Guest guest Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 From a General Surgery standpoint when someone has elevated Alk Phos associated w/ abdominal pain we look for gallstone/gallbladder/common bile duct (i.e. biliary) disease (i.e.inflammation) such as: 1) cholelithiasis (asymptomatic gallstones) 2) biliary colic (pain from gallstones) 3) cholecystitis (infection/inflammation of the gallbladder) 4) choledocholithiasis (stones in the Common Bile Duct) and finally 5) ascending cholangitis (infection of the Common Bile Duct). 6) tumors Normal levels are around <125-150 depending on your lab and they do have to be interpreted with the other LFT's. After we've ruled out a surgical problem usually using ultrasound and CAT-scan we get GI involved to look into cholestasis i.e hepatitis, PSC, PBC etc. The usual extra-biliary source of Alk Phos is bone i.e. bony metastasis from prostate cancer. I agree with the Fibrates seem promising in the near-future. I wonder if (HOPE) there are as of yet any Clinical trials using fibrates for PSC? If so sign me up! -Stefan " Knowledge is Power " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 Dear Stef; Thanks very much for your valuable medical clarifications on alkaline phosphatase and GGT! Most of the clinical trials on fibrates and PBC and PSC seem to be in Japan, and most of the work seems to have been done on PBC rather than PSC (see for example): Hepatol Res. 2004 Aug;29(4):216-222. Prospective randomized crossover trial of combination therapy with bezafibrate and UDCA for primary biliary cirrhosis. Itakura J, Izumi N, Nishimura Y, Inoue K, Ueda K, Nakanishi H, Tsuchiya K, Hamano K, Asahina Y, Kurosaki M, Uchihara M, Miyake S. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, 1-26-1 Kyonan-cho, Musashino City, Tokyo 180-8610, Japan. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the combination therapy with bezafibrate and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), compared to UDCA monotherapy. Sixteen patients with compensated PBC were divided randomly into two groups. Group A received treatment with bezafibrate and UDCA for 6 months, while group B received UDCA alone, treatment protocols were then exchanged for another 6 months. The laboratory data was followed every month. The mean levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) decreased significantly more in group A than in group B in the first half of the study. Then serum ALP levels were elevated in group A after exchanged the therapy, but fell down in group B. Serum levels of gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), immunoglobulin M and triglycerides values were significantly lower in group B than in group A, after changing therapies from monotherapy to combination therapy with bezafibrate and UDCA. The mean levels of ALP, GGT and triglycerides were significantly lower at the end of the combination therapy than those at the end of the monotherapy. The combination therapy with bezafibrate and UDCA significantly improves the laboratory data that specific for PBC in comparison with UDCA monotherapy. PMID: 15288014. For additional references on fibrates see: http://www.psc-literature.org/fibrate.htm Best regards, Dave (father of (19); PSC 07/03; UC 08/03) > I agree with the Fibrates seem promising in the near-future. > I wonder if (HOPE) there are as of yet any Clinical trials using > fibrates for PSC? If so sign me up! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 , Wow I was thinking that given the relative lack of efficacy of Urso that combination therapy might show an effect in PSC too. . . . there must be someone is the USA looking into a clinical trial like this. Interesting that this came out of Japan. HCC is the #1 viceral (GI) cancer in the world, while colon cancer is #1 in the USA. The difference is that in the far east and 3rd world countries there is a much higher incidence of hepatitides ==> HCC. Relative to this I wonder what the geographic distribution of PSC is? I might assume that it is more common in Israel and Scandanavia as we spoke about. I also wonder why more progress seems to be being made in PBC but not PSC. . . . Also are the fibrates FDA approved? If not what about compassionate use 'cause right now we ain't got sh*t. -Stef > > Dear Stef; > > Most of the clinical trials on fibrates and PBC and PSC seem to be in > Japan, and most of the work seems to have been done on PBC rather > than PSC (see for example): > > Hepatol Res. 2004 Aug;29(4):216-222. > > Prospective randomized crossover trial of combination therapy with > bezafibrate and UDCA for primary biliary cirrhosis. > > Itakura J, Izumi N, Nishimura Y, Inoue K, Ueda K, Nakanishi H, > Tsuchiya K, Hamano