Guest guest Posted February 9, 2002 Report Share Posted February 9, 2002 Does it impede movement in any way? Is she told to take it off at recess? Is there an issue with her not hearing then? If so you may have an equal access, or 504 violation. Kay also has something on her website about ADA and the AT being the preference of the user. I can't remember where. Barb ----- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2002 Report Share Posted February 9, 2002 Well, at least I remembered I heard it from you at one time. It would be a good idea to put it there. I often look on your site first when I need something. Barb You probably can't remember where because I don't actually have it on my website. I guess since this isn't the first time this has come up, I should probably put it there. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2002 Report Share Posted February 9, 2002 > Kay also has something on her website about ADA and the AT being the preference of the user. I can't remember where. You probably can't remember where because I don't actually have it on my website. I guess since this isn't the first time this has come up, I should probably put it there. Here is the reg: 28 C.F.R. 35.160 http://www.ed.gov/offices/OCR/regs/28cfr35.html#S160 a) A public entity shall take appropriate steps to ensure that communications with applicants, participants, and members of the public with disabilities are as effective as communications with others. ((1) A public entity shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a service, program, or activity conducted by a public entity. (2) In determining what type of auxiliary aid and service is necessary, a public entity shall give primary consideration to the requests of the individual with disabilities. Hugs, Kay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2002 Report Share Posted February 9, 2002 Generally the wireless FM systems such as the one my son wears are supposed to be far superior in terms of sound quality and content but everyone is different and what works for one kid may not work for another. The school purchased his FM system (Microlink) and in part our argument and the argument of the Audiologist was that the system was integrated and compatible with his hearing aid and provided the lowest level of " stigma " and highest functionality thereby meeting the least restrictive notion of IDEA. It works great and he is able to wear it during sports activities and home because the district agreed that he needed it for homework and to develop socially. There are several systems available. It has been a godsend for my son and makes school manageable along with his captioning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2002 Report Share Posted February 9, 2002 sorry forgot something, The audiologist actually provided a written report to the school that specified the hearing aid my son had and the FM system that he required for that aid. She basically prescribed it and as a result the district was moved to purchase this specific FM. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2002 Report Share Posted February 10, 2002 On Sunday, February 10, 2002, at 06:57 AM, vrnwallace@... wrote: > sorry forgot something, > > The audiologist actually provided a written report to the school that > specified the hearing aid my son had and the FM system that he required > for > that aid. She basically prescribed it and as a result the district was > moved > to purchase this specific FM. > > ====== Does the district also pay for his hearing aid? We're getting an argument that our district " never " pays for ANY kinds of hearing aids. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2002 Report Share Posted February 10, 2002 Hi , The district does not pay for the aid. My son wears (Claro 311). However, there are districts that do purchase aids. Sometimes the kids can take them home with them and sometimes they have to check them at the office before they go home. An argument can be made for taking them home as the youngster gets older and needs help with homework, etc. The argument to get support with the aid may be that the youngster only needs to wear the aid for school and educational activities. Good Luck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2002 Report Share Posted February 10, 2002 Thank you everyone who posted. I now feel like I have a leg to stand on. Thanks, Kay, for the link. It will be very helpful. The school does not pay for her aids, just as well, it's one less fight. I get to choose what I want, without argument! Thanks again!! Jill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2002 Report Share Posted February 10, 2002 > Does the district also pay for his hearing aid? We're getting an > argument that our district " never " pays for ANY kinds of hearing aids. That's called Presumptively Denying Assistive Technology and OSEP has this to say about that: OSEP letter re: presumptively denying assistive technology http://www.listen-up.org/rights/osep4.htm You also might want to show them this little ditty: OSEP letter re: hearing aids are assistive technology http://www.listen-up.org/rights/osep1.htm -Kay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 11, 2002 Report Share Posted February 11, 2002 > An argument can be made for taking them home as the youngster > gets older and needs help with homework, etc. If there are any auditory rehabilitation goals on the IEP, the argument can also be made that in order for the child to learn HOW to use their hearing in all types of situations, the child needs to practice in all situations and thus the hearing aids should go home. Or to learn a language, a child needs to be immersed in that language. The IDEA recognizes that for a child learning sign language, the parents may also need sign language and thus it allows for parents to receive instruction in signing. I don't see any difference between learning sign language for a child and learning auditory language, at least as far as the need for exposure and communication is concerned, and thus the hearing aids should go home. Hugs, Kay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.