Guest guest Posted October 18, 2002 Report Share Posted October 18, 2002 That figures - it took 3 years and $1 million dollars for them to tell us what we already know. This is what makes me see red every time I read about the MIND institute. Just think what one of our doctors could do with $1 million toward mercury chelation trials or studies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 18, 2002 Report Share Posted October 18, 2002 They (MIND) seem to be doing a good job of building their case from the ground up. They built a respected research facility connected w/ a major University (UC ), hired credentialed researchers and scientists and funded a study to prove an increase in the autism rate. It's taking a long time (for those of us wanting the answers yesterday) but what a way to do it. This is going to be good. If MIND comes up w/ a vaccine link their reputation will back up the results of the study. The vaccine companies ought to be taking notice right about now. Fasten you seatbelts. Valeri Re: [ ] Rollens Response To M.I.N.D. Ca. Epi Study] Actually, the money to do this epidemiology study was a good investment. Although WE might feel we knew this already, the rest of the scientific community professed that they didn't. Now that the increase is " official " , due to this study, there will be a lot more money poured into environmental factors research. This also gives all of " us " - parents and researchers alike - who are pushing very hard for recognition of the vaccine/thimerosal connection, incredible ammunition for arguing our case. I know on this list we are always asking for ammo to show our doctors. This adds to the pile. Unfortunately, epidemiological studies are very expensive. The CDC should have done this 3 years ago, but of course they're not interested in the truth. So, good for the MIND Institute, with a separate source of funding, to have done this and for have stated the case so strongly and forcefully in their press release. nelsoneyes@... wrote: >That figures - it took 3 years and $1 million dollars for them to tell us >what we already know. This is what makes me see red every time I read about >the MIND institute. Just think what one of our doctors could do with $1 >million toward mercury chelation trials or studies. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 18, 2002 Report Share Posted October 18, 2002 Actually, the money to do this epidemiology study was a good investment. Although WE might feel we knew this already, the rest of the scientific community professed that they didn't. Now that the increase is " official " , due to this study, there will be a lot more money poured into environmental factors research. This also gives all of " us " - parents and researchers alike - who are pushing very hard for recognition of the vaccine/thimerosal connection, incredible ammunition for arguing our case. I know on this list we are always asking for ammo to show our doctors. This adds to the pile. Unfortunately, epidemiological studies are very expensive. The CDC should have done this 3 years ago, but of course they're not interested in the truth. So, good for the MIND Institute, with a separate source of funding, to have done this and for have stated the case so strongly and forcefully in their press release. nelsoneyes@... wrote: >That figures - it took 3 years and $1 million dollars for them to tell us >what we already know. This is what makes me see red every time I read about >the MIND institute. Just think what one of our doctors could do with $1 >million toward mercury chelation trials or studies. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 18, 2002 Report Share Posted October 18, 2002 Valeri - I wish I could agree with you. I think, however, it's far from " fasten your seatbelts " time. I think our kids will be middle-aged before MIND comes up with anything that resembles treatment. They don't even pretend to be looking for a cure - they are a place where academicians can make a name for themselves and where researchers can get grant $$$$ and publish their volumes. OK, it's been about 5 years since they broke ground and now, millions of dollars later, they have " officially " told us that there's an autism epidemic, So, now what? More research, more grant $$$$, and in another 5 years we may see a study that links environmental factors to autism. THEN, more studies and research will be required, on and on, ad nauseum. This is the way that these centers work. In my mind, this is not the way to tackle a life or death epidemic. Sorry for being such a cynic - I would love to be proven wrong on this one. I know people involved with this institute(I live only an hour away) and they agree with me that the purpose of MIND is not to find a cure for autism, nor to make the autism-vaccine link, nor to do much of anything anything but research. > > They (MIND) seem to be doing a good job of building their case from the > ground up. They built a respected research facility connected w/ a major > University (UC ), hired credentialed researchers and scientists and > funded a study to prove an increase in the autism rate. It's taking a long > time (for those of us wanting the answers yesterday) but what a way to do > it. This is going to be good. If MIND comes up w/ a vaccine link their > reputation will back up the results of the study. The vaccine companies > ought to be taking notice right about now. Fasten you seatbelts. