Guest guest Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 Thanks Dave,I notice though that the dose was 17 to 23 mg/kg which might be why Dr. Chapman is advocating at least 30mg/kg.I think I might talk to Bill's Dr. to make sure that he is taking at least this much.Let's get that funding for research! We need it soon!Lee Dear All; The latest high-dose ursodeoxycholic acid study in PSC has just been submitted for publication in Gastroenterology. If you go to: http://journals.elsevierhealth.com/periodicals/ygast then click on "Articles in Press", look for the following article: Accepted August 10, 2005 High-dose ursodeoxycholic acid in primary sclerosing cholangitis. A five year multicenter randomised controlled study Rolf Olsson, Kirsten M. Boberg, Ove Schaffalitsky de Muckadell, Stefan Lindgren, Rolf Hultcrantz, Geir Folvik, Helge Bell, Magnhild Gangsøy-Kristiansen, Jon Matre, s Rydning, Ola Wikman, Ake sson, Hanna Sandberg-Gertzen, Kjell-Arne Ung, Anders sson, Lars Loof, Hanne Prytz, Hanns-Ulrich Marschall, Ulrika Broome The .pdf file of the article appears to be "free"! Unfortunately, the news is not so good. Here's the abstract [i hope I am not violating Gastroenterology's press embargo rule by posting this?]: _______________ Abstract: Background & Aims: There is no medical treatment of proved benefit in primary sclerosing cholangitis. The present study aimed at studying the effect of a higher dose of ursodeoxycholic acid than previously used on survival, symptoms, biochemistry and quality of life in this disease. Methods: A randomised placebo-controlled study performed in tertiary and secondary gastroenterology units. 219 patients were randomised to 17 to 23 mg /kg bw/day of ursodeoxycholic acid (n=110) or placebo (n=109) for 5 years. Follow-up data are available from 97 patients randomised to ursodeoxycholic acid and 101 randomised to placebo. Quality of life was assessed using SF-36. Results: The combined endpoint "death or liver transplantation" occurred in 7/97 (7.2%) patients in the ursodeoxycholic acid group vs. 11/101 (10.9%) patients in the placebo group (p=0.368, 95%-CI [- 12.2; 4.7%]). Occurrence of liver transplantation as a single endpoint showed a similar positive trend for ursodeoxycholic acid treatment (5/97 (5.2%) vs. 8/101 (7.9%), 95%-CI [-10.4; 4.6%]). Three ursodeoxycholic acid and 4 placebo patients died from cholangiocarcinoma, one placebo patient died from liver failure. ALP and ALT tended to decrease during the first 6 months. There were no differences between the two groups in symptoms, or quality of life. Analyses of serum ursodeoxycholic acid concentration gave no evidence that non-compliance may have influenced the results. Conclusions: The present study found no statistically significant beneficial effect of a higher dose of ursodeoxycholic acid than previously used, on survival or prevention of cholangiocarcionoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis. _______________ Sorry to be the bearer of this not so good news. I have been pinning some of my hopes on high-dose ursodiol. Best regards to all; Dave (father of (20); PSC 07/03; UC 08/03) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 NICE TIMING! We go today to discuss with our doctor. From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 9:30 AM To: Subject: Latest high-dose urosdeoxycholic acid study in PSC Dear All; The latest high-dose ursodeoxycholic acid study in PSC has just been submitted for publication in Gastroenterology. If you go to: http://journals.elsevierhealth.com/periodicals/ygast then click on " Articles in Press " , look for the following article: Accepted August 10, 2005 High-dose ursodeoxycholic acid in primary sclerosing cholangitis. A five year multicenter randomised controlled study Rolf Olsson, Kirsten M. Boberg, Ove Schaffalitsky de Muckadell, Stefan Lindgren, Rolf Hultcrantz, Geir Folvik, Helge Bell, Magnhild Gangsøy-Kristiansen, Jon Matre, s Rydning, Ola Wikman, Ake sson, Hanna Sandberg-Gertzen, Kjell-Arne Ung, Anders sson, Lars Loof, Hanne Prytz, Hanns-Ulrich Marschall, Ulrika Broome The .pdf file of the article appears to be " free " ! Unfortunately, the news is not so good. Here's the abstract [i hope I am not violating Gastroenterology's press embargo rule by posting this?]: _______________ Abstract: Background & Aims: There is no medical treatment of proved benefit in primary sclerosing cholangitis. The present study aimed at studying the effect of a higher dose of ursodeoxycholic acid than previously used on survival, symptoms, biochemistry and quality of life in this disease. Methods: A randomised placebo-controlled study performed in tertiary and secondary gastroenterology units. 219 patients were randomised to 17 to 23 mg /kg bw/day of ursodeoxycholic acid (n=110) or placebo (n=109) for 5 years. Follow-up data are available from 97 patients randomised to ursodeoxycholic acid and 101 randomised to placebo. Quality of life was assessed using SF-36. Results: The combined endpoint " death or liver transplantation " occurred in 7/97 (7.2%) patients in the ursodeoxycholic acid group vs. 11/101 (10.9%) patients in the placebo group (p=0.368, 95%-CI [- 12.2; 4.7%]). Occurrence of liver transplantation as a single endpoint showed a similar positive trend for ursodeoxycholic acid treatment (5/97 (5.2%) vs. 8/101 (7.9%), 95%-CI [-10.4; 4.6%]). Three ursodeoxycholic acid and 4 placebo patients died from cholangiocarcinoma, one placebo patient died from liver failure. ALP and ALT tended to decrease during the first 6 months. There were no differences between the two groups in symptoms, or quality of life. Analyses of serum ursodeoxycholic acid concentration gave no evidence that non-compliance may have influenced the results. Conclusions: The present study found no statistically significant beneficial effect of a higher dose of ursodeoxycholic acid than previously used, on survival or prevention of cholangiocarcionoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis. _______________ Sorry to be the bearer of this not so good news. I have been pinning some of my hopes on high-dose ursodiol. Best regards to all; Dave (father of (20); PSC 07/03; UC 08/03) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 Dave, More reason to give them heck down at NIH. I hope the Mayo study some of us are on will prove different. I am at approx. 28mg/kg based on my 150lbs to 2000mgs of Urso. Omaha Tim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 Hi Tim; Yes, let's hope that the U.S. and U.K. studies will prove different! I will try to ask as many questions as possible at the NIH conference, and hope to be able to write up the highlights in a future newsletter? Best regards, Dave (father of (20); PSC 07/03; UC 08/03) > Dave, > > More reason to give them heck down at NIH. I hope the Mayo study some of us are on will prove different. I am at approx. 28mg/kg based on my 150lbs to 2000mgs of Urso. > > Omaha Tim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.