Guest guest Posted November 17, 2009 Report Share Posted November 17, 2009 Armin, Actually I do know the difference between profit and loss. We actually are about $600K short each year in the department, after covering our department expenses. We can never meet the expenses and margins that the hospital places on us to help support the entire system. I know that Medicare is a better payor in some places, but we are predominently Medicaid. I am trying to make the point that where private practice owners feel that the playing field isn't level when going against hospitals, I believe that it can go against us, especially for the non profits. Private practice owners usually do not have a whole hospital, let alone a system to support with what they make. But....if this was a private practice, we would be making a profit. Tom Kaluzny PT Rehabilitation Services Manager Providence Mount Carmel Hospital 982 E. Columbia Colville, WA 99114 Work: Fax: email: thomas.kaluzny@... ________________________________ From: PTManager [mailto:PTManager ] On Behalf Of Armin Loges, PT Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 2:12 PM To: PTManager Subject: Re: Hosp-based Off-Site Outpatient Rehab Supervision Tom: I am not presuming to know. Much to the contrary... So, what you are saying is that, after covering all the PT dept. expenses, pay roll, rent, etc etc, there are still moneys from PT to support other departments? That, in PP world would be considered profit, would not? Which contradicts what others have submitted about hospitals not profiting from PT. In many areas, for private practice, Medicare is the better payer. Sincerely: Armin Loges, PT Tampa, FL From: Kaluzny, R. Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 2:20 PM To: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> Subject: RE: Hosp-based Off-Site Outpatient Rehab Supervision Good Morning, As a non profit, hospital based, rural outpatient PT service, I think that there is another aspect to this line. While we do have to compete with other private practices, eighty two percent of our referrals are Medicare and Medicaid. Our local physicians refer mainly those patient populations to us since we are non profit. We do not see the higher end payors. This makes it very difficult for us to maintain our margin. We are responsible for a nearly 7 figure margin to support the other hospital based services (we are off site and have to pay our own rent, cleaning, utilities, etc) and then are responsible for helping to maintain the other services. We have been unable to meet our margin responsibiltiy in the 7 years I have been manager. I was in private practice for 10 years and have found it much harder to try and maintain profitability in a hospital setting than I ever did in private practice. Our productivity is at 107%, with overtime, so it is not a lack of patients, just the patient mix since we are a non profit hospital. Tom Kaluzny PT Rehabilitation Services Manager Providence Mount Carmel Hospital 982 E. Columbia Colville, WA 99114 Work: Fax: email: thomas.kaluzny@... <mailto:thomas.kaluzny%40providence.org> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 17, 2009 Report Share Posted November 17, 2009 Armin, Actually I do know the difference between profit and loss. We actually are about $600K short each year in the department, after covering our department expenses. We can never meet the expenses and margins that the hospital places on us to help support the entire system. I know that Medicare is a better payor in some places, but we are predominently Medicaid. I am trying to make the point that where private practice owners feel that the playing field isn't level when going against hospitals, I believe that it can go against us, especially for the non profits. Private practice owners usually do not have a whole hospital, let alone a system to support with what they make. But....if this was a private practice, we would be making a profit. Tom Kaluzny PT Rehabilitation Services Manager Providence Mount Carmel Hospital 982 E. Columbia Colville, WA 99114 Work: Fax: email: thomas.kaluzny@... ________________________________ From: PTManager [mailto:PTManager ] On Behalf Of Armin Loges, PT Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 2:12 PM To: PTManager Subject: Re: Hosp-based Off-Site Outpatient Rehab Supervision Tom: I am not presuming to know. Much to the contrary... So, what you are saying is that, after covering all the PT dept. expenses, pay roll, rent, etc etc, there are still moneys from PT to support other departments? That, in PP world would be considered profit, would not? Which contradicts what others have submitted about hospitals not profiting from PT. In many areas, for private practice, Medicare is the better payer. Sincerely: Armin Loges, PT Tampa, FL From: Kaluzny, R. Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 2:20 PM To: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> Subject: RE: Hosp-based Off-Site Outpatient Rehab Supervision Good Morning, As a non profit, hospital based, rural outpatient PT service, I think that there is another aspect to this line. While we do have to compete with other private practices, eighty two percent of our referrals are Medicare and Medicaid. Our local physicians refer mainly those patient populations to us since we are non profit. We do not see the higher end payors. This makes it very difficult for us to maintain our margin. We are responsible for a nearly 7 figure margin to support the other hospital based services (we are off site and have to pay our own rent, cleaning, utilities, etc) and then are responsible for helping to maintain the other services. We have been unable to meet our margin responsibiltiy in the 7 years I have been manager. I was in private practice for 10 years and have found it much harder to try and maintain profitability in a hospital setting than I ever did in private practice. Our productivity is at 107%, with overtime, so it is not a lack of patients, just the patient mix since we are a non profit hospital. Tom Kaluzny PT Rehabilitation Services Manager Providence Mount Carmel Hospital 982 E. Columbia Colville, WA 99114 Work: Fax: email: thomas.kaluzny@... <mailto:thomas.kaluzny%40providence.org> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 17, 2009 Report Share Posted November 17, 2009 Ditto for our department (we are a not-for-profit). If you just look at our book of business, that is net revenue and actual expenses, we barely break even. Medicare is one of our better payors as well, and comprises 30-40% of our business. The hospital assigns margin or overhead, which is the amount the hospital expects us to contribute to the system. When you add in the overhead, we are a huge money loser for the hospital. I think you'll find that is the case in many hospital systems. I know that is the case statewide here. Some hospitals are seriously considering divesting themselves of rehab for that very reason. We are a major expense. One hospital in our region got rid of all their rehab and contracted with a corprate. Much cheaper for their bottom line. Not saying this is a good idea, but it is reality. Meryl Freeman, MS PT Manager, Outpatient Rehab Rex Healthcare Raleigh, NC RE: Hosp-based Off-Site Outpatient Rehab Supervision Good Morning, As a non profit, hospital based, rural outpatient PT service, I think that there is another aspect to this line. While we do have to compete with other private practices, eighty two percent of our referrals are Medicare and Medicaid. Our local physicians refer mainly those patient populations to us since we are non profit. We do not see the higher end payors. This makes it very difficult for us to maintain our margin. We are responsible for a nearly 7 figure margin to support the other hospital based services (we are off site and have to pay our own rent, cleaning, utilities, etc) and then are responsible for helping to maintain the other services. We have been unable to meet our margin responsibiltiy in the 7 years I have been manager. I was in private practice for 10 years and have found it much harder to try and maintain profitability in a hospital setting than I ever did in private practice. Our productivity is at 107%, with overtime, so it is not a lack of patients, just the patient mix since we are a non profit hospital. Tom Kaluzny PT Rehabilitation Services Manager Providence Mount Carmel Hospital 982 E. Columbia Colville, WA 99114 Work: Fax: email: thomas.kaluzny@... <mailto:thomas.kaluzny%40providence.org> <mailto:thomas.kaluzny%40providence.org> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 17, 2009 Report Share Posted November 17, 2009 Ditto for our department (we are a not-for-profit). If you just look at our book of business, that is net revenue and actual expenses, we barely break even. Medicare is one of our better payors as well, and comprises 30-40% of our business. The hospital assigns margin or overhead, which is the amount the hospital expects us to contribute to the system. When you add in the overhead, we are a huge money loser for the hospital. I think you'll find that is the case in many hospital systems. I know that is the case statewide here. Some hospitals are seriously considering divesting themselves of rehab for that very reason. We are a major expense. One hospital in our region got rid of all their rehab and contracted with a corprate. Much cheaper for their bottom line. Not saying this is a good idea, but it is reality. Meryl Freeman, MS PT Manager, Outpatient Rehab Rex Healthcare Raleigh, NC RE: Hosp-based Off-Site Outpatient Rehab Supervision Good Morning, As a non profit, hospital based, rural outpatient PT service, I think that there is another aspect to this line. While we do have to compete with other private practices, eighty two percent of our referrals are Medicare and Medicaid. Our local physicians refer mainly those patient populations to us since we are non profit. We do not see the higher end payors. This makes it very difficult for us to maintain our margin. We are responsible for a nearly 7 figure margin to support the other hospital based services (we are off site and have to pay our own rent, cleaning, utilities, etc) and then are responsible for helping to maintain the other services. We have been unable to meet our margin responsibiltiy in the 7 years