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 18, 2002 Report Share Posted October 18, 2002 I'm not sure you understand the importance of what has been accomplished here. Of course we as parents know the truth but the government, the CDC, the medical establishment still strongly contends that autism is just getting diagnosed more efficiently and they don't buy the possibility (or don't want to buy it) that something is causing an increase. The MIND study was government funded and it concluded that the large increase in autism cases cannot be attributed to improved diagnosis or more cases moving into the state. Now the government is going to have a hard time refuting the claim that there actually is an autism epidemic and with any luck they are going to be forced to spend money to find the cause. This is a HUGE step forward over where we were before IF pressure is kept on the government to follow through. Thus the large expenditure of money and time may prove to have been worth the effort, at least for the future of this terrible disease. Since the study was done carefully and scientifically, it is something that the scientific community and the government will have to pay attention to. It may therefore open some doors which have been closed up to now. Let's hope so. Ken Sokolski Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 18, 2002 Report Share Posted October 18, 2002 They seem to have fallen' into the category of " the cottage industry' that has grown and feeding off the limited trough of moneys sorely needed to get to the root cause of this epidemic. We need researcher in the trenches with us not these blue-sky academics investigating the obvious. I had hopes when this center was starting up but after this report I'm convinced they will speculate forever. lots of smoke but no fire! S nelsoneyes@... wrote:Valeri - I wish I could agree with you. I think, however, it's far from " fasten your seatbelts " time. I think our kids will be middle-aged before MIND comes up with anything that resembles treatment. They don't even pretend to be looking for a cure - they are a place where academicians can make a name for themselves and where researchers can get grant $$$$ and publish their volumes. OK, it's been about 5 years since they broke ground and now, millions of dollars later, they have " officially " told us that there's an autism epidemic, So, now what? More research, more grant $$$$, and in another 5 years we may see a study that links environmental factors to autism. THEN, more studies and research will be required, on and on, ad nauseum. This is the way that these centers work. In my mind, this is not the way to tackle a life or death epidemic. Sorry for being such a cynic - I would love to be proven wrong on this one. I know people involved with this institute(I live only an hour away) and they agree with me that the purpose of MIND is not to find a cure for autism, nor to make the autism-vaccine link, nor to do much of anything anything but research. > > They (MIND) seem to be doing a good job of building their case from the > ground up. They built a respected research facility connected w/ a major > University (UC ), hired credentialed researchers and scientists and > funded a study to prove an increase in the autism rate. It's taking a long > time (for those of us wanting the answers yesterday) but what a way to do > it. This is going to be good. If MIND comes up w/ a vaccine link their > reputation will back up the results of the study. The vaccine companies > ought to be taking notice right about now. Fasten you seatbelts. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 18, 2002 Report Share Posted October 18, 2002 Hey I live about an hour away from MIND too, Walnut Creek. Where are you? I didn't mean that they would find a cure, but that hopefully the next step is proving the vaccine manufactures liable. In my fantasy the people who knew there would be " collateral damage " and allowed the use of mercury anyway would serve prison time. My but my fantasies have gotten tame. Valeri, mom to: Jenna (4 1/2 ASD) (3 1/2 NT) LeeLee (1 1/2 NT) Re: [ ] Rollens Response To M.I.N.D. Ca. Epi Study] Valeri - I wish I could agree with you. I think, however, it's far from " fasten your seatbelts " time. I think our kids will be middle-aged before MIND comes up with anything that resembles treatment. They don't even pretend to be looking for a cure - they are a place where academicians can make a name for themselves and where researchers can get grant $$$$ and publish their volumes. OK, it's been about 5 years since they broke ground and now, millions of dollars later, they have " officially " told us that there's an autism epidemic, So, now what? More research, more grant $$$$, and in another 5 years we may see a study that links environmental factors to autism. THEN, more studies and research will be required, on and on, ad nauseum. This is the way that these centers work. In my mind, this is not the way to tackle a life or death epidemic. Sorry for being such a cynic - I would love to be proven wrong on this one. I know people involved with this institute(I live only an hour away) and they agree with me that the purpose of MIND is not to find a cure for autism, nor to make the autism-vaccine link, nor to do much of anything anything but research. > > They (MIND) seem to be doing a good job of building their case from the > ground up. They built a respected research facility connected w/ a major > University (UC ), hired credentialed researchers and scientists and > funded a study to prove an increase in the autism rate. It's taking a long > time (for those of us wanting the answers yesterday) but what a way to do > it. This is going to be good. If MIND comes up w/ a vaccine link their > reputation will back up the results of the study. The vaccine companies > ought to be taking notice right about now. Fasten you seatbelts. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2002 Report Share Posted October 19, 2002 Valeri - I live in Napa, about an hour from you as well! I hope you're right about the next step, but I have a sad feeling that this won't be the case. But, we'll see and let's hope. > Hey I live about an hour away from MIND too, Walnut Creek. Where are you? > I didn't mean that they would find a cure, but that hopefully the next step > is proving the vaccine manufactures liable. In my fantasy the people who > knew there would be " collateral damage " and allowed the use of mercury > anyway would serve prison time. My but my fantasies have gotten tame. > > Valeri, mom to: > Jenna (4 1/2 ASD) > (3 1/2 NT) > LeeLee (1 1/2 NT) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.