Guest guest Posted June 20, 2004 Report Share Posted June 20, 2004 From: wegandy1938@... > Any organization that provides medical care is covered. Period. Reread > Chapter 181, Texas Health and Safety Code if there are any questions. Far be it from me to argue the point with you, but just one little point of contention: is not the Camp Director acting in loco parentis, and therefore eligible for medical information release? It seems to me that the Camp Director, as the person who the child has been signed over to for the week, would have as much right to this information as a parent. Of course, this still leaves those cases where the patient is an adult scouter or a minor whose parent(s) are also at the camp. Comment, Gene? Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 20, 2004 Report Share Posted June 20, 2004 From: wegandy1938@... > Any organization that provides medical care is covered. Period. Reread > Chapter 181, Texas Health and Safety Code if there are any questions. Far be it from me to argue the point with you, but just one little point of contention: is not the Camp Director acting in loco parentis, and therefore eligible for medical information release? It seems to me that the Camp Director, as the person who the child has been signed over to for the week, would have as much right to this information as a parent. Of course, this still leaves those cases where the patient is an adult scouter or a minor whose parent(s) are also at the camp. Comment, Gene? Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 20, 2004 Report Share Posted June 20, 2004 From: wegandy1938@... > Any organization that provides medical care is covered. Period. Reread > Chapter 181, Texas Health and Safety Code if there are any questions. Far be it from me to argue the point with you, but just one little point of contention: is not the Camp Director acting in loco parentis, and therefore eligible for medical information release? It seems to me that the Camp Director, as the person who the child has been signed over to for the week, would have as much right to this information as a parent. Of course, this still leaves those cases where the patient is an adult scouter or a minor whose parent(s) are also at the camp. Comment, Gene? Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 20, 2004 Report Share Posted June 20, 2004 No. Camp Director is not acting en loco parentis. That would be a scoutmaster/assistant scoutmaster, however medical records/information only get released to the parent/guardian on my watch. Parent/Guardian is that as defined by the Family Code. The Health Officer is actually the only one the consent is given to, in the form of the written authorization at the bottom of the Class 1/2 & Class 3 Physicals. § 32.001. CONSENT BY NON-PARENT. (a) The following persons may consent to medical, dental, psychological, and surgical treatment of a child when the person having the right to consent as otherwise provided by law cannot be contacted and that person has not given actual notice to the contrary: (1) a grandparent of the child; (2) an adult brother or sister of the child; (3) an adult aunt or uncle of the child; (4) an educational institution in which the child is enrolled that has received written authorization to consent from a person having the right to consent; (5) an adult who has actual care, control, and possession of the child and has written authorization to consent from a person having the right to consent; (6) a court having jurisdiction over a suit affecting the parent-child relationship of which the child is the subject; (7) an adult responsible for the actual care, control, and possession of a child under the jurisdiction of a juvenile court or committed by a juvenile court to the care of an agency of the state or county; or (8) a peace officer who has lawfully taken custody of a minor, if the peace officer has reasonable grounds to believe the minor is in need of immediate medical treatment. ( The Texas Youth Commission may consent to the medical, dental, psychological, and surgical treatment of a child committed to it under Title 3 when the person having the right to consent has been contacted and that person has not given actual notice to the contrary. © This section does not apply to consent for the immunization of a child. (d) A person who consents to the medical treatment of a minor under Subsection (a)(7) or (8) is immune from liability for damages resulting from the examination or treatment of the minor, except to the extent of the person's own acts of negligence. A physician or dentist licensed to practice in this state, or a hospital or medical facility at which a minor is treated is immune from liability for damages resulting from the examination or treatment of a minor under this section, except to the extent of the person's own acts of negligence. Re: Digest Number 2239 From: wegandy1938@... > Any organization that provides medical care is covered. Period. Reread > Chapter 181, Texas Health and Safety Code if there are any questions. Far be it from me to argue the point with you, but just one little point of contention: is not the Camp Director acting in loco parentis, and therefore eligible for medical information release? It seems to me that the Camp Director, as the person who the child has been signed over to for the week, would have as much right to this information as a parent. Of course, this still leaves those cases where the patient is an adult scouter or a minor whose parent(s) are also at the camp. Comment, Gene? Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.