I have been manager. I was in private practice for 10 years and have found it much harder to try and maintain profitability in a hospital setting than I ever did in private practice. Our productivity is at 107%, with overtime, so it is not a lack of patients, just the patient mix since we are a non profit hospital. Tom Kaluzny PT Rehabilitation Services Manager Providence Mount Carmel Hospital 982 E. Columbia Colville, WA 99114 Work: Fax: email: thomas.kaluzny@... <mailto:thomas.kaluzny%40providence.org> <mailto:thomas.kaluzny%40providence.org> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 17, 2009 Report Share Posted November 17, 2009 Ditto for our department (we are a not-for-profit). If you just look at our book of business, that is net revenue and actual expenses, we barely break even. Medicare is one of our better payors as well, and comprises 30-40% of our business. The hospital assigns margin or overhead, which is the amount the hospital expects us to contribute to the system. When you add in the overhead, we are a huge money loser for the hospital. I think you'll find that is the case in many hospital systems. I know that is the case statewide here. Some hospitals are seriously considering divesting themselves of rehab for that very reason. We are a major expense. One hospital in our region got rid of all their rehab and contracted with a corprate. Much cheaper for their bottom line. Not saying this is a good idea, but it is reality. Meryl Freeman, MS PT Manager, Outpatient Rehab Rex Healthcare Raleigh, NC RE: Hosp-based Off-Site Outpatient Rehab Supervision Good Morning, As a non profit, hospital based, rural outpatient PT service, I think that there is another aspect to this line. While we do have to compete with other private practices, eighty two percent of our referrals are Medicare and Medicaid. Our local physicians refer mainly those patient populations to us since we are non profit. We do not see the higher end payors. This makes it very difficult for us to maintain our margin. We are responsible for a nearly 7 figure margin to support the other hospital based services (we are off site and have to pay our own rent, cleaning, utilities, etc) and then are responsible for helping to maintain the other services. We have been unable to meet our margin responsibiltiy in the 7 years I have been manager. I was in private practice for 10 years and have found it much harder to try and maintain profitability in a hospital setting than I ever did in private practice. Our productivity is at 107%, with overtime, so it is not a lack of patients, just the patient mix since we are a non profit hospital. Tom Kaluzny PT Rehabilitation Services Manager Providence Mount Carmel Hospital 982 E. Columbia Colville, WA 99114 Work: Fax: email: thomas.kaluzny@... <mailto:thomas.kaluzny%40providence.org> <mailto:thomas.kaluzny%40providence.org> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 I think the biggest challenge we face is providing services for charity care which negates our bottom line and over the past one year charity care has gone up. I don't know what the answer is.  Pam Eluri,PT,MS Subject: RE: Hosp-based Off-Site Outpatient Rehab Supervision To: PTManager Date: Tuesday, November 17, 2009, 10:19 PM  Ditto for our department (we are a not-for-profit) . If you just look at our book of business, that is net revenue and actual expenses, we barely break even. Medicare is one of our better payors as well, and comprises 30-40% of our business. The hospital assigns margin or overhead, which is the amount the hospital expects us to contribute to the system. When you add in the overhead, we are a huge money loser for the hospital. I think you'll find that is the case in many hospital systems. I know that is the case statewide here. Some hospitals are seriously considering divesting themselves of rehab for that very reason. We are a major expense. One hospital in our region got rid of all their rehab and contracted with a corprate. Much cheaper for their bottom line. Not saying this is a good idea, but it is reality. Meryl Freeman, MS PT Manager, Outpatient Rehab Rex Healthcare Raleigh, NC RE: Hosp-based Off-Site Outpatient Rehab Supervision Good Morning, As a non profit, hospital based, rural outpatient PT service, I think that there is another aspect to this line. While we do have to compete with other private practices, eighty two percent of our referrals are Medicare and Medicaid. Our local physicians refer mainly those patient populations to us since we are non profit. We do not see the higher end payors. This makes it very difficult for us to maintain our margin. We are responsible for a nearly 7 figure margin to support the other hospital based services (we are off site and have to pay our own rent, cleaning, utilities, etc) and then are responsible for helping to maintain the other services. We have been unable to meet our margin responsibiltiy in the 7 years I have been manager. I was in private practice for 10 years and have found it much harder to try and maintain profitability in a hospital setting than I ever did in private practice. Our productivity is at 107%, with overtime, so it is