Guest guest Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 Thanks to those who provided feedback, both publicly and privately, on my question regarding Landmark's Care Management Program. Very helpful. In summary, the responses stated that we all (the PT, insurer, and patient) want to improve quality of care, and we all understand the need to cut costs, but no one who responded felt that the Landmark's Care Management program was the right way to do it. So, my question is....what IS the right way to do it? If you were tasked to figure out the optimal way(s) to decrease PT medical costs by creating a win-win-win situation for the PT-insurer-patient, what would you recommend? In responding to insurance executives regarding my clinical perspective, I not only want to provide clear feedback on what PTs feel is NOT the correct way to manage costs, but also what they feel IS the correct way to manage costs (e.g. decrease fraud? reimbursement based more on evidence-based medicine/comparative effectiveness, partnership where the insurer helps PTs stay up-to-date on the latest research, prospective payment system rather than fee-for-service reimbursement, pay-for-performance programs, more 'telemedicine' PT, etc). Your input would really be helpful in developing my response. Thanks so much. Beth Rohrer, PT, DPT Outpatient PT - Centreville, VA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.