Guest guest Posted December 31, 2004 Report Share Posted December 31, 2004 Barb, I hope you'll just take this as just my 2 cents, but I'm shocked that the doctor wants to see fewer labs from Ken given that he's had the recent bruising you mentioned. I understand what you mean about wanting to have some time off from the disease, but the longest I've ever had between blood draws since diagnosis is three months. (I do cancer screenings ever three months regardless of the frequency of my other labs). It has usually varied between six weeks and a month. Yes, my veins are quite scarred, but I want to relate to you that my enzymes do change significantly between blood draws - sometimes, it is only a month and we see a big difference. Having the blood draws frequently helps the doctors know if I'm trending this way or that way. Even before I was listed, we drew my blood frequently to determine when I should be listed. Here are a couple of examples from my labs to show you just how much my numbers have changed quickly: In 04/03 my bilirubin was just 4.2 - by June, it was 13.1. That's quite a jump in not a lot of time. (My other numbers similarly elevated at the same time.) This necessitated the last-ditch attempt ERCP in later June. This is just one example. Post-baby, I went from a bilirubin of 4 something pre-delivery to 15 something (don't have the records on me) in six weeks. Granted, Ken's not having any babies, but I question what this doctor is telling you in general about numbers not changing quickly. For me, this disease turns on a dime. Just another perspective to share. I hope you and Ken are both well at the start of this New Year! Happy Holiday! Deb in VA PSC 1998, UC 1999, Listed Ltx 2001, MELD 17 (blood draw yesterday - expecting it to go higher) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2004 Report Share Posted December 31, 2004 OOPS - That was 04/04, not 04/03 - sorry! Guess my thinking isn't too clear today...Deb > > Barb, > I hope you'll just take this as just my 2 cents, but I'm shocked that > the doctor wants to see fewer labs from Ken given that he's had the > recent bruising you mentioned. I understand what you mean about > wanting to have some time off from the disease, but the longest I've > ever had between blood draws since diagnosis is three months. (I do > cancer screenings ever three months regardless of the frequency of my > other labs). It has usually varied between six weeks and a month. > Yes, my veins are quite scarred, but I want to relate to you that my > enzymes do change significantly between blood draws - sometimes, it > is only a month and we see a big difference. Having the blood draws > frequently helps the doctors know if I'm trending this way or that > way. Even before I was listed, we drew my blood frequently to > determine when I should be listed. > > Here are a couple of examples from my labs to show you just how much > my numbers have changed quickly: > > In 04/03 my bilirubin was just 4.2 - by June, it was 13.1. That's > quite a jump in not a lot of time. (My other numbers similarly > elevated at the same time.) This necessitated the last-ditch attempt > ERCP in later June. This is just one example. Post-baby, I went from > a bilirubin of 4 something pre-delivery to 15 something (don't have > the records on me) in six weeks. Granted, Ken's not having any > babies, but I question what this doctor is telling you in general > about numbers not changing quickly. For me, this disease turns on a > dime. > > Just another perspective to share. I hope you and Ken are both well > at the start of this New Year! > > Happy Holiday! > Deb in VA > PSC 1998, UC 1999, Listed Ltx 2001, MELD 17 (blood draw yesterday - > expecting it to go higher) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2004 Report Share Posted December 31, 2004 Don’t worry Deb, I am a firm believer in debate, how else do folks learn if not though give & take on ideas & thoughts, plus this disease differs so from person to person it’s a “good thing” for everyone to talk about what works (or doesn’t work) for them. I was talking about other people in the early stages of PSC. But, even Ken at Stage 4 gave blood every 3 months for years & it was totally unnecessary - early on - because he was stable. Now it’s a different thing altogether & he’ll go back to 3 months or more often as needed. I am very disappointed Ken’s doctor didn’t order a PT & INR when he did the LFT’s. Baylor uses both the CTP & MELD and with Ken’s edema & albumin score if he had had those numbers he might have had a chance to be listed or at the very least a 1 time score to build on, but without the PT & INR we’re stuck waiting – again! Ken’s MELD has been at a 10 or above since 2002. UGH……I “think” it’s because Baylor has so many people already listed for livers they don’t want to add to their list until absolutely necessary. So we wait….. Barb in Texas - Son Ken (30) UC 91 & PSC 99 -----Original Message----- From: Deb hope you'll just take this as just my 2 cents, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.