not a lack of patients, just the patient mix since we are a non profit hospital. Tom Kaluzny PT Rehabilitation Services Manager Providence Mount Carmel Hospital 982 E. Columbia Colville, WA 99114 Work: Fax: email: thomas.kaluzny@ providence. org <mailto:thomas. kaluzny%40provid ence.org> <mailto:thomas. kaluzny%40provid ence.org> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 Group: I think there is a little bit of misunderstanding here, and perhaps I did not get my point across. None of this has to do with us vs. them (or vice versa, private practice vs. hospital and so on). We are all PTs and should, in one way or another, " play on the same team " . That is, in my opinion, what we don't do. I can feel through some of these posts, some get quite offended - which is fine. Not my intention to offend, but is part of any debate. IN ANY RATE...my ORIGINAL point being we as ONE profession are dealt LIKE we are many different professions, depending on who we are working for: I am talking about regulation. But also rate of reimbursement. We are all apples, but are dealt like bananas, apples, oranges, cucumbers, and on and on. And most of us seem to think is ok and its how it has always been and how it will always be. This sheepish attitude bothers me, I must confess. Nonetheless, I know hospital based, private practice, Nursing home, etc etc, we all have our challenges and no one is in any privileged situation. What I mean is that we all should really have to have the same challenges, because we are really all PTs. We don't because we are not the ones deciding what we do. Everybody else is doing it for us. It meant it to be a quick remark. Not a debate, but ok. ON ANOTHER NOTE, regardless (or aside of) of cost shifting, I been reading opposing remarks from the hospital based folks. (THIS IS NOT CRITICISM. MORE OF A QUESTION). It seems in some places PT is carrying the load (paying the bills) and in some is being the black hole. I would like to hear more about that from the guys from hospital based outpatient. Sincerely; Armin Loges, PT Tampa, FL From: Freeman, Meryl Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 10:19 PM To: PTManager Subject: RE: Hosp-based Off-Site Outpatient Rehab Supervision Ditto for our department (we are a not-for-profit). If you just look at our book of business, that is net revenue and actual expenses, we barely break even. Medicare is one of our better payors as well, and comprises 30-40% of our business. The hospital assigns margin or overhead, which is the amount the hospital expects us to contribute to the system. When you add in the overhead, we are a huge money loser for the hospital. I think you'll find that is the case in many hospital systems. I know that is the case statewide here. Some hospitals are seriously considering divesting themselves of rehab for that very reason. We are a major expense. One hospital in our region got rid of all their rehab and contracted with a corprate. Much cheaper for their bottom line. Not saying this is a good idea, but it is reality. Meryl Freeman, MS PT Manager, Outpatient Rehab Rex Healthcare Raleigh, NC RE: Hosp-based Off-Site Outpatient Rehab Supervision Good Morning, As a non profit, hospital based, rural outpatient PT service, I think that there is another aspect to this line. While we do have to compete with other private practices, eighty two percent of our referrals are Medicare and Medicaid. Our local physicians refer mainly those patient populations to us since we are non profit. We do not see the higher end payors. This makes it very difficult for us to maintain our margin. We are responsible for a nearly 7 figure margin to support the other hospital based services (we are off site and have to pay our own rent, cleaning, utilities, etc) and then are responsible for helping to maintain the other services. We have been unable to meet our margin responsibiltiy in the 7 years I have been manager. I was in private practice for 10 years and have found it much harder to try and maintain profitability in a hospital setting than I ever did in private practice. Our productivity is at 107%, with overtime, so it is not a lack of patients, just the patient mix since we are a non profit hospital. Tom Kaluzny PT Rehabilitation Services Manager Providence Mount Carmel Hospital 982 E. Columbia Colville, WA 99114 Work: Fax: email: thomas.kaluzny@... <mailto:thomas.kaluzny%40providence.org> <mailto:thomas.kaluzny%40providence.org> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 Hi Meryl and All.. Hospital based PT depts. do and should make a profit - whether they are not-for-profit or otherwise. we cant control the cost shifting that occurs at the accounting level of the hospital - the fact remains, OP hospital PT depts make $ - that is why they are a target for outside contractors - the inpatient DRG simply isn't attractive in mostc ases. Keep in mind that most hospitals have managed care contracts that pay a % of charges which allows the hospital to take a disproportionate amount of self pays (non-pay) and lower payors like Medicaid. All docs know that rehab folks 'count' referrals and many try to be 'fair' in their communities by