work. " When I questioned his definition of 100%

compliance, he said, " Medical contraindications would not apply…there

would be NO exceptions. I would rather vaccinate them and take my chances

treating the potential complications. In India, we vaccinated everyone. The

only medical contraindication was leprosy, and we sometimes vaccinated

them. I'm sure that we killed a few people, but we did the best that we

could. "

I pressed the issue further by saying, " if the death rate really is 30%

(which I doubt), doesn't that mean the survival rate is 70%? Shouldn't that

person have the right to play the odds with his health if he chose to? " His

answer was the same: " If the person is exposed, there will be NO

exceptions, medical or otherwise. Those people in the first ring-regardless

of health status MUST be vaccinated. "

That means that all people with medical contraindictions-organ transplants,

cancer, HIV, eczema and other skin conditions-would be vaccinated, even it

was against their will and with the use of force, if necessary. He was

quite the zealot about it; hopefully, in the event of a smallpox exposure,

more reasonable minds will prevail.

Myth #5: The vaccine will keep me from getting the infection

Most people believe that all vaccines work to protect them, meaning that

the vaccine will be clinically effective. What most people do not know is

that vaccines have never been proven to protect them from getting the

infection.

This little known fact is not only true for all vaccines, it is also true

for the smallpox vaccine. Here are a few examples:

Chickenpox vaccine:

" No data exists regarding post-exposure efficacy of the current varicella

vaccine. "

" Vaccinated persons have a less severe out break than unvaccinated "

(300 vs. 50 lesions.)

Pertussis vaccine:

" The findings of efficacy studies have not demonstrated a direct

correlation between antibody response and protection against pertussis

disease. "

Smallpox vaccine:

" Neutralizing antibodies are reported to reflect levels of protection,

although this has not been validated in the field. "

Dr. Harold Margolis, Senior Advisor to the Director for Smallpox Planning

and Response, stated in Atlanta that " the vaccine decreased the death rate

among those vaccinated by 'modifying the disease', not by preventing

infection. "

TAKE HOME POINTS:

1. Smallpox is NOT highly contagious. You have time. Don't panic.

2. Smallpox is only spread by close contact of less than 6 feet for at

least 6-7 days. You aren't that close to coworkers or commuters.

3. Treatment for smallpox should be surveillance and containment, without

vaccination.

4. Smallpox is not highly fatal. There are treatments for smallpox.

5. The vaccine will not protect you from getting the infection. The vaccine

has high complication rates, is an experimental drug and there are many

contraindications. (Please see article at

http://www.mercola.com/2002/jun/12/smallpox_update.htm )

Addendum:

As I was completing this report this morning, I read in the New York Times

that the CDC plans to increase the number of " first responders " who receive

the vaccination to 500,000 from the agreed-to 15,000. Preparations are

also underway for rapid mass vaccination of the general public. The more

extensive vaccination plan is possible because supplies are increasing. As

I have stated before, the government spent more than $780 million to

develop its arsenal. Now that we have it, we will use it.

In addition to medical first responders, a presentation at the June 20th

meeting suggested that first responders should also include a class to be

defined as " economic first responders, " those who would be necessary in

keeping the economy moving in the event of a nationwide " lock down " caused

by an outbreak. This group would include pilots, truck drivers, food

handlers, etc. It is the " etc. " that is of concern. Where do you draw the

line? Obviously, the line will be drawn after Tommy 's vision of a

" vaccine for every man, woman and child " has been fulfilled.

One of the major problems is the lack of vaccinia immune globulin (VIG),

the " antidote " that is needed for those who experience a severe reaction to

the vaccine. The Times article reports that there are only 700 doses

currently available. Dr. Tom Mack, among others at the CDC warned that, " in

the absence of VIG, extensive vaccination would be extremely dangerous. "

With the continued rhetoric about the US plans to go to war with Iraq, we

are essentially taunting Saddam into launching a biological weapons attack

on our own people. We are not given an exact knowledge as to Saddam's

capability but are given euphemisms such as " reasonably high " or " quite

high. " But we don't know for sure. And if the government knows, it is not

telling. And if Saddam does have biological smallpox, what is the chance he

has other weapons of biological destruction, those for which we do not have

a vaccine?

We are developing " grounds " for a war with Iraq in spite of the rest of the

world telling us to stay out of there. I encourage all to spend some time

on this site: www.globalpolicy.org for some eye-opening information on

policy that you won't see in the popular press.