K, Asahina Y, Kurosaki M, Uchihara M, Miyake S. > > Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross > Hospital, 1-26-1 Kyonan-cho, Musashino City, Tokyo 180-8610, Japan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 it is more common in Israel and Scandanavia as we spoke about. I > also wonder why more progress seems to be being made in PBC but not > PSC. . . . The PBC support group is the backbone of that progress. Andi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 Dear Stef; I've read that the Mayo clinic in Rochester may be starting a bezafibrate study with PBC patients, but I don't know whether they are also considering one with PSC in combination with URSO. We may have to wait until the PSC high-dose URSO trial is completed? As far as I am aware, fibrates are FDA approved. They have been used in other trials related to hyperlipdemia, and there is some evidence that they may be superior to statins: Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2004 Mar;6(2):148-57. The role of fibrates in managing hyperlipidemia: mechanisms of action and clinical efficacy. Fazio S, Linton MF. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 383 PRB, Nashville, TN 37232-6300, USA. sergio.fazio@... At a time when the lipid management guidelines give more and more emphasis to the identification and treatment of high-risk patients with the metabolic syndrome and diabetes, there is an obvious need to balance the known effects of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) lowering with the new evidence of clinical efficacy derived from the adjustment of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and triglyceride levels. Whereas the statins remain the drug of choice for patients who need to reach the LDL goal, fibrate therapy may represent the best intervention for subjects with atherogenic dyslipidemia and an LDL already close to goal. In addition, the concomitant use of fibrates may significantly reduce cardiovascular risk in patients whose LDL is controlled by statin therapy. In this review, we evaluate the pharmacologic properties of the fibrate drugs, with particular attention to the effects of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor a activation in the control of dyslipidemia as well as in the attenuation of arterial inflammation. Clinical trials of fibrates, such as the Helsinki Heart Study, Veterans Affairs High- density lipoprotein Intervention Trial, Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study, and Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention trial, have conjured up a scenario for the clinical utility of fibrates and their possible superiority to statins in the management of obese, insulin- resistant, and diabetic patients presenting with near-goal LDL and inappropriate HDL and triglyceride levels. PMID: 15023300. Bezafibrate is made by Roche, and is called " Bezalip " . Best regards, Dave (father of (19); PSC 07/03; UC 08/03) > Also are the fibrates FDA approved? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 Maybe in my spare time (haha) i'll contact Roche - anyone interested in helping? But seriously thanx - I think we have to be the 'squicky wheel' and push for a clinical trial. I'm an impatient (not inpatient) not willing to wait for the results of the high dose Urso. Ask your doctor why not Mucomyst (NAC) now? Ask why not a Fibrate now? Can they offer nothing? Typical medical docs - leave the really tough cases to the surgeons. . . . I don't have the time to wait - we need progress NOW!!!! Lack of evidence does not equal lack of efficacy, safety being equal. Just my 2cent _rant_ for the day. . . . -Stefan, busy-bee Surgery-PGY-3 MD PS Saw my 33wk gestational age baby-to-be's face in 3D yesterday - now that's progress > > Also are the fibrates FDA approved? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 Dear Stef; Great news about the baby-to-be pictures! I do plan to contact Roche over the next month or so [depending on progress with the new PSC Foundation that Don & Ricky & Lee & Deb & Arne & Ali and several others (sorry if I omitted names!) are establishing]. The initial contact will likely be to request funds (an educational grant) to support a conference next spring [more about that later when Don & Ricky have completed contacts with potential speakers, and a conference site and dates are solidified]. If we establish credibility with Roche (and other drug companies which have philanthropic programs), they may be more willing to listen to our needs, and perhaps explore new territory? I fully agree that we need progress NOW, and one approach is to talk with our doctors about potential new treatments. No kidding when I say we may know more