spreading the referrals around to each PT provider, be it a PP or corporate or hospital. Since the hospital PT dept takes Medicaid, charity, and self-pays, the docs, who know that well, tend to refer the lower paying spectrum to the hospital This results in a lesser quality payer mix than the other competitors in town. So actually, non hospital providers get an artificial boost, if you will. Also, hospitals are quickly moving away from a volume based accounting system (units, without regard for collections, for instance), and moving towards real world net revenue, much like a PP. It no longer makes any sense for hospital PT's to continue the old school focus of 'units billed' when there remains a disproportionate lower quality payor mix adding to the decline of net revenue. Another point is that hospital PT departments are sometimes hindered in gaining referrals because docs 'strike back' at the hospital for things that have absolutely nothing to do with the access to or quality of PT care there - corporates or PP don't have that problem. So, it is a tough world out there, but hospital PT will not only survive, but make significant gains on competitors in their locales as they are able to attract and retain quality PT's. The trick is to do this collegiality in each of our communities - the real enemy is not each other, but docs in non-direct access/reimbursement states that continually bring the service in-house. Medicare direct access is the single most important thing that can happen next - when that happens - then the playing field is more level and the setting matters less, and then, may the best PT win! Don Walsh, PT, MS, OCS Northeast Georgia Medical Center Gainesville, GA > > Ditto for our department (we are a not-for-profit). If you just look at > our book of business, that is net revenue and actual expenses, we barely > break even. Medicare is one of our better payors as well, and comprises > 30-40% of our business. The hospital assigns margin or overhead, which > is the amount the hospital expects us to contribute to the system. When > you add in the overhead, we are a huge money loser for the hospital. I > think you'll find that is the case in many hospital systems. I know that > is the case statewide here. Some hospitals are seriously considering > divesting themselves of rehab for that very reason. We are a major > expense. One hospital in our region got rid of all their rehab and > contracted with a corprate. Much cheaper for their bottom line. Not > saying this is a good idea, but it is reality. > > > Meryl Freeman, MS PT > Manager, Outpatient Rehab > Rex Healthcare > Raleigh, NC > > > > > > RE: Hosp-based Off-Site Outpatient Rehab > Supervision > > Good Morning, > As a non profit, hospital based, rural outpatient PT service, I > think that there is another aspect to this line. While we do > have to > compete with other private practices, eighty two percent of our > referrals are Medicare and Medicaid. Our local physicians refer > mainly > those patient populations to us since we are non profit. We do > not see > the higher end payors. This makes it very difficult for us to > maintain > our margin. We are responsible for a nearly 7 figure margin to > support > the other hospital based services (we are off site and have to > pay our > own rent, cleaning, utilities, etc) and then are responsible for > helping > to maintain the other services. We have been unable to meet our > margin > responsibiltiy in the 7 years I have been manager. I was in > private > practice for 10 years and have found it much harder to try and > maintain > profitability in a hospital setting than I ever did in private > practice. > Our productivity is at 107%, with overtime, so it is not a lack > of > patients, just the patient mix since we are a non profit > hospital. > > Tom Kaluzny PT > Rehabilitation Services Manager > Providence Mount Carmel Hospital > 982 E. Columbia > Colville, WA 99114 > Work: > Fax: > email: thomas.kaluzny@... > <mailto:thomas.kaluzny%40providence.org> > <mailto:thomas.kaluzny%40providence.org> > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 Meryl, I direct a hospital based department, although our hospital is very small and we see about 80% outpatient load compared to only 20% inpatient. We make a profit as long as our volume stays consistently high. that is the key, and we strive to " earn " this volume through " word of mouth " among the patients we serve by providing high quality of care. Matt Dvorak, PT Yankton, SD ________________________________ From: PTManager on behalf of Freeman, Meryl Sent: Tue 11/17/2009 8:45 AM To: PTManager Subject: RE: Hosp-based Off-Site Outpatient Rehab Supervision Armin: I work in a hospital outpatient setting and I can tell you with certainty that the hospital does not make any money from our services. Like all other outpatient settings who bill legally and ethically, we are very lucky if we break even. We are not a profit center for the hospital and are considered one of those necessary services that will not get much attention or capital, but exists only to provide the service. Our hospital does not employ physicians that refer to PT and we are out there