We are setting the stage for a health disaster unlike anything we have seen

before in America, and it will be our own doing. World health records

(England, Germany, Italy, the Philippines, British India, etc.) document

that devastating epidemics followed mass vaccination. The worst smallpox

disaster occurred in the Philippines after a 10 year compulsory US program

administered 25 million vaccinations to its population of 10 million

resulting in 170,000 cases and more than 75,000 deaths from 'smallpox', in

a country having only scattered cases in rural villages prior to the

onslaught of vaccines.

I received an excellent bulletin from Larken Rose

(www.Theft-By-Deception.com) who is an activist regarding taxes. So much of

what he said applies to the vaccine movement, that I got his permission to

include part of his letter here. It is time to STAND AGAINST forced

vaccination. Stop the hysteria! Information is power. However, after

gaining power, you must ACT.

Here is something to inspire you:

More than 200 years ago, the people of this country chose to tell King

, not just that he was unreasonable, not just that they didn't like

him, not just that they had complaints about him, but that they were going

to RESIST BY FORCE his tyrannical ways. The Declaration was not a threat

to take King to court; it was not a petition, or a request for

fairness, or even a demand. It was a STATEMENT-a DECLARATION-that the

people of America REFUSED TO TOLERATE the oppression, and were going to

openly resist it, and didn't give a damn what the King thought about it.

Though it may be politically incorrect to describe it this way, the

Declaration of Independence was a bunch of people openly stating that they

were going to IGNORE the law (not debate it or litigate it), and OVERTHROW

their present government. (King was not a foreign invader; he was

" the government. " ) Again, in the words of the Declaration, " when a long

train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object,

evidences a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is the

people's right, it is their duty, to throw off such government. "

Where are the Americans who still have that attitude?

There are a few (very few), and most people consider them to be " fringe

extremists. " Where do YOU draw the line? What injustice would government

agents have to commit, before YOU would openly resist? Is there a line for

you? Or would you complain and bicker all the way to absolute tyranny?

" Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will.

Find out just what people will submit to, and you have found out the exact

amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them, and these

will continue till they have resisted with either words or blows, or with

both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom

they suppress. "

- Frederick

-

This is a very different country today from what it was 226 years ago. We

have become a country of sheep. We occasionally " baaa " at government

injustice, but we do not ACT. For the most part, our " rebelliousness " now

consists of pushing buttons in voting booths, to hopefully elect the less

scummy of two lying scumbags (after a debate about which one is scummier).

For most people that is the extent of their resistance to

government-imposed injustice. Each of us cowers in a corner for fear that

we will be the next one that government makes an " example " of. While

self-preservation is no sin, at some point a country of " self-preservers "

will " preserve " itself into total submission to tyrants.

We are just steps away from that now.

Once upon a time, a group of individuals declared to the world that they

would fight and risk death, rather than tolerate the oppressions of an

abusive government. Now, we are too comfortable for that. We are spoiled.

We are cowards. For today's battle, we need only the smallest fraction of

the courage our forefathers demonstrated.

We do not need to lie in the mud, squinting in the cold to see the rifle

sites, waiting for the glimpse of British Troops that we know are headed

our way just over the next ridge. We do not need to run into the open

field, in heavy enemy fire, to retrieve our buddy who just had his leg

blown off by a cannonball.We do not need to leave our families and friends

to fight, and possibly to die. No, today the price for our freedom (at

least a huge chunk of it) is a pittance compared to what others have paid,

but I have my doubts about whether we are willing to pay even that. What

is that price? What do we need to do?

We need to just say NO by affirming the following:

I will avoid fear.

I will seek alternatives to the forced medical experimentation.

I will avoid being injected with an experimental new drug based on a

" hunch " or based on something that happened hundreds or thousands of miles

from where I live.

I will resist the government's efforts to take away my right to do what I

believe is best for my body.

I will take personal responsibility for my heath and for the health of my

family.

I will keep my country because I will not let them take it away.

--------------------------------------------------------

Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK

$$ Donations to help in the work - accepted by Paypal account

vaccineinfo@... voicemail US 530-740-0561

(go to http://www.paypal.com) or by mail

Vaccines - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm

Homeopathy course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm

ANY INFO OBTAINED HERE NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE

DECISION TO VACCINATE IS YOURS AND YOURS ALONE.

Well Within's Earth Mysteries & Sacred Site Tours

http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin

International Tours, Homestudy Courses, ANTHRAX & OTHER Vaccine Dangers

Education, Homeopathic Education

CEU's for nurses, Books & Multi-Pure Water Filters

******

" Just look at us. Everything is backwards; everything is upside down.

Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy

knowledge, governments destroy freedom, the major media destroy information

and religions destroy spirituality " .... Ellner