Guest guest Posted December 16, 2002 Report Share Posted December 16, 2002 Thank you for this fascinating information, Jaquelyn. It does appear that there is no current consensus among the original participants in the consensus working group. I am curious why other physicians think they should follow a protocol that most of the original developers are don't use. Andy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > In attempting to complete the 2nd Edition of Children with Starving Brains, I recently e-mailed as many of the original DAN! participants in the February 2001 Chelation Consensus meeting as I could find addresses for (15) and received 10 replies (thank you so much!). I asked these (mostly) clinicians to comment on their present feeling about timing of administration of chelation agents, as there is conflict/confusion in the community about the every four versus the every eight hour schedules. The essence of many of the replies have been posted under the Articles Section of my website, www.Autism-RxGuideBook.net, and briefly summarized below: > > Summary: 2, always prefers the 8 hr schedule. > 1, always prefers the 4 hr schedule > 1, uses 4 hrs and 8 hr schedules equally (as I do) > 1, uses 4 hr in daytime, 8hrs for night > 1, usually the 8 hr schedule, but varies according to child > 1, educates parents, let them decide, change if not working > 1, primarily uses IV DMPS now > 1, prefers oral DMPS every 8 hrs (with informed consent) > 1, prefers " natural " anti-oxidative stress therapy to chelation > (glutathione, ALA, selenium, melatonin, vit C etc) > > > [Non-text portions of this message have b Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 2002 Report Share Posted December 17, 2002 > I think it's simply that when you first start you don't know what else to > do, and the more experience you get, the more you have the courage to get > flexible and find what works the best - I believe intuition and experience > play a large role here. Yes, which does make it kind of interesting that the DAN! committee consited almost entirely of physicians with no relevant experience, and didn't contain people like me who had the actual experience necessary, though of course I have experience at *PROMOTING OPTIMAL HEALTH* and not at *TREATING DISEASE* as physicians have if they do essentially the same thing, since they have a license to use whatever words they want to describe what they are doing. Also do please note that experience not illuminated by thoughtful reflection and analysis is worthless, otherwise all the pediatricians who are still shooting kids full of thimerosal would have stopped it long since. Everyone gets experience from living. Some have the sense to learn from it. A very few have the sense to learn from the hard experiences of others without having to repeat those personally. Andy . . .. . . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2002 Report Share Posted December 18, 2002 Dr. McCandless, Could you elaborate on the comment regarding the one dr. who does oral DMPS every eight hours (with informed consent)? That reference is a little scary for me, a DMPS user. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.