competing with private practices, corporates, and POPTS for patients just like you are. We are subject to the same expense/revenue issues you are. Salaries and non-controllable expenses are going up, reimbursement is going down. These are major issues that we all share. They are issues we all need to address as a profession. As for the non-cap with hospitals, my understanding was that CMS based this on a utilization study that showed overall hospital-based utilization of PT was less than that of the private sector. I could be mistaken. I agree with you that private practice may be at a disadvantage with negotiations for reimbursement, etc, but I can tell you that as a profession, we are all struggling with the same issues. I honestly don't know how anyone, private practice or otherwise, makes any profit. Change of subject here, but is anyone out there doing more than breaking even while practicing/billing in an ethical manner? If so, I'd sure like to hear about your model. Regards, Meryl W. Freeman, MS PT Manager, Outpatient Rehab Raleigh, NC Hosp-based Off-Site Outpatient Rehab Supervision To: PTManager@yahoogrou ps.com Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2009, 9:00 PM Hello Group, I've recently joined a health system which includes one hospital-based, off-site outpatient physical and occupational therapy clinic. I've been informed by our Risk manager that Medicare requires on-site physician supervision, meaning that a physician must be in the building whenever a Medicare client is seen for therapy. According to her, this was a Medicare ruling in 2001. (In fact, she is following a discussion that indicates the ruling was misinterpreted all this time and really means that the physician must be in the room!) This apparently doesn't apply to non-hospital- based outpatient centers, and any on-site centers are assumed to have a physician in the Emergency Department. I have worked in both the private practice and hospital arenas, including hospital-based, off-site outpatient therapy centers and I've never heard of this ruling before. In fact, many centers I'm aware of don't have a physician for miles. My questions to the group: - Have you ever heard of this ruling or discussion before? - Does your hospital have off-site outpatient therapy and if so, how do you meet this requirement while still providing access for extended hours (evenings, weekends, etc)? - Is APTA/AOTA involved in this discussion? I haven't heard anything. Any feedback is appreciated! I do have copies (pdf files) of letters discussing the ruling, etc if you're interested. Christen, PT Kchristen1fhn (DOT) org Director of Rehabilitation Services FHN Freeport, IL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 Meryl, I direct a hospital based department, although our hospital is very small and we see about 80% outpatient load compared to only 20% inpatient. We make a profit as long as our volume stays consistently high. that is the key, and we strive to " earn " this volume through " word of mouth " among the patients we serve by providing high quality of care. Matt Dvorak, PT Yankton, SD ________________________________ From: PTManager on behalf of Freeman, Meryl Sent: Tue 11/17/2009 8:45 AM To: PTManager Subject: RE: Hosp-based Off-Site Outpatient Rehab Supervision Armin: I work in a hospital outpatient setting and I can tell you with certainty that the hospital does not make any money from our services. Like all other outpatient settings who bill legally and ethically, we are very lucky if we break even. We are not a profit center for the hospital and are considered one of those necessary services that will not get much attention or capital, but exists only to provide the service. Our hospital does not employ physicians that refer to PT and we are out there competing with private practices, corporates, and POPTS for patients just like you are. We are subject to the same expense/revenue issues you are. Salaries and non-controllable expenses are going up, reimbursement is going down. These are major issues that we all share. They are issues we all need to address as a profession. As for the non-cap with hospitals, my understanding was that CMS based this on a utilization study that showed overall hospital-based utilization of PT was less than that of the private sector. I could be mistaken. I agree with you that private practice may be at a disadvantage with negotiations for reimbursement, etc, but I can tell you that as a profession, we are all struggling with the same issues. I honestly don't know how anyone, private practice or otherwise, makes any profit. Change of subject here, but is anyone out there doing more than breaking even while practicing/billing in an ethical manner? If so, I'd sure like to hear about your model. Regards, Meryl W. Freeman, MS PT Manager, Outpatient Rehab Raleigh, NC Hosp-based Off-Site Outpatient Rehab Supervision To: PTManager@yahoogrou ps.com Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2009, 9:00 PM Hello Group, I've recently joined a health system which includes one hospital-based, off-site outpatient physical and occupational therapy clinic. I've been informed by our Risk manager