about these potential " new " treatments than some of our doctors do! Some of the articles on these " new " treatments don't have Abstracts, and frankly doctors are often so busy that they don't have time to read the literature thoroughly. Here's the best article I've found on PSC and bezafibrate [as I mentioned earlier, there seems to have been more work on PBC]. If you look this article up in PubMed, you only get the title! It's not much to go on, but it's something to consider and perhaps talk with your doctor(s) about if you're interested in pursuing this: Kita R, Kita-Sasai Y, Hanaoka I, Kimura T, Kokuryu H, Takamatsu S, Osaki Y, Tomono N, Hachiya T, Shimizu T 2002 Beneficial effect of bezafibrate on primary sclerosing cholangitis (three case reports). Am. J. Gastroenterol. 97: 1849-1851. TO THE EDITOR: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a progressive cholestatic liver disease characterized by diffuse inflammation and fibrosis involving intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary ducts. The cause of PSC remains unknown, no medical treatment has been proven to counteract the natural progression of the disease, and liver transplantation is the only feasible option for patients in its end stage (1-3). Bezafibrate is a commonly used medicine for hyperlipidemia, and several recent studies have demonstrated that bezafibrate has the beneficial effect of lowering biliary enzymes in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) (4-6). We report here three cases of PSC treated with oral administration of bezafibrate, all of which showed a significant reduction in biliary enzymes without side effects. Informed consent for inclusion in this study was obtained from each patient. CASE 1. A 64-yr-old man was admitted to our hospital in December, 1997 for further examination of an elevated titer of hepatobiliary enzymes. ERCP provided evidence of multiple irregular strictures and dilations of the intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) (600 mg/day p.o.) from February, 1998 resulted in a reduction in hepatobiliary enzymes, but transient exacerbation of biliary enzymes caused by cholangitis often occurred and hepatobiliary enzymes remained high. The level of ALP fluctuated between 650 and 850 IU/L until December, 2000. Additional bezafibrate (400 mg/day p.o.) was started in January, 2001, when the laboratory data showed the following results: AST (36 IU/L), ALT (28 IU/L), ALP (813 IU/L), gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase (g-GTP) (95 IU/L), and antinuclear antibody (X80) were positive and perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody was negative. The level of ALP decreased immediately and significantly after the administration of bezafibrate and became normalized in July, 2001 (526 IU/L in February, 426 IU/L in April, and 343 IU/L in July). CASE 2. A 38-yr-old man was admitted to our hospital in July, 1983 for further examination of abdominal pain and tarry stool. He had been followed up in connection with liver dysfunction for 2 yr at another hospital. As a result of colonoscopy and ERCP examination, he was diagnosed as having ulcerative colitis and PSC. Administration of salazosulfapyridine improved ulcerative colitis dramatically. Administration of UDCA (300 mg/day) was started in April, 1993, and the biliary enzyme level decreased (ALP = 1403 IU/L and g-GTP = 575 IU/L in April; ALP = 586 IU/L and g-GTP = 178 IU/L in July, 1993). However, the level of biliary enzymes gradually increased again during the next 8 yr, and administration of bezafibrate (400 mg/day) has been added since April, 2001, when the levels of hepatobiliary enzymes were AST, 45 IU/L; ALT, 63 IU/L; ALP, 1177 IU/L; g-GTP, 731 IU/L; and total bilirubin, 0.6 mg/dl. The levels of ALP and g-GTP decreased immediately and significantly within a few months (ALP = 610 IU/L and g-GTP = 458 IU/L in May; ALP = 592 IU/L and g-GTP = 547 IU/L in October, 2001). CASE 3. A 78-yr-old man was admitted to our Department of Gastroenterology for further examination regarding elevated ALP levels in December, 2000. He had been followed up for cerebral infarction, diabetes insipidus, and diabetes mellitus at the Department of Endocrinology in our hospital since 1998. Biological tests in December, 2000 showed the following: AST, 40 IU/L; ALT, 41 IU/L; ALP, 817 IU/L; g-GTP, 94 IU/L; and total bilirubin, 0.4 mg/dl. Abdominal ultrasound and CT demonstrated multiple intrahepatic bile duct dilations, and ERCP showed multiple strictures and dilations of the intrahepatic bile duct. Antinuclear antibody and perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody were negative. The level of ALP has been fluctuating between 550 and 850 IU/L. Administration of bezafibrate (400 mg/day) was started in May, 2001, when the level of ALP was 725 IU/L, but it showed a significant decrease within a few months (398 IU/L in June and 404 IU/L in October). Bezafibrate is a commonly used medicine for hyperlipidemia and is known to reduce biliary enzymes such as ALP and g-GTP (4). Several recent studies have demonstrated that bezafibrate can lower the levels of ALP, g-GTP, and IgM and is useful for the treatment of PBC (5, 6). The mechanism of the protective effect of bezafibrate on the biliary system remains unclear, but at least two possible explanations have been proposed: 1) bezafibrate induces multidrug resistance 3 gene expression and upregulates Pglycoprotein expression, thus facilitating the production of biliary phospholipids, which are secreted into bile to produce micelles with hydrophobic toxic bile acid, resulting in the reduction of cytotoxicity on the biliary epitheliums (5), and 2) bezafibrate works as a ligand of the peroxisome proliferater-activated receptor alpha and suppresses inflammation by modulating tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukins, nuclear factor KB, and leukotriene B4 (7). In the study presented here, bezafibrate was administered to three patients with PSC, whose biliary enzyme levels improved significantly, as in the previously reported cases of PBC. Bezafibrate was well tolerated and produced no significant side effects in any of the cases. In a study of asymptomatic PSC (8), Porayko et al. showed that patients with comparatively high levels of AST or ALP had short survival times. So, medication that lowers the level of AST or ALP is thought to be beneficial for preventing the disease progression of PSC, whereas safety is required for long term administration. This means that, similarly to UDCA, methotrexate, and tacrolimus, bezafibrate could also be a promising candidate for the treatment of patients with PSC (2, 3). Takikawa (9) reported that there were two distinct age groups among Japanese patients with PSC, a younger group under 40 yr and an older group 40 yr and over. Differences in the characteristics of these groups include frequency of complication of inflammatory bowel disease and chronic pancreatitis and positivity of antinuclear antibody. Of the three patients in our study, 1 and 3 belonged to the older group and 2 to the younger group, but bezafibrate could reduce the level of biliary enzymes in both groups of patients. Although we could not assess the effect of bezafibrate on histological findings in our study and the follow-up period was short, our results suggest that bezafibrate may have a beneficial effect on biliary enzymes and thus delay the progression of PSC when used alone or with various combinations of other medicines such as UDCA, methotrexate, and tacrolimus. Because PSC slowly progresses over many years, the long term effects of bezafibrate on survival and histological improvement need to be evaluated. REFERENCES 1. Lee YM, Kaplan MM. Medical treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 1999;6:361-5. 2. Lindor KD, The Mayo PSC-UDCA Study Group. Ursodiol for primary sclerosing cholangitis. N Engl J Med 1997;336:691-5. 3. Thiel DHV, Carroll P, Elmagd KA, et al. Tacrolimus (FK506), a treatment for primary sclerosing cholangitis: Results of an open-label preliminary trial. Am J Gastroenterol 1995;90:455-9. 4. Day AP, Feher MD, Chopra R, et al. The effect of bezafibrate treatment on serum alkaline phosphatase isozyme activities. Metabolism 1993;42:839-42. 5. Iwasaki S, Tsuda K, Ueta H, et al. Bezafibrate may have a beneficial effect in pre-cirrhotic primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatol Res 1999;16:12-8. 6. Kurihara T, Furukawa M, Tsuchiya M, et al. Effect of bezafi- brate in the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 2000;61:74-82. 7. Devchand PR, Keller H, s JM, et al. The PPARalpha-leukotriene B4 pathway to inflammation control. Nature 1996;384:39-43. 8. Porayko MK, Wiesner RH, LaRusso NF, et al. Patients with asymptomatic primary sclerosing cholangitis frequently have progressive disease. Gastroenterology 1990;98:1594-602. 9. Takikawa H. Recent status of primary sclerosing cholangitis in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 1999;6:352-5. Best regards, Dave R. (father of (19); PSC 07/03; UC 08/03) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2004 Report Share Posted December 16, 2004 PS Saw my 33wk gestational age baby-to-be's face in 3D yesterday - now that's progress >>> That is very exciting! When is your baby's due date? A new years eve baby? Blessings, Barby-KS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.