that Medicare requires on-site physician supervision, meaning that a physician must be in the building whenever a Medicare client is seen for therapy. According to her, this was a Medicare ruling in 2001. (In fact, she is following a discussion that indicates the ruling was misinterpreted all this time and really means that the physician must be in the room!) This apparently doesn't apply to non-hospital- based outpatient centers, and any on-site centers are assumed to have a physician in the Emergency Department. I have worked in both the private practice and hospital arenas, including hospital-based, off-site outpatient therapy centers and I've never heard of this ruling before. In fact, many centers I'm aware of don't have a physician for miles. My questions to the group: - Have you ever heard of this ruling or discussion before? - Does your hospital have off-site outpatient therapy and if so, how do you meet this requirement while still providing access for extended hours (evenings, weekends, etc)? - Is APTA/AOTA involved in this discussion? I haven't heard anything. Any feedback is appreciated! I do have copies (pdf files) of letters discussing the ruling, etc if you're interested. Christen, PT Kchristen1fhn (DOT) org Director of Rehabilitation Services FHN Freeport, IL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2009 Report Share Posted November 23, 2009 Meryl, I direct a hospital based department, although our hospital is very small and we see about 80% outpatient load compared to only 20% inpatient. We make a profit as long as our volume stays consistently high. that is the key, and we strive to " earn " this volume through " word of mouth " among the patients we serve by providing high quality of care. Matt Dvorak, PT Yankton, SD ________________________________ From: PTManager on behalf of Freeman, Meryl Sent: Tue 11/17/2009 8:45 AM To: PTManager Subject: RE: Hosp-based Off-Site Outpatient Rehab Supervision Armin: I work in a hospital outpatient setting and I can tell you with certainty that the hospital does not make any money from our services. Like all other outpatient settings who bill legally and ethically, we are very lucky if we break even. We are not a profit center for the hospital and are considered one of those necessary services that will not get much attention or capital, but exists only to provide the service. Our hospital does not employ physicians that refer to PT and we are out there competing with private practices, corporates, and POPTS for patients just like you are. We are subject to the same expense/revenue issues you are. Salaries and non-controllable expenses are going up, reimbursement is going down. These are major issues that we all share. They are issues we all need to address as a profession. As for the non-cap with hospitals, my understanding was that CMS based this on a utilization study that showed overall hospital-based utilization of PT was less than that of the private sector. I could be mistaken. I agree with you that private practice may be at a disadvantage with negotiations for reimbursement, etc, but I can tell you that as a profession, we are all struggling with the same issues. I honestly don't know how anyone, private practice or otherwise, makes any profit. Change of subject here, but is anyone out there doing more than breaking even while practicing/billing in an ethical manner? If so, I'd sure like to hear about your model. Regards, Meryl W. Freeman, MS PT Manager, Outpatient Rehab Raleigh, NC Hosp-based Off-Site Outpatient Rehab Supervision To: PTManager@yahoogrou ps.com Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2009, 9:00 PM Hello Group, I've recently joined a health system which includes one hospital-based, off-site outpatient physical and occupational therapy clinic. I've been informed by our Risk manager that Medicare requires on-site physician supervision, meaning that a physician must be in the building whenever a Medicare client is seen for therapy. According to her, this was a Medicare ruling in 2001. (In fact, she is following a discussion that indicates the ruling was misinterpreted all this time and really means that the physician must be in the room!) This apparently doesn't apply to non-hospital- based outpatient centers, and any on-site centers are assumed to have a physician in the Emergency Department. I have worked in both the private practice and hospital arenas, including hospital-based, off-site outpatient therapy centers and I've never heard of this ruling before. In fact, many centers I'm aware of don't have a physician for miles. My questions to the group: - Have you ever heard of this ruling or discussion before? - Does your hospital have off-site outpatient therapy and if so, how do you meet this requirement while still providing access for extended hours (evenings, weekends, etc)? - Is APTA/AOTA involved in this discussion? I haven't heard anything. Any feedback is appreciated! I do have copies (pdf files) of letters discussing the ruling, etc if you're interested. Christen, PT Kchristen1fhn (DOT) org Director of Rehabilitation Services FHN Freeport, IL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.